Research Article


DOI :10.26650/CONNECTIST404711   IUP :10.26650/CONNECTIST404711    Full Text (PDF)

Privacy Protection Versus Advertising Revenues: The Case of Content Publishers

Andrej MiklosikMartin KuchtaStefan Zak

Users as consumers of the content generated by publishers expect to receive a certain level of content quality and availability. However, consumers often do not accept the monetization schemes employed by publishers to ensure sufficient revenue streams to support their editorial work and infrastructure. To protect their privacy, a growing number of users utilize ad blockers that protect them from displaying third-party advertisements while browsing the internet and consuming the content. Content publishers are looking for ways of increasing their income through new subscription models and online advertising. In this paper, the authors introduce a framework that enables the publishers of digital content to utilize the potential of the online advertising revenue stream with respect to the preferences of their audience and the privacy protection practices applied by website users. An empirical research in the form of a case study analyzing 105 websites located in seven countries was conducted using the method of content analysis. The suggested framework consists of three main approaches that can be adopted by content publishers to optimize the effectiveness of their online advertising system and thus maximize the contribution of advertising sales revenues to the media budget. 


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Digitalization, virtualization and transformation of everyday activities into the digital environment amplified by the globalized barrier-free world has led to the evolvement and enhancement of products and services. Media publishers have been forced to transform their traditional publication processes, with the content being published not only in print but also on their websites. Consumers of content were used to paying for printed versions, however, they are often not used to- and more importantly - not willing to pay for content consumed on the internet. Thus, the only monetization model for online content is dependent on displaying advertisements in their various forms. Digitalization and technologically advanced processes allow for the tracking of user behavior, for the development and mining of user information, and for the utilization of the data for enhancing user experience on websites. Even if the publisher is not able to create this data by himself, it is possible to obtain it from a third-party company. However, the mined data often also contains some form of personal information about users, leading to the need for change in the current concept of privacy. Displaying advertisements efficiently using this data offers an acceptable monetization model for content publishers on the one hand and an enhanced user experience for consumers thanks to better targeting on the other. Media publishers employ various approaches in terms of banner advertisements, with some of them disrupting consumers of the content and invading their privacy. Users have developed banner blindness and are protecting themselves by utilizing ad-blocking software solutions. These create great obstacles for displaying banner advertisements and thus, negatively affect revenue streams of content publishers.

The main aim of this article is to introduce a framework that enables publishers of digital content to maximize the visibility of online advertising in its various forms across multiple devices. To achieve the main aim, three sub-goals were defined. The first sub-goal focuses on determining the situation in displaying advertisements of diverse types on websites of selected American and European publishers. The research unveils the current banner advertisement approaches in various markets and determines the reasons leading to the banner blindness phenomena and the increased usage of ad-block software. The second sub-goal aims at determining what type of information marketing subjects possess about their users and how this is utilized. The research focuses on cookie files which represent a powerful source of information for advertisers, yet can be controversial when it comes to data privacy and protection. The third sub-goal aims at introducing components of the framework usable for maximizing the income from advertising. The framework can be employed by every digital content publisher struggling with ensuring a sufficient revenue stream from online advertising.

To achieve these goals, the authors have used empirical research in the form of a case study analysing 105 websites located in seven countries across North America and Europe. The research sample was selected by using purposive sampling and the websites were placed into one of these categories: cars; entertainment; technology; gaming; lifestyle — general, men, parenting, and women; movies; news — general and political; sports; and weather. These websites belong to the most visited websites in selected countries in terms of monthly real users and brand awareness. Furthermore, each website was assigned one of two categories, either premium or non-premium, with 51% being premium and 49% non-premium. The method of content analysis was applied to assess the content of each website with the focus on advertising formats, their frequencies, and responses to detecting an ad blocker. To secure a high relevancy and precision of research results, each website was visited at least ten times. The homepage of the website and one other page were visited five times each and analyzed. Both the homepage and the other page were visited three times with an ad blocker enabled and twice with an ad blocker disabled. Four different categories of advertisements were observed and assessed on each of the websites: standard banners, invasive banners, retargeting formats, and native advertising.

The article introduces a framework which, when implemented by publishers, should lead to increased advertising revenues by considering the current privacy protection issues of their readers and creating a platform for dialogue between them and the publisher. The framework contains three group actions which should be taken consecutively, focusing on the marketing approach, technical approach and conversational approach. The conducted literature review shows that published papers to date offer typically no or very limited solutions to address the consequences of increasing usage of ad-blockers and banner blindness both for users and publishers. Thus, this article introduces a very specific action scheme leading to improved user experience on content websites, while enhancing the online advertising monetization model as the main source of online content publishers’ revenues.


PDF View

References

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Miklosik, A., Kuchta, M., & Zak, S. (2018). Privacy Protection Versus Advertising Revenues: The Case of Content Publishers. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 0(54), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST404711


AMA

Miklosik A, Kuchta M, Zak S. Privacy Protection Versus Advertising Revenues: The Case of Content Publishers. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences. 2018;0(54):117-140. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST404711


ABNT

Miklosik, A.; Kuchta, M.; Zak, S. Privacy Protection Versus Advertising Revenues: The Case of Content Publishers. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 54, p. 117-140, 2018.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Miklosik, Andrej, and Martin Kuchta and Stefan Zak. 2018. “Privacy Protection Versus Advertising Revenues: The Case of Content Publishers.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0, no. 54: 117-140. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST404711


Chicago: Humanities Style

Miklosik, Andrej, and Martin Kuchta and Stefan Zak. Privacy Protection Versus Advertising Revenues: The Case of Content Publishers.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0, no. 54 (Aug. 2025): 117-140. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST404711


Harvard: Australian Style

Miklosik, A & Kuchta, M & Zak, S 2018, 'Privacy Protection Versus Advertising Revenues: The Case of Content Publishers', Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, vol. 0, no. 54, pp. 117-140, viewed 14 Aug. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST404711


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Miklosik, A. and Kuchta, M. and Zak, S. (2018) ‘Privacy Protection Versus Advertising Revenues: The Case of Content Publishers’, Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 0(54), pp. 117-140. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST404711 (14 Aug. 2025).


MLA

Miklosik, Andrej, and Martin Kuchta and Stefan Zak. Privacy Protection Versus Advertising Revenues: The Case of Content Publishers.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, vol. 0, no. 54, 2018, pp. 117-140. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST404711


Vancouver

Miklosik A, Kuchta M, Zak S. Privacy Protection Versus Advertising Revenues: The Case of Content Publishers. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences [Internet]. 14 Aug. 2025 [cited 14 Aug. 2025];0(54):117-140. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST404711 doi: 10.26650/CONNECTIST404711


ISNAD

Miklosik, Andrej - Kuchta, Martin - Zak, Stefan. Privacy Protection Versus Advertising Revenues: The Case of Content Publishers”. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0/54 (Aug. 2025): 117-140. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST404711



TIMELINE


Submitted12.03.2018
Accepted11.05.2018

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE



Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.