Research Article


DOI :10.26650/IAR2023-1400500   IUP :10.26650/IAR2023-1400500    Full Text (PDF)

The Joking Relationship as a Bulwark Against Open Crises Between Baribas and Fulbés in Banikoara

İsmail Yarou Bio SouleyYüksel Kırımlı

This study explores the joking relationship, a bulwark against the open crises that occur between the two dominant demographic elements of the Banikoara commune in the northern region of the Republic of Benin on the African continent: the Baribas and the Fulbés. The article is based on an ethnographic field research conducted through observation, focus group discussions, and personal interviews with Banikoara residents in 2019. Research findings point to the importance of the joking relationship between the two communities in social rapprochement processes, such as mutual adaptation, kinship, and alliance formation. The practice of joking, an ancestral tradition, has been shown to lead to a kind of virtual kinship, creating patterns of harmony and alliance. The tradition of joking facilitates neighborly relations within the commune between the Baribas and the Fulbés, who sometimes face clashes.

DOI :10.26650/IAR2023-1400500   IUP :10.26650/IAR2023-1400500    Full Text (PDF)

Banikoara’da Baribalar ve Fulbéler Arasındaki Açık Krizlere Karşı Bir Siper Olarak Şaka İlişkisi

İsmail Yarou Bio SouleyYüksel Kırımlı

Bu çalışma, Afrika kıtasında yer alan ve 1975 yılına kadar Dahomey adıyla anılan Benin Cumhuriyeti’nin kuzey bölgesindeki Banikoara komününün iki başat demografik unsuru Baribalar ve Fulbéler arasında meydana gelen açık krizlere karşı bir siper olan şaka ilişkisini konu edinmektedir. Makale, Banikoara’da 2019 yılında katılarak gözlem, odak grup görüşmeleri ve kişisel mülakatlar yoluyla gerçekleştirilen bir etnografik alan araştırmasına dayanmaktadır. Araştırma bulguları, iki topluluk arasındaki şaka ilişkisinin karşılıklı uyum sağlama, sanal akrabalık ilişkisi ve ittifak kurma gibi toplumsal yakınlaşma süreçlerindeki önemine işaret etmektedir. Bir ata geleneği olan şakalaşma pratiği, sanal akrabalık yoluyla uyum ve ittifak örüntüleri yaratmaktadır. Şakalaşma geleneği, zaman zaman birbirleriyle çatışan Baribalar ile Fulbélerin komün içindeki komşuluk ilişkilerini kolaylaştırmaktadır. 


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


This study focuses on the relationship patterns between the Baribas and Fulbés, the two dominant demographic elements of Banikoara, one of the 77 communes of the West African country Benin. The agricultural income earned in Benin over the years comes from the production of food products and cotton. Banikoara is the main center of cotton production in the country, where the Bariba is the main provider. While the Bariba is a sedentary community that produces cash crops, primarily cotton and also food crops, the Fulbé, a semi-nomadic community, are mostly identified with animal husbandry. They raise small livestock such as sheep and goats, and poultry, and also engage in aquaculture, including shrimp and other mollusks. Conflicts between these two communities occasionally arise from the limitations and problems in the agricultural and livestock activities of the region and ecological crises (CARDER, 2000; FAO, 2004).

Banikoara consists of one urban (Banikoara-Marou city) and nine rural (Founougo, Gomparou, Goumori, Kokey, Kokiborou, Ounet, Somperekou, Soroko and Toura districts) local government districts. The rural districts (arrondisement) consist of sixty-nine (69) villages. The country’s population is diverse, with approximately thirty ethno-linguistic communities. It consists of Bariba (70%), Fulbé (23%), Dendi (1.6%), Yoruba (1.3%), Fon (0.8%) and other groups (3.3%). (RGPH4-2013). Although each of these communities speak their vernacular language, 57 different languages ​​are known to be spoken throughout the country (Bio Bigou, 1987). Bariba people speaking the Baaton language make up the majority of Banikoara’s population, while Fulbé people speaking the Fulfulbé language are the second largest community in the commune. Both communities span multiple regions and countries. Baribas are found in the Alibori, Borgou and Atacora regions of Benin and Nigeria; Fulbé people live in almost every region of Benin and in countries such as Cameroon, Nigeria, Niger, Burkina Faso, Guinea and Mali.

This study explores the joking relationship, which is a bulwark against the open crises occurring between the Baribas and Fulbés of the Banikoara commune in Benin. The article is grounded in an ethnographic research conducted in 2019, employing methods such as observation, focus group discussions, and personal interviews within the Banikoara commune in Benin. The research delves into the reflections of agricultural policies aimed at rural development in the Republic of Benin, specifically examining their impact on the socioeconomic conditions of the Banikoara commune. A substantial portion of our interviews, totaling 90 individuals, engaged active members of local development associations—12 individuals from each of the 5 associations. Additionally, we interviewed religious leaders (5 individuals) and other residents of the region. This article heavily relies on interviews conducted with members of the Bariba and Fulbé communities, providing insights into their daily interactions. 

Although the ‘peaceful’ history of the two communities has been emphasized in interviews with community members and in common narratives, it is known that there are" silinecek. "conflicts" kelimesinden sonra "arise" eklenecek. Yani düzelti şöyle görünecek: ", conflicts arise between these two communities from time to time, especially due to the limitations and problems in the agricultural and livestock activities of the region and ecological crises. It is necessary to evaluate these conflicts within national and regional socio-ecological, economic, and political contexts. The first part of the article outlines the major reasons for the past and future conflicts between the Baribas and Fulbés. The second part discusses the socio-cultural implications of various types of joking relationships between these communities.

Research findings point to the importance of the joking relationship between the two communities in social rapprochement processes, such as mutual adaptation, kinship, and alliance formation. The practice of joking, an ancestral tradition, has been shown to lead to a kind of virtual kinship, creating patterns of harmony and alliance. The tradition of joking facilitates neighborly relations within the commune between the Baribas and the Fulbés. 


PDF View

References

  • Abeles, M. (2017). Devletin antropolojisi (N. Ökten, Çev.). İstanbul: Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar
  • Adjimoti, G. O., & Kwadzo, G. T. M. (2018). Crop diversification and household food security status: evidence from rural Benin. Agriculture & Food Security, 7(1), 1-12. google scholar
  • Alimi, R. & Faaki, V. (1998). Rapport d’etude sur la gestion alternative des conflits lies aux ressources naturelles. GERAM-Conseils. google scholar
  • Apte, M. L. (1983). Humor research, methodology, and theory in anthropology. In: P.E. McGhee & J.H. Goldstein (Eds), Handbook of Humor Research: Volume 1: Basic Issues (pp. 183-212). New York, NY: Springer New York. google scholar
  • Aydın, S. ve Erdal, Y. S. (2011). Antropoloji. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Badahoui, A. (1996). Lapeche maritime artisanale et laproblematique de securite despecheurs au Benin. (Memoire de maîtrise en Sociologie-Anthropologie, UAC-FLASH, non publie). google scholar
  • Bako-Arıfarı N. (2006). La gestion de la violence «xenophobie» dans le jeu politique beninois, Benin: LASDEL. google scholar
  • Balaban, A.R. (1982). Evlilik ve akrabalık türleri. İzmir: Karınca Yayınları. google scholar
  • Balandier, G. (1967). Anthropologie politique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. google scholar
  • Barnouw, V. (1975). Ethnology. London: The Dorsey Press. google scholar
  • Bio Bigou, L, B. (1987). La vallee benino-nigerienne du fleuve Niger: Population et developpement economique (These de Doctorat, Univerite de Bourgogne Dijon). google scholar
  • Boxer, D., & Cortes-Conde, F. (1997). From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal ofpragmatics, 27(3), 275-294. google scholar
  • CARDER, B. (2000). Plan de gestion des pestes et pesticides. 104p. google scholar
  • Carty, J., & Musharbash, Y. (2008). You’ve got to be joking: Asserting the analytical value of humour and laughter in contemporary anthropology. Anthropological Forum, 18(3), 209-217. google scholar
  • DGAT MISD. (2001). Atlas monographique des communes du Benin, Plan de Developpement actualise de la commune de Banikoara et Programmation Physique. google scholar
  • Engels, F. ([1884] 1978). Ailenin, özel mülkiyetin ve devletin kökeni. İstanbul: Sol Yayınları. google scholar
  • Eriksen, T. H. (2009). Küçük yerler derin mevzular: Sosyal ve kültürel antropolojiye giriş. (F.Adsay, Çev.). İstanbul: Avesta Yayınları. google scholar
  • FAO (2004). The state of agriculture, agricultural biotechnology meeting the needs of the poor 222p. google scholar
  • FAO (2006). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations food aid for food security 187p. google scholar
  • Fine, G. A., & Soucey, M. D. (2005). Joking cultures: Humor themes as social regulation in group life. Humor, 18(1), 1-22. google scholar
  • Güvenç, B. (1999). İnsan ve kültür. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Hagberg, S. (2001). Â l’ombre du conflit violent: Reglement et gestion des conflits entre agriculteurs karaboro et agro-pasteurs peul au Burkina Faso. Cahiers d’etudes africaines, 161(1), 45-72. google scholar
  • Holy, L. (2016). Antropolojinin akrabalık yaklaşımları. (Ç. Enneli, Çev.). Ankara: Heretik yayınları. google scholar
  • Kırımlı, Y. (1998). Köyde sosyal organizasyon ve sıhri hısımlık ilişkileri: Eltiler. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Mauss, M. (1926). Parentes aplaisanterie: Texte d’une communicationpresentee a l’Institutfrançais d’anthropologie. Texte extrait de l’Annuaire de l’Ecole pratique des Hautes etudes, section des sciences religieuses, Paris. google scholar
  • Mitas, O., Yarnal, C., & Chick, G. (2012). Jokes build community: Mature tourists’ positive emotions. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(4), 1884-1905. google scholar
  • Morgan, L.H. (1877). Ancient Society. London: MacMillan & Company. google scholar
  • Nakou, S. A., Gouda, S. & Dakpo, P. (2013). Gonasiru et Gonasine entre Baatombu et Kaobu, une contribution a l’integration et au maintien de la paix sociale par les alliances et relations de parente aplaisanterie au Benin, Cotonou: Les Cahiers du CBRST. google scholar
  • Orekan, V. (2006). Effets spatiaux de la migration sur l’occupation du sol dans le bassin de l’Oueme Superieur au Benin. UVSQ, GRET, IRD, Gestion concertee des ressources naturelles et de l’environnement, Colloque GECOREV, Üniversite de. google scholar
  • Pliya, J. (1980). La peche dans le Sud-ouest du Benin: etude de geographie appliquee sur la peche continentale et maritime. Paris: Agence de cooperation culturelle et technique. google scholar
  • Ravallion M, Chen S. & Sangraula P. (2008). New evidence on the urbanization of global poverty. Population and development review, 33(4), 667-701. google scholar
  • RGPH-4. (2013). Principaux indicateurs sociodemographiques et economiques du departement de l’Alibori (INSAE) 34p google scholar
  • Schneider, J. (2000). Republique du Benin: rapport sur les pays, extrait de la documentation sur l’Afrique de l’ouest destinee aux ROE, Berne: Organisation suisse d’aide aux refugies. google scholar
  • Sissao, A, J. (2002). Alliances et parentes a plaisanterie au Burkina- faso. Mecanisme de fonctionnement et avenir sankofa et gurli editions, Burkina Faso: Sankofa & Gurli. google scholar
  • Sotindjo S. D. (2008). Perennite des structures de dependance et reproduction du sous-developpement: Le cas du Benin (ex-Dahomey) de la colonisation a aujourd’hui, Dans: Adame Ba Konare ed., Petit precis de remise a niveau sur l’histoire africaine a l’usage du president Sarkozy (pp. 227-239). Paris: La Decouverte. google scholar
  • Sounon, A. (2008). Evaluation du coût economique et financier de la degradation de l’environnement dans les zones arides au Benin: Cas des departements du Borgou et de l’Alibori, Ministere de l’Environnement et de la Protection de la Nature (MEHU). google scholar
  • Topdemir Koçyiğit O. (2023). Göç, aile ve evlilik. G. Kaya (Ed.). Cumhuriyetin göçlerle dolu 100 yılı. 100 başlıkta göç yazıları içinde (s.145-152), İzmir: Cem Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Trembley, J. M. (2002). A.R. Radcliffe-Brown (1924-1949), Structure et fonction dans la societe primitive Apartir de Traduction de Françoise et Louis Martin, Presentation et notes de Louis Martin Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1972, 317 pages. Collection: Points Sciences Humaines. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Bio Souley, İ.Y., & Kırımlı, Y. (2024). The Joking Relationship as a Bulwark Against Open Crises Between Baribas and Fulbés in Banikoara. Istanbul Anthropological Review, 0(3), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.26650/IAR2023-1400500


AMA

Bio Souley İ Y, Kırımlı Y. The Joking Relationship as a Bulwark Against Open Crises Between Baribas and Fulbés in Banikoara. Istanbul Anthropological Review. 2024;0(3):79-98. https://doi.org/10.26650/IAR2023-1400500


ABNT

Bio Souley, İ.Y.; Kırımlı, Y. The Joking Relationship as a Bulwark Against Open Crises Between Baribas and Fulbés in Banikoara. Istanbul Anthropological Review, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 3, p. 79-98, 2024.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Bio Souley, İsmail Yarou, and Yüksel Kırımlı. 2024. “The Joking Relationship as a Bulwark Against Open Crises Between Baribas and Fulbés in Banikoara.” Istanbul Anthropological Review 0, no. 3: 79-98. https://doi.org/10.26650/IAR2023-1400500


Chicago: Humanities Style

Bio Souley, İsmail Yarou, and Yüksel Kırımlı. The Joking Relationship as a Bulwark Against Open Crises Between Baribas and Fulbés in Banikoara.” Istanbul Anthropological Review 0, no. 3 (Dec. 2024): 79-98. https://doi.org/10.26650/IAR2023-1400500


Harvard: Australian Style

Bio Souley, İY & Kırımlı, Y 2024, 'The Joking Relationship as a Bulwark Against Open Crises Between Baribas and Fulbés in Banikoara', Istanbul Anthropological Review, vol. 0, no. 3, pp. 79-98, viewed 23 Dec. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/IAR2023-1400500


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Bio Souley, İ.Y. and Kırımlı, Y. (2024) ‘The Joking Relationship as a Bulwark Against Open Crises Between Baribas and Fulbés in Banikoara’, Istanbul Anthropological Review, 0(3), pp. 79-98. https://doi.org/10.26650/IAR2023-1400500 (23 Dec. 2024).


MLA

Bio Souley, İsmail Yarou, and Yüksel Kırımlı. The Joking Relationship as a Bulwark Against Open Crises Between Baribas and Fulbés in Banikoara.” Istanbul Anthropological Review, vol. 0, no. 3, 2024, pp. 79-98. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/IAR2023-1400500


Vancouver

Bio Souley İY, Kırımlı Y. The Joking Relationship as a Bulwark Against Open Crises Between Baribas and Fulbés in Banikoara. Istanbul Anthropological Review [Internet]. 23 Dec. 2024 [cited 23 Dec. 2024];0(3):79-98. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/IAR2023-1400500 doi: 10.26650/IAR2023-1400500


ISNAD

Bio Souley, İsmailYarou - Kırımlı, Yüksel. The Joking Relationship as a Bulwark Against Open Crises Between Baribas and Fulbés in Banikoara”. Istanbul Anthropological Review 0/3 (Dec. 2024): 79-98. https://doi.org/10.26650/IAR2023-1400500



TIMELINE


Submitted05.12.2023
Accepted19.12.2023
Published Online08.01.2024

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.