References

• 1. Nguyet Hai Ninh L, Luong V, Nguyen Van C, et al. An updated checklist of Theaceae and a new species of Polyspora from Vietnam. Taiwania. 2020;65(2):216-227. google scholar
• 2. Dung LV, Lieu NT, Cuong TQ, Thanh NT. Da tu tra la nho (Polyspora microphylla Luong, Nguyen et Truong) mot loai moi thuoc ho Ch (Theaceae) o Viet Nam. JS: NST. 2016;32(2):1-5. google scholar
• 3. Orel G, Wilson PG, Curry AS, Luu HT. Polyspora huongiana sp. nov. (Theaceae) from Vietnam and notes on related species. Nord J Bot. 2012;30(1):47-52. google scholar
• 4. Beech E, Barstow M, Rivers M. The Red List of Theaceae. 2017. google scholar
• 5. Le S, Lesueur D, Herrmann L, et al. Sustainable tea production through agroecological management practices in Vietnam: A re-view. J Environ Sustain. 2021;4:589-604. google scholar
• 6. Romprasert S. Sweet green tea consumption with health eco-nomics matter. Int J Econ Res. 2017;14:193-202. google scholar
• 7. Zhang W, Kan S-l, Zhao H, Li Z-y, Wang X-q. Molecu-lar phylogeny of Tribe theeae (Theaceae s.s.) and its implica-tions for generic delimitation. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e98133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098133 google scholar
• 8. Cheng L, Li M, Han Q, et al. Phylogenomics resolves the phy-logeny of Theaceae by using low-copy and multi-copy nuclear gene makers and uncovers a fast radiation event contributing to tea plants diversity. Biology (Basel). 2022;11(7). doi: 10.3390/bi-ology11071007 google scholar
• 9. Fan Z-F, Ma C-L. Comparative chloroplast genome and phyloge-netic analyses of Chinese Polyspora. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):15984. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16290-4 google scholar
• 10. Erdei B, Hably L. Fossil Gordonia (s.l.)-like (Theaceae) winged seeds from the early Miocene of the Mecsek Mts, W Hungary. Paleobiodivers Paleoenviron. 2021;101(1):59-67. google scholar
• 11. Sucher N, Hennell J, Carles M. DNA Fingerprinting, DNA bar-coding, and next generation sequencing technology in plants. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;862:13-22. google scholar
• 12. Ankola K, Mahadevegowda L, Melichar T, Boregowda MH. Chapter 18 - DNA barcoding: nucleotide signature for identifi-cation and authentication of livestock. In: Mondal S, Singh RL, editors. Advances in Animal Genomics: Academic Press; 2021. p. 299-308. google scholar
• 13. Kress W, Erickson D. DNA Barcodes: Methods and Protocols. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;858:3-8. google scholar
• 14. Orel G, Wilson PG, Curry AS, Luu HT. Polyspora huongiana sp. nov. (Theaceae) from Vietnam and notes on related species. Nord J Bot. 2012;30(1):47-52. google scholar
• 15. Huang H, Shi C, Liu Y, Mao SY, Gao LZ. Thirteen Camellia chloroplast genome sequences determined by high-throughput sequencing: Genome structure and phylogenetic rela-tionships. BMC Evol Biol. 2014;14:151. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-151 google scholar
• 16. Li W, Zhang C, Guo X, Liu Q, Wang K. Complete chloroplast genome of Camellia japonica genome structures, comparative and phylogenetic analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0216645-e. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216645 google scholar
• 17. Aboul-Maaty NA-F, Oraby HA-S. Extraction of high-quality genomic DNA from different plant orders applying a modified CTAB-based method. BNRC. 2019;43(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s42269-019-0066-1 google scholar
• 18. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular Evo-lutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(7):3022-3027. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab120 google scholar
• 19. Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sanchez-DelBamo JC, et al. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34(12):3299-3302. google scholar
• 20. Ho VT, Tran TKP, Vu TTT, Widiarsih S. Comparison of matK and rbcL DNA barcodes for genetic classification of jewel orchid accessions in Vietnam. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2021;19(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s43141-021-00188-1 google scholar
• 21. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining A new method for recon-structing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4(4):406-425. google scholar
• 22. Wang Y, Yao X, Liu R, Liu C. DDQR (dynamic DNA QR coding): An efficient algorithm to represent DNA barcode sequences. PLoS One. 2023;18(1):e0279994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279994 google scholar
• 23. Li Q, Guo Q, Gao C, Li H. Characterization of complete chloro-plast genome of Camellia weiningensis in Weining, Guizhou Province. J Acta Horticulturae Sinica. 2020;47:779-787. google scholar
• 24. Zheng H, Wei S. Complete chloroplast genomes of Camellia pubipetala Y. Wan et S. Z. Huang and Camellia debaoensis R. C. Hu et Y. Q. Liufu. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2021;6(8):2381-2382. google scholar
• 25. Yu XQ, Gao LM, Soltis DE, et al. Insights into the historical assembly of East Asian subtropical evergreen broadleaved forests revealed by the temporal history of the tea family. New Phytol. 2017;215(3):1235-1248. google scholar
• 26. Tamura K. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G+C-content biases. Mol Biol Evol. 1992;9(4):678-687. google scholar
• 27. Buckley TR, Simon C, Chambers GK. Exploring among-site rate variation models in a maximum likelihood framework us-ing empirical data: effects of model assumptions on estimates of topology, branch lengths, and bootstrap support. Syst Biol. 2001;50(1):67-86. google scholar
• 28. Wei S-J, Liufu Y-Q, Zheng H-W, et al. Using phylogenomics to un-tangle the taxonomic incongruence of yellow-flowered Camellia species (Theaceae) in China. J Syst Evol. 2023;61(5):748-763. google scholar
• 29. Enan M, Al-Deeb M, Fawzi N, Amiri K. DNA Barcoding of Ricinus communis from different geographical origin by using chloroplast matk and internal transcribed spacers. Am J Plant Sci. 2012;03:1304-1310. google scholar
• 30. Kang Y, Deng Z, Zang R, Long W. DNA barcoding analysis and phylogenetic relationships of tree species in tropical cloud forests. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):12564. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13057-0 google scholar
• 31. Patwardhan A, Ray S, Roy A. Molecular Markers in Phyloge-netic studies-A review. J Phylogen Evolution Biol. 2014;2:2. doi: 10.4172/2329-9002.1000131 google scholar
• 32. Meyer CP, Paulay G. DNA barcoding: Error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol. 2005;3(12):e422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030422 google scholar
• 33. Liao M, Gao X, Zhang J, Deng H-N, Xu B. Comparative chloroplast genomics of Sophora species: Evolution and phy-logenetic relationships in the early-diverging legume subfamily Papilionoideae (Fabaceae). Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:778933. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.778933 google scholar
• 34. Li H, Xiao W, Tong T, et al. The specific DNA barcodes based on chloroplast genes for species identification of Orchidaceae plants. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1424. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81087-w google scholar
• 35. Birch JL, Walsh NG, Cantrill DJ, Holmes GD, Murphy DJ. Test-ing efficacy of distance and tree-based methods for DNA bar-coding of grasses (Poaceae tribe Poeae) in Australia. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0186259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186259 google scholar
• 36. Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. Biolog-ical identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci. 2003;270(1512):313-321. google scholar
• 37. Abbas A, Ali A, Hussain A, et al. Assessment of genetic variability and evolutionary relationships of Rhizoctonia solani inherent in legume crops. Plants. 2023;12(13):2515. doi: 10.3390/plants12132515 google scholar

Citations