Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/mecmua.2025.83.2.0005   IUP :10.26650/mecmua.2025.83.2.0005    Tam Metin (PDF)

AB ve Türk Hukukunda Yeşil Aklamanın (Greenwashing) Önlenmesi

Bilgehan Çetiner

“Doğa dostu” , ‘İklim dostu harekete katıl” veya “Doğayı senin kadar düşünen” ve benzeri reklam beyanlarının yanı sıra ürün ambalajları üzerine konulan çevreye ilişkin semboller, logolar, onaylar, görseller ile “doğal”, “organik”, sürdürü lebilir” gibi ifadelerin günümüzde tüketicilerin ürün tercihinde önemli bir rol oynadığı bilinen bir gerçektir. Ancak, bu beyanların yalnızca bazıları gerçek durumu yansıtmaktadır ve haliyle diğerleri tüketiciler için yalnızca yanıltıcı, aldatıcı ve yanlış yönlendirici beyanlardan ibarettir. Bunların yanıltıcı olmasının nedeni söz konusu nitelemelere ilişkin açık ve şeffaf bir gerekçelendirmenin bulunmaması yanında çevreye uyum ve sürdürülebilirlik için alındığı iddia olunan önlemleri ile bunların olumlu çevresel sonucu arasındaki ilişkinin örneğin uygun bir sertifika ile kanıtlanmamış olmasıdır. İşte bu durumu ifade etmek üzere 90’lı yıllardan bu yana yeşil aklama (green washing) terimi kullanılmaktadır. Yeşil aklamayı önlemeye yönelik AB düzeyinde iki yasal düzenleme karşımıza çıkmaktadır: Yeşil Dönüşümde Tüketicilerin Güçlendirilmesine İlişkin Direktif ve Yeşil Beyanlar Direktifi Tasarısı. Türk Hukukunda ise yeşil aklamayı önlemeye yönelik halihazırda iki temel düzenleme bulunmaktadır. Bunlardan ilki TTK m. 5463 arasında düzenlenen haksız rekabete ilişkin hükümler, diğeri ise Ticari Reklam ve Haksız Ticari Uygulamalar Yönet meliği ile buna dayalı olarak Ticaret Bakanlığı tarafından çıkarılan Çevreye İlişkin Beyanlar İçeren Reklamlar Hakkında Kılavuz’dur.

DOI :10.26650/mecmua.2025.83.2.0005   IUP :10.26650/mecmua.2025.83.2.0005    Tam Metin (PDF)

Prevention Of Greenwashing in EU and Turkish Law

Bilgehan Çetiner

It is a well known fact that environmental symbols, logos, approvals, visuals and expressions such as ‘natural’, ‘organic’, ‘sustainable’ and similar advertising statements as well as environmental symbols, logos, approvals, visuals on product packaging play an important role in consumers’ product preferences today. However, only some of these statements reflect the real situation and therefore others are only misleading, deceptive and misleading statements for consumers. They are misleading not only because there is no clear and transparent justification for such characterisations, but also because the relationship between the environmental compliance and sustainability measures claimed to have been taken and the positive environmental outcome of such measures is not proven, for example, by an appropriate certificate. The term ‘green washing’ has been used since the 90s to describe this situation. There are two legal regulations at EU level to prevent green laundering: Directive on Empowering Consumers in Green Transformation and Draft Green Claims Directive. In Turkish Law, there are currently two main regulations to prevent green laundering. The first one is the provisions on unfair competition regulated under Articles 5463 of the TCC, and the other one is the Regulation on Commercial Advertisements and Unfair Commercial Practices and the Guideline on Advertisements Containing Environmental Declarations issued by the Ministry of Trade based on this Regulation


GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


Greenwashing is briefly defined as ‘an untrue or unverifiable statement that a good or service has a positive impact on the environment, or at least no negative impact, or is less harmful to the environment compared to competing goods or services’. There are two important regulations at EU level to prevent green washing: Directive on Empowering Consumers in Green Transformation ((EU) 2024/825) and Draft Green Claims Directive. In Turkish Law, there are currently two main regulations on this issue. The first one is the provisions on unfair competition regulated under Articles 5463 of the TCC, and the other one is the Regulation on Commercial Advertisements and Unfair Commercial Practices and the Guideline on Advertisements Containing Environmental Declarations issued by Commission of Advertising based on this Regulation.

The Empowering Directive makes certain amendments for the prevention of green washing within the scope of commercial practices regulated in Articles 6 and 7 of the Unfair Practices Directive, which are considered deceptive and therefore prohibited, and misleading practices regulated in Annex I, which are considered unfair and prohibited in all circumstances. According to Article 6(1) of the Unfair Practices Directive, a commercial practice shall be deemed to be an unfair commercial practice in the nature of deceptive behavior if it contains false information and is therefore untrue, or if, even if it contains accurate information, it deceives or is likely to deceive the average consumer in certain respects in any way, including the manner of presentation, and causes or is likely to cause the consumer to take a decision on a transaction which the consumer would not actually take. In the provision, the issues where the consumer may be deceived are listed in six subparagraphs. Here, with the amendment made in Art. 6/f. 1/b, ‘environmental and social features’ and ‘circularity features such as durability, repairability and recyclability’ have been added to the features of the product that should not be misleading. Two new cases have been added to the practices set out in Art. 6(2) of the Unfair Practices Directive, where it is determined whether the commercial practice is deceptive or not by taking into account all the existing circumstances on a caseby case basis. The first one (Art. 6(2)(d)) is environmental representations (relating to a product, product category, brand or operator) concerning future environmental performance. The other is ‘advertising of benefits to consumers that are not derived from, and are unrelated to, any characteristic of the product or business’ (art. 6/f. 2/e).

One of the unfair commercial practices based on lack of consumer information is introduced by the Empowering Directive. In the newly added f. 7 to Art. 7 of the Unfair Practices Directive, where an operator provides a service which compares products and provides consumers with information on environmental or social characteristics or on circularity aspects such as the durability, repairability or recyclability of products or their suppliers, the method of comparison, information on the products concerned and their suppliers, as well as the measures taken to keep the information up to date, are recognized as essential information which must be provided to consumers.

With the Green Claim Directive, which aims to complement the Empowering Directive and to uniformize and concretize the standards to which environmental declarations are subject, green declarations of enterprises will in future have to be verified by independent auditors and substantiated on the basis of scientific evidence. In the Draft Directive, the requirements for open environmental declarations relate to their clarity, accuracy, relevance and comparability, and labelling systems for products will only be applicable if they are verified in the manner provided for in the EU Directive.

In Turkish Law, the first regulation on the prevention of green laundering is Article 62/f. 1 of the Law on the Protection of Consumers. Here, unfair commercial practices towards consumers are prohibited. In addition, the determination of which commercial practices have these characteristics is made according to the Regulation on Commercial Adver tising and Unfair Commercial Practices dated 2015. According to Article 29/f. 1 of this Regulation, ‘Commercial practices that contain false information or, even if the information provided is essentially correct, when all the circumstances of its presentation are evaluated, deceive or are likely to deceive the average consumer and thus cause or are likely to cause the consumer to become a party to a legal transaction to which the consumer would not be a party under normal circumstances shall be deemed deceptive’. In the provision, the acts related to certain matters are also counted as deceptive commercial practices (Art. 29/f. 2). The most important of these acts in terms of our subject matter are the acts that deceive the consumer in terms of ‘the effects of a good or service on the ….environment’ under Art. 29/f. 2/a. Since greenwashing is briefly defined as the misleading of consumers by an enterprise that it or its products and services are environmentally friendly, there is no doubt that green laundering practices will also fall within the scope of Art. 29/f. 2/a of the Regulation on Advertising and Practices.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Anthamatten S., Green Advertising, Zeitschrift für Immaterialgüter-, Informations- und Wettbewerbsrecht, sic! 2024, 9-17. google scholar
  • Atamer Y., Güner G. K., Etik Üretim Metotlarına Aykırılık Satıcının Sorumluluğunu Doğurabilir Mi?, Prof. Dr. H. Ercüment Erdem’e Armağan (Oniki Levha Yayıncılık, 2023), 175-209. google scholar
  • Başak Başoğlu, Nükleer Enerji Santralleriyle İlgili Reklamların Düşündürdükleri: Çevreye İlişkin Beyanlar İçeren Reklamlar, İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Özel Sayı Cilt:2 Yıl 2015, 707-722. google scholar
  • Baudenbacher C. / Glöckner J.: Lauterkeitsrecht, Kommentar zum Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb (Hrsg. Baudenbacher, Carl), Helbing&Lichtenhahn, Basel Genf München 2001, Art. 3 lit. i. google scholar
  • Berger M., Basler Kommentar UWG (Hrsg. Hilty, Reto M./Arpagaus, Reto), (Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag, 2013), Art. 3 Abs. 1 Lit. b. google scholar
  • Dedeyan D., Haftung für fehlerhafte Unternehmenskommunikation: Neue Risiken im Zuge der Nachhaltigkeitsregulierung, in: Peter R. google scholar
  • Isler/Rolf Sethe (Hrsg.), Managerhaftung bei Unternehmenskrisen und -zusammenbrüchen, (EIZ Pub 2023). google scholar
  • Diebold N./Rütsche B., Wettbewerbsrecht und Marktregulierung, Bd. 1 Grundlagen, (Zürich 2023), § 3. google scholar
  • Eggen M., Greenwashing, Transparenzpflichten auf Produkt- und Dienstleistungsebene, Jusletter, 13.9.2021, Rn. 1 vd. google scholar
  • Ertan Füsun N., (Ülgen, Hüseyin/ Helvacı, Mehmet/Kaya, Arslan): Ticari İşletme Hukuku, Güncellenmiş ve Kısmen Yeniden Yazılmış 6. Bası, (Vedat, 2019), s. 555-558. google scholar
  • Ertan Füsun N., Haksız Rekabet Hukuku, (Oniki Levha, 2016). google scholar
  • Ferrari-Hofer L./Vasella D., Art. 3 UWG, in: Amstutz Marc/Atamer Yesim M. (Hrsg.), Wirtschaftsrechtliche Nebenerlasse: FusG, UWG, KKG, PauRG und PrHG, 4. Aufl., Zürich/Basel/Genf 2023. google scholar
  • Göckler T. / Rosenow J., Die EU-Regelungsvorhaben zu nachhaltigkeitsbezogener Werbung Überblick über die aktuellen EU-Initiativen und legislativen Herausforderungen, GRUR 2024, 331-340. google scholar
  • Gsell B., Kauf- und deliktsrechtliche Haftung für das nachhaltigkeitsfehlerhafte Produkt als Schaden, ZHR 187 (2023), 392-420. google scholar
  • Günlü Z.N., Çevrimiçi Pazaryerlerindeki Haksız Ticari Uygulamaların AB Hukuku Ve Türk Hukuku Kapsamında İncelenmesi, 2024 (yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). google scholar
  • İmamoğlu B. Ş., Planlı Eskitme (Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Enstitüsü Yayınları 2020). google scholar
  • İnal E., Reklam Hukuku ve Aldatıcı Reklamlar, (Beta 2000). google scholar
  • İnal E., Baysal B., Reklam Hukuku ve Uygulaması, (On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2008. google scholar
  • İnal, E.: “Türk Hukuku’nda Aldatıcı ve Örtülü Reklamlar”, Uluslararası Reklam Hukuku Sempozyumu, (On İki Levha Yayıncılık, 2009), s. 87-104. google scholar
  • İsmail Kırca: Tüketicilerin Hislerine Yönelik Reklamlar, Prof. Dr. Ali Bozer’e Armağan, (Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Araştırmaları Enstitüsü 1998) 333-347. google scholar
  • Jentsch V. / Angliker S., Haftung für Nachhaltigkeitsinformationen, recht 2023, 213-226. google scholar
  • Jung P., Art. 3 Abs. 1 lit. b UWG, in: Jung Peter (Hrsg.), Bundesgesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb (UWG), 3. Aufl., (Bern 2023). google scholar
  • Keller E., Green Claims“-Richtlinienentwurf: Besser eine Beweislastumkehr als ein Bürokratiemonster, GRUR 2025, 1-3. google scholar
  • Koyuncu A.Ç., Tüketici Hukuku Çerçevesinde Haksız Ticari Uygulamalar (Seçkin 2022). google scholar
  • Oetiker C.H., in: P. Jung/P. Spitz (Hg.), Stampfîis Handkommentarzum UWG, 2. Aufl., (Bern 2016), UWG Art. 3 Abs. I lit. i. google scholar
  • Tekin U., Tüketicilerin Haksız Rekabet Hükümlerine Göre Korunması, (Oniki Levha, 2022). google scholar
  • Tekelioğlu N., Tüketicinin Korunması Açısından Hukuka Aykırı Reklamlar, (On İki Levha Yayıncılık 2016). google scholar
  • Topçuoğlu M., Türk Ticaret Kanunu ve Yeni Tüketicinin Korunması Hakkında Kanun Açısından Haksız Ticari Uygulamalar, TAAD 2016, Yıl: 7, Sayı 24, s. 15-58. google scholar
  • Weller M.P., HöBl T., Seemann C., Klimaneutralitat im Privatrecht, ZEup 2024, 576-607. google scholar
  • Weiden H., Aktüelle Berichte - Dezember 2024, GRUR 2024, 1881-1883. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Çetiner, B. (2025). AB ve Türk Hukukunda Yeşil Aklamanın (Greenwashing) Önlenmesi. İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası, 83(2), 487-505. https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2025.83.2.0005


AMA

Çetiner B. AB ve Türk Hukukunda Yeşil Aklamanın (Greenwashing) Önlenmesi. İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası. 2025;83(2):487-505. https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2025.83.2.0005


ABNT

Çetiner, B. AB ve Türk Hukukunda Yeşil Aklamanın (Greenwashing) Önlenmesi. İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası, [Publisher Location], v. 83, n. 2, p. 487-505, 2025.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Çetiner, Bilgehan,. 2025. “AB ve Türk Hukukunda Yeşil Aklamanın (Greenwashing) Önlenmesi.” İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası 83, no. 2: 487-505. https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2025.83.2.0005


Chicago: Humanities Style

Çetiner, Bilgehan,. AB ve Türk Hukukunda Yeşil Aklamanın (Greenwashing) Önlenmesi.” İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası 83, no. 2 (Aug. 2025): 487-505. https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2025.83.2.0005


Harvard: Australian Style

Çetiner, B 2025, 'AB ve Türk Hukukunda Yeşil Aklamanın (Greenwashing) Önlenmesi', İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 487-505, viewed 29 Aug. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2025.83.2.0005


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Çetiner, B. (2025) ‘AB ve Türk Hukukunda Yeşil Aklamanın (Greenwashing) Önlenmesi’, İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası, 83(2), pp. 487-505. https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2025.83.2.0005 (29 Aug. 2025).


MLA

Çetiner, Bilgehan,. AB ve Türk Hukukunda Yeşil Aklamanın (Greenwashing) Önlenmesi.” İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası, vol. 83, no. 2, 2025, pp. 487-505. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2025.83.2.0005


Vancouver

Çetiner B. AB ve Türk Hukukunda Yeşil Aklamanın (Greenwashing) Önlenmesi. İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası [Internet]. 29 Aug. 2025 [cited 29 Aug. 2025];83(2):487-505. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2025.83.2.0005 doi: 10.26650/mecmua.2025.83.2.0005


ISNAD

Çetiner, Bilgehan. AB ve Türk Hukukunda Yeşil Aklamanın (Greenwashing) Önlenmesi”. İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası 83/2 (Aug. 2025): 487-505. https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2025.83.2.0005



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim02.11.2024
Kabul26.05.2025
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma10.07.2025

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ



İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.