Research Article


DOI :10.26650/YTA2020-001   IUP :10.26650/YTA2020-001    Full Text (PDF)

The Reaction of the British Parliament to the Establishment of the Turkish Federated State of Cyprus (1975)

Yasin Coşkun

This study examines the approach of the British parliament to the Turkish Federated State of Cyprus (TFSC), announced on 13 February 1975. Britain together with Turkey and Greece became one of the three guarantor powers of the Republic of Cyprus founded in 1960. Britain also has two military bases on the island. Thus, Britain closely followed the developments in Cyprus. After the Cyprus Peace Operation in 1974, a new situation emerged on the island. Turkish Cypriots established the TFSC in the north of the island. In the statements made by the British government, there was a negative reaction to this new administration. British deputies brought the issue to the agenda of the British parliament. Both opposition and ruling party representatives reacted negatively to the announcement of the establishment of the TFSC. They also criticized the ruling Labour Party government for failing to prevent the announcement of the TFSC. In addition, the steps which Britain could take in the Cyprus problem were discussed in parliament. Within this context, the article analyses the debates in the British parliament after the announcement of the establishment of the TFSC and gives a general assessment of Britain’s approach to the Turkish Cypriot decisions. This study, which is the result of a detailed examination of minutes taken at meetings of the British parliament, contributes to the field by examining British policy towards the Cyprus issue and Turkish-British relations.

DOI :10.26650/YTA2020-001   IUP :10.26650/YTA2020-001    Full Text (PDF)

Kıbrıs Türk Federe Devleti’nin (1975) Kuruluş İlanına İngiliz Parlamentosunun Tepkisi

Yasin Coşkun

Bu çalışma 13 Şubat 1975 tarihinde ilan edilen Kıbrıs Türk Federe Devleti’ne yönelik İngiliz parlamentosunun yaklaşımını incelemektedir. İngiltere, 1960’ta kurulan Kıbrıs Cumhuriyeti’nin Türkiye ve Yunanistan ile beraber üç garantör devletinden birisidir. Ayrıca adada iki askeri üsse sahiptir. Bu açıdan Kıbrıs’ta yaşanan gelişmeleri yakından takip etmiştir. 1974 yılındaki Kıbrıs Barış Harekatı’ndan sonra adada yeni bir durum ortaya çıkmıştır. Adanın kuzeyinde Kıbrıslı Türkler KTFD’yi kurmuşlardır. İngiliz Hükümeti’nden yapılan açıklamalarda, bu yeni yönetime tepki gösterilmiştir. KTFD’nin ilanının ardından İngiliz milletvekilleri konuyu İngiliz parlamentosunun gündemine taşımışlardır. Gerek muhalefet gerek iktidar partisi vekilleri KTFD’nin ilanına olumsuz yaklaşmışlardır. Ayrıca vekiller iktidarda bulunan İşçi Partisi Hükümeti’ni KTFD’nin ilanını önleyemediği için eleştirmişlerdir. Kıbrıs sorununda İngiltere’nin ne gibi yeni adımlar atabileceği parlamentoda tartışılmıştır. Bu çerçevede makale, KTFD’nin ilanının ardından İngiliz parlamentosunda yaşanan tartışmalar üzerinden İngiltere’nin Kıbrıslı Türklerin adada almış olduğu karara yaklaşımının genel bir analizini yapmaktadır. İngiliz parlamento tutanaklarının detaylı bir şekilde incelenmesi sonucunda ortaya çıkan bu çalışma, İngiltere’nin Kıbrıs politikası ve Türk-İngiliz ilişkileri konu başlıklarında alana katkı sunmaktadır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Cyprus has for many years attracted international attention due to its strategic location. The island came under Ottoman rule in 1571. In 1878, British forces took over the island from the Ottoman administration, in exchange for protection against Russian attacks. In response to the entry of the Ottoman Empire into the First World War on the side of Germany, Britain added the island unilaterally to its own territory on 5 November 1914. During the negotiations in Lausanne, the Turkish side accepted that Cyprus belonged to Britain. The declaration of the establishment of the Turkish Republic of Cyprus took place on 16 August 1960, with both Turkish and Greek Cypriots taking part in the administration of the country. However, the Republic of Cyprus was not able to continue for long. Clashes resumed on the island after Makarios attempted to restrict the rights acquired by the Cypriot Turks in the 1960 constitution.

Following the collapse of the Republic of Cyprus in December 1963, Turkish Cypriots established their own administration on the island. First, a separate Turkish administration called “General Committee” was established in 1964. Then, in November 1967, the Provisional Turkish Cypriot Administration was established. Thus, Turkish Cypriots tried to ensure their security in a more organized way. Britain did not support the steps taken by the Turkish Cypriots on the island. After Turkey’s 1974 military intervention, the Autonomous Turkish Cypriot Administration was established in October 1974 in the north of the island. On February 13, 1975, the founding of the Turkish Federated State of Cyprus (TFSC) was announced.

Against this background, this study deals with the response of the British parliament to the declaration of the establishment of the TFSC by Turkish Cypriots in 1975. One of the countries that reacted strongly to the Turkish military intervention on the island in 1974 was Britain. The announcement of the establishment of the TFSC also provoked a strong reaction from Britain. In the statements made by the British government, the establishment of the TFSC was declared to be an “undesired development”. This study examines the approach of British MPs to the TFSC through discussions in the House of Commons.

The first result of the study shows that British MPs did not support the announcement of the establishment of the TFSC. British MPs reacted to this and they questioned whether the British government knew about this announcement beforehand. British MPs also sought an answer to the question of why the government had not taken any steps to prevent the establishment of the TFSC. British government officials emphasized in their statements that they did not know that the founding of the TFSC would be announced. In addition, they expressed with certainty that the newly established Turkish administration would not be recognized by Britain. Another point that the study draws attention to was that because Ankara supported the TFSC, some MPs wanted the British government to “punish” Turkey. Moreover, one member of parliament wanted the British government to work for the suspension of Turkeys’ UN membership. However, British government officials stated that they did not support such a proposal.

Some MPs expressed in the British parliament that Britain, which is one of the guarantor states in Cyprus, should take more initiative in seeking a resolution to the Cyprus problem. In response to this proposal, government officials pointed out the necessity to continue negotiations between the Turkish and Greek Cypriots for peace in Cyprus. British deputies expressed that there would be no results from long-standing inter-communal talks. They argued that the British government should follow a more active policy for peace in Cyprus. Government officials disagreed with these suggestions and stated that Britain could not act alone. Other guarantor states in Cyprus would have to agree together on a solution. Thus, the government did not take into consideration the active policy proposal for a solution to the Cyprus problem. Finally, another issue that came up after the announcement of the establishment of the TFSC was the situation of British citizens on the island. Some MPs proposed to open an official representative office within the boundaries of the TFSC for British citizens. However, British government officials opposed this proposal. 

As a result, MPs in the British parliament did not accept the announcement of the TFSC. Furthermore, there were deputies who said that the Turks should not be declared solely responsible for the Cyprus problem. However, this view did not cause any change in the policy of the British government and the TFSC was not recognized by the British government.


PDF View

References

  • Avam Kamarası (House of Commons, HC) google scholar
  • 14 February 1975, Volume: 886, Column: 779. google scholar
  • Volume: 886, Column: 780. Volume: 886, Column: 781. google scholar
  • Volume: 886, Column: 782. Volume: 886, Column: 783. google scholar
  • Volume: 886, Column: 784. google scholar
  • Volume: 886, Column: 785. 19 February 1975, google scholar
  • Volume: 886, Column: 1309. Volume: 886, Column: 1310. google scholar
  • Volume: 886, Column: 1311. google scholar
  • Volume: 886, Column: 1312. 24 February 1975, google scholar
  • Volume: 887, Column: 27-28. google scholar
  • Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) google scholar
  • FCO 9/2149, “Cyprus: Annual Review for 1974”, 21 February 1975. google scholar
  • FCO 9/2158 “Turkish Cypriot Administration: Turkish Federated State of Cyprus (TFSC)”: Confidential Telegram from the British High Commission in Nicosia to FCO, no: 180, 13 February 1975. google scholar
  • Unclassified Telegram from the British Embassy in Ankara to FCO, no: 283, 13 February 1975. google scholar
  • “Declaration of Turkish Cypriot State”, flash telegram from the British High Commission in Nicosia to FCO, no: 174, 13 February. google scholar
  • “Record of Conversation between Roy Hattersley and Turgut Menemencioğlu, the Turkish Ambassador”, 14 February 1975. google scholar
  • FCO 51/47, “Foreign And Commonwealth Affair‘s Research Department Memorandum”, 4 December 1968. google scholar
  • (Cabinet) CAB 128/43, “Post War Conclusion”, CC (68), 9th conclusion, 18 January 1968. google scholar
  • Bölükbaşı, Süha: Superpowers and the Third World: Turkish American Relations and Cyprus, Lanham, University Press of America, 1988. google scholar
  • Denktash, Rauf: The Cyprus Triangle, Nicosia, K. Rustem & Bro, 1982. google scholar
  • Dodd, Clement H: The Crisis of Turkish Democracy, North Humberside, The Eothen Press, 1983. google scholar
  • Ertekün, Necati Münir: Inter-Communal Talks and The Cyprus Problem, Nicosia, Turkish Federated State of Cyprus, 1977. google scholar
  • Joseph, Joseph S.: Cyprus: Ethnic Conflict and International Politics from Independence to the Threshold of the European Union, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 1997. google scholar
  • Michael Harbottle: The Impartial Soldier, London, Oxford University Press, 1970. google scholar
  • Mirbagheri, Farid: Cyprus and International Peacekeeping, London, Hurst & Company, 1998. google scholar
  • Orr, Charles William James: Cyprus under British Rule, London, Zeno, 1972. google scholar
  • Reddaway, John: Burdened with Cyprus: the British Connection, London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1986. google scholar
  • Tamçelik, Soyalp: Kıbrıs’ın İngiliz İdaresine Geçişi (1878-1919), Lefkoşa, KKTC Cumhurbaşkanlığı Yayınları, 1997. google scholar
  • Tamkoç, Metin: The Turkish Cypriot State: The Embodiment of the Right of Selfdetermination, London, K. Rustem & Brother, 1988. google scholar
  • Wiener, Sharon Anderholm: Turkish Foreign Policy Decision-Making on the Cyprus Issue: A Comparative Analysis of Three Crises, (Ph.D. Thesis), Duke University, 1980. google scholar
  • Yavuzalp, Ercüment: Kıbrıs Yangınında Büyükelçilik, Ankara, Bilgi Yayınevi, 1993. google scholar
  • Alacı, Beral: “Hürriyet Partisi’nin Türk Siyasi Hayatındaki Yeri (1955-1958)”, Türk Yurdu, C. 31, S. 290, s. 134-144. google scholar
  • Babaoğlu, Resul: “Türkiye’nin Kıbrıs Politikasının Evriminde Bir Dönüm Noktası: Londra Konferansı (29 Ağustos-6 Eylül 1955)”, Çağdaş Türkiye Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi, C. 18, S. 36, 2018, s. 323-347. google scholar
  • Bahcheli, Tozun: “Searching for a Cyprus Settlement: Considering Options for Creating a Federation, a Confederation, or Two Independent States”, Publius, Vol: 30, No: 1, Winter 2000, s. 203-216. google scholar
  • Camp, Glen D.: “Greek-Turkish Conflict over Cyprus”, Political Science Quarterly, Vol: 95, No: 1, Spring 1980, s. 43-70. google scholar
  • Coşkun, Yasin: “Kıbrıs Türk Federe Devleti’nin (KTFD) İlanından Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti’nin (KKTC) Kuruluşuna Kadar Olan Süreçte Kıbrıs Sorunu (19751983)”, Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, S. 64, 2018, s. 119-143. google scholar
  • Fırat, Melek: “Yunanistan’la İlişkiler”, Türk Dış Politikası, ed. Baskın Oran, C. I (19191980), İstanbul, İletişim Yayınları, 2009, s. 716-768. google scholar
  • Fisher, Ronald J.: “Cyprus: The Failure of Mediation and the Escalation of an IdentityBased Conflict to an Adversarial Impasse”, Journal of Peace Research, Vol: 38, No: 3, Special Issue on Conflict Resolution inIdentity-Based Disputes, May, 2001, s. 307-326. google scholar
  • Göktepe, Cihat: “The Cyprus Crisis of 1967 and its Effects on Turkey’s Foreign Relations”, Middle Eastern Studies, C. 41, S. 3, s. 431-444. google scholar
  • Kaya, Yakup - Yeter, Bülent: “Demokrat Parti Döneminde Kıbrıs Sorunu”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, C. 20, S. 2, 2018, s. 215-229. google scholar
  • Norma, Salem: “The Constitution of and its Failure”, Cyprus A Regional Conflict and its Resolution, ed. Norma Salem, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 1992, s. 117-126. google scholar
  • Sarıkoyuncu Değerli, Esra: “Demokrat Parti Döneminde Türkiye’nin Kıbrıs Politikası (1950–1960)”, Akademik Bakış, C. 6, S. 11, 2012, s. 85-101. google scholar
  • Şahin, İsmail: “İngiltere’nin Akdeniz Siyasetinde Kıbrıs (1580-1878)”, Asia Minor Studies, C. 4, S. 7, 2016, s. 149-176. google scholar
  • Turan, Orhan: “Kıbrıs Ermeni Toplumu ve Ermeni Kilisesine Dair Bir İngiliz Raporu (1960-1963)”, Tarih ve Gelecek Dergisi, C. 5, S. 3, Aralık-2019, s. 712-723. google scholar
  • (Çevrimiçi), http://www.mfa.gov.tr/ingiltere-siyasi-gorunumu.tr.mfa, 15.05.2020. google scholar
  • (Çevrimiçi), https://members.parliament.uk/member/1327/career, 09.03.2020. google scholar
  • (Çevrimiçi), https://members.parliament.uk/member/1700/career, 12.03.2020. google scholar
  • (Çevrimiçi), https://members.parliament.uk/member/1007/career, 17.03.2020. google scholar
  • (Çevrimiçi), https://members.parliament.uk/member/941/career, 18.03.2020. google scholar
  • (Çevrimiçi), https://members.parliament.uk/member/1337/career, 19.03.2020. google scholar
  • (Çevrimiçi), https://members.parliament.uk/member/857/career, 06.04.2020. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Coşkun, Y. (2020). The Reaction of the British Parliament to the Establishment of the Turkish Federated State of Cyprus (1975). Recent Period Turkish Studies, 0(37), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.26650/YTA2020-001


AMA

Coşkun Y. The Reaction of the British Parliament to the Establishment of the Turkish Federated State of Cyprus (1975). Recent Period Turkish Studies. 2020;0(37):1-19. https://doi.org/10.26650/YTA2020-001


ABNT

Coşkun, Y. The Reaction of the British Parliament to the Establishment of the Turkish Federated State of Cyprus (1975). Recent Period Turkish Studies, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 37, p. 1-19, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Coşkun, Yasin,. 2020. “The Reaction of the British Parliament to the Establishment of the Turkish Federated State of Cyprus (1975).” Recent Period Turkish Studies 0, no. 37: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.26650/YTA2020-001


Chicago: Humanities Style

Coşkun, Yasin,. The Reaction of the British Parliament to the Establishment of the Turkish Federated State of Cyprus (1975).” Recent Period Turkish Studies 0, no. 37 (May. 2021): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.26650/YTA2020-001


Harvard: Australian Style

Coşkun, Y 2020, 'The Reaction of the British Parliament to the Establishment of the Turkish Federated State of Cyprus (1975)', Recent Period Turkish Studies, vol. 0, no. 37, pp. 1-19, viewed 16 May. 2021, https://doi.org/10.26650/YTA2020-001


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Coşkun, Y. (2020) ‘The Reaction of the British Parliament to the Establishment of the Turkish Federated State of Cyprus (1975)’, Recent Period Turkish Studies, 0(37), pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.26650/YTA2020-001 (16 May. 2021).


MLA

Coşkun, Yasin,. The Reaction of the British Parliament to the Establishment of the Turkish Federated State of Cyprus (1975).” Recent Period Turkish Studies, vol. 0, no. 37, 2020, pp. 1-19. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/YTA2020-001


Vancouver

Coşkun Y. The Reaction of the British Parliament to the Establishment of the Turkish Federated State of Cyprus (1975). Recent Period Turkish Studies [Internet]. 16 May. 2021 [cited 16 May. 2021];0(37):1-19. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/YTA2020-001 doi: 10.26650/YTA2020-001


ISNAD

Coşkun, Yasin. The Reaction of the British Parliament to the Establishment of the Turkish Federated State of Cyprus (1975)”. Recent Period Turkish Studies 0/37 (May. 2021): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.26650/YTA2020-001



TIMELINE


Submitted30.04.2020
Accepted17.05.2020
Published Online25.06.2020

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.