Şahabettin

Assist. Prof.

This study aims to investigate the utterance and meaning properties of augmented (mezîd) verbs expressing reflexivity (mutâva‘at) in the Arabic Language. In this study, dictionary definitions of the word ‘mutâva'at’, reflexivity measures of triliteral (sülâsi) verbs, augmented (mezîd) verbs expressing reflexivity (mutâva‘at), usage characteristics of the verbs expressing reflexivity, the opinions of grammarians about reflexivity and comparison of the verbs stating reflexivity with intransitive and passive verbs will be examined in the light of examples from the Qur’an, Arabic poetry and proverbs.Verbs play a significant role in Arabic grammar. Expressing judgment with verb sentences forms the basis of expressing thoughts in Arabic. Arab grammarians, from the time of Sîbeveyhî to the present day, have given special importance to verb patterns and their meanings whether they are mücerred (pure) verbs or mezîd (augmented) verbs. Understanding Arabic texts correctly and translating them appropriately in Turkish is closely related to knowing verb measures and their meanings. In grammar books, verbs have been dealt with under various sub-titles. Active-passive (ma‘lûm-meçhûl), transitive-intransitive (müte‘addî-lâzım), soundweak (sahîh-mu‘tel) and declinable-indeclinable (mutasarrıf-câmid) can be given as examples of these titles. Another important sub-topic of verbs is augmented (mezîd) verbs and their meanings. Verbs in Arabic are divided into two parts depending on whether their letters are original or not. The first category is pure (mücerred) verbs all letters of which are original, and the second one is augmented (mezîd) verbs to which letters are attached. In the Arabic language there are different meanings that augmented verbs express and reflexivity is one of them. Verbs which carry the meaning of reflexivity were used both in religious texts and in Arabic poetry and proverbs during the time before Islam (Câhiliyya).This study uses the scanning method, one of the data collection methods, to analyze and evaluate the collected data, and the views of the Arab grammarians on the subject were included. In order to better understand the subjects, the Qur'an, Arabic poetry and proverbs were quoted. In our preliminary research, it was found that there was no academic study on verbs expressing reflexivity in Arabic. Thus, we decided to prepare this study under the title of “Verbs Expressing Reflexivity in Arabic Language” to close this gap, even if only slightly.In the Arabic language, “infi‘âl” is the basic measure in terms of reflexivity. The measure of “infi‘âl”, which is one of the augmented verbs, is always intransitive and it never takes a direct object (mef‘ûlün bih). While other augmented verbs express other meanings beside reflexivity, the measure of “infi‘âl” only expresses reflexivity. In the Arabic language, there&nbsp;also some other augmented measures expressing reflexivity. Verbs that express reflexivity are not a different notation of intransitive verbs since there are also some transitive verbs with the meaning of reflexivity which take a direct object. However, intransitive verbs can never receive direct objects. Verbs that express reflexivity are divided into two in terms of transitiveness. The first category is that of reflexive (mutâvî‘) verbs that are always intransitive and the other is that of reflexive verbs which are transitive. Other augmented verbs stating reflexivity are also intransitive most of the time.&nbsp;While the topic of verbs is covered along with nouns and letters in grammar books, some books are dedicated only to verbs like the example of Kitâbu fa‘altü ve ef‘altü of Ebû İshâk ez-Zeccâc. In the words of Ibn Hisham, the meaning of reflexivity (mutâva‘at) is that the first of the two verbs creates an effect and the agent of the second verb accepts this effect. Agents of the verbs that express reflexivity have the meaning of object (mef‘ûl). In other words, agents of the verbs expressing reflexivity are not real agents which create an effect because these agents do not describe an action, state or occurrence, but on the contrary they are affected by the action.As a basic fact of grammar taught by Arab grammarians, verbs expressing the meaning of reflexivity are not regular. Radıyüddîn al-Esterâbâdî also says that the use of augmented verbs is irregular, and that those things that are heard from the Arabs should be taken as a basis when deciding which pure triliteral verb comes in which augmented verb measure.&nbsp;Arab grammarians included the style of reflexivity in their works and explained their conditions and features of their usage by giving examples from verse and poetry. There is no significant difference of opinion among the grammarians on the subject of reflexivity. The first grammarian who dealt with reflexivity was Sîbeveyhî. Later grammarians followed in his footsteps. Definitions of reflexivity given by later grammarians such as Radıyyüddîn elEsterâbâdî ve İbn Hişâm el-Ensârî were clearer and more precise, and their way of dealing with the issue was more systematic. Verbs expressing reflexivity are active in terms of utterance and passive with regard to meaning. Some grammarians, such as Sîbeveyhî, evaluate the verbs that express reflexivity in the same category as passive verbs in terms of meaning.

Arapçada Dönüşlülük (Mutâva‘at) Anlamı İfade Eden Mezid Fiiller

Ahmet

Prof.

Merzifon is one of our towns that has raised valuable figures for Islamic scientific and cultural life since the reign of Celebi Sultan Mehmed (between 816-824 Hegira years / 1413- 1421 Gregorian years). Among these figures are pundits, scholars, jurists, sufis, qadis and muftis. Merzifon Madrasah, built between the years of 1414 and 1417 (817-824 Hegira years) upon the order of Sultan Celebi Mehmet, who established his reign in the region of Tokat and Amasya after the Battle of Ankara, is one of the oldest monuments of Turkish-Islamic architecture. This famous madrasah, which has value in terms of the history of art, is also valuable in terms of the history of science in which we put emphasis. Merzifon Madrasah continued education and training activities from its beginning to the end of the ruling period of Sultan Süleyman the Magnificent (926-974 / 1520-1566), namely, in the classical Ottoman period. However, apart from this education and training institution, which we can call official, there were scientific and cultural activities in the town. As a matter of fact, the sources show us that a literary, moral, and mystical education was also provided in the mosques, lodges, houses, and mansions of the members and tutelars of science and literature.&nbsp;Abdurrahîm Merzifonî We should mention Abdurrahîm Merzifonî at the top of the list among the scientists and scholars in Merzifon. Besides his serious mystical experience, it is also observed that he scrutinized many valuable works in this field. Among these works were Vesayâ-yi Kudsiyye by Zeyneddin al-Hafi and the books named Ilam al-Huda and Avarif al-Me'arif by Sufi Shahbeddin as-Suhreverdi, the founder of the Suhreverdiye sect (d. 632/1234).&nbsp;Muhammed Kocevî Muhammed Kocevi, the father of Muhyiddin Seyyidi Çelebi (d.931 / 1524), who was mentioned by Taşköprülü-zade among the scholars in the reign of Sultan Bayezid II, also became a professor at Merzifon Madrasah. However, we need to remember that we do not know anything about him apart from the fact that he worked as a mudarris in this madrasah for a long time and we think he might have accomplished this task before his son.&nbsp;Crimean Sayyid Ahmed Crimean Seyyid Ahmed b. Abdullah took over the education and training after İlyas er-Rûmi, none of whose works were recorded in the sources. Among the information that we learned from Taşköprülü-zâde, is that Sultan Murad II gave Crimean Seyyid Ahmed his madrasah in Merzifon.&nbsp;Abdullah al-AmasiAnother person who worked as a manager in Merzifon during the reign of Sultan Murad II was Abdullah al-Amasi. The title of Amasi suggests that he might have been born in Amasya, or that he served in this city. Unfortunately, the information given in the sources does not allow us to know him closely.&nbsp;Molla AtufiMolla Atûfi, who was included in the scholars of Yavuz Sultan Selim period (918-926 / 1512-1520) by Taşköprülü-zade, dedicated some of his works to Sultan Bayezid II. He mentioned him as the true scholar and caliph of the century at the beginning of his book named K. Ravz el-insan fi t-tıbb en-nebevi, which is about tıbb-ı nebevî among those works.&nbsp;&nbsp;Molla Hafiz AcemMerzifon Madrasa continued to be an education and training institution where many valuable scholars lectured and wrote works during the period of Suleyman the Magnificent (926- 974 / 1520-1566). Molla Hafiz Acem (d. 957/155), who should be mentioned at the head of these, escaped from the pressure of Shah Ismail and came to Anatolia and wrote works during his service in this madrasah.&nbsp;We can listother scholars of Merzifon in the period of Sultan Süleyman the Magnicifient as follows: Kutbeddin el-Merzifoni. Kutbeddin el-Merzifoni, who in his last years was also in the neighborhood of Zenbilli Ali Efendi (d.932 / 1526), the famous scholar and Sheikhülislam of the period of Sultan Bayezid II, probably owes his title to having been born in this town. This figure, who died in 1528 (h.935), worked as a mudarris in Iznik, Davud Pasha (Istanbul) and Trabzon Madrasahs. It is also recorded that he had extensive knowledge in the Arabic sciences, especially in fiqh, and that he contributed with taliks to some parts of Sadru ş-Şerî'a's commentary about the book al-Vikaya and Sayyid Sharif's commentary about al-Miftah Seyrek Muhyiddin, whose full name was Muhyiddin Muhammed al-Huseyni, was from the vicinity of Ankara. Yusuf Germiyani was taught by Sayyidi Muhammed Kocevi and Birgivi-zade Muslihuddin Efendi and later became the assistant (muidi) of Bali Efendi of Aydın. It is recorded that he served as a mudarris in Ankara, Merzifon, and Tokat Madrasahs. He was also the teacher of Sehzade Mehmed, the son of Süleyman the Magnificent, and he passed away during this duty.&nbsp;Mecdi Efendi of Edirne reminded that the works of talik (footscripts), which he had written for some parts of Al-Hidaya and Sadr al-Shari'a, remained as a draft. Molla Zeyrek Muhyiddin also had a mosque and a training house built in his town. Molla İbnu-s Seikh: The father of this person, whose real name was Abdullah but known as Ibnu-s Sheikh, was the caliph of Taceddin, one of the sheikhs of the Zeyniyye sect. Ibnu s-Sheikh, who came from a family in Boyabat, became a student of Muhammed b. Hasan Samsuni and Seyyidi Mahmud Kocevi.&nbsp;He started teaching as a mudarris in Merzifon Madrasah and continued in other madrasahs which were not recorded by sources, but soon retired by opting for seclusion. It is noted that Ibnu s-Sheikh was a versatile scholar and he had extensive and reliable knowledge, especially in Beyzavi interpretation.&nbsp;Sheikh-zade: The father of Sheikh-zade, as mentioned above, Cemaleddin Efendi was one of the great scholars of the Bayezid period (886-918 / 1481-1512). Sheikh-zade, whose real name was Abdurrahman, took lessons from Hafiz Acem during his teaching at Merzifon Madrasah and later became the assistant of Molla Karabagî in Iznik Madrasah. After Karabagî's death in 942/1535, he was at Jazeri Kasımpaşa madrasah.The scientific activities that took place in Merzifon over a century and a half are discussed in this article. They were carried out by the madrasah members and their assistants, namely the mudarrises, their muids and advisors, within the Merzifon Madrasah and the madrasah later founded in the period of Sultan Murad II (824-855 / 1421-1451) and by scholars, poets and sufis outside the madrasah. We were unable to give an exact figure about the number of the madrasah members, their assistants, the scholars and the sufis. Only those who succeeded according to the order in the community books, that is, those who carried out the teaching and education activities in the desired way and also produced works besides these activities, were taken into account in this paper.

XV. ve XVI. Yüzyıllarda Merzifon'da Yetişmiş İlim Adamları

Süleyman

Lecturer

This article seeks to answer the question of how the Imāmī Shī‘ite approached qirā’ā (recitation) -especially in regard to exegetical studies- in its classical period. In order to do this the study takes two prominent scholars who were seen as authorities in the field, namely aṭ-Ṭūsī (d. 460/1067) and aṭ-Ṭabarsī (d. 548/1153). In this context, the scope of this study aims to include the opinions of the above-mentioned scholars regarding aḥruf al-sab‘a (seven letters), the origins of the qirā’ahs, their views on the problem of tawātur (authentically wide-spread), conditions of accepting, scrutinizing of the qirā’ahs and, finally, the preferred qirā’ahs they employed.&nbsp;Ṭūsī and Ṭabarsī are seen as the two most prominent scholars of the classical period of Imāmi Sḥī‘ite. Both at-Tibyān of Ṭūsī and Majma‘ul bayān of Ṭabarsī, which mostly took the former as the reference point regarding method, are seen as the first moderate exegetical studies that are centered on the ‘uṣūl/dirāyah method within the tradition.Both Ṭūsi and Ṭabarsī undertook different approaches in a number of matters compared to the early Shite exegetical scholars, primarily regarding their approach towards the qirā’a. Moreover both paved the way for a transformation within the discourse. Examples of some components of this transformation pioneered by the above-mentioned two scholars include a strong denial of the idea put forward by the early Ak̲h̲bāri S̲h̲iʾte exegetical scholars stating that the verbal recitation of muṣḥaf was distorted, and abandoning the use of extreme utterances and narrations that include defamation and despising of the first three caliphs and some companions. In addition, a philological examination of a number of verses of the Qur’ān, use of classical Arabic poetry, and conjunction by muṣḥaf are a few examples of how both scholars were in line with the commentaries of classical exegetical scholars of ahl al-Sunna.&nbsp;One of the issues greatly emphasized by both Ṭūsī and Ṭabarsī is the problem of al-aḥruf al-sabʿa (seven letters) which is seen as the base for the origination of recitations. Not only Ṭūsī, but also Ṭabarsī summarized the common understanding of narrations and ḥadīt̲h̲ within the S̲h̲iʾte discourse of the past and of their time regarding al-ahrufu’s-sab‘a as follows: “The Qur’ān was revealed to one Prophet, on one letter.” Moreover, they did not stay aloof to a number of narrations, referred to as “ʿāmma”, which comes through the channel of aḥl al-Sunna, and therefore they regarded them as falling within the genus of k̲h̲abar al-wāḥid by also stating that they found the idea of “seven different recitations forms” as compatible.&nbsp;Both Ṭūsī and Ṭabarsī seem to have failed to bring about a clear and distinct explanation regarding the authenticity of the recitations. However, the fact that their placement of some recitations, of which aḥl al-Sunna is regarded as falling within the category of sahīh/mutawātir (authentic), into categories of d̲h̲āif (weak), sh̲ad̲h̲ (uncommon), and further as mistaken, seems to be a good indicator of the fact that they have considered these recitations not tobe mutawātir. In addition to this, their statement that these recitations were both premised, and hence they were in circulation among the recitators of Imamite S̲h̲iʾte, shows that there did not exist a biased approach towards different recitations at the time.&nbsp;This study will demonstrate that the scholars held the criteria of “compatibility with Arabic language, correctness in terms of meaning, suitability to the writing style of musḥaf, and common usage among Muslims” as the main grounds for determining the authentic recitations. Although, these conditions are not found altogether in scholars’ works, it is still possible to draw a general principle from the explanations they made at different times and in different places.When it comes to choosing one recitation over another, both Ṭūsī and Ṭabarsī held that they were not content with the way in which the leaders of the prominent sects gave permission to conducting different recitations which were in circulation among the reciters, and they also objected to reducing the recitations to a single style and praising it. By way of reflection, in their works they tried to maintain an equal distance between all the recitations that existed within the qırā’at al-sab‘a and qırā’at al-asḥara. Although in exegesis and preference the dominance of the Ḥafs narration which stretches through the channel of ʿĀṣim (d. 127/745) is notable, they sometimes applied criticism towards some recitations within the Ḥafṣ (d. 180/796).It should not come as a surprise that both Ṭūsī and Ṭabarsī, who shared close and complementary opinions, engaged somehow in a slightly different methodology compared to the scholars who are placed within the Sunni discourse. However, it is of great significance that both Ṭūsī and Ṭabarsī used the reference sources of Sunni scholars. The attempts of both scholars in the late period (20th century and onwards) in Sunni-Shite dialectic is called the taqrīb’ul madhāib approach and shall be seen as a significant factor. Indeed, some sources are mentioned by Ṭūsī’s al-Tibyān and Ṭabarsī’s Majma‘ul-bayān as being the first works written within the scope of taqrīb (disclosing). It might be for this reason that Ṭūsī and Ṭabarsī dealt with a number of matters, primarily the problem of recitation, which were either ignored or only lightly touched upon by the Shite scholars.

İmâmiyye Şîası’nın Kırâatlere Yaklaşımı:  Tûsî-Tabersî Örneği

Mustafa

This paper is on an Arabic Wakfiya dated 1025/1616 issued by Ottoman Sultan Ahmad I. (from 1603 to 1617). The original copy of the Wakf documents is available among the documents in the Ottoman Archive in Kağıthane, Istanbul1 . Ottoman Sultan Ahmad I decided to prepare a separate Wakfiya in Egypt with his personal properties (Khawass-ı Padishahî) as revenue – generating properties for this wakf. Through the Wali (Governor) of Egypt Ahmad Pasha acting on behalf of the Sultan he arranged the registration of his Wakf in the Sharia Court at Cairo. The aim of the Wakf was to bring some comfort to the pilgrims on their way to Mecca at their final destinations, i.e., Ka’ba and Arafat. Awkaf (the plural of Wakf) are considered as a separate unit operating independently under the administration of Mutawallees, in the present terminology of the Board of Trustees, upon their registrations. They collect the income coming from the assets belonging to awkaf and with this income the endowments beneficiaries in Haramain are subsidized (Haramain is the collective name given to the sacred mosques at Mecca and Madinah).The Mutawallees were sometimes called Nâzır and they were appointed by the owner of the wakf in the beginning, but in later times they were appointed by the higher authorities. In the Awkaf of Haramain the highest authority is “Agha of Dârusse’âde at the Sultans’ Saray.” He held the highest position in the Haramain Awkaf and the yearly financial reports (muhâsebe-i vâridât ve mesârifât) were submitted to him. Mutawallee was responsible to observe that the “shart-ı wâkıf” (the conditions of the waqf) were satisfied in the expenditures. Payments were made according to the programme designed and put forward by the rules designated in Wakfiya. When the Agha of Dâr-üse’âda makes the necessary control of the payments indicated in the financial report, first he double-checks and controls whether any beforehand indication was made by the endowment documents. Sometimes these financial reports are submitted for a couple of years or more. It seems that there had been a double examinations and corporate responsibility throughout this process.&nbsp;Sultan Ahmad I. was a very pious man and apart from his awkaf we present here he established numerous religious foundations. We would like to highlight here that he constructed one of the most famous mosques in İstanbul known by his name: the Sultanahmet (Blue) Mosque. Its opening ceremony was a magnificent occasion in 16172 . All these awkaf show that he was very helpful towards the Muslims to feel free and comfortable in their prayers and visits to the Haramain area. He also pledged the full treatment to the Christians during their tour of Jerusalem and while visiting the famous Sepulchre there3 .Sultan Ahmed I, was also a good poet and wrote in a poetical works towards the Prophet Muhammad to express his feelings:“I wish I had put your foot-prints on my head as my crown”Some of his other works in and around Ka’ba (at the Haram of Mecca) and its neighbourhood: All of these repairs done at Haram and Ka’ba were undertaken by the report from Ameer of Mecca the Shareef because starting such repair works in Ka’ba could have been quite a risky undertaking. Therefore, long discussions took place in İstanbul among the ‘Ulama (The Religious Scholars) and it needed necessary care and attention to appoint an experienced architect. To name a few of such projects:1. He furnished the Ka’ba with many ornaments like “Mîzâb-ul-Rahma” on top of the Ka’ba such as the water spout for the rain water which comes down from the Roof of Ka’ba. Even today the Turkish people call it the “Golden Gutter” because it was made of gold in İstanbul and fixed over the old gutter. During this operation a repair of the roof was also carried out.2. Repairs of the two walls of Ka’ba: As we have seen before, starting a new repair or any alterations at Ka’ba could be a quite risky undertaking and, therefore, a full report was needed from the Ameer of Mecca about the problem asking for a solution. One such problem reported was in two walls of the Ka’ba; one at the western side and the other one in the eastern side. Sultan Ahmed I. invited the notables to a gathering. Some of them were in the opinion that Ka’ba should be demolished and rebuilt again. This would have been the most reliable way to solve the problem. Whereas, the other group proposed that the walls should be strengthened by supporting girdles or iron belts (known as “Nikât” in the Arab histories and in Turkish “Kuşak”) and that would resolve the issue without causing any disturbances. With the latter solution, no prayers (salat) would be interrupted and nobody would be disturbed. So, they chose&nbsp;the second peaceful way to use girdles to surround the wall with strong iron belts or copper plated with silver. But to construct such a heavy and bulky material like this would be achievable only in İstanbul and most probably at Tarsâne-i ‘Âmire (the Royal Arsenal). But then the problem was how to carry all of these materials all the way to Mecca. The story about carrying these heavy metals by camels and the welcoming ceremonies at their arrival has been narrated by many historians who were present among the welcoming people in 1611.3. Renovation of the four corners (al-Makâmât al-Arba’a): The four corners devoted to four major Islamic Schools were available around Ka’ba at the time of the Ottomans. They were Hanafî, Shafi’î, Hanbalî and Malikî schools or as they were called “alMazâhib el-Erba’a.” These corners were renovated in the year 1013/1604 during the time of Sultan Ahmad I.4. The well of Zamzam and its cover: The sacred well of Zamzam is located a little further from the centre of Makâm el-İbrâhîmî at the Ka’ba. According to the reports from the Ameer of Mecca there was a danger around the Zamzam, especially after a flood which used to happen in Mecca once in a while. The sudden increase in the level of Zamzam water would cause a great danger for the people who tried to get ablution or drink some Zamzam water from the well directly. In the upper part, the Zamzam well had a circular basin around the curb-stone of the well. The basin was wide but not very deep. But after the flood, the level of water would increase and create danger for the people. Many accidents and unwanted events took place during or right after the floods. Therefore, the problem was reported to İstanbul and at the end of the consultations among the professionals such as Mimâr Başı (head of the architects) and others they decided to construct a lid on top of Zamzam well to prevent such incidents. This lid was again constructed in İstanbul and send to Mecca for the implementation of the project.5. The water coming from Arafat and joining another water canal from Hunayn reached the city of Mecca. The project was initiated and implemented by Sultan Sulaiman elKanûnî, the great grandfather of Sultan Ahmad I (Ahmed’s father was Sultan Mehmed III, and his father was Sultan Murad III, and his grandfather was Sultan Sulaiman). The great project of sending Arafat water to Mecca was something farfetched at the beginning and with the passage of time the canals carrying the water became full of mud and needed some cleaning. So, during the time of Ahmad I. a new project was initiated to clean the canals of both Arafat waters and the waters of ‘Ayn Zubaida which brought water to Arafat. As a matter of fact, the new project initiated by the Sultan Ahmad I. covered both ‘Ayn Zubaiyda and Kânûnî projects. When they were&nbsp;&nbsp;completed and the water reached Mecca many local poets wrote some poems depicting this amazing event. ‘Alî ‘Abdulkadir el-Taberî wrote the following poetical works; “Fe kultu hâzâ al-‘Âm târîhahu, Karrat ‘Uyûn ul-Nâsi bi’l-Mâ-i.”

Sultan I. Ahmed Han’a Ait Haremeyn’le İlgili Arapça Bir Vakfiye

Serhan

Religion, which means “path, faith, tradition, bond, servitude” in all cultures, is a phenomenon that changes individual and social life with very strong influences. From this point of view, religion plays an important role in the formation of an individual's personality by contributing to their level of consciousness. We can also say that each religion has established a common ‘language of religion’ to form a common perception. In this respect, revelation is a sign this common language of religion and a state of communication in which God himself addresses in a language that humans speak. In other words, the revelation -word of God- that determines an individual's relationship with themselves, their surroundings, and God is presented to human understanding using the Qur'an's own linguistic and stylistic characteristics within the possibilities and limits of the Arabic language. Hence, in order to actualize this addressaddressee dialectic, the Qur'an takes into account the perceptions and concepts of the society it was revealed to and forms a common world view formed by the values of the society such as language, faith, culture, and history. Moreover, it actualizes the most beautiful transformation and change of the individual's mindset and identity by using the Qur'anic Style, which is the language's own style of expression, in verse and language form. Indeed, the correct understanding of the divine word is made possible by taking into account its distinctive Quranic language, its style, and its ikhbari (pronouncement) and inshai (constructive) sentence structures in parallel with its style of expression. In this way, it contains the transitivity in which one can be included in the context of the other from time to time in the course of the Qur'anic style, and it turns into the inshai structure, which is a higher style of the ikhbari form, and drives its addressees to change their actions.&nbsp;This study aims to identify the main subject of Surat Al-Infitar by taking into account the relationship between the addressees and the environment in light of the methods that are unique to the Qur'anic style offered as a linguistic method of understanding the Qur'an and the style of the language of religion that encompasses the whole of the Qur'an. In this sense, our study takes into account the constructional (inshai) structure that plays a role in manifesting&nbsp;and turning the warning (ikhbari) expressions for doomsday -like the sky will break apart, the stars will fall- into action mostly "here-now", beyond the informing of the future apocalypse. Therefore, the study tries to address the surah as a whole within the framework of the specific language structure of the divine word and the Qur'anic style. Thanks to this information that forms the basis of the method of the Qur'anic style, the verse(s) and/or the surah turns the gayb (invisible) sphere like the apocalypse, the judgement day, the hereafter into an active "event" and a new "action" happening "here-now" through the issues of the testimonial sphere of this world in a style that can be understood by all. As it were, the surah creates the comprehension of the truth of the revelation, which is first and foremost the first stage of the God-man relationship, through the reality of the change in the cosmic structure. And it also creates the understanding of "the hereafter with the consciousness of reckoning". Accordingly, it lays the burden of personal responsibility to the individual and it shows how the will and power of the divine truth manifests.&nbsp;In this context, the surah talks about the cosmic changes that took place during the events of doomsday which transforms into kalami action through Allah's taqwini laws and turns this action into morality. The surah begins with "doomsday" scenes that can be described as "the sudden occurrence of an event and/or the beginning of cosmic change" as if to show a new era is about to begin. The word infitar, which gives its name to the Surah, means "splitting, disturbing the existing order, interfering with something". And in this context, it is interpreted as "without knowing its nature, the revelation of the commandments of God to the Earth either through the descent of the Angels or by the greatness of the Lord". In our opinion, these events are aimed at drawing attention to the reality, nature, and possibility of the divine revelation, as well as emphasizing to their addressees that the old corrupt order will be replaced by a new one. As a matter of fact, when we take into account the revelation course of the Qur'an, we see that it conveys its divine message to a society where the majority were illiterate and thought it impossible for Allah to send his divine message to its addressees by means of a human being who also was illiterate. In addition, the context of forward-looking ikhbari statements reveals to us the inshai structure of the issues towards this world. In this sense, the surah builds a religious and moral consciousness through taqwini/qawni verses beyond just giving information. The point that draws attention here is that the qawni verses are both verses themselves, and that they are accepted as signs, prognostics, that is, intellectual evidence of the truth that exists in their own selves. It reflects the greatest evidence for the positioning of the revelation the fact that all beings, including the earth, sky, and man, with their apparent–known features witnessed by themselves are a verse. And it plays a role in the comprehension that they are all parts of the same whole, including this revelation. Moreover, in the minds of the addressees, who thought that it was impossible for Allah to send his message through the Prophet Muhammad Who was ontologically human, the entity to which they ascribe sanctity gains a new meaning and the actions created by this meaning explain the possibility of such revelation.&nbsp;Thus, a&nbsp;consciousness about everything that the Allah-universe relationship represents is created in the addressees and the absolute creative power behind this truth is pointed out. Therefore, the main subject of the surah is the creation of the awareness of the day of reckoning and the understanding of the hereafter, which is put forth with a style that is simultaneous with the possibility of the divine revelation, its nature and its reality.In line with this perspective, our work offers to read the depictions of the doomsday which belongs to the gayb for humans, the topics concerning the hereafter like the awareness of the day of reckoning in inshai form in the context of Qur'anic style. In this respect, our article attempts to understand and explain the effects of the Qur'anic style that are reflected in this world and which turn it into action and morality here and now, not in terms of the “reality and/or awareness of the scenes of the apocalypse”. Of course, this study, taken in the context of the Qur'anic style, is an effort aimed at basing not the style itself but only its method and, in parallel, determining the main idea of the surah.

Kur’ânî Üslup Açısından İnfitâr Sûresi

Şükran

Assoc. Prof.

Throughout the establishment and the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire, activities of compilation (texts, commentary, super-commentary, margin, abbreviation, abridgement, treatise etc.) and translation continued uninterrupted within the field of Arabic Language and Literature. The discipline of rhetoric is one of the most important areas which Ottoman scientific experience, in its connection with the activities of the above-mentioned linguistic disciplines, concentrate on. Three of these topics are mostly processed by metaphor (majâz), analogy-based metaphor (istiʻâra), and allusion (kinâya).Abû al-Qâsim al-Samarqandî’s (d. after 888/1483) analogy-based metaphor treatise Farâid al-fawâid and Mahmud al-Antakî's (d. 1160/1747) work on the relations of metonymy (al-majâz al-mursal) Risâlat al-istiâra, which is also known as al-Alâqa, are at the center of all these works produced within the process which was also pursued during the 18th century. Within this century alone, scholars such as Khalil Fâiz (d. 1134/1714), Musannifak Bakir al-Mantashawî (d. 1149/1736), Mastchizâdah Abdallah (d. 1150/1737), Waliy al-Din Jarullah (d. 1151/1738), Ismat Mehmed (d. 1160/1747), Ahmad al-Kâzâbâdî (d. 1163/1749), Yusuf Afandi-zâdah Abdullah Hilmi (d. 1167/1754), Zaynî-zâdah Husayn al-Burûsawî (d. 1167/1754), Mehmed al-Kafawî (d. 1168/1754), Mehmed Belîgh (d. 1170/1756), Abd al-Wahhâb al-Âmidî (d. 1190/1776), Ibn Qaratepeli Husayn (d. 1191/1777), Hasan İslimyeli (d. 1196/1782) and Muhammad Sâdiq (d. 1223/1808) wrote works of varying lengths about these two works which only focused on rhetoric topics such as metaphor (majâz), analogy-based metaphor (istiʻâra), and allusion (kinâya). Different studies of this century should no doubt be carried out in order to determine the reasons for such an occurrence.One of the scholars who studied metaphor (majâz), analogy-based metaphor (istiʻâra), and allusion (kinâya) during the same century and who has not yet been a topic of analysis –as far as we know- is Muhammad b. Muhammad el-Chorûmî (18th century). Although there is very little information regarding his life, deducted from the content of his works it is assumed that he might have been a scholar of the 18th century. Through our research we have only&nbsp;identified two of Chorumî’s works which have survived up until today and both of them are about language, more specifically, about metaphor (majâz), and allusion (kinâya).&nbsp;1. Sharh al-masâlik 2. Risâla fî al-farq bayn al-kinâya wa al-majâzWhile examining the difference between allegories and metaphors in Risâla fî al-farq bayn al-kinâya wa al-majâz, Chorûmî took into account the remarks of Sakkâkî, Qazwînî, Taftâzânî and Sayyid Sharîf. During the Ottoman Period, studies on Arabic rhetoric were substantially maintained through these four names to whom Chorûmî has also referred frequently in his study. In fact, to study and teach the works of Sakkâkî, Qazwînî, Taftâzânî and Sayyid Sharîf became a tradition. When analyzing this tradition, it can be seen that it emanated from these three schemas:Name Schema: Sakkâkî (ö. 1228) → Qazwînî (ö. 1336) → Taftâzânî (1390) → Sayyid Sharîf (ö. 1412)Works Schema 1: Miftâh(S) → Talkhîs(K) → Mutawwal ve Mukhtasar(T) → Khâshiya ala al-mutawwal(SŞ)&nbsp;Works Schema 2: Miftâh(S) → Talkhîs(K) → Îdhâh(K)Works Schema 3: Miftâh(S) → Misbâh(SŞ)Particularly after the 16th century, Abû al-Qâsım Samarqandî's (d. after 888/1483) figure of speech treatise Farâid al-fawâid was also articulated to this line and it only became more pervasive during the following centuries. Thus, as pointed out above, in the introduction of his Risâla, Chorûmî fulfilled the wishes of his pupils for him to write a work which would point to the differences between allusion (kinâya), and metaphor (majâz) while teaching Samarqandî’s work known as al-İstiʻârât to the students.As can be seen in the schema, Sakkâkî’s work called Miftâh al-ulûm has been used as a source for many studies and the topics have been discussed mostly through the principles he established. Essentially Chorûmî also preached the subject through two of the main issues put forth, focusing mainly on the first one, as explored in the article extensively. While doing this, he also mentioned the opinions and included the disputes put forth by Qazwînî, Taftâzânî and Sayyid Sharîf. He also expressed his own opinions on the subject with his own reasoning.It can be said that Chorumî utilized the schema created by Sakkâkî in his work Miftâh alulûm in order to explain the difference between metaphor (majâz), and allusion (kinâya) and that he supported the opinions of Sakkâkî while also criticizing Taftâzânî. Consequently, it is possible to follow Chorûmî’s narrative through Taftâzânî. In his work Chorûmî mainly focused on expressing the opinions of the above-mentioned scholars more clearly, mediating between the scholars’ opinions when they differ and opting for the most suitable opinion between the scholars. Chorûmî defined the fundamental difference between metaphor (majâz), and allusion (kinâya) by asking whether the true meaning is implied or not. Through his deduction there has to be a presumption enabling the implication of the true meaning in metaphor (majâz), but with

Mehmed Çorûmî'nin Mecâz ve Kinâye ile İlgili Risâlesi

Fatih

The assessment of the historians and biography authors in the period of the Mamluks should be made by considering the political, military, economic, social and scientific developments during the period, from the establishment of this state to its collapse. For example, in history works, which were written during the founding years of the Mamluks, the major theme is the struggles against the Crusaders and the Mongols. In the following years, the historians focus especially on the interior developments during al-Melikü-n-Nasir Muhammed b. Kalavun (first reign: 693-694/1293-1294, second reign: 698-709/1299-1309, third reign: 709-741/1309-1341). In the late 8th (14th) century and early 9th (15th) century, the historians focused on Timur (771-807/1370-1405), and especially towards the end of the Burji/Circassian Mamluke period (784-923 / 1382-1517), the focus was on the new rival and the hostile Ottomans. Likewise, due to the increasing economic problems in the last period of the state and the riots caused by the Mamluk groups, economic and social issues were discussed more. On the other hand, the social classes to which historians belong to affect both the content of the historical works and the way they address the events. For example, historians from the military class concentrate more on political events and give more information about the military class that holds the power. Also, the biographies of the people belonging to this class are relatively intense compared to other individuals in the biography sections of their work. The historians from the Ulema class, although there are exceptions, address to social and scientific/cultural developments more, and also devote a large part for the biographies of scholars in the biography sections. The geographical regions where the historians live also affect the content of their works. For example, historians who live in the Damascus region (Syria/Bilad-i Damascus) generally concentrate on the biographies and prefer Damascus-based narrative in political developments. Egyptian historians, on the other hand, address the events more than the biographies, and they focus on the developments taking place in Cairo, the capital city. Therefore, Mameluke historiography has several differences based on the period, place, and social class of the historians and their position in the state.First of all, it is necessary to point out some possible reasons for writing so many historical works during the Mamluks period. The patronage provided by the sultans and statesmen to the historians and their encouragement should be mentioned first. As a matter of fact, Sultan Baybars adopted Ibn Sheddad and Ibn Abduzzahir among his relatives and took them to some of his campaigns. For example, Ibn Abduzzahir was with Baybars during his Kayseri campaign. Ibn Abduzzâhir’s booklet in makâma-style on the Kayseri campaign is quite detailed and requires special study. Also, it is a primary source in terms of determining the characteristics of the Turkish Seljuks, such as their various customs, and clothing. The statesmen of this period not only encouraged and provided patronage to the historians, but some of them also wrote historical works such as Baybars el-Mansuri and Ebu'l-Fida al-Meliku'l-Mueyyed. Also, it is determined that the leading Mameluke sultans transferred their knowledge and observations to the historians of the period. As a matter of fact, it is determined that many Mameluke sultans were among the important sources of historians such as Yunini, Nuveyri, Ibnu'd-Devadari, Makrizi, Ayni, and Ibn Tagriberdi.The works of the children of the Mameluke sultans, which were the class of "evladunnas", also played an important role in the spread of historiography. It could be said that the members of this group, who were regarded as a reserve force and not generally appointed to important positions, tried to stand out with what they wrote in the field of history. We compare this situation with the fact that the non-Arab class, which was generally in the second order in the Umayyads (41-132/661-750) period, came to the fore in the field of science. Among the leading historians of the Mamluks period, the authors such as Ibnu'd-Devadari, Ibn Dokmak, Ibn Tagriberdi, Abdulbasit el-Malati, and Ibn Iyas tried to maintain the role of their fathers or grandfathers in the field of history. Substantially, the criticism of these historians for the historians came to the fore in the religious sciences such as Makrizi, Ibn Hacer, Sehavi, or Hatib el-Cevheri from the public class, and the criticisms of historians from the ulema class for them took place on the ground of knowledge or ignorance about the Mameluke State politics and Mameluke system. In particular, the criticisms of IbnTagriberdi on this group in terms of the Mameluke system and their knowledge of Turkish language, the statements of him and Abdulbatit al-Malati, which glorified the Bahri/Turkish Mamluks period, and severe criticism of Sehavi and Hatib al-Cevheri's on their close relations with the statesmen of the "evladunnas" class can be given as examples. It should be noted that the criticisms of Sehavi and Hatib al-Cevheri also provided very valuable information in terms of determining the understanding of the patronage of scholars in this period.Finally, we would like to propound some of our opinions about how historical works written during the Mamluks should be used. First of all, we should present our objections to the view that the Mameluke historiography is a repetition of each other and that there are several fundamental works. In our opinion, some minor details are scientifically vital in illuminating many historical events. For example, Makrizi, who lived about a century&nbsp;after the establishment period of the Mamluks period, points out many details in his works, which he wrote with the help of historians who had witnessed that period and also he connected events that were reported to be independent of each other in previous history books. Also, the widest information about the biography of Baybars al-Mansuri is included in the works of Makrizi, not Safedi or Kutubi. Being from the same period as Makrizi, Ibn Kadi Suhbe conveys some of the events, which are comprehensively conveyed by Makrizi, in a short form but with important remarks. For example, while Makrizi mentions general statements about the peace that was tried to be established by the Crusader states for a long time after the known Alexandria raid, Ibn Kadi Suhbe reports that Cyprus is also among the parties to the accord and provides explanatory information, stating that the term of the accord is twenty years. Ibn Tagriberdi, who was the student of Makrizi, quotes many events from the works of his teacher during his life, however, he provides important remarks and corrections by intervening with his famous “kultu”s. Ed-Delilu's-safi, which is a summary of the twelve-volume al-Menhel, is one of the two biographical works of Ibn Tagriberdi, and it can be given as an example of this situation in that it contains additional biographies and the death dates of some sultans not included inthe first work. Therefore, the historical works that appear to be repetitions of each other, play an important role in clarifying the events with the details they provide, although they are little.

Memlükler Dönemi (648-923/1250-1517) Tarih ve Tabakât Eserlerine Dair

Özgür

The new situation that emerged following the collapse of the Baghdad-based Abbasid Caliphate in 1258 brought about a number of developments in terms of political thought. . The institution of the caliphate had been renovated in 1261 by Egypt-centered Mamluks, a realm which had been founded immediately prior to the fall of the caliphate, and this new structure of the caliphate had encouraged many scholars to enquire into various aspects of politics, especially the caliphate issue. In addition, the ongoing conflicts with the Mongols and the Crusaders had influenced the attitudes and the language of texts in the field. Moreover, with the influence of competition with the neighboring Islamic states, sometimes in times of war and sometimes in times of peace, a rich literature of political thought had been collected in the Mamluk era.This study tries to draw together some thoughts on the diversity of political thought texts in the Mamluk period and tries to shed light on the main issues of that period. Additionally, the study draws attention to two main arguments on “political-jurisprudential ahkâm”: The debates on the caliphate-sultanate axis which revive the tradition of al-Ahkam al-Sultaniyya and the problems of political legitimacy stemming from the question of being a Qureshi or not. The main claim of the article is that the different fiqh tendencies of the time triggered discussions on politics, as a result of which a rich literature emerged. This article focuses only on the written literature of the field, bearing in mind the fact that there is a variety of sources regarding this literature. It is possible to categorize the main issues of the political texts of the Mamluk era as follows:&nbsp;1. Political- Jurisprudential Issues a. The question of the caliphate and the sultanate that came to the fore following the emergence of the Egyptian Abbasid caliphate as a consequence of the fall of the Abbasid caliphate; the issues particularly related to the problem of being a Qureshi or not; and the issue of legitimacy.b. The discussions on siyasa shariyya that arose with the influence of The Great yāsā of Chingiz Khān, the practices of mazalim and hisbe as an extension of this, and the discussions about the most appropriate mazhab for the state which aimed to change the mazhab preference of the state if it was deemed necessary.c. The jihad/siyer, bağy and âdâb-ı harb/the art of war literature, that was formed with the influence of the wars with the Crusaders, Mongolians and other Islamic states, and also ahkam of zımmîs as an extension of this subject.• Since a dynastic model could not be properly executed, the power would change hands frequently. Hence issues like dethroning (hal‘), resignation and coup are among the main issues. • The pressing need to establish institutions dealing with social control, and the responsibilities that politicians had in the face of the emergence of vital social problems/ bid’ahs.2. Adab Literature: Political Nasihatnâmesc. Moral, political and historical texts written for sultans whose religious and cultural backgrounds were relatively limited and who did not have sufficient experience; the texts written for the purpose of the education of the sultan. d. The literature on official correspondence. e. Texts including the speeches of meetings attended by the sultan, and the divan which contains the sultan’s poems. f. Texts written for other state officials. The literature addressing all the above-mentioned issues constitutes the main sources of political thought in the Mamluk period. The following issues should also be added to the pool of resources:&nbsp;3. Issues Related to Social-Cultural Life-Political Thought g. Classification of sciences and unmûzac books. h. Texts about the social-cultural life in Mamluk period. i. Encyclopedic works.&nbsp;Following this general introduction, the article firstly focuses on the debates taking place around the caliphate and the sultanate axis which revive the tradition of al-Ahkâm al-sultaniye. In this context, Ibn Jamâa (d. 733/1333), the first author whose opinions are examined in this study, tried to draw a legal framework around the caliphate-sultanate separation in his book entitled Tahrîr al-ahkâm fî tadbîr ahl al-Islâm”. While another shafi faqih, Muhibbuddin al-Maqdisi (d. 888/1483), strengthened the position of the Mamluk sultan and pushed the caliphate institution to the background in his work Bazl an-nesâih as-shar'iyya, Ibn al-Mibred (d. 909/1503) from the Banî Qudâme family heavily criticized the regime at the time and proposed an alternative ruling model centered around a Qureshi caliphate in his work Izâh turuk al-istikâme.The competition between the Mamluks and the Ilhanites who adopted Shiite practices in the Olcaytu period also caused intellectual fragmentation. For instance, Ibn Taymiyya&nbsp;(d. 728/1328) wrote titled Minhâc as-sunnah an-nabaviyyah as a refutation for al-Hillî’s (d. 726/1325) work entitled Minhâc al-karâmah. Zahabî (d. 748/1348) who wrote a summarized version of Ibn Taymiyya’s voluminous book and who also wrote imamah texts as a rejection of Shiite understanding of imamah, took his place among studies which discussed the issue of the imamah-caliphate debate.The second issue examined by this study is the problem of political legitimacy stemming from the question of Qureyishness. This issue is analyzed through three types of texts. Ideas of Hayrbaytî (d. 844/after 1440-1441), who had established the formulation of “the sultan being appointed by Qureshi” in his work titled al-Durra al-garrâ will be studied at first. Secondly, the approach of Arab faqih al-Maqdisî from Quds (d. 896/after 1490-1491) will be examined. The latter wrote a thesis titled Duval al-Islâm as-sharîfa that claims Arabs lost the quality for political leadership and that the existing gap was filled by the Turks. Finally, two other books, Nafâis macâlis al-sultâniyya and al-Ukûd al-Cavhariyya, are discussed in this study. Those books draw attraction since they include the records of Kansu Gavrî’s (d. 922/1516) discussions with the ruling elite about the Circassians’ attempts to establish a link between Circassians and the Arabs or prophets Ishaq and Yaqub.The works included in this study, which are about the problem of the caliphate-sultanate separation and about the problems of legitimacy, also show that the political attitudes of ulama from different sects sometimes correspond with each other in Mamluk political thought. The efforts of both Hanafi and Shafii scholars to recognize the legitimacy of Mamluk sultans are meaningful from this perspective. There are texts showing what a rich environment of discussion had taken place. For instance, there were scholars who defended the idea that some applications of the Mamluk period were a departure from the legitimate political applications of earlier periods. And also this departure constitutes a problem that should be solved. By taking the detailed information about the identities, legal sects and political positions of the scholars into consideration, the extensive analyzes will give an opportunity to better realize the Mamluk political thought on the one hand, and also facilitate the process of understanding the thoughts of Ottoman scholars who contacted this knowledge on the other. Moreover, by so doing, a fruitful ground is expected to emerge for Ottoman political thought studies.

Memlükler Dönemi Siyaset Düşüncesine Giriş: Ahkâm-ı Sultâniye Geleneğinin İhyasi ve Meşruiyet Problemini Aşma Çabaları

Tuncay

In this article, I studied the characteristics, types, and titles of fiqh works written in the Ayyubid-Mamluk period with special reference to the scientific mindset of the period. I tried to map the legal writing and to analyze it from the point of its characteristics. Firstly, relying on research on the biographies in the TDV Encyclopedia of Islam and some other biographical studies, I found 464 scholars who had written at least one fiqh work with the condition that they had lived and died in Egypt, Biladush-Sham or Hijaz in the Ayyubid-Mamluk period. According to my findings, most of the scholars lived and carried out their studies in Qairo and Damascus. These two cities were followed by Halab, Mecca, al-Quds as-Sharif, Alexandria, and Madina in order of the scholars’ origins. Secondly I identified all the fiqh works of these scholars including those that either no longer exist today or we don’t have any information about their existence, and found around 1750 titles. The number of legal works might possibly be higher than this when additional research is done through the manuscript libraries and tabaqat works. Then I classified and analysed them, setting the general inclinations and characteristics of the fiqh writing in that period. As an example, there are around 350 works on usul al-fiqh, some complete and some incomplete, some in verse (manzum), written in this period. Nearly forty works on ahadith al-ahkam, more than thirty tabaqat works for fuqaha (not including the general biographies, history books, autobiographies, biographies focused on some regions, etc.) were written as well. Additionally I made general, macro-level comparisons between the mentioned period and other periods of Islamic history. The scholarly and intellectual orientation of this period seems to be highly different from that of the Eastern Lands of Islam (the region between Baghdad and Samarkand) in the late classical period. The scholars of Ayyubid-Mamluk period were more religious and humanistic studies oriented and more interested in the history, hadith and fiqh studies, whereas the eastern scholars, especially the followers of Fakhraddin al-Razi, were more interested in ulum al-aqliyya, e.g. kalam, logic, speculative ethics and theoretical linguistic studies. As characteristic of the Ayyubid-Mamluk period, many works on tabaqat, ahadith al-ahkam, etc. were written - more so than in any other period. New genres like qawaid / furuq / al-ashbah wa al-nazair came out as a result of certain intellectual transformations in the late classical period. Important textbooks (mukhtasars) of three fiqh madhhabs (Shafii, Maliki and Hanbali) that generated a literary tradition of sharhs and hashiyahs in the late classical period were written by the Ayyubid-Mamluk scholars. A striking tendency of the Mamluk scholars was their unprecedented thirst and race for writing scholarly books. Although having authored some fiqh work, proving the legal competency seems to be a semi-obligatory custom for one’s designation to the offices like qadi, mudarris, mufti of dar al-adl, there were other more important -and one might say – existential motives that stimulated the growth of legal writing such as the concern for the preservation of the scholarly legacy against the threat of extinction, like reproduction of past works and adaptation to a new milieu, and the existence of four madhhabs competing with each other. However, the&nbsp;scholarly works of this period cannot be seen as limited to a mere imitation of and copy of past works; on the contrary, they brought important newness and freshness to the field. Against the thesis and historical narrative seeing this period as a period of decline and imitation, I claim that the richness of fiqh literature, rise of new types and existence of assertive fiqh scholars and works draw a very different picture. And so, the history of legal thought and practice of this period deserves to be researched and rewritten.

Eyyûbîler ve Memlükler Dönemi Fıkıh Yazımı

Güllü

Aiming to be an introduction to the historiography of sīra during the Mamlūk era, this study is planned as two parts. The first part examines an established list of sīra works written in this period in terms of contents, methods, and subjects put forward by scholars. Thus, it tries to draw a frame for sīra books of the Mamlūk era by putting emphasis on the diversity of them. Examining one or two texts from each genre, it reaches some conclusions which are thought to be extended to include other texts of the same genre as well. The second part discusses some controversies on sīra subjects and texts compiled because of these controversies. Also, it emphasizes the source value of treatises and fatwa compilations for the historiography of sīra since treatises were written by scholars to defend their views in the scholarly debates and fatwa compilations depict the transmission of religious knowledge produced within scholarly circles to social practices.The Mamlūk era is regarded as representing the highest rank that the Islamic world has reached until that day in text production not only quantitatively but also qualitatively. It can be said that this judgement is acceptable for the historiography of sīra. Even it is still far from being thorough, our text list is rich enough to confirm this assessment. Although we cannot talk about an emerging new genre in the sīra field, the most developed texts of every genre were compiled during this period. Also some genres came into prominence and issued more texts than others. First of all, we must remark “comprehensive sīras” as the first of these genres. Designating a sīra work as “comprehensive” in this study means that it includes not only a chronological narrative of the Prophet Muhammad’s life but also his appearance (shamāil), his special features (khasāis) and prophetic proofs (dalāil), his hilya, his miracles, his family and relatives, his wives and children, his freed slaves and servants, his scribes and mu’azzins, his property, weapons and mounts, his major and minor pilgrimages, his death and funeral. Comprehensive sīras can be regarded as a reflection of the encyclopedic feature of the period on the historiography of sīra. Even in abridged sīras written in this period, the content of the comprehensive sīras was applied. In addition to comprehensive sīras, there are so many examples of abridged sīras and sīras written in verse from the Mamlūk era and these texts are primarily used for educational purposes in scholarly circles.&nbsp;Another scholarly feature of the Mamlūk era is compiling commentaries and glosses on canonic texts of Islamic sciences. Considering the sīra field, this period is also very rich in regard to the commentaries and glosses. It can be observed that some scholars tend to limit&nbsp;themselves to literally explanations, while on the contrary, others tend to extend their comments on every aspect of the text under scrutiny. In addition to sīra books, it must be noted that there are also books from other genres written in this period which include a chapter on sīra. These sīra chapters in general histories, biographical dictionaries, and encyclopedic works must also be examined in detail to reach a complete picture of the period in terms of the historiography of sīra.&nbsp;Beside the above mentioned sīra works which were produced and consumed mostly within academic circles, there are also “popular” sīra works which were mostly composed and narrated by storytellers and preachers. Prominent scholars such as Ibn Taymiyya severely criticized these popular sīra works and issued fatwas or compiled treatises against them especially on the mawlid (the birthday of the Prophet Muhammad and the celebrations), his miracles and prophetic proofs.To conclude it must be emphasized that the historiography of sīra during the Mamlūk era is still a largely unstudied subject. Thus, the very first aim of this study is to show that there are an exhausting list of works still waiting to be examined in various aspects. Because that period witnessed a massive text production and scholars put emphasis on protecting the academic heritage, reconstructing it and transmitting it to the next generations in a more systematic way.

Memlükler Dönemi Siyer Yazıcılığına Genel Bir Bakış

Nagihan

Res. Assist.

The Mamlūk Turkish State (648-923/1250-1517) was a state that triumphed against the Mongols and the Crusaders. The Mamlūk Turkish State which dominated Egypt, Damascus and Hijaz, the most important regions of the Islamic world for nearly three centuries, had a great impact on the Islamic states after that, especially the Ottoman Empire, with its political and scientific institutions. The Mamlūk State where developments could be regarded as the summit in terms of science as well as political avhievements, should be handled in terms of hadith science. Because this period was a rich period where many muhaddithūn were trained, the best examples of hadith literature were written, and they offer basic resources to today’s researchers in every field of the Islamic sciences.One of the reasons why hadith science became popular in this period is that the Muslims living in the Mamlūk s period were the people who knew that the most important science center, Baghdad, was recently destroyed by the Mongols, and who actually fought against the Mongols. This situation should have prompted them to hold on the Qur’an and sunna more tightly, and to adopt a simple and clean contract as in the first years of Islam, rather than new theoretical-philosophical debates. In addition to the hadith science in society, the fact that much more importance was given to the life of Sufism and zuhd, and the positioning of society in a high position in the hadith science and muhaddithūn shows this.Mamlūks took many of their features from the Ayyūbid State, which ruled before them in the geography they dominated. There are some applications of the Ayyūbids on the background of the importance given to the science of hadith in society. One of the reasons why madrasahs and Dār al-ḥadīth were built during the Ayyūbid period was to take a precaution against Shii, and to adopt the Sunni contract. Because of this purpose, the Ayyūbids gave much more importance to Asharism than to other sects, with the thought that they were the best representatives of Sunni in general. Overtime, this attitude became more radical in the name of Asharism. As a result of the efforts made to spread and strengthen the Asharism, the majority of the people adopted it. When the Mamlūks came in time, it was not possible to eliminate the Ashari/Shafii effect from the Ayyubids despite some practices such as the appointment of judges from four different sects. The negative policies followed by the Shia tendencies against the hadith led to the selection of hadith and circumcision as the method of protecting the Sunni in Egypt and Damascus, and the emphasis on the hadith. Accordingly, the number of Dār al-ḥadīth in the&nbsp;region, and the importance given by the society to the hadith education increased. This situation seems to be the main reason underling the fact that hadith science developed significantly during the Mamlūk period.The importance of the Mamlūk Sultans and Emirs, who gave importance to science and scholars in general, to give special importance to science of the hadith and scholars, which were engaged in hadith, and the presence of Sultans and Emirs, who attended the hadith assemblies, listened and narrated the hadith, and classified the works, can be mentioned among the factors affecting the development of the hadith.Another reason for the hadith science to be highly developed and widespread among the Mamlūks during the Mamlūk is the high number of places and facilities where the science of hadith could be collected. Because there were quite different and easy ways to collect hadith education in this period.A large number of Dār al-ḥadīth allocated to hadith science, especially madrasahs, where other Islamic sciences were collected, mosques where people from all walks of life could easily participate without any quota, age or scientific level limitation, served as training institutions as well as hankhah, ribat, lodges, libraries and tombs that served as an educational institution made the hadith science easily accessible, and offered numerous possibilities for those who wanted to collect hadith science.&nbsp;Some situations arising from the technical characteristics of hadith science should have contributed to the spread of hadith science in the society and to increase the number of scholars receiving hadith education. Practices belonging to the science of hadith, such as isnad, acceptance of the method of icazet and concluding the sema and spelling councils that can be easily attended by all sects, and which gained widespread in many cities during the Mamlūk s, led to the formation of a mobility and liveliness in favor of hadith science in the society.&nbsp;It can also be thought that the upbringing of the Mamlūk Sultan and Emirs, brought from various countries as devshirme, with the love of Prophet and perception of the sunna, gave them a special emphasis on the science of hadith when they came power. In addition, the fact that Turks, who love to fight and are a strong nation, have adopted the understanding of jihad for God should be considered. In this regard, the science of hadith has performed a role that encourages both the sultan and emirs and the society which they managed. It can be said that this understanding also leads to the fact that the science of hadith has had a special place for the administrators.In the Mamlūk society, scholars generally received education in many branches of Islamic sciences and they wrote works by giving lectures in each branch of science. For this reason, many of comrades in this period were also good historians, good jurists, good commentators. In Mamlūk society, apart from being a group that produced information, scholars had a different function. Since the Sultans and the Emirs were different from the people in terms of ethnicity and sectarian, they needed scholars to establish contact with the people. Sultans have been in contact with scholars to ensure their legitimacy, to control the religious structures of the society, to encourage the society in war and economic troubles and to persuade society in important decisions. The Scholars also needed a political stability in order to work in institutions such as madrasahs and Dār al-ḥadīth and to continue their scientific studies at peace. Therefore, the Scholars should have been in contact with the Sultans. This situation has often affected their scientific and social relations with each other.&nbsp;In the Mamlūk community where various denominations and ethnic groups live, the position of scholars in society varies. The people gave a special value to the scholars who were busy with the ḥadīth because of their interest in the Hz. Prophet and the science of the ḥadīth. In this study, the relationship of the Scholars and especially the muḥaddith with the politicians and each other, the understanding of the ḥadīth and sunna of the society and the position of the scholars in the society will be discussed.

Memlüklerde Hadis ve Ulema

Muhammet

Mamluks held a distinguished status in Islamic history by virtue of putting an end to the Crusader threat in the Egyptian-Syrian region and to the Mongol invasion, which had destroyed the eastern Islamicate world. First the Mongol invasion, then Timur’s expeditions wreaked havoc in the eastern Islamicate world and caused the movement of a great number of scholars to the Mamluk-ruled territories. Similarly, on one hand, the uneasiness derived from the ongoing reconquista in al-Andalus, and on the other, the memories of pilgrim-scholars of al-Andalus and al-Maghrib regarding the cities of Egypt and Syria, where prominent scholars preferred to live and numerous scholarly institutions existed, attracted the Andalusi and Magribi scholars’ attention to Egyptian-Syrian cities. Scholars coming from east and west of the Egyptian-Syrian region participated in the scholarly milieu of Mamluk cities such as Cairo and Damascus within a short period of time. They acquired positions like the post of chief judge and mudarris, and the majority preferred to live in these cities to the end of their lives with the pleasure of having multiple facilities. The influx of scholars from the east and west constituted the cosmopolitan scholarly milieu in the cities of Egypt and Syria, and, thanks to that, numerous works in almost all branches of the Islamic sciences were produced, and new encyclopedic genres came to light.Mamluks fashioned themselves as the guardians of the Islamic world by protecting the Egyptian-Syrian region from external threats, like the Crusades and the Mongols, as the restorers of the caliphate by reinstituting the caliphate in Cairo after the collapse of the Baghdadcentered Abbasid caliphate; and as the servants of the two holy places (khadim al-haramayn) after acquiring the obedience of the sharif of Makkah. All of these developments increased the respect of scholars for the Mamluks.In addition to promoting the safety and stability in the region they ruled, Mamluks made cities like Cairo, Damascus, Aleppo, and Jerusalem prominent learning centers in the Islamicate world by constructing a great number of scholarly institutions and providing a wide range of facilities for scholars. During the Mamluk period, what is called “scholarly institution” was by no means restricted to the institution of madrasa. Thus, historians of ulama and educational&nbsp;institutions of that period need to take into consideration other scholarly institutions alongside the madrasa. For instance, in that period, mosques and hanqāhs had lessons supported by waqfs and also offered stipendiary positions (mansibs) to ulama. Furthermore, institutions like madrasa, mosque and hanqāh intertwined with each other in terms of their architectural forms and institutional functions, so that they became multi-functional scholarly institutions, with the names: “mosque-madrasa”, “hanqāh-madrasa”, “mausoleum-madrasa”, “mosquemadrasa-hanqāh” and “mosque-madrasa-mausoleum”. In the period covered by this article, scholarly institutions, which have lessons for four Sunni schools of law together with lessons for hadīth, tafsīr, usūl al-fiqh, qirā’ā, nahw, medicine, and ‘ilm al-mīqāt, were formed. These types of scholarly institutions paved the way for a large number of scholars and students to establish personal, scholarly, and professional networks with each other.&nbsp;This article deals with the motivations behind the movement of scholars to the EgyptianSyrian region in the Mamluk period and evaluates remarks in modern scholarship on this issue. Moreover, the article proposes that three interrelated tendencies came into view at the scholarly institutions of Cairo, which was the political and cultural center of the Mamluks. These tendencies are: first, the harmonization of madrasa and mosque in terms of their architectural forms and institutional functions; second, the emergence of scholarly institutions that combine the functions of a number of institutions such as mosque, madrasa, hanqāh, bīmāristān, and mausoleum; and lastly, the formation of scholarly institutions, that offer a large number of mansibs to ulama by providing lessons for the four Sunni schools of law together with lessons for tafsīr, hadīth, and the other sciences mentioned above.

Ulemânın Memlük Coğrafyasına Yönelmesi ve Memlükler Döneminde Kahire İlim Kurumları

Abdurrahman

Hicrî 6. Asırda Yaşamış Rakkalı Bir Müderrisin Bilinmeyen Nâdir Bir Eseri (Sâid b. Ahmed b. Ebubekir el-Hanefî’nin “el-Cem‘u beyne’l-fetvâ ve’t-takvâ fî muhimmâti’d-dîni ve’d-dünyâ” Adlı Eseri)

Ümit

Mohammad

Şeyh Alî el-Bistâmî’nin (Musannifek) “Risâle Der Cevâbi Hasen/Kâfûr-i Hasen” Adlı Risâlesi Üzerine Bir İnceleme: Tercüme ve Değerlendirme

Cemal

Kitap Değerlendirmesi: Faiz Meselesi: Tarihte Örnek Uygulamalar Murat Ustaoğlu-Ahmet İncekara (İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları), s. 361. ISBN: 978-605-399-546-3

Mahmut

Assist. Prof. Dr.

&nbsp;The purpose of this article is to examine the critical views of a modest author who moved from ilmiye class to qalamiyya class, ezamining practices in the first months of the Second Constitutional Era through, his treatise titled İslâmlık Elden Gidiyor. In this way, it will be revealed how a young writer with religious sensitivities, who went through both religious and secular education processes of the period, was at the beginning of his civil service life and who also produced literary works, was affected by the Second Constitutional Monarchy environment and its practices, and how he viewed controversial issues.&nbsp;Ali Fuad was the son of the regent (nâib) Mehmed Şükrü Efendi (1850-1919), a member of the ilmiye class. Although it is not known for certain, it is understood that he was born in Istanbul in the last quarter of the 19th century and that he passed through the religious and secular education processes of his period. He began his civil service career as a clerk in the Adana Province Registrar’s Office (1906). Later, he was appointed as a clerk at the Directorate of the Registry of Konya Province. In the spring of 1908, he traveled to Istanbul to pursue his request for promotion and to become the director of correspondence (tahrirat) in any place.&nbsp;Although he was appointed as the director of correspondence, he could not leave Istanbul because of his mother’s illness. During this period, he began producing literary works and published his treatise İslâmlık. Between 1909 and 1920, he worked as a director of correspondence, letter carrier, and district governor in places such as Divaniye, Devrek, Gelibolu, Diyarbakır, Çermik and Suşehri. After returning to İstanbul, he published his memoirs in periodicals by editing them into short stories. He brought some of these narratives together in his book, Mustafa Kemal Paşa and Köse Hoca, which was published in 1923. Although this work contains remarkable information and comments on the administrative, social, moral, and literary affairs of the Second Constitutional Monarchy and the National Struggle periods, it did not receive the attention in academic history and literature writing that it deserves, and it was even attribute to Ali Fuat Cebesoy, Ali Fuat Türkgeldi, and Ali Fuat Bilgen. In this article, this mistake has been corrected, and Ali Fuad’s life story has been revealed with the information and documents used for the first time. The treatise on Islam has also been re-published in Latin letters and analyze and criticize.&nbsp;It can be said that the treatise İslâmlık was one of the first, perhaps the first, works to criticize the conditions created by the Second Constitutional Monarchy from religious, ethical, and social perspectives. Although the cover of the treatise does not indicate when it was published, it is understood that it was published in the last days of 1908 or early 1909, based on the signs of its content. Considering that treatises and books criticizing the period in terms of religious, moral and social aspects started to be published a few years after the declaration of the Second Constitutional Monarchy, the importance of the treatise can be better understood.&nbsp;Ali Fuad explicitly stated that he had published his work with the approval of the Şeyhülislam. This shows that he differentiated himself from the crude criticisms directly projected at the regime and the Şeyhülislam, which could be summarize in the oppositional or rebellious attitudes of the period, which could be summarized as "we want şeriat". In this sense, the discourse of "İslâm is being lost" differs from the discourse of "we want şeriat". Moreover, the fact that the author was not subjected to any prosecution during and after 31 March and that he served in different regions of the state as the director of correspondence/district governor confirms this.&nbsp;It should be noted that the treatise İslâmlık is problematic in terms of language, expression, fiction, and word-sentence structure. This situation may be related to both the author’s inexperience and the treatise’s sloppy typesetting. However, considering both the title and the issues in the content of the treatise, it should be beyond dispute that this is an important work.&nbsp;It can be easily said that the treatise does not oppose the constitutional regime itself, nor is it theoretically opposed to popular conceptions of civilization, modern science and the progress of the period. The areas that the treatise opposes and criticizes focus on the point that these modern concepts and institutions are "misunderstood" and "misapplied". It is underlined that current practices harm İslâm and the state, which is considered an integral part of it.

II. Meşrutiyet Döneminde Bir Din Müdafaası: Nâibzâde  Ali Fuad ve İslâmlık Elden Gidiyor Risalesi

Muhammed

Assoc. Prof. Dr.

The linguistic exegesis movement began to develop in the late second and early third centuries. In the works written during this period, the linguistic features of the Qur’ān were analyzed, especially the expressions and verses that were difficult to understand. From the same years onwards, questions were raised regarding the miraculous nature of the Qur’an (i‘jāz), and various works were written on the subject. ‘Abd al-Qāhir al-Jurjānī (d. 476/1078-79) theorized this claim by saying that i‘jāz of the Qur’ān is in its verse structure. Zamakhsharī (d. 538/1144) adapted this theory to exegesis in his work al-Kashshāf. Zamakhsharī’s al-Kashshāf was a turning point in linguistic exegesis and established a tradition. Al-Bayḍāwī’s Anwār al-tanzīl is one of the most famous tafsīr based on al-Kashshāf. Systematic sharḥ writing in the field of tafsīr began with the sharḥs on al-Kashshāf and turned into a tradition with the sharḥs on Anwār al-tanzīl. Al-Bayzāwī’s tafsīr became the work on which the most sharḥ were written in the Ottoman tafsīr tradition.In the tradition of sharḥ, commentators served as guides for constituent texts by explaining the words, concepts, and expressions used by the author in the main text, clarifying obscure phrases, and contributing to the reader’s comprehension of these texts. Commentaries have various functions: In these works, the commentators elaborate on issues that the author did not elaborate on, present the reasons for the determinations made in the work, and analyze objections that may be directed against these determinations. The commenters, who also evaluated the analyzed opinions in terms of the author’s school affiliations and the internal consistency of the work, endeavored to reflect the author’s views objectively and enabled the deciphering of implicit presuppositions. When all these aspects are considered, it is seen&nbsp; &nbsp;that sharḥs add value to the tradition of Islamic thought and science and offer a framework to prove scholarly intellectual innovations and depth. However, in modern times, the period of sharḥ has been criticized by some scholars as a process of introversion, rumination, intellectual rupture, and scholarly narrowing.&nbsp;One of the most essential works in the field of linguistic exegesis within the Ottoman exegetical heritage is Irshād al-ʿaḳl al-ṣalīm ilā mezāya al-Qitāb al-qarīm by Abūssuūd Efendi (d. 982/1574). In the introduction to his tafsīr, Abūssuūd Efendi states that he compiled his work from the tafsīr works of Zamakhsharī and Bayzāwī. However, Irshād al-ʿaḳl al-ṣalīm has features that can comprehended solely through careful analysis. This is not only a synthesis of Kashshāf and Anwār al-tanzīl, but also contains information from the commentaries on these two texts. It also contains implicit references, hidden signs, and allusions.&nbsp;The problematic aspect of this research is based on the criticisms of the sharḥ literature in the modern period and the claim that Abūssuūd’s tafsīr is not original. In this study, it is predicted that Abūssuūd wrote his tafsīr by taking into account the knowledge accumulated in the sharḥs, and that he brought the scholarly depth acquired during the period of the sharḥs to the tafsīr, thus constituting a very important place in terms of the tradition of tafsīr writing in the Ottoman period. This claim implies a paradigmatic shift in the Ottoman tafsīr writing tradition. In this study, the first verse of Sūrah al-Baqarah was chosen as the sample. This is because this verse comprises hurūf al-muqatta. “Hurūf al-muqattaa is a complex theoretical issue with various aspects to consider. It involves discussions about the intelligibility of speech, the Quran’s challenge to people through its verses, and its impact on them.” The most detailed analysis of the hurūf al-muqattaa is usually found in the first verse of Sūrah al-Baqarah. These features make the hurūf al-muqattaa an important example that should be consulted to trace the fictional and theoretical similarities and divergences of the texts of Zamakhsharī, Bayzāwī and Abūssuūd. In this context, this study first analyzes how Zamakhsharī and al-Bayzāwī interpreted this verse through discourse analysis, then discusses the discussions in the sharḥs that are thought to have influenced Abūssuūd’s text through discourse and process analysis, and finally analyzes Abūssuūd’s text through discourse and content analysis.&nbsp;This study, conducted within the framework of the first verse of Sūrah al-Baqarah, has shown that Abūssuūd clarified the ambiguous issues in his tafsīr, constructed a terminological structure in accordance with his preferred view, and identified the main themes and super subheadings. In this context, it can be said that the most unique aspect of Irshād al-ʿaḳl al ṣalīm, which contains implicit references to the information in the sharḥs, is that it brings the vertical knowledge gained in the sharḥ tradition to the horizontal plane. This means that the efforts made in understanding and analyzing Zamakhsharī and al-Bayḍāwī’s determinations during the sharḥ period, which some scholars consider stagnant, are directly related to the words of the verse and are included in the literature.

Hâşiyeden Telife Uzanan Üslûp ve Muhtevasıyla  Ebüssuûd Tefsiri: Bakara Sûresinin Birinci Âyeti  Bağlamında

İmam

The problem of free will in human actions is a controversial issue between the Hanafī/ Māturīdī tradition and the Ash‘ari tradition. Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (d. 606/1210), who reconstructs Ashʿarite theology with the language and concepts of Avicennian philosophy, argues that the actions of the people are under compulsion (jabr). In his argument to support this claim, al-Rāzī centers on the concept of “murajjiḥ” and argues that human action exists necessarily depending on the chain of causality. In this chain of causality, the human act necessarily comes into existence through the motivations (dāʿīs), which al-Rāzī characterizes as murajjiḥ, while motivations are created by the power of God, the ultimate murajjiḥ. According to al-Rāzī, human will (irāda) is necessarily determined by these dāʿīs. This argument, which al-Rāzī uses to prove his claim of jabr, sets the agenda of Hanafī theologians and jurists in the post-classical period. Shams al-Dīn al-Samarqandī (d. 702/1303) and Sadr al-Sharīʿa (d. 747/1346), who were among the first thinkers in Transoxiana to reexamine the scholarly legacy of the Hanafī tradition in theology and legal theory with the concepts and issues of Avicennian philosophy and classical logic, criticized al-Rāzī’s argument in their works.&nbsp;Although there are several studies in the modern literature dealing with al-Rāzī’s and Sadr al-Sharīʿa’s approaches to the acts of people, there is a need for a study that deals with al-Samarqandī’s views on this issue in connection with these two thinkers’ ideas. This article aims to address a gap in the literature by examining the continuity and change in the criticism of al-Rāzī’s argument within Hanafī circles. It will also demonstrate how the Hanafī tradition in Transoxiana engaged with the Ashʿarite tradition during the post-classical period through discussions on free will.&nbsp;In this article, I argue that the two Hanafī thinkers, Shams al-Dīn al-Samarqandī and Sadr al-Sharīʿa, respond to the concepts and issues of Avicennian philosophy and classical logic in different ways to the challenge of al-Rāzī’s argument of jabr. While al-Samarqandī criticizes al-Rāzī's jabr argument by adopting the hierarchical chain of causality that leads to divine &nbsp;determinism, Sadr al-Sharīa‘s criticism is based on the concept of “the complete cause (al-illā al-tāmma)” and the idea of “the ontological category of state (al-ḥāl)” which he considers to be included in the complete cause. In his argument, al-Samarqandī considers human will and power as the proximate cause of action and God‘s power as the remote cause of the action in the hierarchical chain of causality, thus arguing that human power has an effect on human action as much as God’s power. Thus, he prefers the approach of Abū İsḥāk al-Isferāyīnī (d. 418/1027), one of the early Ashʿarites, who accepted both God and human power as efficient causes of action. On the other hand Sadr al-Sharī’a, in his criticism, goes one step further than his predecessor and tries to refute the premises of the jabr argument of al-Rāzī. Sadr al-Sharīʿa in his counter-argument called “four premises (al-muqaddimāt al-arba‘)” breaks the chain of causality that leads to necessity by including “the noncausal states (al-ḥāl)”, such as human will, in the complete cause of human action. In addition, contrary to al-Rāzī’s claim, he argues that motivations (dāʾīs), do not necessarily determine the choice of human will in actions. With this approach, Sadr al-Sharīa seems to prefer the view of the classical Māturīdī tradition, which attributes the efficient cause of human action exclusively to God but recognizes a role for human beings, which is referred to as “kasb”.

Hanefî Geleneğin Klasik Sonrası Döneminde Özgür  İrade Problemi: Semerkandî ve Sadrüşşerîa’nın Râzî’ye  Eleştirileri

“Sakın Ondan Bahsetme!”: Erken İslam Tarihinde Muhaddisler  ve Sansür

Ayşe

&nbsp;Islamic science literature on Ahl al-Sunna and Shīʿa was formed depending on sectarian doctrines. It is possible to follow this clearly through hadith sources. When we look at the Shīʿite hadith works, we see that, unlike the Ahl al-Sunna, the words of the Imāms are also accepted as hadith. On the other hand, unlike Shī‘a, according to Sunnī thought, the Companions played an important role in transmitting hadith. When the chains of Sunnī and Shīʿite narrations are examined, these two basic differences are clearly observed. Although Sunnī and Shīʿite scholars adopt different methods on many issues, such as the acceptance, rejection, and authenticity criteria of narrations, there is a group of common narrations in the hadith literature of the two schools.&nbsp;These narrations are very important because they reveal the issues on which the schools agreed upon and the size of this alliance. However, more importantly, these narrations provide information about the early periods of hadith history. At this point, the common narrators in both Sunnī and Shīʿite isnāds of common narrations rise to prominence. Because it is possible to obtain information about the hadith transitions between the two schools based on the evaluations of Sunnī and Shīʿite scholars regarding common narrators. The texts of common narrations are also important in terms of revealing whether the hadiths were changed within the framework of sectarian views. This article aims to show what proportions of common narrations exist in the hadith sources of Ahl al-Sunna and Shīʿa, and on which hadiths these two schools agree and differ from each other. Additionally, the article will show how, where, when, and through whom narrations are transferred between Ahl al-Sunna and Shīʿa.&nbsp;In recent times, there have been studies examining common narrations. The most important of these studies are the books prepared by Taqrīb al-Madhāib projects operating in Egypt and Kuwait to bring the two schools closer to each other. Common hadiths in these studies are narrations about a subject in both Sunnī and Shīʿite literature. Therefore, it is not possible to accurately make evaluations of the common narrations in the hadith works of the two schools based on these works. In these studies, there is no discussion of how common narrations were transferred from one school’s hadith circle to another.&nbsp;Unlike previous studies, this article investigates hadiths with similar texts in the books of Sunnī and Shīʿite scholars, spesicifically focusing itself to Usūl section of Kulaynī’s al-Kāfī. In this study, it was determined that 406 out of 3798 hadiths were found to be common. This&nbsp; shows that the common narrations in the hadith sources of the two schools are around 10%. In addition, it was observed that the common narrations were mainly about hadiths regarding morality. Another issue discussed in this paper is the isnād characteristics of common narrations. The most important element in the chains is the common narrators, as they are connected to the scientific circles of Ahl al-Sunna and Shīʿa. Because of the information about the common narrators in both Sunnī and Shīʿite rijāl works, it is possible to make inferences about the period and region in which these people participated in the narration activity. Essentially, this gives an idea about when, where, and through which names individuals the transfer of information between Sunnī and Shīʿite circles occurred. However, the biographical material about common narrators also provides information about the period when a hadith scholar’s circle was open to narrators from both schools. Based on these details about common narrators, it is possible to determine when the hadith circles of the two schools separated from each other or gained independent identity.&nbsp;Finally, this article provides information about the textual features of common hadiths. When the texts of these narrations were examined, it was observed that there were no serious textual differences between the Sunnī and Shīʿite texts. However, this situation changes, especially regarding critical issues for Ahl al-Sunna and Shīʿa, such as imāmate and walāyah. Significant changes such as addition and reduction occurres in the texts of these narrations that are the subjects of the Sunnī and Shīʿite conflict. As a result, it has been determined that common narrations were transferred from one school circle to another in the 2nd/8th century. The transfer of hadiths between Sunnī and Shīʿite circles mainly occurred in Kūfah. According to this research, the people who transferred these hadiths from one circle to another are Shīʿite oriented, weak, liar, unknown, and crypto narrators.

Ehl-i Sünnet ve Şîa’da Müşterek Rivayetler -Küleynî’nin  el-Kâfî’sinin Usûl Bölümü Özelinde-

&nbsp;Following the execution of Fażlallāh Astarābādī by Mīrānshāh in 796/1394, a considerable number of caliphs and disciples were left behind, possessing intellectual background to ensure the continued survival and transmission of his works to future generations. The most significant and comprehensive work of Fażlallāh is undoubtedly the Jāvdānnāma. In his Kursīnāma, Fażlallāh’s caliph ‘Alī al-A’lā states that in 788/1386, the secret of the Quran emerged from Fażlallāh and that the main book, Jāvdānnāma, was written. This was initially composed in a disorganized manner on various rolls of paper. Following his death, he made some annotations and markings to facilitate the organization of these papers. Fażlallāh himself named the book Jāvdānnāma, a designation explained by the Quranic assertion that those who desire the face of Allah ‘will remain there eternally’ (ادبأ اهيف نيدلاخ). In other words, this book leads to the knowledge of eternity, where everything perishes, and only His face remains.Jāvdānnāma-ye Kabīr is primarily written in the Gurgan dialect of Persian, which is no longer spoken and is mixed with standard Persian. The fact that this work was written over a long period of time and under different physical conditions has led to the existence of long and monolithic chapters as well as short sections, memorable notes, and fragmentary sentences.Three works in world literature have been written in this dialect, all related to Hurufism. In addition, all of these works contain sentences written in standard Persian and Gurgan dialect. These works are Fażlallāh’s Jāvdānnāma-ye Kabīr and Muhabbatnāma, and Fażlallāh’s disciple Sayyid Ishāq’s Mahramnāma.Jāvdānnāma-ye Kabīr contains a total of eight circular figures, each drawn on a different page and accompanied by notes written inside them. The notes are in Persian and the Gurgan dialect of Persian, and include Arabic verses and hadiths. This article aims to elucidate the significance of these circular drawings. A close reading of four distinct manuscripts of Jāvdānnāma-ye Kabīr has enabled the identification of all eight circular figures, which are presented here with Arabic translations. The article then introduces the Ḥurūfī doctrine and discusses how medieval and early modern Ḥurūfīs, especially Hamza Bey, interpreted and discussed these figures. Finally, the article discusses the traditional medieval cosmology and places the circular drawings in their proper context.&nbsp;Hamza Bey is the only Ḥurūfī author who has commented on these figures. Our knowledge of Hamza Bey is somewhat limited, but it is recorded that he died in 1033/1623. In addition the terms “Hamza Bey” and “Hamza Efendi” were used to refer to him, his Turkish commentaries suggest that he lived in the Ottoman geography. Hamza Bey represents the final link in the chain of succession, which began with Fażlallāh’s caliph ‘Alī al-A’lā and continued through Mīr Fāżılī, Mīrzā Dastburīda Muhammad and Jāwidī. Similar to his master Jāwidī, Hamza Bey composed commentaries on Fażlallāh’s works. He wrote two distinct commentaries on Jāvidānnāma. The first commentary is represented by three copies (Millet Library, Ali Emiri Persian, no. 1046, in the margin of the copy of Jāvidānnāma; Basel University Library, Tschudi, M VI 70, ff. 1b-148a; Basel University Library, Tschudi, M VI 71, ff. 68b-169b) and the second commentary is represented by a single copy (Basel University Library, Tschudi, M VI 71, ff. 68b-169b).	&nbsp;This article illustrates how Fażlallāh integrated traditional medieval cosmology with Hurufism philosophy. Through these circular drawings, Fażlallāh and his disciples clearly position human beings at the center of their beliefs and supported this belief through an interpretation of cosmology. Neither the circular drawings themselves nor their interpretations have been published or subjected to in-depth study. The interpretation of these circular drawings not only provides a more solid foundation for future research on Hurufi doctrines but also offers a novel perspective on the study of traditional medieval cosmology.

Fazlullah Hurufi’nin Câvidân-nâme’sindeki Şekillerde İlm-i Felek

&nbsp;Al-Ghazālī’s life has always aroused excitement, from the time he lived until today. He wrote his life story at the end of his life. However, in his short autobiography, he also overshadowed many issues. Ghazali, in al-Munqiz, al-Ghazālī does not mention his teachers, his socio-political environment, his family, or the events of the time. After leaving Baghdad, he lived a life of seclusion during his travels to cities such as Damascus, al-Khalīl and Jerusalem. After returning to his hometown, Al-Ghazālī described himself as a recluse, except for “the events of the time” and “the affairs of children”. According to his own narrative, al-Ghazālī led a reclusive life. However, his letters compiled under the title “Fadhā’il al-anām” present a different picture. These letters provide important information about al-Ghazālī’s period of seclusion and his theo-political relations during that time.&nbsp;Al-Ghazālī’s period of seclusion, as discussed in this article, refers to the time from his departure from Baghdad in Dhilqa’dah 488/1095 until his death. Al-Ghazālī remained secluded until his death and did not return to the Nidhāmiyya muderriship in Nishāpur until eleven years later. He was compelled to take up this position, rather than doing so voluntarily. He also mentioned that his return did not signify a true return. He stated that while he was “previously explaining the science that earned people high positions”, he was now “explaining the science that makes people abandon high positions”. Moreover, this process did not last long, and he returned to his hometown, Tus, after a few years. Al-Ghazālī’s period of seclusion can be divided into four parts: From Baghdad to Baghdad: The Period of Seclusion with Traveling, Tus: The Period of Settled Life of Reclusion, and Nishapur: The Return to the Teaching and the Event of the Trial and the Second Period of Tus and his Death.&nbsp;During his time in seclusion, al-Ghazālī did not refrain from attending social events or engaging in individual educational activities. In particular, he took an active interest in the troubles of the people, warned the governors, and wrote letters to the rulers informing them of the troubles of the people. He patronized the dervishes residing in his khangāh and advised the rulers of the state to appoint some of his students to positions they deserved.Based on Fedhā’il al-anām and other sources, the following conclusions have been drawn in this article: Although al-Ghazālī did not name them, some individuals were influential in his life. It is possible to mention the influence of Shaykh Ardishīr b. Abū Mansūr al-ʿAbbādī in his decision to leave Baghdad and embrace the Sufi way of life or pursue a path of seclusion. Again, Abu al-Fath Nasr al-Maqdisī, the muhaddith-jurist and ascetic who met with him in Damascus, influential in al-Ghazālī’s subsistence on his own labor and not receiving help from state officials. After leaving Baghdad, al-Ghazālī did not break away from science and the scholarly environment where he went. The concept of seclusion for al-Ghazālī included three points mentioned in his oath in al-Khalīl. These points include not taking money from rulers, not attending official ceremonies (this includes not being in a managerial position), and avoiding debate and bigotry. During his seclusion period, al-Ghazālī established close relations with dervishes. He had a khangāh in his hometown, Tus, and he watched over the dervishes who stayed there. His approach, which was more distant to sūfis in the Iḥyāʾ, evolved into closer contact in his letters.

Gazzâlî Biyografisine Bir Katkı: Mektupları Işığında  Gazzâlî’nin Uzlet Hayatı

İrfan

The appointment of four judges in Egypt under the Fāṭimid State in 525/1131, two of whom were from Shīʿa and two from Sunnī schools of law, has drawn the interest of researchers due to its significance for both Fāṭimid socio-political history and Islamic jurisprudence. Our anonymous local source, noting this information approximately 50 years after the event, described it as an unprecedented occurrence in the Islamic nation. Although there is no mention of any restriction on judges regarding cases brought before them, their equal authority in matters of inheritance is emphasized. This is particularly noteworthy because some fundamental rulings of inheritance law where Shīʿa and Sunnī doctrines diverge are closely linked to the Fāṭimid concept of imāmate. However, historical sources concerning the period during which this event occurred are limited. Consequently, this information, which provides significant insights into the Fāṭimid judicial system, the implementation of Shīʿa law in the predominantly Sunnī Egyptian society, and the socio-political situation, becomes even more interesting and intriguing. Allouche examined the subject comprehensively and attempted to analyze in detail the political motives behind the appointments, the status and identities of the appointed judges. Later authors referred to Allouche’s article, but no alternative assessments were proposed. According to Allouche, the primary political motive behind these appointments was as follows: This appointment was&nbsp;&nbsp;part of Ibn al- Afḍal’s (d. 526/1131) actions to declare the end of the Fāṭimid caliphate and the shift in the state’s ideology. Specifically, the Ismāʿilī monopoly in the judiciary was abolished. Ibn al-Afḍal took advantage of the political uncertainty that arose due to the death of Caliph Āmir (d. 524/1130) and the absence of a known male heir. He imprisoned ʿAbdulmajīd (later Caliph Ḥāfiẓ, 526-544/1132-1149), who had previously declared himself the heir apparent (waliyyu’l-ʿahd), removed his name from the Friday sermon (khutbah), and minted coins in the name of the expected imam, implying a shift in the state’s allegiance to the Twelver Shīʿa to which Ibn al-Afḍal belonged.&nbsp;Allouche considers that each of the four judges, described merely as judges in the source, was actually a chief judge. He bases this on a comparison with the newly established system of the Mamlūk era, made by Ibn Muyassar (d. 677/1278), who transmitted this unique information in his book Akhbar. In Allouche’s view, this interpretation aligns with Ibn al-Afḍal’s political agenda, whose main objective was to equate Imāmī Law, his own madhhab, with the Ismāʿilī Law, thus representing the new ideology of the state with an Imāmī chief judge. However, according to him, this interpretation simultaneously creates some problems that require resolution. Because at the time of the appointment, the previously appointed chief judge, al-Qaysarānī, was still in office. This implies that with the newly appointed four qāḍīs there were five chief judges, two of whom representing Ismāʿilī madhhab, serving simultaneously: al-Qaysaranī, representing the Fāṭimid state’s Ismāʿilī madhhab, and the four judges appointed by Ibn al-Afḍal, representing the Ismāʿilī, Imāmī, Mālikī, and Shāfiʿī madhhabs. Allouche attempted to resolve this problem by suggesting a potential scribal error regarding the names of the judges. He posits that the Imāmī judge mentioned among the four newly appointed might actually be the same person as the existing chief judge, al-Qaysaranī. Thus, Ibn al Afḍal must have reappointed the incumbent al-Qaysaranī as the chief judge representing the Imāmiyya. He believed that the good relations between al-Qaysaranī and Ibn al-Afḍal, as suggested by the information available in the sources, would support this interpretation. However, there are strong arguments against this interpretation, and it seems that Allouche did not sufficiently address the issues arising from this. First, Allouche did not consider that the sources clearly indicated that al-Qaysarānī was actually a Shāfiʿī. For sure, one can argue that numerous instances exist of Sunnīs being appointed to the position of chief judge in the Fāṭimid state. Therefore, it is not impossible that al-Qaysaranī, despite being a Shāfiʿī, served as the Ismāʿilī chief judge for a period and was later appointed as the Imāmī chief judge because of his close ties with the ruling power amidst the political changes. However, a more careful examination of the identities of the other four judges on the list indicates that each of these individuals was more suitable for Ibn al-Afḍal’s political objectives and could not be replaced by al-Qaysaranī. Al-Qaysaranī did not possess the necessary qualifications for the office of qāḍī, as indicated by contemporary sources. His appointment to the position of chief judge before this event was primarily due to his prestigious status as a Cairo elite, rather than his legal expertise. In contrast to al-Qaysaranī’s background, each of the individuals named in the appointment of the four judges was esteemed within their respective religious groups for possessing the qualities of a judge. Viewed in this light, the appointment of these four judges underscores Ibn al-Afḍal’s need for support from the Cairo elites, military groups and broader segments of the population in the delicate situation in which he assumed power, as well as the constraints on his authority. Therefore, the information available in the sources can be interpreted as follows: Following the coup in 525/1131, al-Qaysaranī retained his high-level administrative powers and, in particular, his authority to oversee grievance cases (maẓālim) as the chief judge. The remaining four judges were appointed with the authority to adjudicate civil cases in accordance with their respective madhhabs. Hence, the claim of a scribal error in the information provided by the sources arises from an incomplete and improper reading of the sources. The use of the term qāḍī al-qudāt in the sources in this context is also misleading, as evidenced by examples in which qāḍīs described as chief qāḍī in annals or other historical sources were named in official records as nāib or wakīl of the vizier.

Mısır Fâtımî Devleti’nde 525/1131 Yılında Dört Kadı  Ataması, Yeni Bir Değerlendirme

İsa

Mehmed Ismet Efendi (d. 1747), a prominent intellectual in the first half of the 18th century, was a distinguished professor in Islamic sciences, a poet and scholar who authored works in Turkish, Arabic, and Persian, an astronomer who conducted studies in astronomy, a well-known calligrapher of his time, and a Ṣūfī master who had authority in five different Ṣūfī orders. In addition to these qualities, he deserves attention for the extensive library he has succeeded in establishing in his household. Focusing on the surviving manuscripts of Mehmed Ismet and his previously neglected probate inventory, this article examines the formation process of the library he managed to establish, the strategies he adopted during this process, and the fate of the library following his death. By focusing on his library, which contained abundant works on Islamic sciences, poetry, and astronomy, this study contributes to ongoing research on Ottoman manuscript culture, book collecting, and Ottoman libraries and determines Mehmed Ismet’s place in Ottoman intellectual history.While examining the formation process of the library, the first claim of the article is that the foundation of Mehmed Ismet’s library was a collection inherited from his father, Ibrāhīm Agha, who was the steward of one of the grand viziers during the reign of Mehmed IV (r. 1648-1687). In addition, it is asserted that Mehmed Ismet managed to successfully expand his library by effectively using substantial wealth and economic power. Moreover, it is demonstrated that Mehmed Ismet’s collection grew with the books and treatises inherited from his brother Osmān Efendi, who died in December 1734 in Kavala, where he was the judge of the city. However, the number of manuscripts inherited from Osmān Efendi seemed extremely limited. The existing literature widely suggests that, except for those belonging to well-established ulema families who were controlling high-ranking offices in official ulema establishments, the wealth accumulation of the eighteenth-century Ottoman ulema was very limited to the extent that they survived with deep economic concerns. Yet, Mehmed Ismet lived in prosperity thanks to the substantial wealth inherited from his family, the gratuities he received from the panegyric poems he presented to high-ranking officials as well as the proceeds from the authored and translated works he did for them, his income from his professorship, his earnings from calligraphy, and the allowance from the pious foundation of Kādīzāde Mehmed Efendi, of which he was a trustee for a while. It is among the theses of the article that he financed the&nbsp;&nbsp;formation of his library with this wealth and, in line with his professional and personal interests, succeeded in establishing a library predominantly containing scholarly works pertaining to Islamic sciences, astronomy, and Sufism.&nbsp;Another claim of this article is that as a skilled calligrapher of his age, Mehmed Ismet benefitted from his reputation when establishing his library. He relied on calligraphy not only to sustain his livelihood but also to reduce the expenses of creating a book collection. Available data demonstrate that he copied 28 books and 93 treatises for his library. Given that the entire collection did not survive to the present day, it can be assumed that the number of scholarly works that Mehmed Ismet duplicated and added to his collection was higher. He particularly enjoyed copying and collecting treatises, classifying and bounding them according to language, subject, and author. It can be argued in this respect that he was in full harmony with the eighteenth-century Ottoman intellectual circles, where treatises and pamphlets were in circulation. Nevertheless, one of the characteristics that distinguished Mehmed Ismet from the remaining book collectors of the period was his desire to expand his library by manipulating his official position. For instance, under the pretext of copying for his own library, he misappropriated 129 books belonging to the book collection of Kādīzāde Mehmed Efendi’s waqf, of which he was a trustee for a period. The fact that 51 of these books contained his ownership records and seventeen bore his personal seal indicates that he might have also embezzled books from other libraries and collections. However, no clear evidence of this possibility has been found.&nbsp;The rich book collection that Mehmed Ismet was able to build by utilizing his personal and familial connections, his wealth, and his skills in calligraphy were expeditiously dispersed in a short time following his death. His books were purchased by his friends and the book collectors of the period, including high-ranking statesmen. This was such a rapid and sudden development that in his probate inventory, which was recorded seventy days after his death, only a few works related to Ottoman, Persian, and Arabic poetry were recorded. This situation contradicts given his skill in writing Turkish, Persian, and Arabic poems. The mention of only fifteen divans in the inventory and the complete absence of literary works by the great figures of classical Ottoman poetry such as Aḥmad Pasha (d. 1497), Nedjātī (d. 1509), Zātī (d. 1546), Fuḍūlī (d. 1556), Khayālī (d. 1557), Nefʿī (d. 1635), Nābī (d. 1712), and Nedīm (d. 1730) are clear indications of the sudden and rapid dispersal of the collection. This situation had prevented his library from being established as a permanent building until now. However, a significant portion of his books have been preserved in various book collections and have survived to date.

18. Yüzyılda Şahsi Bir Kütüphanenin İnşası ve Dağılışı:  Mehmed İsmet Efendi Kütüphanesi Örneği

İslim

Sülemî’nin Tabakât Mukaddimesi Üzerinden Velâyet  Düşüncesine Dair Bir Değerlendirme

Selman

Ali Köse’nin “Dinin Geleceği” Adlı Eserinin  Değerlendirmesi

Kevin Vallier’in “All the Kingdoms of the World: On  Radical Religious Alternatives to Liberalism” Adlı  Eserinin Değerlendirmesi

Murat

Maurits Berger’in “2004: De toekomst van islam in  Nederland” Adlı Eserinin Değerlendirmesi

Düzeltme: İstişari Bir Ümmet Tasavvur Etmek: Namık Kemal’in Anayasal Tahayyülüne Bir Giriş

@JOURNAL_BOX_CURRENT

@JOURNAL_BOX_EARLYVIEW

@JOURNAL_BOX_FEATURED

@JOURNAL_BOX_MOSTREAD

İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi, İstanbul Üniversitesi İslam Tetkikleri Enstitüsü tarafından Mart ve Eylül ayları olmak üzere yılda iki defa yayımlanan uluslararası ve açık erişimli bilimsel bir yayındır. 1953 yılında kurulmuştur. Dergiye yayınlanması için gönderilen bilimsel makaleler Türkçe, İngilizce ya da Arapça olmalıdır.

İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi, İslami ilimler alanında ulusal ve uluslararası düzeyde bilimsel niteliklere sahip çalışmaları yayımlayarak İslami ilimler alanındaki bilgi birikimine katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır.  

İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi, Türkçe, İngilizce ve Arapça dillerinde yazılmış araştırma makalesi, araştırma notu, kitap değerlendirmesi, sempozyum tanıtımı, yazma eser tanıtımı türünde yapılan çalışmaları yayımlamaktadır.   
   
Tarihçe

1933 yılında İstanbul Dârulfünunu İlahiyat Fakültesinin kapatılmasıyla Edebiyat Fakültesi bünyesinde kurulan İslam Tetkikleri Enstitüsü, 1941 yılında kapatılmış ve 1953 yılında müdürü Zeki Velidi Togan ve müdür yardımcısı Fuat Sezgin idaresinde tekrar faaliyete geçmiştir. 1982 yılında statüsü araştırma merkezi olarak değiştirilen Enstitü 2018 yılında İstanbul Üniversitesi Rektörlüğüne bağlanmıştır. Statüsü değişse de kuruluşundan itibaren Kurum bünyesinde hakemli bilimsel bir dergi faaliyeti sürdürülmüştür.

Dergi, 1953-1982 yılları arasında İslam Tetkikleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1982-1995 yılları arasında ise İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi ismiyle dokuz cilt ve on dört farklı sayı olarak yayımlanmıştır. Dergi, 2020 Mart ayı itibarıyla yeniden yayım hayatına başlamıştır.

Muharrem

Scopus

EBSCO

TR Dizin

DOAJ

SOBIAD

ATLA Religion Database

@METRIC_VOLUMES

@METRIC_ISSUES

@METRIC_ARTICLES

@METRIC_OPENACCESS

İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi

@INFO_TAB_ABOUT

Editor in Chief

Co Editor in Chief

Editorial Management Board Member

Publicity Manager

Ethics Editor

Section Editor

Language Editor

Book Review Editor

Editorial Assistant

Editorial Board Member

@INFO_TAB_BOARDS

İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi, İslami ilimler alanında ulusal ve uluslararası düzeyde bilimsel niteliklere sahip çalışmaları yayımlayarak bu alandaki bilgi birikimine katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır.İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi, temel İslami ilimler, İslam tarihi ve düşüncesi alanındaki yazılara yer veren çift taraflı kör-hakemli bir dergidir. Dergi, bu alanlarda interdisipliner, multidisipliner ve Osmanlı dönemini merkeze alan çalışmalara öncelik vermektedir.İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi, Türkçe, İngilizce ve Arapça dillerinde yazılmış araştırma makalesi, derleme makale, araştırma notu, kitap değerlendirmesi, sempozyum/çalıştay tanıtımı gibi türlerde çalışmalar yayımlamaktadır.

Amaç ve Kapsam

TÜBİTAK-ULAKBİM TR Dizin DOAJSOBİADEBSCO Humanities SourceEBSCO Central &amp; Eastern European Academic Source ScopusATLA Religion Database

Dizinler

Dergi yayın etiğinde en yüksek standartlara bağlıdır ve <a href="https://publicationethics.org/" target="_blank">Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)</a>, <a href="https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/#principles-of-transparency-and-best-practice-in-scholarly-publishing" target="_blank">Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)</a>, <a href="https://oaspa.org/" target="_blank">Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA)</a> ve <a href="https://www.wame.org/" target="_blank">World Association of Medical Editors (WAME)</a> tarafından yayınlanan etik yayıncılık ilkelerini benimser; Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing başlığı altında ifade edilen ilkeler için: <a href="https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing" target="_blank">https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing</a> Gönderilen makaleler derginin amaç ve kapsamına uygun olmalıdır. Orijinal, yayınlanmamış ve başka bir dergide değerlendirme sürecinde olmayan, her bir yazar tarafından içeriği ve gönderimi onaylanmış yazılar değerlendirmeye kabul edilir. Makale yayınlanmak üzere Dergiye gönderildikten sonra yazarlardan hiçbirinin ismi, tüm yazarların yazılı izni olmadan yazar listesinden silinemez ve yeni bir isim yazar olarak eklenemez ve yazar sırası değiştirilemez.İntihal, duplikasyon, sahte yazarlık/inkar edilen yazarlık, araştrma/veri fabrikasyonu, makale dilimleme, dilimleyerek yayın, telif hakları ihlali ve çıkar çatışmasının gizlenmesi, etik dışı davranışlar olarak kabul edilir. Kabul edilen etik standartlara uygun olmayan tüm makaleler yayından çıkarılır. Buna yayından sonra tespit edilen olası kuraldışı, uygunsuzluklar içeren makaleler de dahildir.İntihal Ön kontrolden geçirilen makaleler, iThenticate yazılımı kullanılarak intihal için taranır. İntihal/kendi kendine intihal tespit edilirse yazarlar bilgilendirilir. Editörler, gerekli olması halinde makaleyi değerlendirme ya da üretim sürecinin çeşitli aşamalarında intihal kontrolüne tabi tutabilirler. Yüksek benzerlik oranları, bir makalenin kabul edilmeden önce ve hatta kabul edildikten sonra reddedilmesine neden olabilir. Makalenin türüne bağlı olarak, bunun oranın %15 veya %20'den az olması beklenir.Çift Kör Hakemlikİntihal kontrolünden sonra, uygun olan makaleler baş editör tarafından orijinallik, metodoloji, işlenen konunun önemi ve dergi kapsamı ile uyumluluğu açısından değerlendirilir. Editör, makalelerin adil bir şekilde çift taraflı kör hakemlikten geçmesini sağlar ve makale biçimsel esaslara uygun ise, gelen yazıyı yurtiçinden ve /veya yurtdışından en az iki hakemin değerlendirmesine sunar, hakemler gerek gördüğü takdirde yazıda istenen değişiklikler yazarlar tarafından yapıldıktan sonra yayınlanmasına onay verir.

Politikalar

Dergi açık erişimlidir ve derginin tüm içeriği okura ya da okurun dahil olduğu kuruma ücretsiz olarak sunulur. Okurlar, ticari amaç haricinde, yayıncı ya da yazardan izin almadan dergi makalelerinin tam metnini okuyabilir, indirebilir, kopyalayabilir, arayabilir ve link sağlayabilir. Bu <a href="https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/translations/turkish-translation" target="_blank">BOAI</a> açık erişim tanımıyla uyumludur. Derginin açık erişimli makaleleri Creative Commons Atıf-GayrıTicari 4.0 Uluslararası (<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.tr" target="_blank">CC BY-NC 4.0</a>) olarak lisanslıdır.

Derginin tüm giderleri İstanbul Üniversitesi tarafından karşılanmaktadır. Dergide makale yayımı ve makale süreçlerinin yürütülmesi ücrete tabi değildir. Dergiye gönderilen ya da yayıma kabul edilen makaleler için işlemleme ücreti ya da gönderim ücreti alınmaz.

Yazarlar dergide yayınlanan çalışmalarının telif hakkına sahiptirler ve çalışmaları  Creative Commons Atıf-GayrıTicari 4.0 Uluslararası (<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.tr" target="_blank">CC BY-NC 4.0</a>) olarak lisanslıdır. CC BY-NC 4.0 lisansı, eserin ticari kullanım dışında her boyut ve formatta paylaşılmasına, kopyalanmasına, çoğaltılmasına ve orijinal esere uygun şekilde atıfta bulunmak kaydıyla yeniden düzenleme, dönüştürme ve eserin üzerine inşa etme dâhil adapte edilmesine izin verir.

Editörler, yayınlanan makalede, bulguları, yorumları ve sonuçları etkilemeyen küçük hatalar tespit edilirse düzeltme yayınlamayı düşünebilirler. Editörler, bulguları ve sonuçları geçersiz kılan büyük hatalar / ihlaller söz konusu olduğunda, makaleyi geri çekmeyi düşünmelidir. Yazarlar tarafından araştırma veya yayını kötüye kullanmaya yönelik olasılık söz konusu ise; bulguların güvenilir olmadığına ve yazarların kurumlarının olayı soruşturmadığına dair kanıtlar var veya olası soruşturma haksız veya sonuçsuz görünüyor ise, editörler endişe ifadesi yayınlamayı düşünmelidir. Düzeltme, geri çekme veya endişe ifadesi ile ilgili olarak <a href="https://publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts/complete-set-english" target="_blank">COPE</a> ve <a href="https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/" target="_blank">ICJME</a> yönergeleri dikkate alınır.

Dergide yayınlanan tüm yazıların korunmasını ve kalıcı olarak erişilebilir olmasını sağlamak için makaleler, ulusal bir arşiv sitesi olarak hizmet veren ve aynı zamanda LOCKSS'in içeriği toplamasına, korumasına ve sunmasına izin veren Dergipark'ta saklanmaktadır.Ek olarak, yazarların kendilerinin makalelerinin son PDF sürümünü Open Archives Initiative (<a href="https://www.openarchives.org/" target="_blank">https://www.openarchives.org/</a>) standartlarına uygun açık elektronik arşivlerde arşivlemeleri önerilir. Yazarlar, yayınladıkları arşiv versiyonundan, İ.Ü. Yayınevinin dergi web sitesinin URL'sine bağlantı sağlamalıdır.

Genel İlkeler Her sayıda lisansüstü tezlerden üretilen en fazla iki makale yayımlanabilir. Makalelerin yeni bir düzenleme ile makale formatına uygun hâle getirilmesi esastır.Dergimizde makalesi yayımlanmış bir yazarın takip eden sayıda başka bir makalesi yayımlanmaz.Etik İlkeler İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi, yayın etiğinde en yüksek standartlara bağlıdır ve <a href="https://publicationethics.org/" target="_blank">Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)</a>, <a href="https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/#principles-of-transparency-and-best-practice-in-scholarly-publishing" target="_blank">Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)</a>, <a href="https://oaspa.org/" target="_blank">Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA)</a> ve <a href="https://www.wame.org/" target="_blank">World Association of Medical Editors (WAME)</a> tarafından yayınlanan etik yayıncılık ilkelerini benimser; Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing başlığı altında ifade edilen ilkeler için: <a href="https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing" target="_blank">https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing</a>Gönderilen makaleler derginin amaç ve kapsamına uygun olmalıdır. Daha önce yayımlanmamış ya da başka bir dergide değerlendirme sürecinde olmayan, her bir yazar tarafından içeriği ve gönderimi onaylanmış yazılar değerlendirmeye kabul edilir.Makale yayımlanmak üzere dergiye gönderildikten sonra yazarlardan hiçbirinin ismi, tüm yazarların yazılı izni olmadan yazar listesinden silinemez, yeni bir isim yazar olarak eklenemez ve yazar sırası değiştirilemez.İntihal, duplikasyon, sahte yazarlık/inkâr edilen yazarlık, araştırma/veri fabrikasyonu, makale dilimleme, dilimleyerek yayın, telif hakları ihlali ve çıkar çatışmasının gizlenmesi, etik dışı davranışlar olarak kabul edilir. Kabul edilen etik standartlara uygun olmayan tüm makaleler yayından çıkarılır. Buna yayından sonra tespit edilen olası kural dışı, uygunsuzluklar içeren makaleler de dâhildir.

Etik

İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi araştırma etiğinde en yüksek standartları gözetir ve aşağıda tanımlanan uluslararası araştırma etiği ilkelerini benimser. Makalelerin etik kurallara uygunluğu yazarların sorumluluğundadır:<ul><li>Araştırmanın tasarlanması, tasarımın gözden geçirilmesi ve araştırmanın yürütülmesinde, bütünlük, kalite ve şeffaflık ilkeleri sağlanmalıdır.</li><li>Araştırma ekibi ve katılımcılar, araştırmanın amacı, yöntemleri ve öngörülen olası kullanımları; araştırmaya katılımın gerektirdikleri ve varsa riskleri hakkında tam olarak bilgilendirilmelidir.</li><li>Araştırma katılımcılarının sağladığı bilgilerin gizliliği ve yanıt verenlerin gizliliği sağlanmalıdır. Araştırma katılımcıların özerkliğini ve saygınlığını koruyacak şekilde tasarlanmalıdır.</li><li>Araştırma katılımcıları gönüllü olarak araştırmada yer almalı, herhangi bir zorlama altında olmamalıdırlar.</li><li>Katılımcıların zarar görmesinden kaçınılmalıdır. Araştırma, katılımcıları riske sokmayacak şekilde planlanmalıdır.</li><li>Araştırma bağımsızlığıyla ilgili açık ve net olunmalı; çıkar çatışması varsa belirtilmelidir.</li><li>Deneysel çalışmalarda, araştırmaya katılmaya karar veren katılımcıların yazılı bilgilendirilmiş onayı alınmalıdır. Çocukların ve vesayet altındakilerin veya tasdiklenmiş akıl hastalığı bulunanların yasal vasisinin onayı alınmalıdır.</li><li>Çalışma herhangi bir kurum ya da kuruluşta gerçekleştirildiyse bu kurum ya da kuruluştan çalışma yapıldığına dair onay alınmalıdır.</li><li>İnsan ögesi bulunan çalışmalarda, “yöntem” bölümünde katılımcılardan “bilgilendirilmiş onam” ve çalışmanın yapıldığı kurumdan etik kurul onayı alındığının belirtilmesi gerekir.</li></ul>

Makalelerin bilimsel ve etik kurallara uygunluğu yazarların sorumluluğundadır. Yazar makalenin orijinal olduğu, daha önce başka bir yerde yayımlanmadığı ve başka bir yerde, başka bir dilde yayımlanmak üzere değerlendirmede olmadığı konusunda teminat sağlamalıdır. Uygulamadaki telif kanunları ve anlaşmaları gözetilmelidir. Telife bağlı materyaller (örneğin tablolar, şekiller veya büyük alıntılar) gerekli izin ve teşekkürle kullanılmalıdır. Başka yazarların, katkıda bulunanların çalışmaları ya da yararlanılan kaynaklar uygun biçimde kullanılmalı ve referanslarda belirtilmelidir.Gönderilen makalede tüm yazarların akademik ve bilimsel olarak doğrudan katkısı olmalıdır, bu bağlamda “yazar” yayımlanan bir araştırmanın kavramsallaştırılmasına ve dizaynına, verilerin elde edilmesine, analizine ya da yorumlanmasına belirgin katkı yapan, yazının yazılması ya da bunun içerik açısından eleştirel biçimde gözden geçirilmesinde görev yapan birisi olarak görülür. Yazar olabilmenin diğer koşulları ise, makaledeki çalışmayı planlamak veya icra etmek ve/veya revize etmektir. Fon sağlanması, veri toplanması ya da araştırma grubunun genel süpervizyonu tek başına yazarlık hakkı kazandırmaz. Yazar olarak gösterilen tüm şahıslar sayılan tüm ölçütleri karşılamalıdır ve yukarıdaki ölçütleri karşılayan her şahıs yazar olarak gösterilebilir. Yazarların isim sıralaması ortak verilen bir karar olmalıdır. Tüm yazarlar yazar sıralamasını <a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/9B77E355354E4B01894A352474E55BAF" target="_blank">Telif Hakkı Anlaşması Formu</a>’nda imzalı olarak belirtmek zorundadırlar.Yazarlık için yeterli ölçütleri karşılamayan ancak çalışmaya katkısı olan tüm şahıslar “teşekkür/bilgiler” kısmında sıralanmalıdır. Bunlara örnek olarak ise sadece teknik destek sağlayan, yazıma yardımcı olan ya da sadece genel bir destek sağlayan, finansal ve materyal desteği sunan kişiler verilebilir.Bütün yazarlar, araştırmanın sonuçlarını ya da bilimsel değerlendirmeyi etkileyebilme potansiyeli olan finansal ilişkiler, çıkar çatışması ve çıkar rekabetini beyan etmelidirler. Bir yazar kendi yayımlanmış yazısında belirgin bir hata ya da yanlışlık tespit ederse, bu yanlışlıklara ilişkin düzeltme ya da geri çekme için editör ile hemen temasa geçme ve iş birliği yapma sorumluluğunu taşır.

Makaleler hakemlik süreci öncesinde editör kurulu tarafından ön değerlendirmeye tabi tutulur. Editör kurulu, makaleleri, yazarların etnik kökeninden, cinsiyetinden, uyruğundan, dinî inancından ve siyasi felsefesinden bağımsız olarak değerlendirir. Değerlendirmede derginin ilgi alanları, dergi yazım kuralları, kelime sınırı, akademik üslup, dil-gramer kuralları, analiz ve yorumların yeterliliği, kaynak kullanımı ve konunun özgünlüğü dikkate alınmaktadır. Makale başvurularının yoğunluğu sebebiyle ön değerlendirme sonucunda iade veya reddine karar verilen makaleler için ayrıntılı bir rapor sunulmaz.

Ön kontrolden geçirilen makaleler, iThenticate yazılımı kullanılarak intihal için taranır. İntihal/kendi kendine intihal tespit edilirse yazarlar bilgilendirilir. Editörler, gerekli olması hâlinde makaleyi değerlendirme ya da üretim sürecinin çeşitli aşamalarında intihal kontrolüne tabi tutabilirler. Yüksek benzerlik oranları, bir makalenin kabul edilmeden önce ve hatta kabul edildikten sonra reddedilmesine neden olabilir. Makalenin türüne bağlı olarak, benzerlik oranının en fazla %20 olması beklenir.

Baş editör, makaleleri, yazarların etnik kökeninden, cinsiyetinden, uyruğundan, dinî inancından ve siyasi felsefesinden bağımsız olarak değerlendirir. Yayına gönderilen makalelerin adil bir şekilde çift taraflı kör hakem değerlendirmesinden geçmelerini sağlar. Baş editör; yazarlar, editörler ve hakemler arasında çıkar çatışmasına izin vermez. Hakem atama konusunda tam yetkiye sahiptir ve dergide yayımlanacak makalelerle ilgili nihai kararı vermekle yükümlüdür.Baş editör, içerik ve yayının toplam kalitesinden sorumludur. Gerektiğinde hata sayfası yayımlamalı ya da düzeltme yapmalıdır.Baş editör, makaleleri değerlendirilmek üzere en az iki ulusal/uluslararası dış hakeme gönderir; hakemlik süreci sonrasında yayım kararı baş editör tarafından verilir.Baş editör, makalelere ilişkin tüm bilginin, makale yayımlanana kadar gizli kalacağını garanti eder; hakemlerin kimliğinin gizli kalmasına özen gösterir.Baş editör, hakemlere gönderilen makalelerin, yazarların özel mülkü olduğunu ve bunun imtiyazlı bir iletişim olduğunu açıkça belirtir. Hakemler ve yayın kurulu üyeleri üçüncü kişilerle makaleleri tartışamazlar.Bazı durumlarda editörün kararıyla, ilgili hakemlerin makaleye ait yorumları aynı makaleyi yorumlayan diğer hakemlere gönderilerek hakemlerin bu süreçte aydınlatılması sağlanabilir.Hakemlerin araştırmayla ilgili, yazarlarla ve/veya araştırmanın finansal destekçileriyle çıkar çatışmaları olmamasına dikkat edilmelidir.

Editör, makalelerin adil bir şekilde çift taraflı kör hakemlikten geçmesini sağlar ve makale biçimsel esaslara uygun ise, gelen yazıyı ulusal/uluslararası en az iki dış hakemin değerlendirmesine sunar, hakemler gerek gördüğü takdirde yazıda istenen değişiklikler yazarlar tarafından yapıldıktan sonra yayımlanmasına onay verir.

Hakemlik Hakkında

Baş editör, makaleleri, yazarların etnik kökeninden, cinsiyetinden, uyruğundan, dinî inancından ve siyasi felsefesinden bağımsız olarak değerlendirir. Yayına gönderilen makalelerin adil bir şekilde çift taraflı kör hakem değerlendirmesinden geçmelerini sağlar.Baş editör; yazarlar, editörler ve hakemler arasında çıkar çatışmasına izin vermez. Hakem atama konusunda tam yetkiye sahiptir ve dergide yayımlanacak makalelerle ilgili nihai kararı vermekle yükümlüdür.Baş editör, içerik ve yayının toplam kalitesinden sorumludur. Gerektiğinde hata sayfası yayımlamalı ya da düzeltme yapmalıdır.Baş editör, makaleleri değerlendirilmek üzere en az iki ulusal/uluslararası dış hakeme gönderir; hakemlik süreci sonrasında yayım kararı baş editör tarafından verilir.Baş editör, makalelere ilişkin tüm bilginin, makale yayımlanana kadar gizli kalacağını garanti eder; hakemlerin kimliğinin gizli kalmasına özen gösterir.Baş editör, hakemlere gönderilen makalelerin, yazarların özel mülkü olduğunu ve bunun imtiyazlı bir iletişim olduğunu açıkça belirtir. Hakemler ve yayın kurulu üyeleri üçüncü kişilerle makaleleri tartışamazlar.Bazı durumlarda editörün kararıyla, ilgili hakemlerin makaleye ait yorumları aynı makaleyi yorumlayan diğer hakemlere gönderilerek hakemlerin bu süreçte aydınlatılması sağlanabilir.Hakemlerin araştırmayla ilgili, yazarlarla ve/veya araştırmanın finansal destekçileriyle çıkar çatışmaları olmamasına dikkat edilmelidir.

Hakemlerin değerlendirmeleri objektif olmalıdır. Hakemlik süreci sırasında hakemlerin aşağıdaki hususları dikkate alarak değerlendirmelerini yapmaları beklenir:<ul><li>Makale yeni ve önemli bir bilgi içeriyor mu?</li><li>Öz, makalenin içeriğini net ve düzgün bir şekilde tanımlıyor mu?</li><li>Problematik net ve veciz bir şekilde ifade edilmiş mi?</li><li>Yöntem bütünlüklü ve anlaşılır şekilde tanımlanmış mı?</li><li>Yapılan yorum ve varılan sonuçlar bulgularla kanıtlanıyor mu?</li><li>Alandaki diğer çalışmalara yeterli referans verilmiş mi?</li><li>Dil kalitesi yeterli mi?</li></ul>Hakemler, gönderilen makalelere ilişkin tüm bilgilerin, makale yayınlanana kadar gizli kalmasını sağlamalı ve makalede telif hakkı ihlali veya intihal tespit ederlerse editöre raporlamalıdırlar. Hakem, makale konusu hakkında kendini yetkin görmüyor ya da zamanında geri dönüş sağlayamayacağını düşünüyorsa editörü bilgilendirmeli ve hakemlik sürecine kendisini dâhil etmemesini istemelidir.

DilDerginin yayın dili Türkçe, İngilizce ve Arapçadır.Yayın TürleriAraştırma Makalesi: Orijinal araştırma makaleleri derginin kapsamına uygun konularda akademik değeri olan, özgün ve bilimsel sonuçlar sunan çalışmalardır.Derleme Makale: Bir bilgi ya da konunun vardığı son düzeyi anlatan, tartışan, değerlendiren ve gelecekte yapılacak olan çalışmalara yön vermesi beklenen yazılardır.Araştırma Notu: Bir konunun makale boyutuna ulaşmayan kapsam ve nitelikte ele alındığı yazılardır. Araştırma notunun 4000 kelimeyi geçmemesi beklenir. Araştırma notu türündeki yazılar hakemlik sürecine alınmaz; editör tarafından değerlendirilerek yayım sürecine alınır. Araştırma notunda Türkçe ve İngilizce özet yer almaz. Yazıda Türkçe başlığın yanı sıra İngilizce başlık ve her iki dilde 5-8 adet anahtar kelime verilmelidir.Kitap Değerlendirmesi: Son 5 yılda yayımlanmış çalışmalarla ilgili değerlendirmelere öncelik verilir. Değerlendirme yazılarının alanın uzmanları tarafından hazırlanması beklenir. Sadece tanıtım ve özet mahiyetindeki yazılar kabul edilmez. Kitap değerlendirmelerinde değerlendirilen kitabın başlığından bağımsız özgün bir başlık (Türkçe ve İngilizce) ve 5-8 adet anahtar kelime (Türkçe ve İngilizce) belirlenmelidir.Sempozyum/Çalıştay Tanıtımı: Ulusal veya uluslararası akademik toplantıların değerlendirilmesini içeren yazılardır. Tanıtım yazılarında özellikle toplantının akademik katkısı ele alınmalıdır.

Yazım Kuralları

Aksi belirtilmedikçe gönderilen yazılarla ilgili tüm yazışmalar ilk yazarla yapılacaktır. Makale gönderimi online olarak <a href="https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/42/submission/step/manuscript/new" target="_blank" style="text-decoration: underline;font-size: 13.3333px;">https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iuislamtd</a> adresinden erişilen <a href="https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/login" target="_blank" style="font-size: 13.3333px;">https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/login</a> üzerinden yapılmalıdır. Gönderilen yazılar, makale türünü belirten ve makaleyle ilgili detayları içeren (bkz: Son Kontrol Listesi) <a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/480192FFC1954084A60C5E74062392E1" target="_blank" style="font-size: 13.3333px;">Kapak Sayfası</a>; editöre mektup, yazının elektronik formunu içeren Microsoft Word 2003 ve üzerindeki versiyonları ile yazılmış elektronik dosya ve tüm yazarların imzaladığı <a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/68873B40EDF8448CB632792AC623F1F9" target="_blank" style="font-size: 13.3333px;">Telif Hakkı Anlaşması Formu</a> eklenerek gönderilmelidir.

Makale ana metninde, çift taraflı kör hakemlik süreci gereği, yazarın/yazarların kimlik bilgileri yer almamalıdır.Çalışmaların başlıca şu unsurları içermesi gerekmektedir: Türkçe başlık, öz ve anahtar kelimeler; İngilizce başlık, öz ve anahtar kelimeler; genişletilmiş özet, ana metin bölümleri, kaynaklar, tablolar ve şekiller.Başlık seçiminde atıf göstermede karışıklık yaşanmaması için çift tırnak işareti kullanılmamalı, gerekiyorsa tek tırnak veya italik yazım tercih edilmelidir.Türkçe ve İngilizce Öz/Abstract bölümlerinin her biri 150-250 kelime; Türkçe ve Arapça makaleler için İngilizce Genişletilmiş Özet (Extended Abstract) ise 600-800 kelime sınırına uygun olmalıdır. Öz, genişletilmiş özette aynen yer almamalı; dil bilgisi açısından doğru ve anlaşılır olmalıdır.Türkçe özün altında çalışmanın içeriğini temsil eden 5-8 Türkçe anahtar kelime olmalıdır. İngilizce özün altında içeriği temsil eden 5-8 İngilizce anahtar kelime olmalıdır.Anahtar kelimeler, genelden özele doğru sıralanmalı ve kelimelerin ilk harfleri büyük yazılmalıdır. bk. https://www.isnadsistemi.org/guide/isnad2/akademik-yazim/5-anahtar-kelimelerin-secimi/Metin ana bölümleri (Öz, Genişletilmiş Özet, Kaynakça vs. hariç) 9000 kelimeyi geçmemelidir.Makale ana bölümlerinde Giriş ve Sonuç hariç başlıklar 1., 1.1., 1.1.1., şeklinde sıralı rakamlarla numaralandırılmalıdır.Genel yazımda Türk Dil Kurumunun imla kurallarına uyulmalı; Arapça ve İslami ilimlere dair özel isimlerin ve kavramların yazımında Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi’nin kullanımları dikkate alınmalıdır. Kelimelerin yazımında metin boyunca imla birliğinin sağlanması esastır.Yabancı dildeki kelimelere gelen Türkçe ekler, özel isim değilse kesme işaretiyle ayrılmamalı ve ilgili dilin telaffuzuna uygun olmalıdır (Yabancı dildeki kelimeler italik yazılabileceği veya tırnak içinde gösterilebileceği gibi kelimenin Türkçe karşılığı kullanılarak kelimenin orijinali parantez içine de alınabilir).Örnek: natureın söylediği, “nature”ın söylediği, tabiatın (nature) söylediğiArapça, Farsça, Türkçe ve Osmanlı Türkçesindeki özel isim ve kavramların İngilizce yazımında <a href="https://www.isnadsistemi.org/guide/isnad2/akademik-yazim/25-ceviri-yazi-alfabesi-transkripsiyon/" target="_blank">İSNAD Atıf Sistemi Çeviri Yazı Alfabesi</a> esas alınır.Kaynakların doğruluğundan yazar(lar) sorumludur. Tüm kaynaklar metinde belirtilmelidir.

İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi, atıf ve kaynak gösterme için İSNAD 2. Edisyon (Dipnotlu) atıf sistemini benimser. İSNAD 2. Edisyon hakkında bilgi için: <a href="https://www.isnadsistemi.org" target="_blank">https://www.isnadsistemi.org</a>İSNAD atıf sisteminden farklı olarak makalenin hiçbir yerinde eser adları tam transkripsiyon alfabesiyle yazılmamalıdır. Yanlış: Eḥâdîs̱ muḫtâre min Mevżûʿâti’l-Cevreḳānî ve’bni’l-CevzîDoğru: Ehâdîs muhtâre min Mevzû‘âti’l-Cevrekânî ve’bni’l-CevzîBlok alıntılar dâhil tüm alıntılar tırnak içerisine alınmalı; tırnak içindeki alıntılar ayrıca italik olmamalıdır.Atıf yapılan kaynakların başlıkları ve alıntılardaki yazım aynen korunmalıdır.

Aşağıdaki listede eksik olmadığından emin olun:● Makale Ana MetniÖnemli: Ana metinde yazarın/yazarların kimlik bilgilerinin yer almamış olması gerekir.<ul><li>Türkçe ve İngilizce başlık</li><li>Özetler: 150-250 kelime Türkçe ve 150-250 kelime İngilizce </li><li>Türkçe ve Arapça makaleler için İngilizce Genişletilmiş Özet (Extended Abstract) (600-800 kelime)</li><li>Anahtar Kelimeler: 5-8 adet Türkçe ve 5-8 adet İngilizce</li><li>Makale ana metin bölümleri (9000 kelimeyi aşmamalıdır)</li><li>Kaynaklar</li><li>Tablolar-Resimler, Şekiller (başlık, tanım ve alt yazılarıyla)</li></ul>● <a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/68873B40EDF8448CB632792AC623F1F9" target="_blank">Telif Hakkı Anlaşması Formu</a>● Daha önce basılmış materyal (yazı-resim-tablo) kullanılmış ise İzin Belgesi● <a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/480192FFC1954084A60C5E74062392E1" target="_blank">Kapak Sayfası</a><ul><li>Makalenin kategorisi</li><li>Makale dilinde ve İngilizce başlık</li><li>Yazarların adı soyadı, ünvanları, bağlı oldukları kurumlar (sırasıyla üniversite, fakülte, şehir, ülke bilgisi) ve e-posta adresleri</li><li>Sorumlu yazarın e-posta adresi, açık yazışma adresi, iş telefonu, GSM, faks numarası</li><li>Tüm yazarların ORCID’leri</li><li>Finansal destek (varsa belirtiniz)</li><li>Çıkar çatışması (varsa belirtiniz)</li><li>Teşekkür (varsa belirtiniz)   </li></ul>● <a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/7D1907500B7A45D3BDBFB8FD115EC3AD" target="_blank">Yazar Katkısı Formu</a>Önemli: Birden fazla yazar olması durumunda her bir yazarın katkısı belirtilerek sorumlu yazar tarafından imzalanmalıdır.

<a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/68873B40EDF8448CB632792AC623F1F9" target="_blank">Telif Hakkı Anlaşması Formu</a><a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/480192FFC1954084A60C5E74062392E1" target="_blank" style="font-size: 10pt;">Kapak sayfası</a><a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/7D1907500B7A45D3BDBFB8FD115EC3AD" target="_blank">Yazar Formu</a>

Sayı Türü	Regular
Editör(ler)	Ahmet Hamdi Furat
Tam Metin (PDF)
Ön Sayfalar (PDF)