Research Article


DOI :10.26650/jol.2023.1252566   IUP :10.26650/jol.2023.1252566    Full Text (PDF)

Acquisition of Morpho-phonological Changes in Individuals Learning Turkish as a Foreign Language

Gamze Hallı

One of the most frequently researched topics in the field of applied linguistics is how words are stored and accessed in a lexicon. Although various models of word processing can be found in the literature, they have failed to explain the word recognition process in agglutinative languages such as Turkish. Moreover, despite the fact that there are many factors that can affect the visual word recognition process (e.g., sound onset effect, age of language acquisition, number of phonological and orthographic neighbors), previous studies in applied linguistics have frequently referred to two main factors: a) morphological factors and b) the word frequency effect. Meanwhile, the majority of the models related to the visual word recognition process have been limited to the findings of monolingual individuals. Therefore, this study examines the acquisition of morpho-phonological changes among a sample of individuals learning Turkish as a foreign language, with specific focus on the representation of inflected words in the lexicon. For this purpose, a quasi-experimental research design was used and a lexical decision test was administered to the participants. In this regard, the effects of language proficiency levels, morphophonemic changes (regular or irregular), and word frequency (low or high) on their visual word recognition process were investigated. Based on the data obtained, it is concluded that (1) in the acquisition of morpho-phonological changes by adults with L2 Turkish, words are processed holistically at the beginner level - as a whole without separating roots and affixes – and as their proficiency level increases, the analysis of roots and affixes develops afterwards, in other words, dual mechanisms are effective in the lexical access process depending on the proficiency level. Also, (2) the words with a high number of orthographic neighbors have a positive effect only on the linguistic performance of the L2 A2 level group, and (3) the words with a high frequency of use have a positive effect only on the linguistic performance of the L2 B2 level group, while processing words with regular morpho-phonological changes.

DOI :10.26650/jol.2023.1252566   IUP :10.26650/jol.2023.1252566    Full Text (PDF)

Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçede Biçim-Sesbilgisel Değişimlerin Edinimi

Gamze Hallı

Sözcüklerin dil edinicisinin zihinsel sözlüğünde nasıl saklandığı ve bunlara nasıl erişildiği uygulamalı dilbilimin en sık araştırılan konularından biridir. Alan yazınında sözcük işlemlemeye dair çeşitli modeller sunulmuştur. Fakat bu modeller, Türkçe gibi biçimler açısından zengin sondan eklemeli dillerdeki sözcük tanıma sürecini açıklamakta yetersiz kalmaktadır. Görsel sözcük tanıma sürecinde sözcük erişimini etkileyen birçok faktör (örn. seslem ve seslem başlangıç etkisi, dil edinim yaşı, fonolojik ve imla komşu sayısı vb.) olmasına rağmen uygulamalı dilbilim çalışmalarında sıklıkla iki ana faktöre atıfta bulunulmaktadır: a) biçimbilimsel faktörler ve b) sözcük sıklığı etkisi. Görsel sözcük tanıma sürecine ilişkin modellerin çoğunlukla tek dilli bireylerden elde edilen bulgularla sınırlı olduğu görülmektedir. Bu nedenle bu çalışmada, yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğrenen bireylerin biçim-sesbilgisel değişimleri edinme yolları incelenmiş, çekimli sözcüklerin zihinsel sözlükte temsilinin araştırılması amaçlamıştır. Yarı-deneysel araştırma deseninin kullanıldığı bu çalışmada katılımcılara süreç-içi yöntemlerden sözcüksel karar testi uygulanmıştır. Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğrenen bireylerin a) dil yeterlik düzeylerinin, b) biçim-sesbilgisel değişim türünün (düzenli veya düzensiz) ve c) sözcük sıklığının (düşük veya yüksek) görsel sözcük tanıma sürecini ne yönde etkilediği araştırılmıştır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


In the study, a quasi-experimental method, one of the quantitative research designs, was used. Lexical decision task was applied in a computer lab by using the PyschoPy program (Pierce et al., 2019) to collect the data. Considering the effect of phonology on morphology, stimuli ending with /p/, /t/, /tʃ/ and /k/ sounds and changing by inflection were presented to adults learning Turkish as a foreign language. These target/critical stimuli used in the lexical decision task were prepared using the Sketch Engine (Kilgarriff et al., 2014) corpus platform out of 157.293 word tokens. The words in the corpus were divided into four groups: 1) words with high frequency and regular morpheme-phonological changes (DU-YU), 2) words with low frequency and regular morpheme-phonological changes (DU-DU), 3) words with high frequency and irregular morpheme-phonological changes (DZ-YU), and 4) words with low frequency and irregular morpho-phonological changes (DZ-DU). For the analysis of the reaction time data in the study, 3 (L1 Turkish, L2 A2 level, L2 B2 level) X 2 (regular morphophonological changes, irregular morpho-phonological changes) X 2 (high frequency and low frequency) mixed ANOVA was used for repeated measures, and Bonferroni correction was applied for post hoc multiple comparison.

The results of the study revealed that L2 A2 level participants processes the words with irregular morpho-phonological changes faster than the regular ones (p<.001). However, the control group L1 Turkish and experimental group L2 B2 level participants didn’t show any statistically significant difference. This finding was interpreted as A2 and B2 language learners of Turkish as a foreign language process regular and irregular inflected words in different ways. Among the intermediate level participants (B2 level), the reaction time averages of irregular words getting longer and becoming similar to regular inflections, and thus the difference between regular and irregular morpho-phonological change types decreases and becomes statistically meaningless. The awareness of morphological analysis begins to emerge as the language proficiency level increases. Another reason for the faster processing of words with irregular morpho-phonological changes in the L2 A2 group may be explained with orthographic neighbors effect. According to Van Heuven (2005), the increase in the number of orthographic neighbors of the words reduces latency in the visual word recognition process in foreign language acquisition, and the effect is more obvious in words with low frequency than in words with high frequency (see Andrews, 1989, 1992; Pollatsek, Perea, & Binder, 1999). In the study, the average of orthographic neighbors of the words with irregular morphophonemic changes was 5.5, and the average of the regular ones was 1.95. It was interpreted that the average difference of 4 words might have positively affected the performance of participants by activating more words in their mental lexicon. The difference between L2 A2 participants' processing of DU-DU and DZ-DU words also supports this interpretation (p<.001). The mean number of orthographic neighbors of DU-DU words is lower than that of DZ-DU words (M=1.8, M=6.2, respectively). Although L2 A2 participants might not have recognized a target word presented as DZ-DU, this word may have affected the processing process positively by activating other words that are syntactically similar to the target word, reducing the average reaction time of the target word.

In conclusion, the study revealed that depending on the language proficiency level, dual mechanisms may be active in the lexical access in visual word recognition process. At the beginning, the foreign language learners of Turkish might be using full-listing strategy, as their proficiency increases, they might show a tendency to use decomposition. Secondly, words with a high number of orthographic neighbors positively affect the performance of L2 A2 level language learners of Turkish. In other words, at the beginning, when a word is encountered, other words orthographically related to that word may be activated and facilitating the word access process. Finally, it has been observed that the hypothesis that words with a high frequency will positively affect the linguistic performance (reaction time) of the participants compared to words with a low frequency is limited only to the L2 B2 group when processing words with regular morpho-phonological changes. This result was interpreted as L2 B2 level language learners process words with high frequency as a single input in their mental lexicon, while final devoicing rule is applied to those with low frequency, consequently, they process words with high frequency faster.


PDF View

References

  • Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(2), 234-254. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.2.234 google scholar
  • Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(5), 802-814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.802 google scholar
  • Balota, D. A., Cortese, M.J., & Yap, M. (2006). Visual Word Recognition: The Journey from Features to Meaning (A Travel Update). M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Dü.) içinde, Handbook of Psycholinguistics, (s. 285-376). A.B.D.:Elsevier google scholar
  • Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,133(2), 283-316. https://doi. org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283 google scholar
  • Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(3), 340-357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.10.3.340 google scholar
  • Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. B. Butterworth (Dü.) içinde, Language Production (s. 257294). London: Academic Press. google scholar
  • Booij, G. (2007). The Grammar of Words. Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Caramazza, A., Luadanna, A, & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28(3), 297-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90017-0 google scholar
  • Chialant, D., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Where is morphology and how is it processed? The case of written word recognition. L. B. Feldman (Dü.) içinde, Morphological aspects of language processing (s. 55-76). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. google scholar
  • Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204-256. https://doi. org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204 google scholar
  • Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. G. Underwood (Dü.) içinde, Strategies of Information Processing (s. 151-216). San Diego, CA: Academic Press google scholar
  • Davelaar, E., Coltheart, M., Besner, D., & Jonasson, J. T. (1978). Phonological recoding and lexical access. Memory & Cognition, 6(4), 391-402. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197471 google scholar
  • Field, J. (2003). Psycholinguistics: A resource book for students. London: Routledge. google scholar
  • Frauenfelder, U.H., Schreuder, R. (1992). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. G. Booij, J. van Marle (Dü.) Yearbook of Morphology 1991 (s. 165-183). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2516-1_10 google scholar
  • Fromkin, V., Hyams, N., & Rodman, R. (2011). An introduction to language. Australia : Thomson Wadsworth. google scholar
  • Gonnerman, L. M., Seidenberg, M. S., & Andersen, E. S. (2007). Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 323-345. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.323 google scholar
  • İmer, K., Kocaman, A., & Özsoy, A. S. (2011). Dilbilim Sözlüğü. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Jiang, N. (2012). Conducting Reaction Time Research in Second Language Studies. London: Routledge google scholar
  • Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A Theory of Reading: From Eye Fixations to Comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329 google scholar
  • Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Busta, J., JakuHcek, M., Kovar, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychly, P., & Suchomel, V. (2014). The Sketch Engine: ten years on. Lexicography, 1: 7-36. google scholar
  • Lehtonen, M., & Laine, M. (2003). How word frequency affects morphological processing in monolinguals and bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(3), 213-225. google scholar
  • McGinnies, E., Comer, P. B., & Lacey, O. L. (1952). Visual-recognition thresholds as a function of word length and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44(2), 65-69. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063142 google scholar
  • Milin, P., Smolka, E., & Feldman, L. B. (2018). Models of Lexical Access and Morphological Processing. E. M. Fernandez, & H. Smith Cairns (Dü) içinde, The Handbook of Psycholinguistics (s. 240-268). Wiley Blackwell. google scholar
  • Peirce, J. W., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M. R., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., Lindeİ0v, J. (2019). PsychoPy2: experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods. 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y google scholar
  • Pollatsek, A., Perea, M., & Binder, K. S. (1999). The effects of “neighborhood size” in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(4), 1142-1158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1142 google scholar
  • Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L., & Millikan, J. A. (1970). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 9(5), 487-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80091-3 google scholar
  • Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. L. B. Feldman (Dü.) içinde, Morphological aspects of language processing (s. 131-154). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. google scholar
  • Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15(6), 607-620. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5371(76)90054-2 google scholar
  • Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 14(6), s. 638-647. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X google scholar
  • Uygun, S. & Gürel, A. (2016). Processing morphology in L2 Turkish: The effects of morphological richness in the L1 (s. 251-279). A. Gürel (Dü.) içinde, Second Language Acquisition of Turkish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. google scholar
  • Van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 458-483. google scholar
  • Weekes, B. S. (1997). Differential Effects of Number of Letters on Word and Nonword Naming Latency. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 50(2), 439-456. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755710 google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Hallı, G. (2023). Acquisition of Morpho-phonological Changes in Individuals Learning Turkish as a Foreign Language. The Journal of Linguistics, 0(40), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2023.1252566


AMA

Hallı G. Acquisition of Morpho-phonological Changes in Individuals Learning Turkish as a Foreign Language. The Journal of Linguistics. 2023;0(40):1-20. https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2023.1252566


ABNT

Hallı, G. Acquisition of Morpho-phonological Changes in Individuals Learning Turkish as a Foreign Language. The Journal of Linguistics, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 40, p. 1-20, 2023.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Hallı, Gamze,. 2023. “Acquisition of Morpho-phonological Changes in Individuals Learning Turkish as a Foreign Language.” The Journal of Linguistics 0, no. 40: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2023.1252566


Chicago: Humanities Style

Hallı, Gamze,. Acquisition of Morpho-phonological Changes in Individuals Learning Turkish as a Foreign Language.” The Journal of Linguistics 0, no. 40 (May. 2024): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2023.1252566


Harvard: Australian Style

Hallı, G 2023, 'Acquisition of Morpho-phonological Changes in Individuals Learning Turkish as a Foreign Language', The Journal of Linguistics, vol. 0, no. 40, pp. 1-20, viewed 3 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2023.1252566


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Hallı, G. (2023) ‘Acquisition of Morpho-phonological Changes in Individuals Learning Turkish as a Foreign Language’, The Journal of Linguistics, 0(40), pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2023.1252566 (3 May. 2024).


MLA

Hallı, Gamze,. Acquisition of Morpho-phonological Changes in Individuals Learning Turkish as a Foreign Language.” The Journal of Linguistics, vol. 0, no. 40, 2023, pp. 1-20. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2023.1252566


Vancouver

Hallı G. Acquisition of Morpho-phonological Changes in Individuals Learning Turkish as a Foreign Language. The Journal of Linguistics [Internet]. 3 May. 2024 [cited 3 May. 2024];0(40):1-20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2023.1252566 doi: 10.26650/jol.2023.1252566


ISNAD

Hallı, Gamze. Acquisition of Morpho-phonological Changes in Individuals Learning Turkish as a Foreign Language”. The Journal of Linguistics 0/40 (May. 2024): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2023.1252566



TIMELINE


Submitted17.02.2023
Accepted06.06.2023
Published Online25.12.2023

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.