Research Article


DOI :10.26650/IAR2024-1575935   IUP :10.26650/IAR2024-1575935    Full Text (PDF)

Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Calculated via Direct Measurement and its Relation to Aggressive Behaviour

Fatih AydıkBerna Ertuğrul Özener

The human face plays a fundamental role in communication and social interactions. Whether faces reflect behavioural or personality traits has been widely debated. The facial width-to-height ratio has emerged as a popular measure in this context because testosterone is believed to promote increased bizygomatic width in males, leading to a higher ratio. Testosterone is thought to be related with aggressive behaviour, thus, many previous studies have focused on the relationship between the facial width-toheight ratio and aggressiveness. However, most studies have focused on small Western samples, often relying on measurements derived from two-dimensional photographs. In this study, we examined the relationship between the facial width-to-height ratio and self-reported aggressive behaviour by directly measuring the facial height and width to calculate the facial width-to-height ratio. Our sample consisted of 196 students (88 males and 108 females). We assessed aggression using the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire, which contains various subdomains. Supporting some prior research, our results did not reveal significant sexual dimorphism in the facial width-to-height ratio, nor did it associate with self-reported aggressiveness in the expected direction. In females, the subdomain of verbal aggression negatively predicted the facial widthto-height ratio, but after controlling for BMI, the relationship became insignificant. We also found a correlation between the facial width-to-height ratio and body mass index, suggesting that the facial width-to-height ratio may reflect underlying body mass differences rather than distinct facial morphological variations. Thus, we recommend a cautious approach when examining the facial width-to-height ratio as a sexually dimorphic feature. 


PDF View

References

  • Archer, J. (2006). Testosterone and human aggression: an evaluation of the challenge hypothesis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(3), 319-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. neubiorev.2004.12.007 google scholar
  • Atchley, W. R., Gaskins, C. T., & Anderson, D. (1976). Statistical properties of ratios. I. Empirical results. Systematic Zoology, 25(2), 137-148. https://doi.org/10.2307/2412740 google scholar
  • Batrinos, M. L. (2012). Testosterone and aggressive behavior in man. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(3), 563. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3661 google scholar
  • Bird, B. M., Jofre, V S. C., Geniole, S. N., Welker, K. M., Zilioli, S., Maestripieri, D., ... & Carre, J. M. (2016). Does the facial width-to-height ratio map onto variability in men’s testosterone concentrations?. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(5), 392-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. evolhumbehav.2016.03.004 google scholar
  • Buss, A. H., & Warren, W. L. (2000). Aggression questionnaire:(AQ). Torrence, CA: Western Psychological Services. google scholar
  • Can, S. (2002). Study of validity and reliability of Aggression Questionnaire for Turkish population. Unpublished thesis, GATA/Haydarpaşa Training and Research Hospital, Department of Psychiatry: İstanbul. google scholar
  • Carre, J. M., & McCormick, C. M. (2008). In your face: facial metrics predict aggressive behaviour in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275(1651), 2651-2656. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0873 google scholar
  • Caton, N. R., Zhao, A., Lewis, D. M., & Dixson, B. (2022). Facial masculinity predicts men’s actual and perceived aggressiveness. Preprint available. PsyArxiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qejga google scholar
  • Coetzee, V., Chen, J., Perrett, D. I., & Stephen, I. D. (2010). Deciphering faces: Quantifiable visual cues to weight. Perception, 39(1), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1068/p6560 google scholar
  • Du, S., Tao, Y., & Martinez, A. M. (2014). Compound facial expressions of emotion. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences, 111(15), E1454-E1462. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322355111 google scholar
  • Eisenbruch, A. B., Lukaszewski, A. W., Simmons, Z. L., Arai, S., & Roney, J. R. (2018). Why the wide face? Androgen receptor gene polymorphism does not predict men’s facial width-to-height ratio. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 4, https://doi.org/138-151.10.1007/s40750-017-0084-x google scholar
  • Farkas, Leslie G. (1994). Anthropometry of the Head and Face. Raven Press. google scholar
  • Geniole, S. N., Denson, T. F., Dixson, B. J., Carre, J. M., & McCormick, C. M. (2015). Evidence from meta-analyses of the facial width-to-height ratio as an evolved cue of threat. PloS One, 10(7), e0132726. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132726 google scholar
  • Haselhuhn, M. P., Ormiston, M. E., & Wong, E. M. (2015). Men’s facial width-to-height ratio predicts aggression: A meta-analysis. PloS One, 10(4), e0122637. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0122637 google scholar
  • Hodges-Simeon, C. R., Hanson Sobraske, K. N., Samore, T., Gurven, M., & Gaulin, S. J. (2016). Facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) is not associated with adolescent testosterone levels. PloS One, 11(4), e0153083. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153083 google scholar
  • Jack, R. E., & Schyns, P. G. (2015). The human face as a dynamic tool for social communication. Current Biology, 25(14), R621-R634. S0960-9822(15)00655-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.052 google scholar
  • Kordsmeyer, T. L., Freund, D., Pita, S. R., Jünger, J., & Penke, L. (2019). Further evidence that facial width-to-height ratio and global facial masculinity are not positively associated with testosterone levels. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 5, 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-018-0105-4 google scholar
  • Kosinski, M. (2017). Facial width-to-height ratio does not predict self-reported behavioral tendencies. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1675-1682. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617716929 google scholar
  • Kramer, R. S., Jones, A. L., & Ward, R. (2012). A Lack of Sexual Dimorphism in Width-to-Height Ratio in White European Faces Using 2D Photographs, 3D Scans, and Anthropometry. PLoS One, 7(8), e42705-e42705. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042705 google scholar
  • Lefevre, C. E., & Lewis, G. J. (2014). Perceiving aggression from facial structure: further evidence for a positive association with facial width-to-height ratio and masculinity, but not for moderation by self-reported dominance. European Journal of Personality, 28(6), 530-537. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1942 google scholar
  • Lefevre, C. E., Etchells, P. J., Howell, E. C., Clark, A. P., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2014). Facial width-to-height ratio predicts self-reported dominance and aggression in males and females, but a measure of masculinity does not. Biology Letters, 10(10), 20140729. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0729 google scholar
  • Lefevre, C. E., Lewis, G. J., Perrett, D. I., & Penke, L. (2013). Telling facial metrics: facial width is associated with testosterone levels in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(4), 273-279. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.03.005 google scholar
  • Lefevre, C., Lewis, G., Bates, T., Dzhelyova, M., Coetzee, V., Deary, I., & Perrett, D. (2012). No evidence for sexual dimorphism of facial width-to-height ratio in four large adult samples. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 623-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.03.002. google scholar
  • Lolli, L., Batterham, A. M., Kratochvü, L., Flegr, J., Mills, J., & Hogan, K. M. (2020). CEO facial masculinity and firm financial outcomes. Corporate Board: Role, Duties and Composition, 16(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbv16i1art4 google scholar
  • Ormiston, M. E., Wong, E. M., & Haselhuhn, M. P. (2017). Facial-width-to-height ratio predicts perceptions of integrity in males. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 40-42. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.017 google scholar
  • Özener, B. (2012). Facial width-to-height ratio in a Turkish population is not sexually dimorphic and is unrelated to aggressive behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(3), 169-173. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.08.001 google scholar
  • Packard, G. C., & Boardman, T. J. (1988). The misuse of ratios, indices, and percentages in ecophysiological research. Physiological Zoology, 61, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1086/physzool.61.1.30163730 google scholar
  • R Core Team (2024). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www. R-project.org/ google scholar
  • Sarıbay, S. A. (2018). Yüz en-boy oranının psikolojik özellikler, sosyal davranış ve sosyal algıyla ilişkisi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 21(41), 78-95. Accessed from: https://psikolog.org.tr/yayinlar/turk-psikoloji-yazilari google scholar
  • Todorov, A., Olivola, C. Y., Dotsch, R., & Mende-Siedlecki, P. (2015). Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 519-545. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831 google scholar
  • Trebicky, V., Fialova, J., Kleisner, K., & HavHcek, J. (2016). Focal length affects depicted shape and perception of facial images. PLoS One, 11(2), e0149313. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0149313 google scholar
  • Valentine, K. A., Li, N. P., Penke, L., & Perrett, D. I. (2014). Judging a man by the width of his face: The role of facial ratios and dominance in mate choice at speed-dating events. Psychological Science, 25(3), 806-811. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613511823 google scholar
  • Verdonck, A., M. Gaethofs, C. Carels, & F. de Zegher, (1999). Effect of low-Dose Testosterone Treatment on Craniofacial Growth in Boys with Delayed Puberty. European Journal of Orthodontics 21, no. 2: 137-143. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/21.2.137 google scholar
  • Weston, E. M., Friday, A. E., & Liö, P. (2007). Biometric evidence that sexual selection has shaped the hominin face. PLoS One, 2(8), e710. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000710 google scholar
  • Weston, K. L., & Atkinson, G. (2017). A comprehensive allometric analysis of 2nd digit length to 4th digit length in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284(1857), 20170356. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0356 google scholar
  • Wickham H., François R., Henry L., Müller K., Vaughan D. (2023). dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 1.1.4, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr. google scholar
  • Wickham, H. (2016) ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York. google scholar
  • Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592-598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.0175 google scholar
  • Windhager, S., Schaefer, K., & Fink, B. (2011). Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity. American Journal of Human Biology, 23(6), 805-814. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.21219 google scholar
  • Zeileis A., Torsten H. (2002). Diagnostic Checking in Regression Relationships. R News 2(3), 7-10. https://CRAN.R-project.org/doc/Rnews/ google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Aydık, F., & Ertuğrul Özener, B. (2024). Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Calculated via Direct Measurement and its Relation to Aggressive Behaviour. Istanbul Anthropological Review, 0(4), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.26650/IAR2024-1575935


AMA

Aydık F, Ertuğrul Özener B. Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Calculated via Direct Measurement and its Relation to Aggressive Behaviour. Istanbul Anthropological Review. 2024;0(4):83-91. https://doi.org/10.26650/IAR2024-1575935


ABNT

Aydık, F.; Ertuğrul Özener, B. Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Calculated via Direct Measurement and its Relation to Aggressive Behaviour. Istanbul Anthropological Review, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 4, p. 83-91, 2024.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Aydık, Fatih, and Berna Ertuğrul Özener. 2024. “Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Calculated via Direct Measurement and its Relation to Aggressive Behaviour.” Istanbul Anthropological Review 0, no. 4: 83-91. https://doi.org/10.26650/IAR2024-1575935


Chicago: Humanities Style

Aydık, Fatih, and Berna Ertuğrul Özener. Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Calculated via Direct Measurement and its Relation to Aggressive Behaviour.” Istanbul Anthropological Review 0, no. 4 (Apr. 2025): 83-91. https://doi.org/10.26650/IAR2024-1575935


Harvard: Australian Style

Aydık, F & Ertuğrul Özener, B 2024, 'Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Calculated via Direct Measurement and its Relation to Aggressive Behaviour', Istanbul Anthropological Review, vol. 0, no. 4, pp. 83-91, viewed 4 Apr. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/IAR2024-1575935


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Aydık, F. and Ertuğrul Özener, B. (2024) ‘Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Calculated via Direct Measurement and its Relation to Aggressive Behaviour’, Istanbul Anthropological Review, 0(4), pp. 83-91. https://doi.org/10.26650/IAR2024-1575935 (4 Apr. 2025).


MLA

Aydık, Fatih, and Berna Ertuğrul Özener. Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Calculated via Direct Measurement and its Relation to Aggressive Behaviour.” Istanbul Anthropological Review, vol. 0, no. 4, 2024, pp. 83-91. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/IAR2024-1575935


Vancouver

Aydık F, Ertuğrul Özener B. Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Calculated via Direct Measurement and its Relation to Aggressive Behaviour. Istanbul Anthropological Review [Internet]. 4 Apr. 2025 [cited 4 Apr. 2025];0(4):83-91. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/IAR2024-1575935 doi: 10.26650/IAR2024-1575935


ISNAD

Aydık, Fatih - Ertuğrul Özener, Berna. Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Calculated via Direct Measurement and its Relation to Aggressive Behaviour”. Istanbul Anthropological Review 0/4 (Apr. 2025): 83-91. https://doi.org/10.26650/IAR2024-1575935



TIMELINE


Submitted30.10.2024
Accepted11.12.2024
Published Online06.01.2025

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.