Research Article


DOI :10.26650/EurJBiol.2021.1017807   IUP :10.26650/EurJBiol.2021.1017807    Full Text (PDF)

Proteomic Analysis Revealed Underlying Biological Pathways Associated with Hormetic Response of Hormone Positive Breast Cancer Cell Line Exposed to Low-Dose Flavonoid Mixture

Mete Bora TüzünerAyşe Begüm Ceviz

Objective: A considerable level of evidence has accumulated about the breast cancer risk-reducing effect of consuming specific flavonoids, through the increasing amount of research and epidemiologic studies. Different flavonoids may have different cellular bioavailability and favor, i.e., the occurrence of a hormetic effect, thus it is important to evaluate breast cancer cells’ response to different doses of flavonoids. This study aims to investigate the alterations of the biological pathways in a hormone-positive (HR+) breast cancer cell line as a resemblance for the most common breast cancer subtype, related to the low-dose exposure of the flavonoids. Materials and Methods: Different levels of doses were applied to MCF-7 breast cancer cells. In order to determine cellular proliferation, WST-1 analysis was conducted. The highest proliferation was observed with cell lines exposed to a low-dose flavonoid mixture and these were selected for further analysis. Intracellular protein expression were investigated by peptide analysis on a nano LC-MS/MS platform. A protein-protein interaction network and pathway analysis were conducted for the proteins expressed differently between the groups. Results: A total of 214 proteins were identified and 36 proteins with significant alterations (≥1.2-fold change, p≤0.05) were detected. Significant changes were observed in the pathways related to carbon metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis, splicing mechanism, mitochondrial protein import and translation elongation pathways. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that flavonoids can have a hormetic effect which can initially alter metabolic pathways vital for cell proliferation and survival. These pathways may include potential targets for enhancing the anticancer activity of the flavonoids.


PDF View

References

  • 1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of inci-dence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71: 209-49. google scholar
  • 2. Rodnguez-Garaa C, Sanchez-Quesada C, J Gaforio J. Dietary Flavonoids as Cancer Chemopreventive Agents: An Updated Review of Human Studies. Antioxidants 2019; 8(5): 137. google scholar
  • 3. Toreti VC, Sato HH, Pastore GM, Park YK, Recent progress of prop-olis for its biological and chemical compositions and its botanical origin, Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013; 697390. google scholar
  • 4. Banskota AH, Tezuka Y, Kadota S. Recent progress in pharmacolog-ical research of propolis. Phytother Res 2001; 15(7): 561-71. google scholar
  • 5. Peeters PH, Keinan-Boker L, van der Schouw YT, Grobbee DE. Phy-toestrogens and breast cancer risk: Review of the epidemiological evidence. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2003; 77: 171-83. google scholar
  • 6. Lim DW, Giannakeas V, Narod SA. Survival Differences in Chinese Versus White Women With Breast Cancer in the United States: A SEER-Based Analysis. JCO Glob Oncol 2020; 6: 1582-92. google scholar
  • 7. Rupasinghe HP, Ronalds CM, Rathgeber B, Robinson RA. Absorp-tion and tissue distribution of dietary quercetin and quercetin glycosides of apple skin in broiler chickens. J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90(7): 1172-8. google scholar
  • 8. Gonzales GB, Smagghe G, Grootaert C, Zotti M, Raes K, Van Camp J. Flavonoid interactions during digestion, absorption, distribution and metabolism: a sequential structure-activity/property relation-ship-based approach in the study of bioavailability and bioactivity. Drug Metab Rev 2015; 47(2): 175-90. google scholar
  • 9. Seyhan MF, Yılmaz E, Timirci-Kahraman Ö, Saygılı N, Kısakesen Hİ, Gazioğlu S, et al. Different propolis samples, phenolic content, and breast cancer cell lines: Variable cytotoxicity ranging from ineffec-tive to potent. IUBMB Life 2019; 71(5): 619-31. google scholar
  • 10. Bonofiglio D, Giordano C, De Amicis F, Lanzino M, Ando S. Natural Products as Promising Antitumoral Agents in Breast Cancer: Mech-anisms of Action and Molecular Targets. Mini Rev Med Chem 2016; 16(8): 596-604. google scholar
  • 11. Pal S, Konkimalla VB. Hormetic Potential of Sulforaphane (SFN) in Switching Cells’ Fate Towards Survival or Death. Mini Rev Med Chem 2016; 16(12): 980-95. google scholar
  • 12. Son TG, Camandola S, Mattson MP. Hormetic dietary phytochemi-cals. Neuromolecular Med 2008; 10(4): 236-46. google scholar
  • 13. Jodynis-Liebert J, Kujawska M. Biphasic Dose-Response Induced by Phytochemicals: Experimental Evidence. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2020; 9(3): 718. google scholar
  • 14. Narter F, Diren A, Kafkasli A, Eronat AP, Seyhan MF, Yilmaz-Aydogan H, et al. Anatolian Propolis Prevents Oxalate Kidney Stones: Dra-matic Reduction of Crystal Deposition in Ethylene-Glycol-Induced Rat Model. Rec Nat Prod 2018; 12(5): 445-59. google scholar
  • 15. Huang KT, Chen YH, Walker AM. Inaccuracies in MTS assays: major distorting effects of medium, serum albumin, and fatty acids. Bio-techniques 2004 Sep; 37(3): 406, 408, 410-2. google scholar
  • 16. Wisniewski JR, Zougman A, Nagaraj N, Mann M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat Methods 2009; 6(5): 359-62. google scholar
  • 17. Akgun E, Tuzuner MB, Sahin B, Kilercik M, Kulah C, Cakiroglu HN, et al. Proteins associated with neutrophil degranulation are upreg-ulated in nasopharyngeal swabs from SARS-CoV-2 patients. PLoS One 2020; 15(10): e0240012 google scholar
  • 18. Carbon S, Ireland A, Mungall CJ, Shu S, Marshall B, Lewis S, AmiGO Hub; Web Presence Working Group. AmiGO: online access to on-tology and annotation data. Bioinformatics 2009; 25(2): 288-9. google scholar
  • 19. Batra P, Sharma AK. Anti-cancer potential of flavonoids: recent trends and future perspectives. 3 Biotech 2013; 3(6): 439-59. google scholar
  • 20. Coller HA. Is cancer a metabolic disease? Am J Pathol 2014; 184(1): 4-17. google scholar
  • 21. Pavlova NN, Thompson CB. The emerging hallmarks of cancer me-tabolism. Cell Metab 2016; 23(1): 27-47. google scholar
  • 22. Liberti MV, Locasale JW. The Warburg effect: how does it benefit cancer cells? Trends Biochem Sci 2016; 41(3): 211-8. google scholar
  • 23. Richardson AD, Yang C, Osterman A, Smith JW. Central carbon me-tabolism in the progression of mammary carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 110(2): 297-307. google scholar
  • 24. Samec M, Liskova A, Koklesova L, Samuel SM, Zhai K, Buhrmann C, et al. Flavonoids against the Warburg phenotype-concepts of pre-dictive, preventive and personalised medicine to cut the Gordian knot of cancer cell metabolism. EPMA J 2020; 11(3): 377-98. google scholar
  • 25. Zang HY,Gong LG, Li SY, HaoJG. Inhibition ofa-enolaseaffects the biological activity of breast cancer cells by attenuating PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2020; 24(1): 249-57. google scholar
  • 26. Locasale JW. Serine, glycine and one-carbon units: cancer metabo-lism in full circle. Nat Rev Cancer 2013; 13: 572-83. google scholar
  • 27. Possemato R, Marks KM, Shaul YD, Pacold ME, Kim D, Birsoy K, et al. Functional genomics reveal that the serine synthesis pathway is essential in breast cancer. Nature 2011; 476(7360): 346-50. google scholar
  • 28. Liu C, Wang L, Liu X, Tan Y, Tao L, Xiao Y, et al. Cytoplasmic SHMT2 drives the progression and metastasis of colorectal cancer by in-hibiting 0-catenin degradation.Theranostics 2021; 11(6): 2966-86. google scholar
  • 29. Maniatis T, Reed R. An extensive network of coupling among gene expression machines. Nature 2002; 416: 499-506. google scholar
  • 30. Millevoi S, Vagner S. Molecular mechanisms of eukaryotic pre-mR-NA 3’ end processing regulation. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 38: 275774. google scholar
  • 31. Orphanides G, Reinberg D. A unified theory of gene expression. Cell 2002; 108: 439-51. google scholar
  • 32. Scotti MM, Swanson MS. RNA mis-splicing in disease. Nat Rev Gen-et 2016; 17(1): 19-32. google scholar
  • 33. Kurata M, Fujiwara N, Fujita KI, Yamanaka Y, Seno S, Kobayashi H, et al. Food-Derived Compounds Apigenin and Luteolin Modulate mRNA Splicing of Introns with Weak Splice Sites. iScience 2019; 22: 336-52. google scholar
  • 34. Geuens T, Bouhy D, Timmerman V. The hnRNP family: insights into their role in health and disease. Hum Genet 2016; 135(8): 851-67. google scholar
  • 35. Silipo M, Gautrey H, Tyson-Capper A. Deregulation of splicing fac-tors and breast cancer development. J Mol Cell Biol 2015; 7(5): 388401. google scholar
  • 36. Calderwood SK, Gong J. Heat Shock Proteins Promote Cancer: It’s a Protection Racket. Trends Biochem Sci 2016; 41(4): 311-23. google scholar
  • 37. Hosokawa N, Hirayoshi K, Nakai A, Hosokawa Y, Marui N, Yoshida M, et al. Flavonoids inhibit the expression of heat shock proteins. Cell Struct Funct 1990; 15(6): 393-401. google scholar
  • 38. Wadhwa R, Yaguchi T, Hasan MK, Mitsui Y, Reddel RR, Kaul SC. Hsp70 family member, mot-2/mthsp70/GRP75, binds to the cy-toplasmic sequestration domain of the p53 protein. Exp Cell Res 2002; 274(2): 246-53. google scholar
  • 39. Wadhwa R, Takano S, Kaur K, Deocaris CC, Pereira-Smith OM, Red-del RR, et al. Upregulation of mortalin/mthsp70/Grp75 contributes to human carcinogenesis. Int J Cancer 2006; 118(12): 2973-80. google scholar
  • 40. Na Y, Kaul SC, Ryu J, Lee JS, Ahn HM, Kaul Z et al. Stress chaperone mortalin contributes to epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer metastasis. Cancer Res 2016; 76(9): 2754-65. google scholar
  • 41. Zhang R, Meng Z, Wu X, Zhang M, Zhang S, Jin T. Mortalin pro-motes breast cancer malignancy. Exp Mol Pathol 2021;118:104593. google scholar
  • 42. Huang TC, Chang HY, Hsu CH, Kuo WH, Chang KJ, Juan HF. Target-ing therapy for breast carcinoma by ATP synthase inhibitor au-rovertin B. J Proteome Res 2008; 7: 1433-44. google scholar
  • 43. Pan J, Sun LC, Tao YF, Zhou Z, Du XL, Peng L, et al. ATP synthase ecto-alpha subunit: a novel therapeutic target for breast cancer. J Transl Med 2011; 9: 211. google scholar
  • 44. Isidoro A, Casado E, Redondo A, Acebo P, Espinosa E, Alonso AM, et al. Breast carcinomas fulfill the Warburg hypothesis and provide metabolic markers of cancer prognosis. Carcinogenesis 2005; 26: 2095-104. google scholar
  • 45. Willers IM, Cuezva JM. Post-transcriptional regulation of the mi-tochondrial H(+)-ATP synthase: a key regulator of the metabolic phenotype in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011; 1807: 543-51. google scholar
  • 46. Cuezva JM, Krajewska M, de Heredia ML, Krajewski S, Santamana G, Kim H, et al. The bioenergetic signature of cancer: a marker of tumor progression. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 6674-81. google scholar
  • 47. Zheng SQ, Li YX, Zhang Y, Li X, Tang H. MiR-101 regulates HSV-1 replication by targeting ATP5B. Antiviral Res 2011; 89: 219-26. google scholar
  • 48. Bilanges B, Stokoe D. Mechanism of translational deregulation in human tumors and therapeutic intervention strategies. Oncogene 2007; 26: 5973-90. google scholar
  • 49. Hassan MK, Kumar D, Naik M, Dixit M. The expression profile and prognostic significance of eukaryotic translation elongation fac-tors in different cancers. PLoS One 2018; 13(1): e0191377. google scholar
  • 50. Meric-Bernstam F, Chen H, Akcakanat A, Do KA, Lluch A, Hennessy BT, Hortobagyi GN, Mills GB, et al. Aberrations in translational regulation are associated with poor prognosis in hormone recep-tor-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2012; 14: R138. google scholar
  • 51. Yao N, Chen CY, Wu CY, Motonishi K, Kung HJ, Lam KS. Novel flavo-noids with antiproliferative activities against breast cancer cells. J Med Chem 2011; 54(13): 4339-49. google scholar
  • 52. Xu L, Wang L, Jiang C, Zhu Q, Chen R, Wang J, et al. Biological effect of ribosomal protein L32 on human breast cancer cell behavior. Mol Med Rep 2020; 22(3): 2478-86. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Tüzüner, M.B., & Ceviz, A.B. (2021). Proteomic Analysis Revealed Underlying Biological Pathways Associated with Hormetic Response of Hormone Positive Breast Cancer Cell Line Exposed to Low-Dose Flavonoid Mixture. European Journal of Biology, 80(2), 145-153. https://doi.org/10.26650/EurJBiol.2021.1017807


AMA

Tüzüner M B, Ceviz A B. Proteomic Analysis Revealed Underlying Biological Pathways Associated with Hormetic Response of Hormone Positive Breast Cancer Cell Line Exposed to Low-Dose Flavonoid Mixture. European Journal of Biology. 2021;80(2):145-153. https://doi.org/10.26650/EurJBiol.2021.1017807


ABNT

Tüzüner, M.B.; Ceviz, A.B. Proteomic Analysis Revealed Underlying Biological Pathways Associated with Hormetic Response of Hormone Positive Breast Cancer Cell Line Exposed to Low-Dose Flavonoid Mixture. European Journal of Biology, [Publisher Location], v. 80, n. 2, p. 145-153, 2021.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Tüzüner, Mete Bora, and Ayşe Begüm Ceviz. 2021. “Proteomic Analysis Revealed Underlying Biological Pathways Associated with Hormetic Response of Hormone Positive Breast Cancer Cell Line Exposed to Low-Dose Flavonoid Mixture.” European Journal of Biology 80, no. 2: 145-153. https://doi.org/10.26650/EurJBiol.2021.1017807


Chicago: Humanities Style

Tüzüner, Mete Bora, and Ayşe Begüm Ceviz. Proteomic Analysis Revealed Underlying Biological Pathways Associated with Hormetic Response of Hormone Positive Breast Cancer Cell Line Exposed to Low-Dose Flavonoid Mixture.” European Journal of Biology 80, no. 2 (Jun. 2025): 145-153. https://doi.org/10.26650/EurJBiol.2021.1017807


Harvard: Australian Style

Tüzüner, MB & Ceviz, AB 2021, 'Proteomic Analysis Revealed Underlying Biological Pathways Associated with Hormetic Response of Hormone Positive Breast Cancer Cell Line Exposed to Low-Dose Flavonoid Mixture', European Journal of Biology, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 145-153, viewed 6 Jun. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/EurJBiol.2021.1017807


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Tüzüner, M.B. and Ceviz, A.B. (2021) ‘Proteomic Analysis Revealed Underlying Biological Pathways Associated with Hormetic Response of Hormone Positive Breast Cancer Cell Line Exposed to Low-Dose Flavonoid Mixture’, European Journal of Biology, 80(2), pp. 145-153. https://doi.org/10.26650/EurJBiol.2021.1017807 (6 Jun. 2025).


MLA

Tüzüner, Mete Bora, and Ayşe Begüm Ceviz. Proteomic Analysis Revealed Underlying Biological Pathways Associated with Hormetic Response of Hormone Positive Breast Cancer Cell Line Exposed to Low-Dose Flavonoid Mixture.” European Journal of Biology, vol. 80, no. 2, 2021, pp. 145-153. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/EurJBiol.2021.1017807


Vancouver

Tüzüner MB, Ceviz AB. Proteomic Analysis Revealed Underlying Biological Pathways Associated with Hormetic Response of Hormone Positive Breast Cancer Cell Line Exposed to Low-Dose Flavonoid Mixture. European Journal of Biology [Internet]. 6 Jun. 2025 [cited 6 Jun. 2025];80(2):145-153. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/EurJBiol.2021.1017807 doi: 10.26650/EurJBiol.2021.1017807


ISNAD

Tüzüner, MeteBora - Ceviz, AyşeBegüm. Proteomic Analysis Revealed Underlying Biological Pathways Associated with Hormetic Response of Hormone Positive Breast Cancer Cell Line Exposed to Low-Dose Flavonoid Mixture”. European Journal of Biology 80/2 (Jun. 2025): 145-153. https://doi.org/10.26650/EurJBiol.2021.1017807



TIMELINE


Submitted02.11.2021
Accepted21.11.2021
Published Online09.12.2021

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE



Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.