Yetim ve Kimsesiz Çocuklar Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı

EnglishTürkçe

BÖLÜM


DOI :10.26650/PB/SS48.2023.003.012   IUP :10.26650/PB/SS48.2023.003.012    Tam Metin (PDF)

Sivil Toplum Kuruluşlarının Çocuk Koruma Uygulamalarındaki Rolü

Burak Küsmez

Korunmaya ihtiyacı olan çocuklar, tarih boyunca devletlerin sorumluluk hissettikleri özneler olarak görülmüşler ve devletler tarafından korunmuşlardır. Devletlerin çocuk koruma sistemleri, sorunları önleyici olmaktan çok iyileştirici nitelikler taşımış ve bu durum yıllar boyunca sürmüştür. Devletler tarafından ortak şekilde uygulanan çeşitli çocuk bakım modelleri de var olmuştur. Bu modeller yıllar boyunca daha çok toplu yaşam modelleri şeklinde olmuş, koğuş bakım sistemleri en çok uygulanan modellerden biri olmuştur. Ancak zaman içinde değişen refah anlayışları ve çocukların iyilik hallerinin öncelenmesi durumu, beraberinde bakım modellerinin de değişmesini getirmiştir. Özellikle toplu yaşamın çocukların ruh sağlığı üzerinde yarattığı sorunların ortaya çıkması, bu değişikliklerin başat faktörü olmuştur. Değişen refah modellerinin devletler üzerindeki etkilerinin de derinleşmesi, kurum bakımı modelinin değişerek alternatif modellerin hayata geçirilmesini beraberinde getirmiştir. Alternatif modellerin refah modelleriyle paralellik göstermesi neticesinde de sivil toplum, çocuk koruma sistemlerinde önemli bir konuma yerleşmiş ve STK’lar tarafından bakım sağlanan çocuk sayıları da dünyada hızla artmıştır. Bu çalışmada da çeşitli kriterlere göre belirlenen Batı ve Doğu ülkelerinin çocuk koruma sistemleri incelenmiş, STK’ların bu ülkelerin çocuk koruma sistemlerindeki rolleri değerlendirilmiş ve bazı STK’ların uygulamalarıyla ilgili örnekler sunulmuştur.


DOI :10.26650/PB/SS48.2023.003.012   IUP :10.26650/PB/SS48.2023.003.012    Tam Metin (PDF)

The Role of Civil Society Organisations in Child Protection Practices

Burak Küsmez

Children in need of protection have been subjects for which states feel responsible throughout history and have been protected by states. States’ child protection systems have been curative rather than preventative, which has persisted over the years. There have also been various childcare models implemented jointly by states. These models have been primarily collective living models over the years, and ward care systems have been one of the most applied models. However, the changing understanding of welfare over time and the priority of children’s wellbeing have changed care models. Especially the emergence of the problems caused by the collective life on the mental health of children has been the dominant factor in these changes. The deepening of the effects of the changing welfare models on the states brought about the alteration of the institutional care model and the implementation of alternative models. As a result of the parallelism of alternative models with welfare models, civil society has taken a significant place in child protection systems, and the number of children cared for by NGOs has increased rapidly in the world. In this study, the child protection systems of Western and Eastern countries determined according to various criteria, the roles of NGOs in the child protection systems of these countries, and examples of the practices of some NGOs were presented.



Referanslar

  • A Family for Every Orphan-Russia. (2022). About us. Erişim adresi: https://afamilyforeveryorphan.org/ about-us/ google scholar
  • Ainsworth, F. ve Thoburn, J. (2014). An exploration of the differential usage of residential childcare across national boundaries. International Journal of Social Welfare, 23(1), 16-24. google scholar
  • Albar, A. (2016). Residential child and youth care in Saudi Arabia: A case study of abandoned children and young people. T. Islam ve L. Fulcher (Ed.). Residential child and youth care in a developing world içinde (s. 156-172). The CYC-Net Press. google scholar
  • Altuwaijri, D. (2017). Nonprofit organizations in Saudi Arabia: An analysis ofimpact assesment tools (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). University of San Francisco, ABD. google scholar
  • Barnrattsbyran. (2022). Om oss. Erişim adresi: https://barnrattsbyran.se/om-oss/ google scholar
  • Beijing Children’s Legal Aid & Research Center. (2022). About us. Erişim adresi: https://sites.google. com/a/chinapilaw.org/bclarc/about-us#:~:text=BCLARC%20provides%20direct%20legal%20 representation,%2C%20welfare%2C%20or%20custody%20issues. google scholar
  • Benevolenski, V. ve Toepler, S. (2016). Modernising social service delivery in Russia: Evolving government support for non-profit organisations. Development in Practice, 27(1), 64-76. google scholar
  • Berrick, J. D., & Chambers, J. (2020). Preventing and responding to errors in US child protection. Errors and mistakes in child protection içinde (s.235-254). google scholar
  • Berrick, J. D. (2011). Trends and issues in the U.S. child welfare system. N. Gilbert, N. Parton ve M. Skivenes (Ed.). Child protection systems international trends and orientations içinde (s. 17-36). University of Maryland. google scholar
  • Bindman, E., vd. (2018). NGOs and the policy-making process in Russia: The case of child welfare reform. Governance, 32(2), 207-222. google scholar
  • Bogdanova, E. ve Bindman, E. (2016). NGOs, policy entrepreneurship and child protection in Russia: Pitfalls and prospects for civil society. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 24(2), 143-171. google scholar
  • Bogoroditskii, A. (2010). “Russia“. International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 12(3). Erişim adresi: www. icnl.org/research/journal/vol12iss3/special_4.htm. google scholar
  • Care for Children China. (2022). What we do. Erişim adresi: https://www.careforchildren.com/what-we-do/ annual-reports.html google scholar
  • Charity Foundation Radost. (2022). About. Erişim adresi: http://www.darimradost.com.ua/en/about-found.php google scholar
  • Chenhall, R., vd. (2010). Social capital and management control systems: A study of a non-government organization. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(2010), 737-756. google scholar
  • Children Defense’s Fund. (2022). About. Erişim adresi: https://www.childrensdefense.org/about-cdf/ google scholar
  • Chosen & Dearly Loved. (2022). What we do. Erişim adresi: https://chosenanddearlyloved. org/?fbclid=IwAR2b4dmX6yforN12W_W5XY_x7JgkpR4b5Ybf%E2%80%A6 google scholar
  • Cocozza, M. ve Hort, S.E.O. (2011). The dark side of the universal welfare state?: Child abuse and protection in Sweden. N. Gilbert, N. Parton ve M. Skivenes (Ed.). Child protection systems international trends and orientations içinde (s. 89-112). University of Maryland. google scholar
  • Coles, D. C. (2015). Identifying differences between privatized, partially privatized, and nonprivatized state foster care systems: A comparative study examining efficiency and effectiveness (Doktora Tezi). Virginia Commonwealth University, VCU Scholars Compass. google scholar
  • Collins-Camargo, C., vd. (2011). Privatization and performence based contracting in child welfare: Recent trends and implications for social service administrators. Administration in Social Work, 35(5), 494. google scholar
  • CONCORDIA-Germany (2022). Social projects. Erişim adresi: https://www.concordia-sozialprojekte.de/en/ google scholar
  • Conrad, A. vd. (2020). Has the US child welfare system become an informal income maintenance programme? A literature review. Child Abuse Review, 29(2), 529-543. google scholar
  • Davies, L. ve N. Duckett (2016). Proactive child protection and social work. SAGE. google scholar
  • Derevni S.O.S. Russia. (2022). About. Erişim adresi: https://sos-dd.ru/ google scholar
  • ECPAT-Germany (2022). Germany. Erişim adresi: https://ecpat.org/country/germany/ google scholar
  • EKHAA. (2022). About us. Erişim adresi: https://website.ekhaa.org.sa/about/ google scholar
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three world of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press. google scholar
  • Fendrich, S. ve Pothmann, J. (2010). Einblicke in die datenlage zur kindesvernachlassigung und kindesmisshandlung in Deutschland. möglichkeiten und grenzen von gesundheits-, kriminal- und sozialstatistiken. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, 53(10), 1002-1010. google scholar
  • Fendrich, S. ve Tabel, A. (2012): Deutlicher Personalanstieg in den Hilfen zur Erziehung. KomDat, 15(1), 8-11. google scholar
  • Fisher, K., vd. (2015). Accountability of children’s services organizations in China. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 9(2015), 94-107. google scholar
  • Gilbert, N., Parton, N., ve Skivenes, M. (Ed.). (2011). Child protection systems: International trends and emerging orientations. Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Gelles, R. (2017). Out of harm’s way: creating and effective child welfare system. Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Hort, S.E.O. (2003). Back on track-to the future? The making and remaking of the Swedish welfare state during the 1990s. N. Gilbert ve R. Van Voorhis (Ed.), Changing patterns of social protection. Transaction. google scholar
  • Howell, J. (2009). Government-organised nongovernment organizations. D. Pong (Ed.), Encyclopedia of modern China içinde (s. 211-230). Charles Scribner’s Sons. google scholar
  • Huggins-Hoyt, K., vd. (2019). Privatization, racial disproportionality and disparity in child welfare: Outcomes for foster children of color. Children and Youth Services Review, 99(2019), 125-131. google scholar
  • Jakobson, L ve S. Sanovich. (2010). The changing models of the Russian third sector: Import substitution phase. Journal of Civil Society, 6(3) 279-300. google scholar
  • Jalal, E., vd. (2019). Barriers to implementing learning from child protection training in Saudi Arabia. International Social Work, 62(6), 1493-1506. google scholar
  • Jamali, D. (2003). NGOs in development: Opportunities and challenges. Labour and Management in Development, 4(2), 1-18. google scholar
  • Javeline, D. ve S. Lindemann-Komarova. (2010). A balanced assessment of Russian civil society. Journal of International Affairs 63(2), 171-188. google scholar
  • Kassem, H. (2020). Partnerships in non-profit organizations: The case of Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 12(2020), 1-24. google scholar
  • Kindernothilfe. (2022). Who we are?. Erişim adresi: https://www.kindernothilfe.org/About+us/Who+we+are. html google scholar
  • Kindler, H. ve Borrmann, S. (2013). Prominent facets of child protection in Germany. J. Hamalainen, B. Littlechild, O. Chytil, M. Sramata, E. Jovelin (Ed.). Evolution of child protection and child welfare policies in selected European countries içinde (s. 161-181). ERIS with Albert Publications. google scholar
  • Kindler, H., vd. (2006): Handbuch Kmdeswohlgefahrdung nach § 1666BGB undAllgemeiner Sozialer Dienst (ASD). DJI. google scholar
  • King Salman Humanitarian Aid & Relief Centre. (2022). About. Erişim adresi: https://www.ksrelief.org/ Pages/AboutDetails/300d3cf9-ccb2-4263-b133-9aacf35a3004 google scholar
  • Küsmez, B. (2020). Korunma ihtiyacı olan çocuklar için kurumsal ve alternatif hizmet modelleri: Bir değerlendirme. International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences, 4(3), 201-225. google scholar
  • Legal Services for Children (2022). About LSC. Erişim adresi: https://www.lsc-sf.org/annual-report/ google scholar
  • Leung, L. C. (2014). Gender mainstreaming childcare policy: Barriers in a Confucian welfare society. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 30, 41-52. google scholar
  • Lundstrom, T. ve Wijkstrom, F. (2012). Fran rost till service, vad hande sedan. F. Wijkstrom (Ed.), Civilsamhalleti samhallskontraktet: en antologi om vad som star pa spel içinde (s.120-141). European Civil Society Press. google scholar
  • Maple Women’s Psychological Counseling Center. (2022). NGO details. Erişim adresi: https:// chinadevelopmentbrief.org/ngos/the-maple-womens-psychological-counseling-center/ google scholar
  • Meagher, G., vd. (2016). Big business in a thin market: Understanding the privatization of residential care for children and youth in Sweden. Social Policy&Administration, 50(7), 805-823. google scholar
  • MENA. (2022). About AUDI. Erişim adresi: http://www.araburban.org/index.php?module=sitemap&p age=content_en&id=180 google scholar
  • Mercer, C. (2002). NGOs, civil society and democratization: A critical review of the literature. Progress in Development Studies, 2(1), 5-22. google scholar
  • NOBAB-Sweden. (2022). NOBAB. Erişim adresi: https://www.nobab.se/ google scholar
  • Partnership for Every Child-Russia. (2022). About us. Erişim adresi: https://p4ec.ru/en/about/ google scholar
  • Porko, P., vd. (2018). Inquiry on private child welfare units. Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. google scholar
  • Posarac, A., vd. (2021). Organization and delivery of child proctection services in Russia. World Bank. google scholar
  • Pothmann, J. ve Tabel, A. (2012): Mehr Personal - aber keine Entlastung. Zur Entwicklung der Beschaftigten im Allgemeinen Sozialen Dienst (ASD). KomDat, 15(1), 12-13. google scholar
  • Reed, D. ve Karpilow, K. (2002). Understanding the child welfare system in California: A primer for service providers and policymakers. Center for Research on Women and Families. Public Health Institute. google scholar
  • Sallnas, M. (2000). Residential care in child welfare. Stockholm University. google scholar
  • Sallnas, M. ve Wiklund, S. (2011). Private service providers in welfare Services. Socionomen, 8(1), 22-7. google scholar
  • Shang, X. ve Fisher, K. R. (2013). Caring for orphaned children in China. Lanham: Lexington Books. google scholar
  • Shang, X. Y. ve Wu, X. M. (2011). The care regime in China: Elder and child care. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, 27, 123-131. google scholar
  • Shanks, E., vd. (2021). Privatisation of residential care for children and youth in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Nordic Welfare Research, 6(3), 128-141. google scholar
  • S.O.S. Children Villages-Germany (2022). Our work. Erişim adresi: https://www.sos-childrensvillages.org/ where-we-help/europe/germany google scholar
  • Skane Stadmission. (2022). Ge stöd. Erişim adresi: https://www.skanestadsmission.se/ google scholar
  • Streeten, P., 1997. ‘Non governmental organizations and development’. J.L. Fernando ve A.W. Heston (Ed.), The Role of NGOs: charity and empowerment içinde (s. 193-210). Sage Publications. google scholar
  • Steen, J. A. ve Smith, S. (2012). An organizational view of privatization: Is the private foster care agency superior to the public foster care agency? Children and Youth Services Review, 34(4), 851-858. google scholar
  • Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare (2019). Statistik om socialtjanstinsatser till barn och unga 2018. Socialstyrelsen. google scholar
  • The Annie E. Casey Foundation (2022). About us. Erişim adresi: https://www.aecf.org/about/financials google scholar
  • The Bridge for Youth (2022). About. Erişim adresi: https://bridgeforyouth.org/about/financials-impact-reports/ google scholar
  • Toepler, S. ve L. M. Salamon. (2003). NGO development in central and Eastern Europe: An empirical overview. East European Quarterly 37(3), 365-378. google scholar
  • Tvedt, T. (1998). Angels of mercy or development diplomats? NGOs and foreign aid. James Currey. google scholar
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2008). Trends in foster care and adoption. AFCARS Report #14. Washington, D.C.: U.S. DHHS Administration for Children and Families. Erişim adresi: http://www. acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/stats_research/afcars/tar/report14.htm. google scholar
  • UMMATY. (2022). About us. Erişim adresi: https://ummaty.org/about-us/ google scholar
  • War Child Sweden. (2022). Vad vi gör. Erişim adresi: https://www.warchild. se/?gclid=CjwKCAjw8JKbBhBYEiwAs3sxNy1LJlvEedET-_Gj-NEoNfi3Mom6ZSZ2oLMqB0m2YvDId qLztg1caBoCNXUQAvD_BwE google scholar
  • Willets, P. (2009). Nongovernmental organizations. G. M. Kutting (Ed.). Conventions, treaties and other responses to global issues-vol II içinde (s. 229-249). UNESCO. google scholar
  • Wolff, R. (1997). Germany: A nonpunitive model. N. Gilbert (Ed.), Combatting child abuse: International perspectives and trends içinde (s. 212-231. Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Wolff, R., vd. (2011). Child protection in an age of uncertainty: Germany’s response. N. Gilbert, N. Parton ve M. Skivenes (Ed.). Child protection systems international trends and orientations içinde (s. 183-204). University of Maryland. google scholar
  • Zhao, F., vd. (2017). Child protection in China: Changing policies and reactions from the field of social work. International Journal of Social Welfare, 26(1), 329-339. google scholar


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.