References

• Amsterdamska, O. (1987). The Neogrammarian Doctrine. Sociology of the Sciences Monographs, vol 6. Springer. Dordrecht. google scholar
• Bar-Hillel, Y. (1977). “Husserl’s Conception of a Purely Logical Grammar” in J.N. Mohanty (ed.). Readings on Edmund Husserl’s Logical Investigations. Nijhoff. The Hague. google scholar
• Benveniste, E. (1962). “‘Structure’ en linguistique” in R. Bastide (ed.). Sens et usages du terme structure dans les sciences humaines et sociales. Mouton & Co., The Hague. google scholar
• Brondal, V. (1943). “Linguistique structurale” in V. Brondal. Essais de linguistique generale. Munksgaard. Copenhague. google scholar
• 21 Wolf-Dieter Stempel’ ‘in 1920’ler ve 1930’ların dilbilimiyle ilgili olarak belirttiği gibi, “o zamanlar yaygın psikolojiye karşı sağlam bir duruş sergilemek, ancak Husserl’in yapabileceği bir şeydi” (Stempel: 1978:15). google scholar
• 22 Önde gelen filozof, matematikçi ve dilbilimci Yehoshua Bar-Hillel’in yazdığı gibi, “ayrıntılardaki tüm eksikliklere rağmen, Husserl’in dil inceleme teknikleri hakkında temel bir kavrayışa sahip olduğu vurgulanmalıdır. Modern dilbilimcilerin komütasyon- değişim/değiştirim (commutation) dediği şeyin dilbilimsel analizde oynadığı temel rolü açıkça gören ilk kişi olabilir” (Y. Bar-Hillel: 1977: 132). Çağdaş dilbilimcilerce, komütasyon veya zıt dağılım (contrastive distribution), “aşağıdaki gibi davranan bir dilde iki konuşma sesi arasındaki ilişki anlamına gelir: bir kelimeyi veya ifadeyi kullanarak birini ya da diğerini değiştirmek en azından bazı durumlarda tamamen cümleye farklı bir anlam kazandırır” (Trask: 2014: 55). google scholar
• Campbell, L. (1999). Historical Linguistics: An Introduction. The MIT Press. Cambridge. google scholar
• Crystal, D. (2008). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Blackwell. Malden-OxfordCarlton. google scholar
• Dennes, M. (1997). “L’influence de Husserl en Russie au debut du XXe siecle et son impact sur les emigres russes de Prague” Cahiers de l’ILSL. No. 9. google scholar
• Drummond, J.J. (2003). “Husserl’s Third Logical Investigation: Parts and Wholes. Founding Connections, and the Synthetic A Priori” in D.O. Dahlstrom (ed.). Husserl’s Logical Investigations. Kluwer. Dordrecht. google scholar
• Fine, K. (1995). “Part-Whole” in B. Smith, D.W. Smith (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Husserl. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. google scholar
• Flack, P. (2013). “Le moment phenomenologique de la linguistique structurale” Cahiers de l’ILSL, No. 37. google scholar
• Graffi, G. (2001). 200 Years of Syntax John Benjamins, Amsterdam-Philadelphia. google scholar
• Gonzalez, Porta M.A. (2008). “La Idea de una Morfolog^a de la Significacion o Gramâtica Universal en la 4a Investigacion Logica de Husserl” Cognitio. Vol. 9. No. 1. google scholar
• Holenstein, E. (1975). Roman Jakobsons phanomenologischer Strukturalismus. Suhrkamp. Frankfurt am Main. google scholar
• Holenstein, E. (1976). Linguistik Semiotik Hermeneutik. Pladoyers für eine strukturale Phanomenologie. Suhrkamp. Frankfurt am Main. google scholar
• Holenstein, E. (1985). Sprachliche Universalien. Eine Untersuchung zur Natur des menschlischen Geistes. Brockmeyer. Bochum. google scholar
• Husserl, E. (1984). Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band. Erster Teil. Untersuchungen zur Phanomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. Husserliana. Vol. 19 (1), hrsg. von U. Panzer, Nijhoff, The Hague-Boston-Lancaster. google scholar
• Jakobson, R. (1962). “Typological Studies and Their Contribution to Historical Comparative Linguistics” in Selected Writings I. Phonological Studies. Mouton & Co., The Hague. google scholar
• Jakobson, R. (1962). “Kindersprache, Aphasie, und allgemeine Lautgesetze” in R. Jakobson. Selected Writings I. Phonological Studies. Mouton & co, The Hague. google scholar
• Lakoff, R. (1976). “La Grammaire generale et raisonnee, ou la grammaire de Port-Royal” in H. Parret (ed.). History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics de Gruyter. Berlin-New York. google scholar
• Lyons, J. (1995). Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. google scholar
• Orth, E.W. (1973). “Philosophy of Language as Phenomenology of Language and Logic” in M. Natanson (ed.). google scholar
• Phenomenology and the Social Sciences. Volume I. Northwestern University Press, Evanston. google scholar
• Ortiz, Hill C. (2003). “Incomplete Symbols, Dependent Meanings, and Paradox”. in D.O. Dahlstrom (ed.). Husserl’s Logical Investigations. Kluwer, Dordrecht. google scholar
• Patocka, J. (1999). “Roman Jakobsons phanomenologischer Strukturalismus” in J. Patocka. Texte, Dokumente, Bibliographie, Karl Alber/OIKOYMENH. FreiburgMünchen/Prag. google scholar
• Pos, H. (2013). Ecrits sur le langage. Sdvig Press. Geneve-Lausanne. google scholar
• Saussure, F. De. (1995). Course de linguistique generale. Payot & Rivages. Paris. google scholar
• Smith, B., Smith D.W. (1995). “Introduction” in B. Smith, D. W. Smith (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Husserl Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. google scholar
• Sokolowski, R. (1977). “The Logic of Parts and Wholes in Husserl’s Investigations” in J.N. Mohanty (ed.). Readings on Edmund Husserl’s Logical Investigations. Nijhoff, The Hague. google scholar
• Sonesson, G. (2004). “The Meanings of Structuralism. Considerations on Structures and Gestalten, with Particular Attention to the Masks of Levi-strauss” Segni e Comprensione, XXVI, No. 78. google scholar
• Stempel, W.-D. (1978). Gestalt, Ganzheit, Struktur. Aus Vor- und Frühgeschichte des Strukturalismus in Deutschland. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen. google scholar
• Stjernfelt, F. (2007). Diagrammatology. An Investigation on the Borderlines of Phenomenology, Ontology, and Semiotics. Springer, Dordrecht. google scholar
• Swiggers, P. (1981). “The relationships between Phenomenology and Structuralism: Some Critical Remarks” Ars Semiotica. Vol. 4. No. 3. google scholar
• Trask, R.L. (2014). A Student’s Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. Routledge, Abingdon-New York. google scholar

Citations