Research Article


DOI :10.17064/iuifd.278412   IUP :10.17064/iuifd.278412    Full Text (PDF)

A Public Relations Utopia: Dialogical Public Relations

Beris Artan Özoran

In this article, dialogical public relations, which has been frequently discussed among public relations scholars since the emergence of the Internet, is considered the ‘utopic’ approach. A dialectic approach is used while discussing the practicality of dialogical public relations, and this study follows the steps that Ollman (2011) defines as a ‘dance’. In a dialectic way of thinking, it is very important to understand how pieces fit into the whole, and this article first examines why ‘dialogical public relations’ is considered as the utopia and the relationship between dialogical public relations and the information society. Second, examining a ‘concept’ separately from its past means detaching it from its context and ignoring its meaning within the whole. Therefore, the basic approaches to public relations before the emergence of dialogical public relations were discussed here. Third, the practicality of dialogical public relations is discussed in the contexts of ‘public’ and ‘organization’, which were transformed in times that could be defined as postmodern, late modern, flexible capitalist or post-industrialist. 

DOI :10.17064/iuifd.278412   IUP :10.17064/iuifd.278412    Full Text (PDF)

Bir Halkla İlişkiler Ütopyası: Diyalojik Halkla İlişkiler

Beris Artan Özoran

Bu makalede özellikle internetin gelişimden sonra sıklıkla tartışılan diyalojik halkla ilişkiler yaklaşımı bir ütopya olarak ele alınmıştır. Halkla ilişkilerin daha etik bir versiyonu olduğu savunulan bu yaklaşımın uygulanabilirliği tartışılırken diyalektik yöntem kullanmıştır. Ollman’ın (2011), dans olarak tanımladığı diyalektik adımlar izlenmiştir. Diyalektik düşünme biçiminde parçanın bütünün içinde nasıl yer aldığı oldukça önemlidir. Bu nedenle öncelikle diyalojik halkla ilişkiler yaklaşımının neden bir ütopya olarak ele alındığı tartışıldıktan sonra bu yaklaşımın Enformasyon Toplumu yaklaşımı ile ilişkisi üzerinde durulmuştur. Bir kavramı tarihinden ayrı olarak incelemek, onu bağlamından koparmak ve bütün içindeki anlamını görmezden gelmektir. Bu nedenle ikinci olarak diyalojik halkla ilişkiler kavramı ortaya çıkana kadar, halkla ilişkiler alanında tartışılan temel yaklaşımlar ele alınmıştır. Üçüncü aşamada, postmodern, geç modern, esnek kapitalist ya da sanayi sonrası dönem olarak tanımlanabilecek yeni zamanlarda dönüşen ‘örgüt’ bağlamında diyalojik halkla ilişkilerin uygulanabilirliği tartışmaya açılmıştır. 


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


In this article, dialogical public relations, which has been frequently discussed among public relations scholars since the emergence of the Internet, is considered the ‘utopic’ approach. There are two main sides to the concept of utopia. The first emphasizes the impossibility of utopia as a place of ‘perfection’ that cannot be realized. The second states that creating utopia can open a window for ‘the better’. In this study, utopia was considered as a concept that includes two opposite approaches. One can say that utopia is important because it opens a discussion about a ‘better place’: in a broader scope for the world and in a narrower scope for a particular field (in this article that field is public relations). But at the same time, utopia’s compatibility with the real world and its practical application within the existing system must be discussed. Within this framework, ‘dialogical public relations’ was discussed as a utopic approach because it presents a new perspective by offering a more ethical model for public relations. However, its practicality in the existing capitalist world is controversial.

The aim of this article is to evaluate the ‘dialogical public relations’ approach and discuss this within the context; for this purpose, the dialectic approach was used and the four steps that Ollman (2011) defines as a ‘dance’ were followed. The first step is analysis, and here the dialogical public relations approach was discussed in the context of utopia and an information society. In a dialectic way of thinking, it is very important to understand how pieces fit within the whole. Therefore, this study discusses first why dialogical public relations is considered utopia and then the relationship between dialogical public relations with information society. The concept of ‘dialogical public relations’ cannot be considered separately from an information society. This PR approach has emerged as an extension of information society thesis; developments that use this approach are the dynamics of the information society and this society must exist to implement the model. In other words, for ‘dialogical public relations,’ the propositions presented by the information society must be realized. The second step is historicization. Examining a ‘concept’ separately from its past means detaching it from its context and ignoring its meaning within the whole (Ollman, 2011). Therefore, this study addressed the basic approaches to public relations before the concept of dialogical public relations emerged. The possibility of the realization of a ‘dialogical public relations’ is related to both the past and the present public relations practices. The third step is a move forward that aims to create an image of the future. For this step, the practicality of dialogical public relations was discussed in the context of ‘public’ and ‘organization,’ which were transformed in the times that could be defined as postmodern, late modern, flexible capitalist or post-industrialist. In addition, by examining the research on dialogical public relations, the applicability of this model was discussed.

As a result, in order to practice ‘dialogical public relations’, organizations should consider dialogue as an aim, not as a mean to realize its interests. However, within capitalist systems, the main aim of a commercial organization is profit maximization and public relations is used for the realization of the corporate purposes. For real dialogue to occur, organizations need to lose control and it is likely that that they would not want to take that risk. According to Theunissen and Noordin (2012) organizations only turn to dialogue when they think their existence depends on it (p. 12). Generally, the communication model that organizations use consists of a balance between persuasion and the dialogical model, because the dialogical model destabilizes the relationship between the organization and its public. Creating balance by persuasion is easier than using dialogue. 

Another problem regards the concept of the Internet. The Internet is an important part of the dialogical public relations. It can create new opportunities for public relations by direct communication through websites or social media channels and enable feedback practices. However, according to Kent and Taylor (1998) the Internet creates a potential for dialogue but it is not the only requirement (p. 325). Ethical public relations is not about answering and conversation, it necessitates dialogue and understanding. Therefore, one can say that using the Internet is not enough to form a dialogue.

Public relations practices can be transformational. However, it should be discussed whether this change is two-way symmetrical to dialogue, or a shift toward more control and manipulation. Simulation of dialogue over the Internet creates a feeling like a ‘real dialogue’; however, it is not possible to talk about a dialogue where two sides have equal conditions. So, it should not be forgotten that the Internet can create a ‘dialogue’ feeling in a world where ‘as if’ and reality are intertwined and use this to manipulate and control public needs and desires. When we consider utopias, we should consider their applicabilities but also answer the question of “whose utopia it is?” Dialogical public relations emerged as a utopia for the public, but it can be said that it transformed into a utopia for organizations.

In this article, dialogical public relations was discussed using three steps of dialectics. To conclude, it should not be forgotten that when we consider a dialogical public relations approach as a utopia, it offers new perspectives by questioning the existing system, even if it has a low potential for implementation in the existing system. With the emergence of this model, dialogue became a popular concept in public relations and scholars began to discuss how we can use the Internet to form a dialogue. What needs to be done now is to make ‘action plans’ for the last step of the dialectic dance. We should discuss new perspectives for more ethical public relations and alternative ways to form ‘real dialogue’.


PDF View

References

  • Aktaş Yamanoğlu, M., Gençtürk Hızal, S. & Özdemir, P. (2013). Türkiye’de halkla ilişkiler tarihi. Ankara: DeKi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Arslan, M. (2006). 20. yüzyıl teknolojik ütopyalarının, hareketlilik, esneklik/uyabilirlik ve teknoloji kavramları. (Unpublished master dissertation). İstanbul Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, Türkiye. google scholar
  • Başaran, F. (2010). İletişim teknolojileri ve toplumsal gelişme. Ankara: Ütopya Yayınları. google scholar
  • Bayar, Ö. (2006). Halkla ilişkiler ve etik. (Unpublished master dissertation). Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara, Türkiye. google scholar
  • Becerikli, S. (2008). Ve halkla ilişkiler. Ankara: Karınca Yayınları. google scholar
  • Bell, D. (1999). The coming of post-ındustrial society. NY: Basic Books. google scholar
  • Beniger, J. (1986). The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of ınformation society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. google scholar
  • Botan, C. (1997). Ethics in strategic communication campaigns: The case for a new approach to public relations. Journal of Business Communication, 34(2), 188-202. google scholar
  • Boztepe, H. (2014). Sivil toplum kuruluşlarında halkla ilişkiler: Kurumsal web sayfalarının bağışçı ilişkileri açısından fon sağlama aracı olarak kullanımı. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 3(4), 150-168. google scholar
  • Cha, H., Yeo S., & Kim, B. (2015). Exploring websites of foreign embassies as a dialogue space for diplomatic offices and foreign publics: Based on dialogic theory of public relations. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 10(2), 297-308. google scholar
  • Demirli, C. &, Kütük, Ö. (2010). Anlamsal web ve ontolojisine genel bir bakış. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(18), 95-105. google scholar
  • Dikmen, A. A. (2003a). Standart üründen marka standardizasyonuna. In E. Yeldan, A. Köse & F. Şenses (Eds.) Küresel Düzen: Birikim, Devlet ve Sınıflar (pp. 1-21) . İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. google scholar
  • Dikmen, A. A. (2003b). Küresel üretim. ASO Medya. Retrieved from: http://www.aso.org.tr/kurumsal/media/kaynak/TUR/asomedya/eylul-ekim2003/buyuteceylul-ekim2003.html google scholar
  • Dikmen, A. A. (2011). Makine, iş, kapitalizm ve insan. Ankara: Tan Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Dozier, D. &, Grunig, L. (2005). Halkla ilişkiler işlevinin örgütlenişi. In J. Grunig (Ed.), Halkla İlişkiler ve İletişim Yönetiminde Mükemmellik (pp. 417-239). İstanbul: Tribeca. google scholar
  • Dozier, D, Grunig, L., & Grınig, J. (2010). Manager’s Guide to Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. NY: Routledge. google scholar
  • Ertem Eray, T., (2016), Utilization of corporate websites as a dialogical public relations tool in Turkey. Global Media Journal, 6(12), 201-213. google scholar
  • Esrock, S. &, Leichty, G. (2000). Organization of corporate web pages: Publics and functions. Public Relations Research, 26(3), 327-344. google scholar
  • Frankel, B. (1991). Sanayi sonrası ütopyaları (K. Durand, Trans.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları. google scholar
  • Gordon, J. &, Berhow, S. (2009). University websites and dialogic features for building relationship with potential students. Public Relations Rewiev, 35(2), 150-152. google scholar
  • Grunig, J. &, Grunig, L. (2005). Halkla ilişkiler ve iletişim modelleri. In J. Grunig (Ed.) Halkla İlişkiler ve İletişim Yönetiminde Mükemmellik (pp. 307- 348). İstanbul: Tribeca,. google scholar
  • Grunig, J.(2009). Paradigms of global public relations in an age of digitalisation. Prism, 6(2), 1-19. google scholar
  • Hancock, P. &, Tyler, M. (2001). Work, postmodernism and organization: A critical ıntroduction. London: Sage . google scholar
  • Hon, L.C. &, Grunig, J.E. (1999). Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations. Institute for Public Relations. google scholar
  • İren, D. (2017). Dördüncü endüstri devrimi sanayinin dijitalleşmesi. Retrieved from http://www.endustri40.com/dorduncu-endustri-devrimi-sanayinin-dijitallesmesi/ google scholar
  • Kent, M. &, Lane, A.B. (2017). A rhizomatous metaphor for dialogic theory. Public Relations Review, 43(3), 568-578. google scholar
  • Kent, M. &, Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28, 21-37. google scholar
  • Kent, M. &, Taylor, M. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through te world wide web. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 321-334. google scholar
  • Kotler, P. &, Caslione, J. A. (2010). Kaos yönetimi: Çalkantılar çağında yönetim ve pazarlama (K. Dündar, Trans.). İstanbul: Optimist Yayınları. google scholar
  • Kumar, K. (2013). Çağdaş dünyanın yeni kuramları (M. Küçük, Trans.). İstanbul: Dost Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Kumar, K. (2005). Ütopyacılık (A. Somel, Trans.). İstanbul: İmge Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Küçüksaraç, B. (2008). Toplumsal örgütlenmelerde internet aracılığıyla halkla ilişkiler (Unpublished master dissertation). Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Türkiye. google scholar
  • Ledingham, J.A. &, Brunig, S.D. (1998). Relationship management in public relations: Dimensions of an organization-public relationship. Public Relations Review, 24(1), 55-65. google scholar
  • Luca, P. (2011). Social media dialogue: An analysis of the social media presence of selected fortune 500 compaines (Unpublished master dissertation). Liberty University Communication Faculty, USA. google scholar
  • Güzeloğlu, E.B. &, Maden, D. (2015). Halkla ilişkilerde ilişkisel yaklaşım: Alan öğrencilerinin ilişki boyutlarına yönelik algıları. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 34, 357-372. google scholar
  • Masuda, Y. (2004). The ımage of the future ınformation society. In F. Webster (Ed.) The Information Society Reader (pp. 15-21). London: Routledge. google scholar
  • Mattelart, A. (2005). Gezegensel ütopya tarihi: Kehanetsel kentten küresel topluma. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları. google scholar
  • Mazıcı, E. (2016). Marka konumlandırmada ilişki yönetimi: Bankacılık sektöründe web sayfaları. International Journal of Social Science, 44, 73-90. google scholar
  • McAllister-Spooner, S. &, Kent, M. (2009). Dialogic public relations and resource dependency: New jersey community colleges as models for web site effectiveness. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 17(4), 220-239. google scholar
  • Munkner, J. (2016). Utopia, dystopia, and myopia in the late 19th century. Retrieved from http://faculty.georgetown.edu/bassr/exhibition/utopia/utopia.html. google scholar
  • Mumford, L. (1992). The Story of utopias. NY: Boni and Liveright Publishers. Retrieved from http://faculty.georgetown.edu/bassr/exhibition/utopia/utopia.html#Utopia, google scholar
  • Okay, A. &, Okay, A. (2011). Halkla ilişkiler: Kavram, strateji ve uygulamaları. İstanbul: Der Yayınları. google scholar
  • Ollman, B. (2011). Diyalektiğin dansı (C. Saraçoğlu, Trans.). İstanbul: Yordam Kitap. google scholar
  • Özdemir, P. &, Aktaş Yamanoğlu, M. (2010). Türkiye’deki sivil toplum kuruluşları web sitelerinin diyalojik iletişim kapasiteleri üzerine bir inceleme. Ankyra, 1(2), 3-36. google scholar
  • Özden, Z. & Saran, M. (2006). Halkla ilişkiler alanında etik sorunlar. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(3), 242-261. google scholar
  • Pavlik, J. (2007). Mapping the consequences of technology on public relations. Wieck Media. google scholar
  • Pieczka, M. (2011). Public relations as dialogic expertise?. Journal of Communication Management, 15(2), 108-124. google scholar
  • Russel, A. (2008). An analysis of public relations and dialogic communication efoorts of 501(c) (6) organizations (Unpublished master dissertation). Ball State University Journalism Department, Indiana. google scholar
  • Rybalko, S. &, Seltzer, T. (2010). Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: How fortune 500 companies engage stakeholders using twitter. Public Relations Review, 36(4), 336-341. google scholar
  • Sanayi 4.0: Uyum sağlayamayan kaybedecek. (2015). Ege Bölgesi Sanayi Odası. Retrieved from http://www.inovasyon.org/pdf/EBSO.Sanayi-4.0_Raporu.Ekim.2015.pdf google scholar
  • Theunissen, P. &, Rahman, K.A. (2010). Dialogue and two-way symmetrical communication in public relations theory and practice. Australian and New Zealand Communication Association Annual Conference, Hamilton, New Zealand. Sayfa aralığı belirtilmemiş google scholar
  • Theunissen, P. &, Noordin, W. (2012). Revisiting the concept dialogue in public relations. Public Relations Review, 38, 5-13. google scholar
  • Toffler, A. (2011). Şok: Gelecek korkusu. İstanbul: Koridor Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Törenli, N. (2004). Enformasyon toplumu ve küreselleşme sürecinde türkiye. Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat. google scholar
  • Van Dijk, J.A.G. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the ınformation society. London: Routledge. google scholar
  • Vassileva, B. (2017). Marketing 4.0: How technologies transform marketing organization. Obuda University Bulletin, 7 (1), 47-56. google scholar
  • Weyer, S., Schmitt, M., Ohmer, M., & Goreck D. (2015). Towards ındustry 4.0 – Standardization as the crucial challenge for higly modular, multi-vendor production systems. IFAC-Papers Online, 48(3), 579-584. google scholar
  • Wright, D.K. &, Hinson, M. (2017). Tracking how social and other digital media are being used in punlic relations practice. Public Relations Journal, 11(1), 1-40. google scholar
  • Wyatt, S., Henwood, F., Miller, N., & Senker, P. (2010). Critical perspectives on technologies, ın/equalities and the ınformation society. In S. Wyatt (Ed.) Technology and In/equality: Questioning The Information Society (pp. 1-19). London: Routledge. google scholar
  • Yağmurlu, A. (2012). Diyalojik iletişim çerçevesinde ankara büyükşehir belediyesi sosyal medya uygulamaları. Selçuk İletişim Dergisi, 8(1), 95-115. google scholar
  • Yılmaz, B. (1998). Bilgi toplumu: Eleştirel bir yaklaşım. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 147–158. google scholar
  • Zencirkıran, M. (2012). Örgüt ve yönetim kuramları. In M. Zencirkıran (Ed.) Örgüt Sosyolojisi (pp. 1-56). Bursa: Dora Basım Yayın. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Özoran, B. (0001). A Public Relations Utopia: Dialogical Public Relations. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 0(53), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.17064/iuifd.278412


AMA

Özoran B. A Public Relations Utopia: Dialogical Public Relations. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences. 0001;0(53):1-30. https://doi.org/10.17064/iuifd.278412


ABNT

Özoran, B. A Public Relations Utopia: Dialogical Public Relations. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 53, p. 1-30, 0001.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Özoran, Beris Artan,. 0001. “A Public Relations Utopia: Dialogical Public Relations.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0, no. 53: 1-30. https://doi.org/10.17064/iuifd.278412


Chicago: Humanities Style

Özoran, Beris Artan,. A Public Relations Utopia: Dialogical Public Relations.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0, no. 53 (Dec. 2024): 1-30. https://doi.org/10.17064/iuifd.278412


Harvard: Australian Style

Özoran, B 0001, 'A Public Relations Utopia: Dialogical Public Relations', Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, vol. 0, no. 53, pp. 1-30, viewed 23 Dec. 2024, https://doi.org/10.17064/iuifd.278412


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Özoran, B. (0001) ‘A Public Relations Utopia: Dialogical Public Relations’, Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 0(53), pp. 1-30. https://doi.org/10.17064/iuifd.278412 (23 Dec. 2024).


MLA

Özoran, Beris Artan,. A Public Relations Utopia: Dialogical Public Relations.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, vol. 0, no. 53, 0001, pp. 1-30. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.17064/iuifd.278412


Vancouver

Özoran B. A Public Relations Utopia: Dialogical Public Relations. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences [Internet]. 23 Dec. 2024 [cited 23 Dec. 2024];0(53):1-30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17064/iuifd.278412 doi: 10.17064/iuifd.278412


ISNAD

Özoran, Beris Artan. A Public Relations Utopia: Dialogical Public Relations”. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0/53 (Dec. 2024): 1-30. https://doi.org/10.17064/iuifd.278412



TIMELINE


Submitted01.07.2016
Accepted29.11.2017

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.