Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences

GÖNDERBİLGİ
EnglishTürkçe

Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1238362   IUP :10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1238362    Tam Metin (PDF)

Türkiye’de iletişim eğitiminin akreditasyonu: Akredite programlardaki idareci akademisyenlerin görüşlerine yönelik bir araştırma

Erdinç Kaygusuz

Bu araştırmanın konusu Türkiye’de iletişim eğitimi alanındaki programların akreditasyonunu, akredite kurumlardaki idari görev yürüten akademisyenlerin (dekan, dekan yardımcısı ya da bölüm başkanı) görüşleri bağlamında incelemektir. Bu kapsamda ilgili akademisyenlerin görüşlerine ışık tutarak programlardaki akreditasyon ihtiyacının nedenlerini ve akreditasyonun kurumlar açısından hangi türden işlev gördüğünü ortaya çıkarmak amaçlanmıştır. Bunun için Türkiye’deki akredite iletişim programlarında ya da programların bağlı olduğu fakültelerde idari görevi bulunan 11 akademisyenle yarı yapılandırılmış derinlemesine görüşme yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubu çok aşamalı örnekleme yoluyla, seçkisiz olmayan yöntemlere göre çekilmiş ve araştırmada evrendeki grupların ağırlıkları oranında temsil edilmelerini sağlamak adına orantılı tabakalı amaçsal örnekleme kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada uygulamada yaşanan kimi sorunlara karşın akreditasyonun kurumları geliştirici işlev gördüğü sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Buna göre akreditasyon kurumlara yenilenme, organizasyon şemasındaki aksaklıkları düzeltme, müfredatı güncelleme, öğretim elemanı kadrosunu güçlendirme, fiziksel ortamlar ile olanakları çoğaltma ve finansal kaynakları geliştirme konularında olanak sağlamaktadır. Bu açıdan Türkiye’de iletişim eğitiminde akreditasyon kurumsal itibar sağlayan bir etiketten ziyade kurumların kendilerini yenilemesine olanak veren somut çıktılar olarak görülmektedir. Bulgular iletişim eğitiminde akreditasyonun getirilerine odaklanan çalışmaları ve onların bulgularını desteklemektedir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler: Yükseköğretimde kalite, akreditasyon, iletişim eğitimi, iletişim bölümleri, İletişim Araştırmaları Derneği
DOI :10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1238362   IUP :10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1238362    Tam Metin (PDF)

Accreditation of communication education in Türkiye: Research on the views of administrator academicians in accredited programs

Erdinç Kaygusuz

The subject of this study is an examination of how communication programs are accredited in Türkiye in the context of the views of administrator academicians. The research aims to explore the views of administrator academicians who are deans, vice deans, or heads of departments in their institutions regarding the accreditation of communication education in Türkiye. The study interviews 11 administrator academicians working in accredited undergraduate programs under communication faculties or the other faculties in which communication programs are included Türkiye, with the study sample being selected using multi-stage sampling. Proportional stratified and purposive sampling was also used to ensure that the groups in the universe are represented in proportion to their weights. Although minor problems exist in practice, accreditation has been concluded to play a developing role for institutions. Accordingly, accreditation allows institutions to renew, to correct the deficiencies in their organizational chart, to update the curriculum, to strengthen the teaching staff, to increase physical environments and opportunities, and to develop financial resources. In this respect, accreditation in communication education in Türkiye is seen as a concrete output rather than a corporate reputation provider. The findings support other studies that have focused on the benefits of accreditation.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Quality in higher education, accreditation, communication education, communication undergraduate programs, Communication Research Association

GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


Higher education has begun transforming in line with the needs of the new liberal era since the beginning of the 1980s, and institutions have been reorganized in accordance with this new period. Universities represent an advanced stage in transforming knowledge into goods and services. The fascinating idea of universities has given way to an instrumental position where professionalization is subordinated to market principles. Science and technology are employed to provide the skills needed by the market, and higher education has been seen as guiding this professionalization.

Universities as economic actors bring the professionals information society needs into the workforce. Universities are based on accountability under all these conditions and in this way strive to eliminate a legitimation crisis. Quality assurance and accreditation have come to the fore in this context. Universities aim to reinforce their presence to attract students to their programs, increase their effectiveness, show society that they are economically and socially transparent, ensure compliance with the market’s demands, and show that they possess innovative qualified pedagogies. 

Accreditation is one of the most preferred quality assurance methods and is defined as a tool for quality assessment and accountability based on professional standards. In this respect, accreditation has spread worldwide.

Previous studies on accreditation in communication education focus on i) the value of accreditation in terms of communication education, ii) its function and benefits for institutions, and iii) its disadvantages. Meanwhile, how academicians perceive accreditation continues to be a matter of academic curiosity. The subject of this study is to examine how communication programs in Türkiye are accredited in the context of administrator academicians’ views.

 Few studies in the literature have documented academicians’ perceptions of the accreditation process in communication education. The current research aims to explore the views of administrator academicians who are deans, vice deans, or heads of departments in their institutions regarding how communication education is accredited in Türkiye. The study presents the following research questions (RQs) within the framework of the main problem area and subject:

 RQ1: According to administrator academicians, why has the need for accreditation arisen in communication programs?

 RQ2: What comments do administrator academicians have about the accreditation evaluation criteria?

RQ3: What are the benefits and drawbacks of accreditation in communication education?

RQ4: Does a difference exist between accredited communication programs and non-accredited communication programs in terms of the expectations from the public and the sector? RQ5: Does a difference exist between academicians who work in public universities and those who work in private universities regarding their perceptions regarding accreditation?

This study uses a qualitative design and qualitative research techniques to collect the needed data. The study interviews 11 administrator academicians working in undergraduate communication programs within Türkiye. The study sample has been selected using multi-stage sampling, with proportional stratified and purposive sampling being used to ensure that the groups in the universe are represented in proportion to their weights. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted face-to-face or online to ask the participants open-ended questions. Accordingly, the interviews were completed between December 13, 2022-January 5, 2023 and lasted between 18-31 minutes. The interviews were recorded with the permission of the interviewees. The obtained data have been classified under specific themes and titles using a thematic coding approach.

Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study. In order to ensure the confidentiality and anonymity of the participants, no identifying information such as names and institution names has been used, with the participants being referred to according to a participation code. These codes include the unique participant (P) and the number in which they were interviewed (e.g., P1, P2) is used in the Findings section to identify the participant being quoted. In addition, this study has received ethical approval from Beykoz University’s ethics committee.

The participants opined accreditation in communication education in Türkiye has relatively small problems in practice alongside benefits and potential. Moreover, the participants think accreditation provides more crucial output for the functioning of the faculty and program rather than for institutional reputation. Although the participants disagree that accreditation carries the risk of convergence between different programs, they agreed that it is still a practice that should be preferred.

 The points this study draws attention to can be a guide for administrator academicians working in communication programs that have an accreditation process or that aim to enter an accreditation process. This study can also provide benefits by eliminating the lack of knowledge regarding accreditation.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Altbach, P. G. (2012). Akademik mükemmeliyete giden yol: Dünya çapında araştırma üniversiteleri oluşturmak. google scholar
  • Altbach, P. G. & Salmi J. (Eds.), Araştırma üniversitelerinin geçmişi, bugünü ve geleceği (pp. 9-26), Kadri Yamaç (Trans.). Ankara: Efil Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Aziz, A. (2020) Türkiye’de yükseköğretimde kalite güvencesi ve iletişim eğitimi Akreditasyonu, Yeni Yüzyıl Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1), 13-29. google scholar
  • Aziz, A., Vural, S. & Yenğin, D. (2021, 12 Kasım). İLAD/İLEDAK kurum bilgilendirme sunumu [PowerPoint slaytları]. google scholar
  • İLEDAK. https://iledak.ilad.org.tr/img/pages/abc_13.11.2021_8289b3d.pdf google scholar
  • Banuelos, N. (2021). Quality and innovation in American higher education accreditation: the case of the University of Phoenix, HistoryofEducation, 50(3), 428-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2020.1858190 google scholar
  • Bell, D. (1976). The coming of the post-industrial society. The Educational Forum, 40(4), 574-579. https://doi. org/10.1080/00131727609336501 google scholar
  • Bendixen, C. & Jacobsen, J. C. (2020). Accreditation of higher education in Denmark and European Union: from system to substance?. Quality in Higher Education, 26(1), 66-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2020.1729310 google scholar
  • Beşbudak, M., Özmelek Taş, N. & Nazlı, A. K. (2022). İletişim Araştırmaları Derneği’nin (İLAD) ve Avrupa İletişim Araştırmaları ve Eğitim Derneği’nin (ECREA) iletişim eğitimi temaları üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir analiz. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(2), 1101-1124. DOI: 10.48146/odusobiad.1121333 google scholar
  • Bingöl, B. (2012). Üniversite özerkliğinin değişen tanımı ve üniversitelerin yeniden yapılandırılması. Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2), 39-75. google scholar
  • Blanchard, R. O. (1988). Academic values are losing out to the narrow values of industry representatives in the accreditation process. Association for Communication Administration Bulletin, April, 50-53. google scholar
  • Blom, R., Bowe, B. J. & Davenport, L. D. (2018) Accrediting Council on Education in journalism and mass communications accreditation: Quality or compliance?. Journalism Studies, 20(10), 1458-1471. https://doi.or g/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1526641 google scholar
  • Blom, R., Davenport, L. D., & Bowe, B. J. (2012). Reputation cycles: The value of accreditation for undergraduate journalism programs. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 67(4), 392-406. https://doi. org/10.1177/1077695812462349 google scholar
  • Boratav, K. (1997). Yapısal uyum ve bölüşüm: Uluslararası bir bilanço, Türk-İş Yıllığı ‘97, 31-45. google scholar
  • Burrows, A. & Harvey, L. (1992, April 6-8). Defining quality in higher education: the stakeholder approach [Symposium]. AETT Conference on Quality in Education, University of York. google scholar
  • Canter, L. (2015). Chasing the accreditation dream: Do employers value accredited journalism courses. Journalism Education: The Journal of the Association of Journalism Education, 4 (1), 40-52. google scholar
  • Carroll, B. A. (1977). Accredited, non-accredited news curricula are similar. The Journalism Educator, 32(1), 42-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769587703200114 google scholar
  • Chrisman, J. J., Hynes, T. & Fraser, S. (1995). Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: The case of the University of Calgary. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(4), 267-281. google scholar
  • Crawford, J. (2014). Leaders in journalism education: Administrators at ACEJMC accredited programs and non-accredited HBCU programs critique the standards. Journal of Research Initiatives, 1(2), 1-13 google scholar
  • Creswell, J. W. (2017). Araştırma deseni. (S. B. Demir, Trans. Ed.). Eğiten Kitap. google scholar
  • Cusatis, C., & Martin-Kratzer, R. (2009). Assessing the state of math education in ACEJMC-accredited and non-accredited undergraduate journalism programs. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 64(4), 355377. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769580906400402 google scholar
  • Çobanoğulları, A. (2015). Üniversitelerin neoliberal dönüşümü: Türkiye örneği [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Ankara Üniversitesi google scholar
  • De Paor, C. (2016). The contribution of professional accreditation to quality assurance in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 22(3), 228-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2016.1263925 google scholar
  • Delanty, G. (1998). The idea of the university in the global era: From knowledge as an end to the end of knowledge? Social Epistemology, 12(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691729808578856 google scholar
  • Dickson, T. V., & Sellmeyer, R. L. (1992). Responses to proposals for curricular change. The Journalism Educator, 47(3), 27 36. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769589204700304 google scholar
  • Etzkowitz, H. (1983). Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science. Minerva, 21(2), 198-233. google scholar
  • European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA). (2015) Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (Brussels, Belgium). google scholar
  • Gersamia, M., & Freedman, E. (2017). Challenges to creating vibrant media education in young democracies: Accreditation for media schools in Georgia. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 72(3), 322-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077695817710104 google scholar
  • Habermas, J. (1971) Toward a rational society. Heinemann. google scholar
  • Hannis, G. (2012). The value of accreditation of journalism programmes: A New Zealand perspective. Pacific Journalism Review: Te Koakoa, 18(1), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.24135/pjr.v18i1.295 google scholar
  • Harvey, L. & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9-34. https:// doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102 google scholar
  • Irish Universities Quality Board (2008). Student handbook: your right to quality in higher education. www.ucd.ie/ t4cms/iuqbstudent_handbook.pdf google scholar
  • İLEDAK. (n.d.). Akredite kurumlar. İLEDAK. Retrieved October 9, 2022, from https://iledak.ilad.org.tr/akreditasyon/ akredite-kurumlar google scholar
  • İletişim Araştırmaları Derneği. (2019). Çalışma raporu (Rapor No: 1). https://iledak.ilad.org.tr/img/pages/yokak-icin-ilad-yillik-raporu-1_04.10.2019_f29e99d.pdf google scholar
  • Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M., & Hellsmark, H. (2003). Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish university system: The case of Chalmers University of Technology. Research Policy, 32(9), 1555-1569. google scholar
  • Kaygusuz, E. (2021). Sınıf ve iletişim: Türkiye’de sendikaların iletişim deneyimleri [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Ankara Üniversitesi. google scholar
  • Knight, J. (2007). Cross-border higher education: Issues and implications for quality assurance and accreditation. GUNI Series (Eds.), Social Commitment of Universities 2: Higher Education in the World (pp. 134-146). Palgrave/ MacMillan google scholar
  • Leef, G. C. (2003). Accreditation is no guarantee of academic quality. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 49(30), B17. google scholar
  • Masse, M. H., & Popovich, M. N. (2007). Accredited and nonaccredited media writing programs are stagnant, resistant to curricular reform, and similar. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 62(2), 141-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769580706200203 google scholar
  • McGuire, P. A. (2009). Accreditation’s benefits for individuals and institutions. New Directions for Higher Education, 145, 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.332 google scholar
  • Murray, F. B. (2009). An accreditation dilemma: The tension between program accountability and program improvement in programmatic accreditation. NewDirections for Higher Education, 145, 59-68. google scholar
  • Nguyen, H.C. & Ta, T.T.H. (2018). Exploring impact of accreditation on higher education in developing countries: a Vietnamese view. Tertiary Education and Management, 24, 154-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.201 7.1406001 google scholar
  • Nidia Banuelos (2021) Quality and innovation in American higher education accreditation: the case of the University of Phoenix. History of Education, 50(3), 428-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2020.1858190 google scholar
  • Ortaç, F. R., Kurt, A. & Kılınç, M. (2021). Öğretim elemanlarının kalite güvencesi algısının ölçümlenmesi, bir vakıf üniversitesi örneği, Anasay, 5(15), 73- 89. google scholar
  • Parsons, T. & Platt, G. (1973). The American university. Harvard University Press google scholar
  • Peker, Ö. (1996). Eğitimde kalite ve akreditasyon, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 19-32. google scholar
  • Romenti, S., Invernizzi, E. & Biraghi, S. (2012). Engaging employers to develop quality in higher education: the case of communication studies in Italy. Quality in Higher Education, 18(2), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/1 3538322.2012.691201 google scholar
  • Rosa, M. J., Cardoso, S. & Videira, P. (2020). Is accreditation ‘on the right track’? The views of Portuguese academics. Tertiary Education and Management, 26, 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-019-09048-7 google scholar
  • Salto, D. J. (2022). Do academic disciplines matter? An analysis of organizational responses to the accreditation of graduate programs by field of study and sector. Higher Education, 84, 569-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10734-021-00789-2 google scholar
  • Sayılan, F. (2006). Küresel aktörler (DB ve GATS) ve eğitimde neoliberal dönüşüm. JMO Haber Bülteni (2006/4), 44-51. google scholar
  • Seamon, M. C. (2010). The value of accreditation: An overview of three decades of research comparing accredited and unaccredited journalism and mass communication programs. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 65(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769581006500103 google scholar
  • Süngü, H. & Bayrakçı, M. (2010). Bolonya süreci sonrası yükseköğretimde akreditasyon çalışmaları. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(4), 895-912. google scholar
  • The Bologna Declaration. (2019). Joint declaration of the European Ministers of Education: The Bologna Declaration of 19 June 1999. http://www.ehea.info/Upload/document/ministerial_declarations/1999_ Bologna_Declaration_English_553028.pdf google scholar
  • Ulker, N. & Bakioglu, A. (2019). An international research on the influence of accreditation on academic quality. Studies in Higher Education, 44(9), 1507-1518. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1445986 google scholar
  • Volkwein, J. F. (2010). The assessment context: Accreditation, accountability and performance. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010 (S1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.327 google scholar
  • Vroeijenstijn, T. (1991). External quality assessment: Servant of two masters? the Netherland University Perspective, in Craft, A. Quality Assurance in Higher Education in Hong Kong Proceedings of an International Conference, Hong Kong, 1991. Falmer Press, 109-132. google scholar
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Yorke, M. (1999). Assuring quality and standards in globalised higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 7(1), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684889910252496 google scholar
  • Yükseköğretim Kurulu (YÖK). (2022). https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/ google scholar
  • Zahavi, H. & Friedman, Y. (2019). The Bologna Process: an international higher education regime, European Journal of Higher Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2018.1561314 google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Kaygusuz, E. (2023). Türkiye’de iletişim eğitiminin akreditasyonu: Akredite programlardaki idareci akademisyenlerin görüşlerine yönelik bir araştırma. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 0(64), 123-153. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1238362


AMA

Kaygusuz E. Türkiye’de iletişim eğitiminin akreditasyonu: Akredite programlardaki idareci akademisyenlerin görüşlerine yönelik bir araştırma. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences. 2023;0(64):123-153. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1238362


ABNT

Kaygusuz, E. Türkiye’de iletişim eğitiminin akreditasyonu: Akredite programlardaki idareci akademisyenlerin görüşlerine yönelik bir araştırma. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 64, p. 123-153, 2023.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Kaygusuz, Erdinç,. 2023. “Türkiye’de iletişim eğitiminin akreditasyonu: Akredite programlardaki idareci akademisyenlerin görüşlerine yönelik bir araştırma.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0, no. 64: 123-153. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1238362


Chicago: Humanities Style

Kaygusuz, Erdinç,. “Türkiye’de iletişim eğitiminin akreditasyonu: Akredite programlardaki idareci akademisyenlerin görüşlerine yönelik bir araştırma.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0, no. 64 (May. 2024): 123-153. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1238362


Harvard: Australian Style

Kaygusuz, E 2023, 'Türkiye’de iletişim eğitiminin akreditasyonu: Akredite programlardaki idareci akademisyenlerin görüşlerine yönelik bir araştırma', Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, vol. 0, no. 64, pp. 123-153, viewed 17 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1238362


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Kaygusuz, E. (2023) ‘Türkiye’de iletişim eğitiminin akreditasyonu: Akredite programlardaki idareci akademisyenlerin görüşlerine yönelik bir araştırma’, Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 0(64), pp. 123-153. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1238362 (17 May. 2024).


MLA

Kaygusuz, Erdinç,. “Türkiye’de iletişim eğitiminin akreditasyonu: Akredite programlardaki idareci akademisyenlerin görüşlerine yönelik bir araştırma.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, vol. 0, no. 64, 2023, pp. 123-153. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1238362


Vancouver

Kaygusuz E. Türkiye’de iletişim eğitiminin akreditasyonu: Akredite programlardaki idareci akademisyenlerin görüşlerine yönelik bir araştırma. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences [Internet]. 17 May. 2024 [cited 17 May. 2024];0(64):123-153. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1238362 doi: 10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1238362


ISNAD

Kaygusuz, Erdinç. “Türkiye’de iletişim eğitiminin akreditasyonu: Akredite programlardaki idareci akademisyenlerin görüşlerine yönelik bir araştırma”. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0/64 (May. 2024): 123-153. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1238362



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Kabul25.03.2023
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma13.06.2023

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.