References

• Götz F, Bannerman T, Schleifer KH. The genera Staphylococcus and Macrococcus. In: Dworkin M, Falkow S,E, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH, Stackebrandt E, eds. The Prokaryotes. 3rd ed. New York, N.Y.: Springer; 2006:5-75. google scholar
• Bhunia AK. Foodborne microbial pathogens: Mechanisms and pathogenesis. New York, N.Y.: Springer; 2008. google scholar
• Ray B. Fundamental Food Microbiology. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC press; 2004. google scholar
• Bloomfield SF, Exner M, Fara GM, Nath KJ, Scott EA. Hygiene procedures in the home and their effectiveness: A review of the scientific evidence base. International Scientific Forum on Home Hygiene. 2013. https://ifh-homehygiene.org/review-best-practice/hygiene-procedures-home-and-their-effectiveness-review-scientific-evidence-base/. google scholar
• Donaghy JA, Jagadeesan B, Goodburn K, et al. Relationship of sanitizers, disinfectants, and cleaning agents with antimicrobial resistance. J Food Prot. 2019;82(5):889-902. google scholar
• Beuchat LR. Surface decontamination of fruits and vegetables eaten raw: A review. World Health Organization. 1998. google scholar
• Lepaus BM, Rdcha JS, Sadjse JFB. Organic acids and hydro-gen peroxide can replace chlorinated compounds as sanitizers on strawberries, cucumbers and rocket leaves. Food Sci Technol. 2020;40:242-249. google scholar
• Suller MTE, Russell AD. Triclosan and antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000;46:11-18. google scholar
• Sheldon AT. Antiseptic “Resistance”: Real or perceived threat? Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:1650-1656. google scholar
• Jones RD, Jampani HB, Newman JL, Lee AS. Triclosan: A review of effectiveness and safety in health care settings. Am J Infect Control. 2000;28:184-196. google scholar
• Glaser A. The ubiquitous triclosan: A common antibacterial agent exposed. Pesticides and You NCODM. 2004;24(3):12-17. google scholar
• Yao K, Wen K, Shan W, Jiang H, Shao B. An immunoaffinity purification method for the simultaneous analysis triclocarban and triclosan in foodstuffs by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67:9088-9095. google scholar
• Azzouz A, Colon LP, Hejji L, Ballesteros E. Determination of alkylphenols, phenylphenols, bisphenol A, parabens, organophos-phorus pesticides and triclosan in different cereal-based foodstuffs by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2020;412:2621-2631. google scholar
• Coia JE, Duckworth GJ, Edwards DI, et al. Guidelines for the con-trol and prevention of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in healthcare facilities. J Hosp Infect. 2006;63S:S1-S44. google scholar
• Ciusa ML, Furi L, Knight D, et al. A novel resistance mechanism to triclosan that suggests horizontal gene transfer and demon-strates a potential selective pressure for reduced biocide suscepti-bility in clinical strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012;40:210-220. google scholar
• Fan F, Yan K, Wallis NG, et al. Defining and combating the mecha-nisms of triclosan resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46(11):3343-3347. google scholar
• Beier RC, Poole TL, Brichta-Harhay DM, et al. Disinfectant and antibiotic susceptibility profiles of Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains from cattle carcasses, feces, and hides and ground beef from the United States. J Food Prot. 2013;76:6-17. google scholar
• Beier RC, Foley SL, Davidson MK, et al. Characterization of antibiotic and disinfectant susceptibility profiles among Pseudomonas aeruginosa veterinary isolates recovered during 1994-2003. J Appl Microbiol. 2014;118:326-342. google scholar
• Beier RC, Duke SE, Ziprin RL, et al. Antibiotic and disinfectant susceptibility profiles of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) isolated from community wastewa-ter in Texas. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2008;80:188-194. google scholar
• Beier RC, Callaway TR, Andrews K, et al. Disinfec-tant and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Salmonella strains from feedlot water-sprinkled cattle: Hides and feces. J Food Chem Nanotechnol. 2017;3:50-59. google scholar
• McBain AJ, Ledder RG, Moore LE, Catrenich CE, Gilbert P. Effects of quaternary-ammonium-based formulations on bacte-rial community dynamics and antimicrobial susceptibility. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(6):3449-3456. google scholar
• To MS, Favrin S, Romanova N, Griffiths MW. Postadap-tational resistance to benzalkonium chloride and subsequent physicochemical modifications of Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(11):5258-5264. google scholar
• Nakata K, Tsuchido T, Matsumura Y. Antimicrobial cationic sur-factant, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, induces superoxide stress in Escherichia coli cells. J Appl Microbiol. 2011;110:568-579. google scholar
• Beier RC, Andrews K, Hume ME, et al. Disinfectant and antimicrobial susceptibility studies of Staphylococcus aureus strains and ST398-MRSA and ST5-MRSA strains from swine mandibular lymph node tissue, commercial pork sausage meat and swine feces. Microorganisms. 2021;9:2401. doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112401. google scholar
• Humayoun SB, Hiott LM, Gupta SK, et al. An assay for de-termining the susceptibility of Salmonella isolates to commer-cial and household biocides. PloS one. 2018;13(12):e0209072. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209072. google scholar
• Burns J, McCoy CP, Irwin NC. Synergistic activity of weak or-ganic acids against uropathogens. J Hosp Infect. 2021;111:78-88. google scholar
• Bai Y, Ding X, Zhao Q, et al. Development of an organic acid compound disinfectant to control food-borne pathogens and its ap-plication in chicken slaughterhouses. Poult Sci. 2022;101:101842. doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101842. google scholar
• In YW, Kim JJ, Kim HJ, Oh SW. Antimicrobial activities of acetic acid, citric acid and lactic acid against Shigella species. J Food Saf. 2013; 33:79-85. google scholar
• Pangprasit N, Srithanasuwan A, Suriyasathaporn W, et al. An-tibacterial activities of acetic acid against major and minor pathogens isolated from mastitis in dairy cows. Pathogens. 2020; 9:961. doi:10.3390/pathogens9110961. google scholar
• Beier RC, Byrd JA, Andrews K, et al. Disinfectant and an-timicrobial susceptibility studies of the foodborne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni isolated from the litter of broiler chicken houses. Poult Sci. 2021;100:1024-1033. google scholar
• Hussain G, Rahman A, Hussain T, Uddin S, Ali T. Citric and lactic acid effects on the growth inhibition of E. coli and S. typhymurium on beef during storage. Sarhad J Agric. 2015;31(3):183-190. google scholar
• Al-Rousan WM, Olaimat AN, Osaili TM, Al-Nabulsi AA, Ajo RY, Holley RA. Use of acetic and citric acids to in-hibit Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella Typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus in tabbouleh salad. Food Microbiol. 2018;73:61-66. google scholar
• Brakstad OG, Aasbakk K, Maeland JA. Detection of Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction amplifica-tion of the nuc gene. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30(7):1654-1660. google scholar
• Bannerman TL, Peacock SJ. Staphylococcus, Micrococcus, and other catalase-positive cocci. In: Versalovic J, Carroll KC, Funke G, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Warnock DW, eds. Manual of clin-ical microbiology, Washington, D.C: ASM Press; 2011:308-330. google scholar
• Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; Ninth edition, M7-A9, in, Wayne, PA, USA, 2012. google scholar
• Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 32nd edition, in, Malvern, PA, USA, 2022. google scholar
• Andrews JM. Determination of minimum inhibitory concentra-tions. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001;48:5-16. google scholar
• Heath RJ, Rock CO. A triclosan-resistant bacterial enzyme. Nature. 2000;406:145-146. google scholar

Citations