Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/jot.2020.6.1.0011   IUP :10.26650/jot.2020.6.1.0011    Tam Metin (PDF)

The Effect of Digital Content Marketing on Tourists’ Purchase Intention

Şerife Yazgan PektaşAzize Tunç Hassan

The purpose of this study is to reveal the effect of digital contents on tourists’ purchase intention using the persuasion knowledge model. For this purpose, data were collected by purpose sampling method between 25 December 2018 and 31 January 2019 with the approval of Bartin University Social and Humanities Ethics Committee. The obtained 105 data were analyzed. As a result of the analysis, it was found that there were significant positive relationships between tourists’ purchase intention, eWOM and suspicion sub-dimensions (reliability, disbelief). While the reliability of the subdimensions of the suspicion scale influenced eWOM and tourists’ purchase intention, it did not appear to have an impact on persuasive information. In addition to the negative correlation between persuasion and suspicion sub-dimensions, it was found that the sub-dimensions of suspicion did not affect persuasion.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Arıkan, R. (2004). Araştırma teknikleri ve rapor hazırlama. Ankara: Asil Yayın. google scholar
  • Artz, N., & Tybout, A.M. (1999). The moderating impact of quantitative information on the relationship between source credibility and persuasion: A persuation knowledge model interpretation. Marketing Letters, 10(1), 51-62. google scholar
  • Aytekin, P., & Ay, C. (2015). İkna Bilgi Modeli in M.İ. Yağcı and S. Çabuk (Eds.), Pazarlama Teorileri (pp. 343-372). İstanbul: MediaCat. Bartın University (2019). 2019 Yılı Performans Programı, https://cdn.bartin.edu.tr/w3/33a09c581e 79b5bd6d9d739698ec97b5/2019-yili-performans-programi.pdf, 06.01.2019. google scholar
  • Bearden, W. O., Hardesty, D. M., & Rose, R. L. (2001). Consumer self-confidence: Refinements in conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 121-134. google scholar
  • Boush, D. M., Friestad, M., & Rose, G. M. (1994). Adolescent skepticism toward TV advertising and knowledge of advertiser tactics. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 165-175. google scholar
  • Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 1-16. google scholar
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2003). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Calfee, J. E., & Ford, G. T. (1988). Economics, information and consumer behavior in M. J. Houston (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research Volume 15 (pp. 234-238), Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research. google scholar
  • Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2000). Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of acceppibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 69-83. google scholar
  • Carlson, J. P., Bearden, W. O. & Hardesty, D. M. (2007). Influences on what consumers know and what they think they know regarding marketer pricing tactics. Psychology and Marketing, 24(2), 117-142. google scholar
  • Çetin, G., & İstanbullu Dinçer, F. (2014). Electronic word of mouth among hotel guests: Demographic and tripographic factors. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, 9(2), 35-41. google scholar
  • Cova, B., & Cova, V. (2002). Tribal marketing: The tribalisation of society and it impact on the conduct of marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 36(5/6), 595-620. google scholar
  • De Bruyn, A., & Lilien, G. L. (2004). A multi-stage model of word of mouth through elektronic referrals. eBusiness Research Center Working Paper. google scholar
  • De Pelsmacker, P., Van Tilburg, S., & Holthof, C. (2018). Digital marketing strategies, online reviews and hotel performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 72, 47-55. google scholar
  • Domino, G., & Domino, M.L. (2006). Psychological Testing: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Ennew, T. C., Bunerjee, A. K., & Li, D. (2000). Managing word of mouth communication: Empirical evidence from India. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 18(2), 75-83. google scholar
  • Elpeze Ergeç, N. (2004). Televizyon reklamlarına yönelik şüphe: İkna bilgi modelinin yorumlanması. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları No: 1553, İletişim Yayınları No: 57. Eskişehir. google scholar
  • Ford, G. T., Darlene, B. S., & Swasy, J. L. (1990). Consumer skepticism of advertising claims: Testing Hypotheses from economics of information. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(4), 433441. google scholar
  • Friestad, M. & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1-31. google scholar
  • Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1995). Persuasion knowledge: Lay people’s and researchers’ beliefs about the psychology of advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 62-74. google scholar
  • Gelter, H. (2017). Digital tourism - An analysis of digital trends in tourism and customer digital mobile behaviour for the Visit Arctic Europe Project, http://www.lme.fi/media/vae-outcomes/ rd-results/report-visit-arctic-europe-mission-3-summary-2.pdf, 06.01.2018. google scholar
  • Godes D., & Mayzlin D. (2004). Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication, Marketing Science, 23(4), 545-560. google scholar
  • Golan, G. J., & Zaidner, L. (2008). Creative strategies in viral advertising: An application of Taylor’s six-segment message strategy wheel. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(4), 959-972. google scholar
  • Goldsmith, R. E., & Horowitz, D. (2006). Measuring motivations for online opinion seeking. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(2), 1-16. google scholar
  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer On Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (Second Edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage. google scholar
  • Ham, C. D., Nelson, M. R. & Das, S. (2015). How to measure persuasion konowledge. International Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 17-53. google scholar
  • Hardesty, D. M., Bearden, W. O., & Carlson, J. P. (2007). Persuasion knowledge and consumer reactions to pricing tactics. Journal of Retailing, 83(2), 199-210. google scholar
  • Hennig-Thurau T., Gwinner, K. P, Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet?. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38-52. google scholar
  • Ismagilova, E., Slade, E. L., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). The Effect of electronic word of mouth communications on intention to buy: A meta-analysis. Information Systems Frontiers, 1-24. google scholar
  • Kachersky, L., & Kim, C. (2011). When consumers cope with price-persuasion knowledge: The role of topic knowledge. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(1), 28-40. google scholar
  • Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H. & Setiawan, I. (2018). Pazarlama 4.0 Gelenekselden Dijitale Geçiş. (Translated, Özata, N.) İstanbul: Optimist Yayın Grubu San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti. google scholar
  • Kozak, M. (2014). Bilimsel Araştırma: Tasarım, Yazım ve Yayım Teknikleri. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Kuş, O. (2016). İçerik pazarlama-dijital dünyada marka ve hikaye yaratma stratejileri. İstanbul: Pales Yayınları. google scholar
  • Li, J., & Zhan, L. (2011). Online persuasion: How the written word drives WOM evidence from consumer-generated product reviews. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(1), 239-257. google scholar
  • Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008). Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management. Tourism Management, 29(3), 458-468. Lorcu, F. (2015). Örneklerle veri analizi SPSS uygulamalı. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Maxham, J. G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2002). A longitudinal study of complaining customers’ evaluations of multiple service failures and recovery efforts. Journal of Marketing, 66(4), 57-71. google scholar
  • Meydan Uygur, S., Sürücü, Ç. ve Sergen, Y. (2018). Yiyecek içecek işletmelerinin dijital pazarlama açısından incelenmesi. Ankara ili örneği. Güncel Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 157-176. google scholar
  • Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. R. (1998). Development of a scale to measure consumer skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 159-186. google scholar
  • Obermiller, C. & Spangenberg, E. R. (2000). On the origin and distinctnepp of skepticism toward advertising. Marketing Letters, 11(4). 311-322. google scholar
  • Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(5), 847-855. google scholar
  • Picazo-Vela, S., Chou S. Y., Melcher A. J., & Pearson, J. M. (2010). Why provide an online review? An extended theory of planned behavior and the role of big-five personality traits. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 685-696. google scholar
  • Ritchie, R. J. B., & Darke, P. R. (2000). In the shadow of doubt: Advertiser deception and the defensive consumer. Poster Session Presented at the Association for Consumer Research Conference, Salt Lake City, UT. google scholar
  • Sapnas, K. G. (2004). Letters to the editor: Determining adequate sample size. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 36(1), 4-9. google scholar
  • Singh, H., & Bhatia, J. (2016). Evaluation of official tourism websites of world’s leading tourist destinations using the balanced score-card approach. Journal of Tourismology, 2(1), 35-49. google scholar
  • Stephen, A. (2016). The role of digital and social media marketing in consumer behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 17-21. google scholar
  • Teng S., Khong, K. W., Goh, W. W. & Chong, A. Y. L. (2014). Examining the antecedents of persuasive eWOM messages in social media. Online Information Review, 38(6), 746-768. google scholar
  • Teng, S., Khong, K. W., Chong, A. Y. L., & Lin, B. (2017). Persuasive Electronic Word-of-Mouth Messages in Social Media. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 57(1), 76-88. google scholar
  • Thompson, D. V., & Malaviya, P. (2013). Consumer-generated ads: Does awareness of advertising co-creation help or hurt persuasion? Journal of Marketing, 77(3), 33-47. google scholar
  • Van Reijmersdal, E. A., Fransen, M. L., Guda, V. N., Opree, S. J., Lisa, V., Sanne, R., Van Lieshout, Z. & Boerman, S.C. (2016). Effects of disclosing sponsored content in blogs: how the use of resistance strategies mediates effects on persuasion. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(12), 1458–1474. google scholar
  • Vashisht, D. & Royne, M. B. (2016). Advergame speed influence and brand recall: The moderating effects of brand placement strength and gamers’ persuasion knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 162–169. google scholar
  • Ward, S. (1972). Children’s reactions to commercials. Journal of Advertising Research, 12(2), 3745. google scholar
  • Wu P. C. S., & Wang, Y. C. (2011). The influences of electronic word-ofmouth message appeal and message source credibility on brand attitude. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 23(4), 448-472. google scholar
  • Xie, G. X., Boush, D. M., & Liu, R. R. (2013). Tactical deception in covertselling: A persuasion knowledge perspective. Journal of Marketing Communications, 21(3), 224-240. google scholar
  • Yoon, S. J. (2012). A social network approach to the influences of shopping experiences of e-WOM. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13(3), 213-223. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Yazgan Pektaş, Ş., & Tunç Hassan, A. (2020). The Effect of Digital Content Marketing on Tourists’ Purchase Intention. Journal of Tourismology, 6(1), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.26650/jot.2020.6.1.0011


AMA

Yazgan Pektaş Ş, Tunç Hassan A. The Effect of Digital Content Marketing on Tourists’ Purchase Intention. Journal of Tourismology. 2020;6(1):79-98. https://doi.org/10.26650/jot.2020.6.1.0011


ABNT

Yazgan Pektaş, Ş.; Tunç Hassan, A. The Effect of Digital Content Marketing on Tourists’ Purchase Intention. Journal of Tourismology, [Publisher Location], v. 6, n. 1, p. 79-98, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Yazgan Pektaş, Şerife, and Azize Tunç Hassan. 2020. “The Effect of Digital Content Marketing on Tourists’ Purchase Intention.” Journal of Tourismology 6, no. 1: 79-98. https://doi.org/10.26650/jot.2020.6.1.0011


Chicago: Humanities Style

Yazgan Pektaş, Şerife, and Azize Tunç Hassan. The Effect of Digital Content Marketing on Tourists’ Purchase Intention.” Journal of Tourismology 6, no. 1 (May. 2024): 79-98. https://doi.org/10.26650/jot.2020.6.1.0011


Harvard: Australian Style

Yazgan Pektaş, Ş & Tunç Hassan, A 2020, 'The Effect of Digital Content Marketing on Tourists’ Purchase Intention', Journal of Tourismology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 79-98, viewed 18 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/jot.2020.6.1.0011


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Yazgan Pektaş, Ş. and Tunç Hassan, A. (2020) ‘The Effect of Digital Content Marketing on Tourists’ Purchase Intention’, Journal of Tourismology, 6(1), pp. 79-98. https://doi.org/10.26650/jot.2020.6.1.0011 (18 May. 2024).


MLA

Yazgan Pektaş, Şerife, and Azize Tunç Hassan. The Effect of Digital Content Marketing on Tourists’ Purchase Intention.” Journal of Tourismology, vol. 6, no. 1, 2020, pp. 79-98. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/jot.2020.6.1.0011


Vancouver

Yazgan Pektaş Ş, Tunç Hassan A. The Effect of Digital Content Marketing on Tourists’ Purchase Intention. Journal of Tourismology [Internet]. 18 May. 2024 [cited 18 May. 2024];6(1):79-98. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/jot.2020.6.1.0011 doi: 10.26650/jot.2020.6.1.0011


ISNAD

Yazgan Pektaş, Şerife - Tunç Hassan, Azize. The Effect of Digital Content Marketing on Tourists’ Purchase Intention”. Journal of Tourismology 6/1 (May. 2024): 79-98. https://doi.org/10.26650/jot.2020.6.1.0011



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim31.07.2019
Kabul12.11.2019
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma30.06.2020

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.