Langage obscène et injurieux dans La Voyeuse interdite de N. Bouraoui et C’est le soleil qui m’a brûlée de C. Beyala
La sexualité est une thématique très prisée dans la littérature africaine de manière générale. Fortement liée à d’autres thèmes comme le patriarcat, l’émancipation de la femme, la domination masculine, etc., la sexualité traduit le conflit de genre en la femme et l’homme et trahit l’idéologie masculine dans les sociétés africaines. La sexualité dans le corpus choisi pour notre étude, à savoir C’est le soleil qui m’a brûlée de Calixthe Beyala et La Voyeuse interdite de Nina Bouraoui, est intimement liée au projet d’écriture de ces auteurs qui ont choisi d’opter pour le langage obscène et les injures afin de montrer à quel point l’homme réduit la femme à un simple objet sexuel et afin d’adopter une position de contre-attaque dans le souci de réduire l’homme à son organe sexuel. Le langage obscène devient alors un moyen de proclamation de la liberté des femmes. Les auteures utilisent aussi ce langage choquant afin de réveiller les consciences des lecteurs sur l’urgence d’établir l’équilibre dans les relations entre femme et homme. La lecture du langage obscène et injurieux à travers les deux romans africains soumis à l’étude nous permettra de voir comment les auteurs dépeignent sans retouche des scènes sexuelles et les remettent constamment dans leur cadre idéologique et social.
Obscene and Offensive Language in La Voyeuse Interdite by N. Bouraoui and C’est le soleil qui m’a brûlée by C. Beyala
Sexuality is a very popular theme in African literature in general. Strongly linked to other themes like patriarchy, female emancipation, male domination, etc., sexuality translates the gender conflict in women and men and betrays male ideology in African societies. Sexuality in the corpus chosen for our study: C’est le soleil qui m’a brûlée by Calixthe Beyala and La Voyeuse interdite by Nina Bouraoui, is intimately linked to the writing project of these authors who chose to opt for obscene language and insults in order to show to what extent man reduces woman to a simple sexual object and in order to adopt a position of counterattack in the concern to reduce man to his sexual organ. Obscene language then becomes a means of proclaiming the freedom of women. The authors also use this shocking language to awaken readers’ awareness of the urgent need to establish a balance in the relationship between women and men. Reading the obscene and offensive language throughout the two African novels submitted for study will allow us to see how the authors portray sexual scenes without retouching and constantly put them back into their ideological and social framework.
The question of sexuality is omnipresent in African literature. The presence of woman in the African novel is certainly vital, because she represents the most significant and interesting character. Her body and sex have become a subject of writing and a romantic object that assume thematic and ideological interpretations.
In order to assert the presence of sex as a means of proclamation, writers refuse to be silent or to hide behind words. Approaching sex is a way of speaking freely and openly by confronting what is usually secret and hidden, that is to say forbidden, to be verbalized at the risk of overturning and breaking the stability of social order. The theme of sexuality has given birth to novelists who violate prohibitions and taboos and venture into writing that is intentionally shocking.
Disobeying the patriarchy and stereotypes of society which make woman a simple sexual object to be consumed according to the desire of man becomes the weapon of any African woman who wishes to change her situation of damned and submissive in order to access emancipation and freedom of choice. The silence imposed by men in African Maghreb and sub-Saharan societies with the aim of subjecting women to enslavement is a subject much addressed by gender studies and current postcolonial studies which further clarify the nature of the link between men and women, particularly in formerly colonized countries. This situation does not seem to be able to last over time, especially after the emergence of female writing.
The theme of sexuality and the use of trivial language particularly interested the African Maghreb and sub-Saharan authors. As a result, we have chosen to examine two representative novels from the Maghreb and sub-Saharan Africa. We will be particularly interested in two writers representative of this theme in both Maghreb and Sub-Saharan spaces: Cest le soleil qui me brûlée by Calixthe Beyala and La Voyeuse interdite by Nina Bouraoui. These authors talk about sex without restraint, describing it in a blunt way. They approach sex by portraying it in a strong, detailed, and unedited way in erotic or even sometimes pornographic-looking scenes. Their concern is to stage carnal relationships bathed in deviation, prohibition, transgression, disorder, and liberation. Our work consists of a careful analysis of coarse language and the lexicon that dominates it while constantly linking with patriarchal and feminist ideology.
The use of trivial language is far from free in the novels submitted to our review. We will see how this language is indeed part of a logic that is part of the authors’ writing project based essentially on excess, excessiveness, and hyperbole in order to awaken the consciousness of the readers and to raise awareness of social debauchery and the flagrant imbalance between men and women. We will show that the exposure of social reality through trivial and pornographic language also signifies to what extent the relationship between man and woman in African societies have a sexual nature which reduces women to a simple object of pleasure. The authors did not fail to respond to this inferiorization imposed by man with demeaning and reductive language. We will also see how the offensive interpellation metaphorically translates feminine attitudes and their perceptions of the masculine gender. It is a way of imposing the subjugation that man knows how to impose on woman. The identification of man by repeatedly derogatory questioning reflects how dominant ideology is through language and has the power to exclude the subject. The strategies of language attack and the defense undertaken by men and women show that even language can be subjected to an ideology which structures it and prepares it for the destruction of a gender, a class, or a race.