Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences

GÖNDERBİLGİ
EnglishTürkçe

Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/siyasal.2022.31.1118613   IUP :10.26650/siyasal.2022.31.1118613    Tam Metin (PDF)

Eski Sovyet Coğrafyasında Norm Mücadelesi ve Yumuşak Güç Dengesi: Avrasya Ekonomik Birliği ve Avrupa Birliği Arasındaki Rekabet

Murat Güneylioğlu

Bu makale, Avrupa Birliği (AB) ve Rusya liderliğindeki Avrasya Ekonomik Birliği (AEB) arasındaki güç rekabeti esasına dayanan norm mücadelesini incelemektedir. Son yıllarda AEB’nin bölgesel çekiciliği artarken; AB’nin cazibesi kendi iç sorunları, daha fazla genişlemenin önündeki engeller, renkli devrimlerin başarısızlığı, bölgede otoriterliğin ve milliyetçiliğin yükselişi gibi nedenlerle azalmaktadır. Bu durum, Rusya’nın kendi koşulları ve liderliği altında alternatif bir bölgesel yönetişim mekanizması oluşturarak bölgesel etki alanını sağlamlaştırması yolunda önemli avantajlar sağlamıştır. Makale, AB ve AEB’nin örgütsel yapılarını ve normatif gündemlerini karşılaştırmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, Rusya’nın projesinin bölge ülkelerinin artan ulusal egemenlik talepleri ve bölgesel ekonomik işbirliği ihtiyacı arasındaki çelişkiyi nasıl uzlaştırdığı analiz edilmektedir. Çalışma, AB’nin bölgede bıraktığı yumuşak güç boşluğunun; egemenlik ve güçlü liderlik gibi “geleneksel Avrasya değerleri” olarak tanımlanan unsurlara dayalı normatif bir çerçeve geliştiren Rusya tarafından doldurulmakta olduğunu savunmaktadır. Makale, bu tür değerler ve AEB’nin belirli bölge ülkeleri nazarında artan cazibesi arasındaki bağlantıları karşılaştırmalı bir perspektiften incelemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Norm mücadelesi, Yumuşak güç, Avrasya Ekonomik Birliği, Avrupa Birliği, Bölgesel entegrasyon
DOI :10.26650/siyasal.2022.31.1118613   IUP :10.26650/siyasal.2022.31.1118613    Tam Metin (PDF)

The Norm Contestation and the Balance of Soft Power in the Post-Soviet Region: The Eurasian Economic Union versus the European Union

Murat Güneylioğlu

This paper examines the power political norm contestation between the European Union (EU) and the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). In recent years, the EAEU has increased its regional attractiveness, while the EU’s appeal has declined due to its internal problems, the impediments to further enlargement, the failure of color revolutions, and the rise of authoritarianism and nationalism in the region. This situation has provided Russia with significant advantages in consolidating its regional sphere of influence through promoting an alternative regional governance mechanism under its own terms and leadership. The paper compares the organizational structures and normative agendas of the EU and the EAEU. In this regard, it analyzes how Russia’s project reconciles regional countries’ increasing demand for national sovereignty with their need for regional economic cooperation. The paper argues that the soft power vacuum left by the EU in the region is being filled by Russia which has not behaved solely as a “spoiler” but developed a normative framework based on sovereignty, strong leadership, and other so-called “traditional Eurasian values.” The paper examines the links between those values and the EAEU’s rising attractiveness for some regional countries from a comparative perspective.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Norm contestation, Soft power, Eurasian Economic Union, European Union, Regional integration

PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Acharya, A. (2016). Regionalism beyond EU-centrism. In Börzel T.A. & Risse T. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (pp. 109-30). Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Allison, R. (2018). Protective Integration and Security Policy Coordination: Comparing the SCO and CSTO. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 11(3), 297-338. google scholar
  • Bayramov, V. (2013). Considering Accession to the Eurasian Economic Union: For Azerbaijan, Disadvantages Outweigh Advantages. Caucasus Analytical Digest. No. 51-52, June, 17, 14-16, https://www.files.ethz.ch/ isn/166585/CAD-51-52.pdf (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Bettiza, G., & Lewis, D. (2020). Authoritarian powers and norm contestation in the liberal international order: Theorizing the Power Politics of Ideas and Identity. Journal of Global Security Studies, 5(4), 559-577. google scholar
  • Busygina, I., & Filippov, M. (2018). Russia and the Eurasian Economic Union: Conflicting Incentives for an Institutional Compromise. Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 31/IR/2018. google scholar
  • Busygina, I., & Filippov, M. (2020). Russia, Post-Soviet Integration, and the EAEU: The Balance between Domination and Cooperation. Problems of Post-Communism, 1-10. google scholar
  • Chebankova, E. (2016). Contemporary Russian Conservatism. Post-Soviet Affairs, 32(1), 28-54. google scholar
  • Cooley, A. (2015). Authoritarianism goes global: Countering democratic norms. Journal of Democracy, 26(3), 49-63. google scholar
  • de Waal (2014). Azerbaijan doesn’t want to be Western. Foreign Affairs. September 26, https://www. foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/2014-09-26/azerbaijan-doesnt-want-be-western (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Del Medico, N. (2014). A Black Knight in the Eastern Neighbourhood? Russia and EU Democracy Promotion in Armenia and Moldova. EU Diplomacy Paper No. 7, October. google scholar
  • Demes, P. (2011). Twenty years of Western Democracy Assistance in Central and Eastern Europe. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. Stockholm. https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/ publications/chapters/the-role-of-the-european-union-in-democracy-building/eu-democracy-building-discussion-paper-47.pdf (Acessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Diuk, N. (2014). Euromaidan: Ukraine’s self-organizing revolution. World Affairs, 176(6), 9-16. google scholar
  • Dragneva, R. (2016). The Eurasian Economic Union: Balancing sovereignty and integration. Institute of European Law Working Papers. No 10. google scholar
  • Dragneva, R., & Wolczuk, K. (2015). Ukraine between the EU and Russia: The integration challenge. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Dragneva, R., & Wolczuk, K. (2017). The Eurasian Economic Union: Deals, Rules and the Exercise of Power. Chatham House Research Paper, Royal Institute of International Affairs, London. google scholar
  • EC (2003). Wider Europe— Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours. Brussels, March, 11, https://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/enp/pdf/pdf/com03_104_en.pdf (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Euractiv (2017a). Moldovan president hopes to cancel EU Association Agreement. January 17, https://www. euractiv.com/section/enlargement/news/moldovan-president-hopes-to-cancel-eu-association-agreement/ (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Euractiv (2017b). Moldova granted observer status in Eurasian Union. April 19, https://www.euractiv.com/ section/europe-s-east/news/moldova-granted-observer-status-in-eurasian-union/ (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Felgenhauer, P. (2014). Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus Form Eurasian Economic Union. Eurasia Daily Monitor, Vol. 11, Issue: 100, https://jamestown.org/program/russia-kazakhstan-and-belarus-form-eurasian-economic-union/ (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Financial Times (2019). Vladimir Putin says liberalism has ‘become obsolete’. June, 27, https://www.ft.com/ content/670039ec-98f3-11e9-9573-ee5cbb98ed36 (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Freedom House (2021). Nations in Transit: The Antidemocratic Turn. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/ files/2021-04/NIT_2021_final_042321.pdf (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Gallup (2015). Rating World Leaders: What People Worldwide Think of the U.S., China, Russia, the EU and Germany, http://www.gallup.com/services/182771/rating-world-leaders-report-download.aspx (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Gallup (2017). Global Leaders. October-December, https://www.gallup-international.com/fileadmin/user_ upload/surveys/2017/2017_Global-Leaders.pdf (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Goddard, S. E., & Nexon, D. H. (2016). The dynamics of global power politics: A framework for analysis. Journal of Global Security Studies, 1(1), 4-18. google scholar
  • Gürcan, E. C. (2020). The construction of “post-hegemonic multipolarity” in Eurasia: A comparative perspective. The Japanese Political Economy, 46(2-3), 127-151. google scholar
  • Herd, G. P. (2014). The “Battle of Ideas, Concepts, and Geopolitical Projects” in Central Asia: Implications for Russo-Chinese Relations? Shifting Priorities in Russia’s Foreign and Security Policy (pp. 183-204). New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Horemuz, M. (2015). Economic Integration of the Post-Soviet Space and Soft Power of Russian Federation. Politicke vedy, 18(2), 8-24. google scholar
  • Ioffe, G. (2021). The Complexities of Measuring Belarusian Public Opinion. Eurasia Daily Monitor. Vol.18, No: 22, https://jamestown.org/program/the-complexities-of-measuring-belarusian-public-opinion/ (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • IPSA (2021). Congress Theme New Nationalisms in an Open World. https://wc2021.ipsa.org/wc/congress-theme (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • IRI (2018). Public Opinion Survey: Residents of Armenia. July 23-August 15, https://www.iri.org/sites/default/ files/2018.10.9_armenia_poll_presentation.pdf (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Kalay, G. (2021). Eurasian Economic Union Factor in Uzbekistan Foreign Policy. ANKASAM, May, 27, https://www.ankasam.org/en/eurasian-economic-union-factor-in-uzbekistan-foreign-policy/ (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Kasymov, S. (2012). Statism in Russia: The implications for US-Russian relations. Journal of 'Eurasian Studies, 3(1), 58-68. google scholar
  • Keating, V. C., & Kaczmarska, K. (2019). Conservative soft power: liberal soft power bias and the ‘hidden’attraction of Russia. Journal of International Relations and Development, 22(1), 1-27. google scholar
  • Kennedy, R. (2016). The limits of soft balancing: the frozen conflict in Transnistria and the challenge to EU and NATO strategy. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 27(3), 512-537. google scholar
  • Keohane, R. O. (2009). The old IPE and the new. Review of International Political Economy, 16(1), 34-46. google scholar
  • Keohane, R. O., & Martin, L. L. (1995). The promise of institutionalist theory. International security, 20(1), 39-51. google scholar
  • Khitakhunov, A., Mukhamediyev, B. & Pomfret, R. (2017). Eurasian Economic Union: Present and future perspectives. Econ Change Restruct, 50, 59-77. google scholar
  • Kobayashi, K. (2017). Competing Regional Orders in the Shared Neighborhood: The EU, Russia, and the Norm Contestation in the Post-Soviet Space. Online Paper Published by the Ghent Russia Platform, October 2017, https://www.ugent.be/russiaplatform/en/colloquium/kazushige-kobayashi-paper.pdf/@@download/ file/Kobayashi%20-%20paper.pdf (Accessed on 20.006.2021). google scholar
  • Krastev, I. (2006). ‘Sovereign Democracy’ Russian-style, Open Democracy, November 16, https://www. opendemocracy.net/globalization-institutions_government/sovereign_democracy_4104.jsp (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Krastev, I., & Leonard, M. (2007). New world order: The balance of soft power and the rise of herbivorous powers. Europe Council on Foreign Relations, https://ecfr.eu/wp-content/uploads/ECFR-01_NEW_ WORLD_ORDER_-_THE_BALANCE_OF_SOFT_POWER.pdf (Accessed on 20.006.2021). google scholar
  • Kucera, J. (2019). Following revolution, Armenia comes to terms with Eurasian Union, Eurasianet, September 30, -- https://eurasianet.org/following-revolution-armenia-comes-to-terms-with-eurasian-union (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Lomia, E. (2020). The Evaluation of Russia’s foreign policy towards Georgia following the ‘Rose Revolution’. Journal of Liberty and International affairs, 6(1), 112-128. google scholar
  • Lukin, A. (2014). Eurasian Integration and the Clash of Values. Survival, 56(3), 43-60. google scholar
  • Marszewski M. (2018). Thaw in Uzbekistan. Reforms by President Mirziyoyev. OSW Commentary. No. 278, July 16, https://www.osw.waw.pl/sites/default/files/commentary_278.pdf (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Matsaberidze, D. (2015). Russia vs. EU/US through Georgia and Ukraine. Connections, 14(2), 77-86. google scholar
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994). The False Promise of International Institutions. International security, 19(3), 5-49. google scholar
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2013). Structural realism. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds.), International relations theories: Discipline and diversity (3rd ed., pp. 77-93). Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Meister S. (2018). Hedging and Wedging: Strategies to Contest Russia’s Leadership in Post-Soviet Eurasia. In Ebert H. & Flemes D. (eds) Regional Powers and Contested Leadership (pp. 301-326). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Mitchell, L. A. (2012). The color revolutions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. google scholar
  • Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. google scholar
  • Mostafa, G., & Mahmood, M. (2018). Eurasian Economic Union: Evolution, challenges and possible future directions. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 9(2), 163-172. google scholar
  • Nikitina, Y. (2014). The” Color Revolutions” and” Arab Spring” in Russian Official Discourse. Connections, 14(1), 87-104. google scholar
  • Noutcheva, G. (2018). Whose legitimacy? The EU and Russia in contest for the eastern neighbourhood. Democratization, 25(2), 312-330. google scholar
  • Nye Jr., J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, New York: Public Affairs. google scholar
  • Omelicheva, M. Y. (2015). Democracy in Central Asia: Competing perspectives and alternative strategies. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky. google scholar
  • Orlov, D. (2008). The new Russian age and sovereign democracy. Russian Politics & Law, 46(5), 72-76. google scholar
  • OSW (2021). Belarusians on Poland, Russia and themselves. January 29, https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/ osw-commentary/2021-01-29/belarusians-poland-russia-and-themselves (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Plekhanov, S. M. (2016). Assisted suicide: Internal and external causes of the Ukrainian Crisis. In J. L. Black & M. Johns (Eds.), The Return of the Cold War: Ukraine, the West and Russia (pp. 3-25). New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • RFE/RL, (2020). Armenians See Russia As ‘Savior’ Not ‘Scapegoat’ In Nagorno-Karabakh War. November 24, https://www.rferl.org/a/armenians-see-russia-as-savior-not-scapegoat-in-nagorno-karabakh-war/30966988. html (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Rivera, P. P., & Garashchuk, A. (2016). The Eurasian Economic Union: prospective regional integration in the post-Soviet space or just geopolitical project? Eastern Journal of European Studies, 7(2), 91-110. google scholar
  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2005). The EU: Promoting Liberal-Democracy through Membership Conditionality. In T. Flockhart (Ed.), Socializing Democratic Norms (pp. 106-126). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Sergi, B. S. (2018). Putin’s and Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union: A hybrid half-economics and half-political “Janus Bifrons”. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 9(1), 52-60. google scholar
  • Shahbazov, F. (2021). Azerbaijan Feels Pressure to Join Moscow-Dominated Eurasian Economic Union. google scholar
  • Eurasia Daily Monitor. Vol. 18, Issue: 68, https://jamestown.org/program/azerbaijan-feels-pressure-to-join-moscow-dominated-eurasian-economic-union/ (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Simionov, L. M. (2013). Setbacks and achievements in managing the Eastern Neighbourhood. CES Working Papers, 5(1), 111-128. google scholar
  • Suveica, S. (2014). Crisis in Ukraine: A Quest for Moldovan Territorial Integrity. Südosteuropa, 62(2), 208-220. google scholar
  • Tatiashvili, N. (2016). The EAP: A Failure of the European Neighbourhood Policy or Sharing a Power Balance in the Neighbourhood? CES Working Papers, 8(3), 522-539. google scholar
  • Terzyan, A. (2020). Political Freedoms and Human Rights in Eurasian Economic Union Countries: The Cases of Russia, Armenia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan. Center for East European and Russian Studies. Eurasian Affairs Research Papers, No. 2, http://eurasiainstitutes.org/files/file/22_human_rights_in_eaeu_countries. pdf (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • The Diplomat (2016). Will Kyrgyzstan Leave the Eurasian Economic Union? August 9, https://thediplomat. com/2016/08/will-kyrgyzstan-leave-the-eurasian-economic-union/ (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • The Diplomat (2020). Uzbekistan Joins Online Eurasian Economic Union Meeting as an Observer. December 14, https://thediplomat.com/2020/12/uzbekistan-joins-online-eurasian-economic-union-meeting-as-an-observer/ (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • The Diplomat (2021). Will Tajikistan Ever Join the Eurasian Economic Union? August, 10, https://thediplomat. com/2020/08/will-tajikistan-ever-join-the-eurasian-economic-union/ (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Todua, Z. (2007). Russia Must Regain the Initiative in Moldova. Russia in Global Affairs. February 11, https:// eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/n_7987 (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Tolipov, F. (2019). History Repeats Itself: Uzbekistan’s New Eurasian Gamble. The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst. November 22, https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/13596-history-repeats-itself-uzbekistans-new-eurasian-gamble.html (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Treaty on Eurasian Economic Union (2014) https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/acc_e/kaz_e/ WTACCKAZ85_LEG_1.pdf (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Turchyn, Y. B., & Ivasechko, O. Y (2020). Countries of the South Caucasus in the focus of the eastern policy of the European Union. nonimuuHe ^umm^, 4, 108-114. google scholar
  • Ultan, M. O., & Ornek, S. (2015). Euroscepticism in the European Union. International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 49-57. google scholar
  • Valiyev, A. (2016). Azerbaijan: Perspectives on Eurasian integration. ECFR. June 8, https://ecfr.eu/article/ essay_eurasian_integration_azerbaijan/ (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Vasilyan, S. (2017). “Swinging on a Pendulum” Armenia in the Eurasian Economic Union and With the European Union. Problems of Post-Communism, 64(1), 32-46. google scholar
  • Volovoj, V. (2017). How the West lost Moldova to Russia. AntePortas—Studia nadBezpieczenstwem, 1, 47-59. google scholar
  • Waever, O. (1996). The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate. In S. Smith, K. Booth, & M. Zalewski (Eds.), International theory: Positivism and beyond (pp. 149-185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Walker, C. (2016). The Authoritarian Threat: The Hijacking of” Soft Power”. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 49-63. google scholar
  • Weiss, A. S. (2020). With Friends Like These: The Kremlin’s Far-right and Populist Connections in Italy and Austria. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. google scholar
  • Wigell, M., Scholvin, S., & Aaltola, M. (2018). Geo-economics and power politics in the 21st century: The revival of economic statecraft. New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Wilson Center (2020). No Great Game: Central Asia’s Public Opinions on Russia, China, and the U.S, No. 56, August, https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/media/uploads/documents/KI_200805_cable%20 56_final.pdf (Accessed on 20.06.2021). google scholar
  • Yesevi, Ç. G. (2014). New regionalism in post-soviet territory: Evolution from Eurasian Economic Community to Eurasian Economic Union. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23), 1986-1994. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Güneylioğlu, M. (2022). Eski Sovyet Coğrafyasında Norm Mücadelesi ve Yumuşak Güç Dengesi: Avrasya Ekonomik Birliği ve Avrupa Birliği Arasındaki Rekabet. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, 31(2), 323-347. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2022.31.1118613


AMA

Güneylioğlu M. Eski Sovyet Coğrafyasında Norm Mücadelesi ve Yumuşak Güç Dengesi: Avrasya Ekonomik Birliği ve Avrupa Birliği Arasındaki Rekabet. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences. 2022;31(2):323-347. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2022.31.1118613


ABNT

Güneylioğlu, M. Eski Sovyet Coğrafyasında Norm Mücadelesi ve Yumuşak Güç Dengesi: Avrasya Ekonomik Birliği ve Avrupa Birliği Arasındaki Rekabet. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, [Publisher Location], v. 31, n. 2, p. 323-347, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Güneylioğlu, Murat,. 2022. “Eski Sovyet Coğrafyasında Norm Mücadelesi ve Yumuşak Güç Dengesi: Avrasya Ekonomik Birliği ve Avrupa Birliği Arasındaki Rekabet.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 31, no. 2: 323-347. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2022.31.1118613


Chicago: Humanities Style

Güneylioğlu, Murat,. “Eski Sovyet Coğrafyasında Norm Mücadelesi ve Yumuşak Güç Dengesi: Avrasya Ekonomik Birliği ve Avrupa Birliği Arasındaki Rekabet.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 31, no. 2 (Sep. 2024): 323-347. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2022.31.1118613


Harvard: Australian Style

Güneylioğlu, M 2022, 'Eski Sovyet Coğrafyasında Norm Mücadelesi ve Yumuşak Güç Dengesi: Avrasya Ekonomik Birliği ve Avrupa Birliği Arasındaki Rekabet', Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 323-347, viewed 16 Sep. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2022.31.1118613


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Güneylioğlu, M. (2022) ‘Eski Sovyet Coğrafyasında Norm Mücadelesi ve Yumuşak Güç Dengesi: Avrasya Ekonomik Birliği ve Avrupa Birliği Arasındaki Rekabet’, Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, 31(2), pp. 323-347. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2022.31.1118613 (16 Sep. 2024).


MLA

Güneylioğlu, Murat,. “Eski Sovyet Coğrafyasında Norm Mücadelesi ve Yumuşak Güç Dengesi: Avrasya Ekonomik Birliği ve Avrupa Birliği Arasındaki Rekabet.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, vol. 31, no. 2, 2022, pp. 323-347. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2022.31.1118613


Vancouver

Güneylioğlu M. Eski Sovyet Coğrafyasında Norm Mücadelesi ve Yumuşak Güç Dengesi: Avrasya Ekonomik Birliği ve Avrupa Birliği Arasındaki Rekabet. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences [Internet]. 16 Sep. 2024 [cited 16 Sep. 2024];31(2):323-347. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2022.31.1118613 doi: 10.26650/siyasal.2022.31.1118613


ISNAD

Güneylioğlu, Murat. “Eski Sovyet Coğrafyasında Norm Mücadelesi ve Yumuşak Güç Dengesi: Avrasya Ekonomik Birliği ve Avrupa Birliği Arasındaki Rekabet”. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 31/2 (Sep. 2024): 323-347. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2022.31.1118613



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim19.05.2022
Kabul05.10.2022
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma08.11.2022

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.