Sanem

Assoc. Prof.

Under Turkish Civil Code paternity between the mother and the child is established with birth. However paternity with the father is established through marriage with mother, court decision or recognition. Through adoption paternity can also be founded between the child and the mother or the father. The Turkish Civil Code entered into force in 2002. Since 2002 Constitutional Court had invalidated some provisions about paternity cases. The time limitations in the denial of paternity cases have been removed. According to Art.289 the father could file a case of denial of paternity within certain time limits. The father has to file a case in one year after he has learnt the birth of the child and that he is not the father, and the mother’s sexual relationship with another man. Before the Constitutional Court has annulled there was another time limitation for the father. The father had to file a case under any circumstances five years after the birth of the child. Thus there were two different time limitation, first one started when the father learnt that the birth of the child or that he was not the real father. The second time limitation was an absolute one regarding the birth of the child. In both conditions the case should be filed five years after the birth of the child. But the Constitunional Court has annulled absolute time limitations on the grounds that such limitation restricts the freedom of claiming legal rights. However, actually Article 289 of the Turkish Civil Code also includes an alternative in cases when the time limitations are prolonged as long as there is a justifiable reason. Thus the Constitutional Court need not nullify the absolute time limitations. On the other hand, the necessity of absolule time limitations will be discussed in the essay. Constitutional Court annulled some parts of Article 303 of the Turkish Civil Code. Before the decision of the Constitutional Court according to this provision the child could file a paternity suit against the biological father within one year after the child has reached maturity. A guardian could be appointed to the child before maturity to file this law suit, in these cases the guardian should file the case within one year after he was appointed as a guardian. However the Constitutional Court annuled the provision and according to the new provision the child can file a paternity suit against the biological father without any time limitations. The time limitations are now valid only when the mother files such a case. According to high Court time limitations in paternity cases are restricting the freedom of claiming rights. Utmost benefit of the child also justifies the invalidation of the time limitations in paternity cases for the child. The accuracy of the High Court’s decision will be discussed throughly. Constitutional Court also annuled the time limitation concerning adoption provision. Under Article 319 of the Civil Code there were two different time limitations to invalidate the adoption when there were reasons to file such a case. The persons that have right to invalidate adoption can file such a case within one after they were aware of the facts to invalidate the adoption. However this law suit in any&nbsp;case should be filed within five years after the adoption of the child. After five years nobody can file such a law suit. However the Constitutional Court has annuled the provision and ruled that five years of absolute time limitation restricts the freedom of claiming rights. This decision should be approached with criticism because the reason of time limitations in adoption cases are to protect the best interest of the child and to restrict the invalidation of adoption after certain time limitations are elapsed. The aims of this paper is to discuss the accuracy of Constitutional Court decisions with regard to the comparative law. German law and Swiss law will be taken into consideration to evalute the decisions.&nbsp;

Soybağı Davalarındaki Hak Düşürücü Sürelere İlişkin Anayasa Mahkemesi Kararlarının Değerlendirilmesi

Barış

In the field of pharmaceutical patent there must be a fair balance between scientific developments and the public interest to access (new) pharmaceuticals. On one hand access to pharmaceuticals is directly related with public health and on the other, as a consequence of pharmaceutical researches, improvements occur both in the field of medical treatment and public health. Thus, the nature of pharmaceutical patent differs from product and process patents related to other fields of industry and includes some special characteristics. As a result, it is important to research both the general patent laws and special regulations concerning pharmaceutical patent. In accordance to Industrial Property Law (IPL), the scope of patent prevention shall primarily be determined by the claims of the applicant. As high-budget research and development activities occur in pharmaceutical industry and by taking into account that the patent right includes the rights on generics, the claims on patent must be clearly defined. Rights on product patent of a pharmaceutical provide to its owner exclusive authority for manufacture, sale, use, import and possession of pharmaceutical for professional purposes. On the other hand, process patent of a pharmaceutical includes authority for use of the patented process, prohibition of making of offer by third parties for the unauthorized use of the patented process, prohibition of sale, distribution and commercial use of the products manufactured directly by implementation of the patented process by third parties, import, possession, implementation of the patented process for commercial use and offering to be made by third parties for execution of contracts for unauthorized use. In terms of prohibition of indirect use, patent owner of a pharmaceutical patent may also prohibit unauthorized delivery of items and instruments related to essential part of the patent by third parties which enables implementation of patent. Notwithstanding the above-mentioned wide scope of rights and powers arisen from patent, activities listed under article 85/3 of IPL and exempted from patent prevention are consisted of acts undertaken privately for noncommercial purposes, acts undertaken for experimental purposes and preparation of medicine in accordance with medical prescription which have non-commercial nature and are undertaken for personal needs and purposes. Acts undertaken privately for non-commercial purposes can be defined as acts including the use of patented product for personal needs and use for the needs of neighborhood. The legal grounds of this exemption can be specified as; use of patent for personal needs does not violate patent rights or constitute any risk for such and scientific advancements can be achieved by such use. Educational activities and gifting can be considered in the scope of this exemption. Acts for experimental purposes may also cause scientific advancements and ease inspection of the patent invention by third parties. The exemption concerning to preparation of medicine by a pharmacist in accordance with medical prescription which is outside the scope of commercial production can be based on customary law. Experimental acts listed under article 85/3 of IPL including those undertaken for obtaining pharmaceutical authorization and other related tests and trials are also classified as Bolar exemption and have critical importance in the area of pharmaceutical patent. As a result of this exemption generic pharmaceutical companies can execute the required trials and experiments for authorization, thus immediately after the expiration of patent term, they can participate in the market which may bring about a competitive medium. In case if Bolar exemption is not accepted by applicable law, generic pharmaceutical companies can realize manufacture and authorization of their products after a long period of time following the end of the patent term, as a result, the competitive medium which is necessary for public interest cannot be achieved at the end of the patent term. As a consequence of the specified reasons, in US law, Bolar exemption which is named after the court decision having the same name is accepted and following this incident such exemption is adopted by the EU law. Under Turkish law Bolar exemption is also recognized by the courts. Bolar exemption provisioned under Turkish law consists tests and trials required for authorization but excludes commercial production, storing and manufacturing prior to the end of patent term. In addition the application of Bolar exemption to data exclusivity enables generic pharmaceutical companies to file abbreviated application for authorization by depending on the data of the original pharmaceuticals which will result in accomplishment of the difficult and long-term authorization process. Under Turkish law Bolar exemption includes both abbreviated and standard applications for authorization and also obtaining of authorization falls under its scope.

Sınai Mülkiyet Kanunu Madde 85/3 Hükmü Kapsamında Bolar İstisnasının Uygulanması

Arzu

Eşlerden Birinin Üçüncü Kişiyle Yaptığı Muvazaalı İşlemlerin Edinilmiş Mallara Katılma Rejimine İlişkin TMK Md.229 Hükmü Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi

Elif

Res. Assist.

The word “limited” in English, is used to refer to the types of companies that have limited liability of partners in international law systems. This type of company, which is expressed as “limited şirket” in Turkish Law, was born and developed in German law and then started to come into effect universally. In this study, the development process of the limited liability company in various legal systems was examined and the contents of the laws were only mentioned in the points of importance. Although it is the foundation of today’s legal systems, in Roman law, legal entities have emerged with the development of the economy. Especially from the B.C. 2nd century onwards, it is seen that people who do not have family ties have started to establish societas by bringing together all their goods in order to gain a profit. However, this type of company called societas does not have a legal entity and depends on the existence of people who created it. In this respect, it is similar to an ordinary company. Therefore, it is not possible to mention the limited liability company which has a separate legal personality as in today’s legal systems. Before we mention the limited liability companies in European law, it is necessary to examine the developments in German law. Germany established its trade with its colonies on joint stock and personal partnerships. However, when the two types of companies failed to satisfy in terms of needs, the concept of limited liability company was first born in 1892 in Germany. In the middle of the Joint-Stock Companies and partnerships, limited liability company has become popular due to its limited responsibility, as well as its ability to established, organized and managed more easily than other types of companies. For this reason, much change has been made on this type of company to date. The most important of these is MoMiG, which came into force on 01.11.2008. The main reason for this reform is to enable the German limited company to compete with the limited liability companies of the EU member states due to decisions made by the European Court of Justice, such as Centros and Inspire Art. Switzerland, due to international customaries, limited liability companies could not be established first. But after other European countries allowed this particular company type and it gained popularity in whole Europe, European limited companies started making business in Switzerland. Therefore, eventually, in 1936 limited liability company foundation was integrated into Swiss Law. However, the regulations herein have not been taken one by one and brought the limited liability company closer to partnerships especially in terms of the responsibilities and obligations of the partners. Despite this, legalization could not popularize the limited liability company which was not in demand in Switzerland. However, in the 1990s, especially after the changes establishment and auditing of joint stock companies in the Swiss Code of Obligations, changed the course. In English Law, private company was first enacted in the Companies Act in 1908. With this new legal regulation, limited liability companies have started to be preferred not only by family companies but also by mid-sized companies. In 1992, to comply with the European Union acquis, the implementation of the minimum amount of capitalization for the establishment of the limited liability company was relinquished and the opportunity to be established with a single partner was granted. These two new changes were enough to make British Law popular in Europe. On the other hand, The European Union is trying to ensure that all European laws are uniformly enacted by publishing directives on corporate law. Centros decision of the European Court of Justice in 1999 makes a tremendous impact of these. In accordance with this decision, a person who is legally engaged in trade in any member country of the European Union should be able to trade with his company in other Union countries. Although it is widely criticized in Europe, particularly in Germany, the European Court of Justice has continued to make important decisions on this matter and has become a situated practice. The legal concept of limited liability company entered into American law in 1977 with Wyoming state after it was adopted in almost all European countries. This innovation brought by Wyoming was followed by Florida in 1982. However, due to the uncertainty in taxation, the legalization process has been slowed down for a while. In 1988, after the IRS (Internal Revenue Administration) allowed limited liability companies to be classified as a company, at the end of 1996, 50 states fully enact the laws about limited liability companies. The most important reason for the adoption of the concept of limited liability companies in the United States is the aim of collecting all companies under one roof. The concept of limited liability in the Commercial Law, which entered into force in Turkish Law for the first time in 1926, was regulated in 14 articles. It was criticized in the doctrine on the grounds that the relevant provisions were quoted from French law and the limited number of regulations were inadequate in practice. Therewith, in 1956, amendments were made to the provisions of limited liability company and the Swiss Code of Obligations was adopted as a source of these provisions. During this quotation, the provisions of the Swiss Code of Obligations were not passed into Turkish Law directly, and a different system was adopted, particularly regarding the responsibilities of the shareholders. However, these new regulations have not been fully approved by the doctrine. With the Turkish Commercial Code (TCC) No. 6102, which came into force in 2012, the limited company gained a new appearance and approached to a joint-stock company. It is organized as a capital company within Article 124 of the TCC. Along with the aforementioned changes it has become the most preferred trading company in Turkey. Examining today’s legal systems, it is seen that this artificial species is preferred more than the types of companies that are born and developed in practice. It is obvious that the main reason for this demand for the limited liability company, which is referred to as “the largest legal export of Germany”, is economic. In addition to being close to the capital companies and especially to the Joint Stock Company, the advantages of taxation and capital have increased the sympathy of small and mediumsized enterprises to the limited liability company. European Union directives and the decisions of the European Court of Justice have also contributed to this rapid acceleration. With the addition of American law, the limited liability company has become an indispensable part of universal legislation and practice.

Tarihsel Perspektifte Limited Şirket Kavramı

Nuri

Assist. Prof.

1. Introduction The purpose of the study is to determine the dismissal of board members in joint stock companies and to clarify the controversial points in the framework of the principle of commitment to the general assembly agenda. The discussion on whether or not the dismissal is dependent on the principle of commitment to the agenda, the extent to TCC 364 which the effect of justified cause on the decision of dismissal is added can be continued even for today. Should be looked for alternative solutions it is difficult for the item to be found on the agenda.2. Conceptual Framework Since the authority of the dismissal is based on the fact that the relationship between the member of the board of directors (proxy) and the partnership (the client) is based on a mutual trust relationship and that the trust can always be terminated, the board members shall always and can be dismissed unilaterally. However, since the right of the general assembly to dismissal the members is a right that causes conditional detrimental right, it is necessary to realize the facts and the reasons set forth in the law in order to use this right. In this context, the dismissal of members should be evaluated separately in accordance with the provisions of the decreasing law. 3. Method The subject was examined within the framework of Turkish and the referenced Swiss doctrine and judicial decisions. The views of different doctrines were quoted when necessary, transferred to the study, discussed and expressed our personal opinion. The footnote system is preferred as citation method. The Turkish Supreme Court case law and Swiss Federal Court decisions were also evaluated from time to time in the main text. The relevant parts of Swiss Federal Court decisions were translated and included in the text. 4. Findings and Discussion Due to the absolute nature of the power of the general assembly, it is discussed in the doctrine whether or not the general assembly may use the power of dismissal if there’s no item on agenda. In law no. 6762, the board member have no right to claim compensation even if the members are appointed by the articles of corporation is regulated in OCC 316; the opinion of Supreme Court was the members can be always dismissed by general assembly even there is an agenda item or not. However, there were decisions of the Supreme Court in the opposite direction. Article 364/1 of the current law states that, unlike both OCC 316 and Swiss Law of Obligations 705 f I,&nbsp;the provisions requires the dismissal to an agenda item or the existence of just cause. The issue is mainly discussed at these points. 5. Conclussion For the validity of the decision, besides the conditions of validity of the other resolutions, it is stated that, there should be an item directly or indirectly related to the dismissal on the agenda, and the partnership may dismiss the board member in the presence of just cause even there’s an agenda item or not. İf there is no just cause, it depends of whether there is any agenda item or not. Thus, if there is not an agenda item, a decision not based just cause shall be unlawful and can be revoked in the meaning of TCC 445 as it does not meet the requirements of the law. If the decision based on an agenda item but without justified reason, the dismissal will be valid but it may be the responsibility of the compensation stipulated in TCC 413/2. In order for this responsibility to occur, in the meaning TOC 512, the decree must be of unjustified nature and there must be a decision of dismissal in an improper time. Although a more severe quorum may be envisaged in the articles of association, but the aggravation shall not be such as to make it impossible. Decree of the decision in the internal relationship should reach board members and goodwill for third parties requires a registration and announcement.&nbsp;

Anonim Ortaklık Genel Kurul Toplantılarında Gündeme Bağlılık İlkesi Çerçevesinde Yönetim Kurulu Üyesinin Azli

Güzide

Ius Civile’nın Tanıdığı Azat Etme Muameleleri ve Özel Hukuk Bakımından Sonuçları

Özgün

Our need for using and controlling animals has traditionally led to the classification of animals as things, namely as objects, and not subjects of rights. Nevertheless, consequently to the development of scientific data as to animal sentience and animal cognition, the anthropocentric approach that considers the human being as the center of the universe has begun to fade away. Our relationship with animals has evolved in parallel to our awareness of their quality of living beings, and law has begun to reflect this evolution through creation of rules, which designate animals as the aim of the legal protection, and not merely as instruments at the service of human beings. Comprehension of the legal effect of such rules and determination of the direction in which the animal law should proceed requires re-evaluation of the legal status of animals with regards to the distinction between persons and things, one of the summa divisio of our private law system The concessions that human beings are willing to make for the benefit of animal welfare are determined differently depending on the needs and values of each society, leading to a high level of diversity in legal steps taken by different countries. Studying Swiss, German and French laws which share similar principles with our private law system and which have taken concrete steps for improvement of legal status of animals, one can observe that some of the rules relating to animal protection aim primarily to protect the animal owners’ interests and as such, do not depart from the tradition which classify animals as objects of rights. Nevertheless, some other rules aim to protect animals for their own interests, and impose restrictions to human behavior exclusively to this effect. In this regard, besides detailed regulations issued under the form of animal protection laws, as is the case in our legal system, amendments of more fundamental nature in different areas of civil law are noteworthy. In particular, exclusion of animals from the category of things in civil codes and the development of “animal dignity” concept reflect a paradigm shift based on the prioritization of animals’ inherent value. Norms aiming at their protection for their own interests and exposing them to a specific legal regime drive animals towards to a sui generis legal status. In some countries, the aim of protection of animals for their own sake has also become a constitutional principle and consequently, legislative, executive and judicial organs have been entrusted with the duty of ensuring the continuity of this evolution. In the presence of such legal limits to human behavior for the protection of animals’ interests, it seems difficult to continue to classify animals as mere things. Once this point accepted, one can observe three groups of propositions of solution. Some scholars defend the classical understanding of the distinction between persons and things and the classification of animals under the second category, but consider animals as a special category of things. Others who underline insufficiencies of the&nbsp;distinction between persons and things argue that animals are neither things nor persons, and thus constitute an intermediate category between persons and things. Finally, scholars who attach personhood to the fact of having legally protected interest argue that the conditions for animals to be accepted as persons or as quasi-persons are satisfied. Accordingly, animals must enjoy a “technical” legal personhood, adapted to their needs, and an efficient tutorship mechanism, enabling them to use the rights attached to such personhood. It has been argued that it would be contradictory to accept animals as something other than things, as long as they remain objects of property right. However, pretending that beings protected by the legal system directly for their own interests do not enjoy any rights also leads to a contradiction. Accepting that a being has its own interest worthy of protection amounts to the recognition of this being as an objective in itself as long as such interests are at stake, rather than as a tool for satisfaction of others’ interest, which is the fate of things. Legal repercussions of our relationship with animals lead to the recognition of animals partially as objects and partially as subjects of rights and demonstrate that the relationship between the categories of persons and things, accepted to be mutually exclusionary, has become questionable in face of some modern classification problems. Interrogations upon the intransigent character of such distinction and to what extent intermediary layers can be acceptable bear importance not only for the status of animals, but also for the proper legal integration of some other beings which have gained new meanings in modern societies, such as plants, other components of environment, human corpse or artificial intelligence.

Kişi ve Eşya Ayrımı Bağlamında Hayvanların Hukuki Statüsü

Kürşad

The termination of lease contracts of residential and roofed business premises has been regulated under the 347th article of Turkish Code of Obligations (TCO) numbered 6098. First paragraph of the article regulates the termination of lease contracts for residences (dwelling houses) and roofed business premises (working places) concluded for a limited duration (fixed term contracts). Pursuant to the first paragraph of Article 347, at the fixed term lease contract of residential and roofed business premises, the contract is deemed to be extended for one year under the same conditions unless the tenant gives notice at least fifteen days prior to the expiration of the contract. The lessor cannot terminate the contract based on the expiry of the contract period. However, at the end of the ten-year extension period, the lessor may terminate the contract without any justification grounds, by giving at least three months’ notice before the end of each extension period. It is controversial when the ten-year extension period will begin and when the lessor can use the right to terminate at the earliest. According to an opinion defended in the doctrine, the lease term agreed in the contract should be included in the ten-year extension period; thus, the ten-year period should begin to operate from the beginning of the lease. This opinion has been criticized on the grounds that according to the wording of the regulation, the ten-year extension period starts from the end of the lease term, not from the beginning of the lease term. According to a second opinion, the purpose of the legislator to establish a tenyear period is to protect the tenant for a period of twelve years, consisting of the first lease year, ten extension years and a subsequent extension year. Even if the lease term is longer than one year, only the first year of the lease period should be taken into account in accordance with the “tenant’s system of protection for twelve years”. Thus, the tenant has been protected for only twelve years and the lessor shall be given the opportunity to ensure that the contract does not extend to the thirteenth year. This opinion was criticized for the lack of a legal basis for the calculation of the time period, based solely on the first year of the lease period; however, the law refers to an entire lease period. According to the prevailing opinion and the Turkish Court of Cassation’s practice, the ten-year extension period starts from the expiry of the lease period determined by the contract. Accordingly, the lessor shall have the right to terminate the contract without giving any reason, after each one-year extension period following the completion of the ten-year extension period after the lease period (Lease period + ten-year extension time + at least one-year subsequent extension period). However, this view cannot provide justification grounds as to why the tenant in indefinite-term&nbsp;lease agreements is less protected than the tenant in fixed-term lease agreements. Unlike Art.347/I of TCO, which regulates fixed term lease agreements, pursuant to the Art.347/II of TCO, which regulates indefinite term lease agreements, in the case of indeterminate lease terms, the lessor may terminate the contract upon notification of termination pursuant to the general provisions of TCO ten years after the beginning of the lease. According to the majority of the authors who is in the opinion that the lease period in the contract is included in the ten-year extension period, the tenant may terminate the lease at the end of the ten-year period. As a second opinion, according to the authors defending the tenant’s 12-year preservation (1 lease-year + 10-year extension + 1-year subsequent extension), the lessor may terminate the lease at the end of the first year of extension following the completion of the 10-year extension period. The prevailing opinion and the application of the Turkish Court of Cassation are that the lessor may terminate the lease agreement at the end of the first year of extension following the completion of the ten years from the end of the lease term. In addition, in cases where the lease term is agreed for a period of more than ten years, when the lessor can use the right of termination, is a matter to be evaluated separately. For instance, that a ten-year lease has been concluded. According to the opinions expressed above, at which moment the lessor can terminate the lease? After ten years? At the end of the agreed 15-year lease period? Or at the end of 26 years (15 years of lease term + 10-year extension period + 1-year subsequent extension period)? According to the above-mentioned views, this issue is also evaluated. On the other hand, while the lease agreement continues, the parties may sometimes come together and make a new lease agreement or extend the term of the existing lease. When may the lessor in such cases terminate the contract at the earliest time? This question is another issue dealt with in our study. Finally, one of the questions that should be answered is whether the termination of the lease by the lessor at the end of the ten-year extension period may be prevented by the tenant, as it would be contrary to the principle of good faith. In particular, in the case of lease contracts for roofed business premises (working places), the lessor may want to rent this place to another tenant after the termination of the lease. However, the existing tenant may be willing to pay the rent requested by the lessor from the new tenant in order not to leave this place. Is the lessor still entitled to terminate the lease with the existing tenant? In this study, in terms of the termination of fixed term lease contracts for residential and roofed business premises, the issue of the beginning of the ten-year extension period and the earliest time that the lessor can notify the end of the contract for&nbsp;termination is evaluated in the context of opinions and judicial practice. In our opinion de lege lata, there is a hidden gap in the law for the first paragraph of Article 347 of TCO. Because there is no justification for the artificial separation created by the legislator in terms of ten-year extension period between fixed-term lease agreements (TCO Art.347 /I) and indefinite-term lease agreements (TCO Art.347/II). The different applications associated with this distinction lead to unpredictable and/ or unfair results in concrete events. We are of the opinion that, this hidden gap should be filled by applying second paragraph of Article 347 of TCO mutatis mutandis in terms of fixed term lease agreements. In other words, as in the Art.347/II of TCO is stated, the ten-year extension period should be calculated from the beginning of the lease period. Furthermore, in the case of de lege ferenda, amendments to the provision of Art.347 of TCO have been proposed.

Belirli Süreli Konut ve Çatılı İşyeri Kiralarında On Yıllık Uzama Süresinin Başlangıç Anı ve Kiraya Verenin Fesih Bildiriminde Bulunabileceği En Erken Zaman Dilimi

Meltem

Today, terrorism threatens not just international peace and security but also national security and public order. With the increase of terrorist attacks in recent years, states have been implementing stricter policies and excluding more foreigners who have links with terrorism from refugee status. Exclusion from refugee status is regulated under Article 1 F of the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (1951 Convention) as follows:“The provisions of this Convention shall not apply to any person with respect to whom there are serious reasons for considering that: (a) he has committed a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity, as defined in the international instruments drawn up to make provision in respect of such crimes; (b) he has committed a serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge prior to his admission to that country as a refugee; (c) he has been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.”&nbsp;Similar provisions to Article 1 F of the 1951 Convention can be found in European Union Law and Turkish Law. Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted (Qualification Directive) clarified who is eligible for refugee status and subsidiary protection in the EU and who would be excluded from these statuses. Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of thirdcountry nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted (Recast Qualification Directive) has replaced the Qualification Directive for all EU Member States except the United Kingdom and Ireland in 2013. Exclusion from refugee status has been regulated under Article 12 of the Qualification Directive and Article 12 of the Recast Qualification Directive in a very similar manner. Article 12 paras (2) and (3) of the Recast Qualification Directive establishes rules for exclusion from refugee status, which are modelled after Article 1 F of the 1951 Convention, as follows:&nbsp;“2. A third-country national or a stateless person is excluded from being a refugee where there are serious reasons for considering that: (a) he or she has committed a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity, as defined in the international instruments drawn up to make provision in respect of such crimes; (b) he or she has committed a serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge prior to his or her admission as a refugee, which means the time of issuing a residence permit based on the granting of refugee status; particularly cruel actions, even if committed with an allegedly political objective, may be classified as serious non-political crimes; (c) he or she has been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations as set out in the Preamble and Articles 1 and 2 of the Charter of the United Nations. 3. Paragraph 2 applies to persons who incite or otherwise participate in the commission of the crimes or acts mentioned therein.”&nbsp;Terrorism, membership of a terrorist group or committing terrorist acts are not identified clearly as exclusion grounds under Article 1 F of the 1951 Convention though exclusion of persons who have links with terrorism mostly falls within the scope of Article 1 F paras (b) and (c) as well as Article 12 paras (2) and (3) of the Recast Qualification Directive. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has over the years clarified a number of important issues related to Article 12 of the Recast Qualification Directive as well as terrorism and exclusion. In this study, the principles introduced by the CJEU on exclusion of persons who have links with terrorism from refugee status will be identified through an analysis of the following decisions: Bundesrepublik Deutschland v B (C-57/09) and D (C101/09), H. T. v Land Baden-Württemberg, C 373/13 and Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides v. Mostafa Lounani, C-573/15. In doing so, how the CJEU interprets Article 12 of the Recast Qualification Directive which is modelled after Article 1 F of the 1951 Convention will be outlined.

Avrupa Birliği Adalet Divanı Kararları Işığında Terörizm ile İlişkisi Olan Kişilerin Mülteci Statüsünden Hariç Bırakılması

Tarık T.

Yusuf

Zafer

Narcotic and psychotropic substances are natural or synthetic substances that produce drowsiness or stimulant effects in the user’s central nervous system, which have intoxicating, enjoyment, passion and alertness, driving effects and creating a two-way dependency on the user as psychological and physical. The fact that the effects of these substances contained a major threat to the public health and it required the establishment of legal regulations on this issue. Therefore, narcotic and psychotropic substances were entered the criminal law’s theme and various criminal offenses have been introduced about them. According to the Turkish Criminal Code No. 5237, Article 190/2; inciting the use of these substances is considered a crime. The protected legal value within arranging this crime type is general health of society. Crime of inciting the use of narcotic or psychotropic substances is an inchoate offense that can be committed by electoral acts. These electoral acts counted in TCC as “inciting publicly” and “incentive boradcast”. In order for the crime to occur, it is sufficient that one of these acts is performed and any result isn’t sought. At this point, it is important to correctly identify the concepts of “publicity” and “incitement” and to determine the correct distinction between “incitement” and “encouragement”. In terms of offender, anyone who carries out the electoral movements in the regulation for the perpetrator can be the perpetrators of this crime. However, qualified version of this crime, that regulated in third paragraph, was specific to some persons. In terms of the victim, there is no concrete victim and all individuals who make up the society have the title of victim. Crime of inciting the use of narcotic or psychotropic substances can be committed intentionally in terms of the intangible element. In order to be able to talk about the occurrence of the intent, the perpetrator must knowingly and willingly execute the act of incitement. The intent element sought here refers to the general intent. In addition, this crime can be commit with probable intent but can’t be commit with negligance. The act must be illegal too in that crime type as in every offense. However, there are different appearance formats of justification reason compliance with “the use of right”. In this context, some justification reasons be able to come up as the “performance of the job”, “the right of notification”, “freedom of thought and expression”, “freedom of science and art”. At this point, due to their great importance, fundamental rights and freedoms, the balance between liberty and authority and social media that make people the active element of media are also especially emphasized in this study. Crime of inciting the use of narcotic or psychotropic substances is an inchoate offense and if the act is executed in such a way that it can be divided into sections, it may become suitable for the criminal attempt within special forms of crime. All&nbsp;forms of complicity are possible in this offense and there is no property about it. Conserning the joinder of offenses, it’s possible to commit the crime successively and it can be found that the provisions of conceptual aggregation can be applied in cases where there is a different crime other than this one. The follow-up type of the crime of inciting the use of narcotic or psychotropic substances is ex officio. The competent court is the penal court of general jurisdiction. The authorized court, as a rule, is the place where the crime was committed. However, if the crime is committed by broadcast or publication, the authorized court will vary according to the attribute of the concrete incident. The sanction of the crime has been increased with various changes after a very short period of time from the entry into force and crime of inciting the use of narcotic or psychotropic substances has been imposed with “imprisonment for five to ten years and judicial fine from a thousand to ten thousand days”. However, it should be stated that this sanction, which is quite severe compared to the injustice content of the crime, is contrary to the principle of proportional punishment and that this situation does not have a side that can be explained by the criminal policy. Consequently, it is possible to say that even if the crime of inciting the use of narcotic or psychotropic substances is still a new type of crime, it will increase its importance. Implementation of sanctions foreseen by this regulation, many controversies have occurred in the context of the criminal protection of general health and the limitation of fundamental rights and freedoms already. This study has been written by considering the need to discuss these issues in a scientific perspective. In this context, in the study, the elements of the crime of inciting the use of narcotic or psychotropic substances, the special appearance of the crime were examined and the limits of freedom of expression and the freedom of science and art, which constitute the reason of compliance with this law type, were tried to be evaluated.

Uyuşturucu veya Uyarıcı Madde Kullanılmasını Özendirme Suçu (TCK m. 190/2)

Murat

The constitutional amendments of 2017 include significant innovations in the field of the executive function and the regulatory authority of the executive, as well as the radical change in the field of government system. The tendency, which started with the constitutional amendments of 1971-1973 in Turkish constitutional system, to strengthen the executive and to expand the regulatory power of executive, reached its peak with the constitutional amendments of 2017. In the new government system, all the powers and duties related to the executive field are gathered in the person of the President and the executive branch are equipped with autonomous regulatory power by means of presidential decrees. Unlike the other regulations of the executive, the presidential decrees are the type of primary regulation. The presidential decrees do not have to be based on the law. With this decrees, a field that was not a subject of law before can be regulated initially. The President does not need to obtain authorization from the Grand National Assembly of Turkey in order to be able to issue a decree, nor does (s)he need to present the decree to the Grand National Assembly of Turkey for approval. The presidential decree is made by the President on his own. With the 2017 amendments, the counter-signature rule, which is an institution specific to the parliamentary system, has been abolished. Consequently, the presidential decrees do not have to be signed by the vice-president or the ministers. The only signature in the presidential decrees is the signature of the President. In the some articles of the constitution (art. 104/9, art. 106/11, art. 108/4, art. 118/6), it is decided that certain issues would be regulated by the Presidential decrees, and the Grand National Assembly of Turkey is prohibited to enact laws on these is-sues. These provisions, which narrowed the principle of the generality of the legislative power, which is a principle established in Turkish public law, create a reserved regulating area for the executive branch. However, if the Grand National Assembly of Turkey enact a law which issues prohibited by the constitution, this law is applied primarily according to the presidential decrees until the annulment or abolition. Because laws are superior to presidential decrees within the hierarchy of norms, and administrative or judicial authorities have no authority to neglect a law that is unconstitutional. A general regulation authority has not been given to the executive branch by the presidential decrees. There are subject restrictions at president’s decree power in provision of 104/7. First of all, with the provision of “the president may in its exercise of executive authority issue presidential decrees”, it is forbidden to issue a presidential decree on legislative prerogative and jurisdiction. Secondly, it is decided that individual rights and freedoms and political rights and duties cannot be regulated&nbsp;by the presidential decrees. In this respect, social and economic rights and duties may be subject to presidential decrees. However, all restrictions on fundamental rights and freedoms should be carried out by law in accordance with article 13 of the constitution. Thirdly, it is stated that presidential decrees cannot be enacted on the matters that are envisaged to be regulated exclusively by law. Finally, it is prohibited to issue a presidential decree on issues that are explicitly regulated by law. Presidential decrees are inferior to laws within the hierarchy of norms. This is natural result of the provision of article 104 of the constitution: “In case of conflict between the provisions of laws and presidential decrees, the provisions of laws shall be applied. If the Grand National Assembly of Turkey legislates on the same issue, the presidential decree shall become null and void”. In this respect, the presidential decree cannot repeal the law, amend the provisions of the law or introduce regulations cont-rary to the provisions of the law. Presidential decrees are superior to regulations within the hierarchy of norms. Because, in article 124 of the constitution, it is stated that the regulations should be based on the law or the presidential decree and could not be contrary to them. There is no hierarchical relationship between statutes and presidential decrees. These two norms are at the same level within the hierarchy of norms. There is no provision in the constitution about that statutes cannot be contrary to presidential decrees. The task of judicial review of the presidential decrees is given to the Constitutional Court, not to the Council of State, although it is a norm of executive branch. The Constitutional Court shall carry out the constitutional review of presidential decrees by means of abstract norm control and concrete norm control. It is possible to control the constitutionality of presidential decrees in both form and substance. On the other hand, it can be appealed to the Constitutional Court only for the claim of unconstitutionality of presidential decrees. Contrariety to law of the presidential decrees are not a reason for annulment. The conflict between the laws and the presidential decrees is eliminated by neglect, not by annulment. If the court hearing a case considers that the presidential decree is contrariety to law, it will not be able to resort to concrete norm control; it will resolve the dispute by neglecting the provision in the presidential decree and by applying the provisions of the law directly. Because according to provision of 104/17, in case of conflict between the provisions of laws and presidential decrees, the provisions of laws shall be applied.

2017 Anayasa Değişiklikleri Çerçevesinde Cumhurbaşkanlığı Kararnameleri

Cenk

Danıştay Kararlarına Göre İmar Planının Yargı Yerince İptal Edilmesinin Yapının Hukuki Durumuna Etkisi – Eleştirel Bir Bakış

Esra

Anonim Ortaklık Esas Sermayesinin 0’a İndirilerek Eş Zamanlı Artırımının Şartı Olarak Mali Durumun İyileştirilmesi Amacı “X AG” Kararı (BGE 138 III 204)

Abdurrahim

Res. Assist. Dr.

&nbsp;The right of preemption grants the right holder the opportunity to acquire ownership over the object of the right once the pre-emption event occurs. The right of preemption can arise from law or contractual agreements. When it arises from a contract, it can be established through an independent pre-emption agreement or by adding a clause to another contract, such as a lease agreement. From the perspective of Turkish law, in Swiss law, which serves as a reference, the legislator has facilitated the formation of pre-emption agreements by considering ordinary written forms to be sufficient, especially when such agreements frequently arise from clauses added to lease contracts. In terms of Turkish law, it has been argued that simplifying the form of pre-emption agreements is meaningless compared to purchase and repurchase agreements. In Turkish legal practice, the addition of pre-emption clauses to lease agreements has been rare. Nevertheless, recent jurisprudential developments have indicated that pre-emption clauses are gradually being included in lease contracts in the UAE. Such practices create a favourable legal situation for lessees who hope to eventually acquire ownership of their rented property or business premises. Therefore, the right of preemption is of paramount importance in lease agreements. From the perspective of Turkish law, not narrow and technical principal-accesory relationship between the right of preemption and a lease agreement. However, beyond this, there exists a functional connection between the origin of the right of preemption and the establishment of a lease agreement. From this perspective, it can be said that there is a broad linkage between the right of preemption and the lease agreement. In this broad sense, the right of preemption becomes subject to the fate of the lease agreement upon acceptance of this connection. Thus, the termination of a lease agreement of any form also terminates the right of preemption. However, if the conditions necessary for the exercise of the pre-emption right are fulfilled, the termination of the lease agreement no longer extinguishes the pre-emption right.The right of preemption can be established for a maximum period of 10 years. Parties may agree to participate for a shorter period. However, if the parties do not specify a time frame, the right of preemption is deemed to have been established for 10 years. In contrast, a lease agreement can be for either fixed or indefinite terms. In both cases, in residential and roofed workplace leases, the contract can be terminated by the lessee in the first instance, and the lessor has this right only after a one-year extension period at the end of 10 years. Therefore, if the lessee does not terminate the lease agreement, the lease agreement will continue for more than 10 years. In this situation, despite the lease agreement continuing beyond 10 years, the right of pre emption will cease due to the mandatory provision limiting its duration to 10 years. In terms of the de lege ferenda, it is more appropriate to accept that the pre-emption right exists as long as the lease agreement continues to exist. The right of preemption as a rule creates legal effects only between the lessee and the lessor. For a lessee to assert his/her right of pre-emption against third parties, the claim must be annotated in the land registry. However, the annotation of the lease agreement in the land registry does not automatically imply an annotation of the right of pre-emption. To annotate the right of pre-emption, the parties must either draw up an annotation agreement or include a related term in the lease agreement. Once the right of pre-emption has been annotated, it can be asserted against third parties who purchase the leased property during the continuation of the lease agreement. However, when the lease agreement terminates, the right of pre-emption also ceases. In this case, annotation naturally loses its effectiveness. In Turkish legislation, the right of pre-emption is regulated by considering independent pre-emption agreements. However, when pre-emption clauses are included in lease agreements or other term-based contracts, legal provisions can sometimes lead to inaccurate results. To solve these problems, which clearly arise in terms of the duration of the pre-emption right, legal regulations can be made in favour of the lessee to grant a legal pre-emption right depending on the establishment of the lease agreement. This approach aligns with the general tendency of law to protect lessees. It has been observed that some legal systems in other countries also recognise legal pre-emption rights in favour of lessees.

Kira Sözleşmesine Koyulan Önalım Hakkına İlişkin Kayıtların  Sözleşmenin Sona Ermesi Halinde Akıbet

Artür

Assist. Prof. Dr.

&nbsp;Directive (EU) 2023/970, adopted on May 10, 2023, aims to enhance the principle of equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women through pay transparency and enforcement mechanisms. This Directive shall be transposed by the Member States by June 7, 2026. The Directive seeks to address the longstanding principle of equal pay, which faces implementation challenges, by introducing pay transparency as a core mechanism to prevent gender-based discrimination. The principle of equal pay was established by the Treaty of Rome in 1957. Various directives have since been adopted, including Directive 75/117/EEC in 1975, which emphasised administrative and judicial mechanisms for addressing discrimination but lacked provisions on the burden of proof. This was addressed by Directive 97/80/EC in 1997, which shifted the burden of proof to employers in cases of gender discrimination. Directive 2006/54/EC further reinforced these principles and highlighted the need for equality bodies. Directive 2023/970 builds on these by emphasising pay transparency and proactive measures against discrimination. The Directive applies to all employers and includes provisions for job applicants. It identifies transparency as crucial for achieving gender equality, addressing the barriers to recognising and proving pay discrimination. Pay includes base wages, bonuses, allowances, and other benefits. Justifiable pay differences must be based on justifiable criteria, such as skills, effort and working conditions. Transparency implies openness, accountability, and communication. It includes collective measures such as pay reporting and individual measures like employee rights to access pay information. Employers must provide information on pay levels and criteria for pay progression. Job applicants must also receive information on initial pay or pay ranges, promoting informed decision-making, and demonstrating gender-neutral pay criteria. Additionally, pay reports must include gender-based pay differences, quartile distributions, and the proportion of employees receiving supplements, with varying requirements based on employer size. German law mandates median earnings disclosure for comparison groups, whereas Turkish law lacks such provisions. Enacted in 2017 to align with Directive 2006/54/ EC, the German Pay Transparency Act also aims to eliminate gender pay disparities. Employers with more than 500 employees must prepare a pay report every three years (or every five years if bound by a collective agreement). This report must outline measures taken to ensure gender equality and pay equality, as well as the average number of employees by gender and full/part-time status. On the other hand, the Directive requires more frequent and detailed pay reports, applicable to employers with at least 100 employees, covering gender pay differences, median pay levels and the proportion of employees receiving supplements. In German law, employees have the right to request information about their wages and the pay elements. The employer must also provide the median earnings of the comparison group. The obligation to provide information applies to workplaces with more than 200 employees. Requests can be made every two years. The Directive, on the other hand, does not limit the information request period, whereas German law imposes a two-year interval. In addition, German law lacks provisions equivalent to the Directive’s transparency on pay progression criteria. The burden of proof shifts to employers if an employee demonstrates prima facie evidence of discrimination. If employers fail to meet transparency obligations, they must prove the absence of discrimination without requiring prima facie evidence from the employee. This principle has been reinforced by past CJEU rulings, and German law practices comply with it. Compensation for gender-based pay inequality must cover all damages, including non-material damage. Member states must ensure effective, proportional and deterrent penalties, potentially including structural workplace changes and exclusion from public tenders for repeated violations. Turkish law also emphasises equal treatment but lacks specific transparency measures. The law provides limited compensation for discrimination and lacks provisions for suspending or interrupting the period of limitation in employment. Aligning Turkish practices with the Directive would enhance transparency and empower employees. Pay transparency must not violate personal data laws. Whereas the Directive mandates that employers cannot seek job applicants’ previous pay information unless relevant to the job, this issue raises different opinions in Turkish doctrine. In conclusion, Directive (EU) 2023/970 strengthens the principle of equal pay through transparency, building on nearly seventy years of EU law. It introduces innovative measures, such as employee access to pay information and simplified burden of proof, aiming to foster a sociocultural shift towards valuing workers and&nbsp; &nbsp;ensuring gender equality in pay. German law requires adjustments to fully align with the Directive, while Turkish law could benefit from adopting similar transparency measures to balance employer-employee power dynamics.

Türk ve Alman Hukukuyla Karşılaştırmalı Olarak Avrupa Birliği’nin Ücret Şeffaflığına İlişkin 2023/970 Sayılı Direktifi  Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Damla

Assoc. Prof. Dr.

&nbsp;Article 1498 of the Turkish Commercial Code (TCC) stipulates that the insurer can’t rescind the contract after five years have passed from the conclusion of the insurance contract, including renewals, due to the misrepresentations at the time the contract was made. In foreign literature, these provisions, which ensure the payment of the insurance amount written in the policy by preventing the insurer from exercising its rights against misrepresentation in application after a certain period of time has passed since the insurance contract is made, are called incontestability clauses. It is accepted that these provisions were first used in England in the 19th century to eliminate distrust in the insurance industry by insurers. However, today they have become mandatory provisions regulated directly by insurance laws. In Turkish law, a regulation in this content was included for the first time at the law level in Article 1498 of TCC No 6102. The main reason why incontestability clauses are mandatory rules and directly regulated by law is to protect the policyholder and the beneficiary. The main function of these provisions is to assure the policyholder and beneficiaries that the insurance amount written in the policy will be paid after the contestability period expires. The second function of these provisions, which is as important as the first, is to encourage the insurer to check the policyholder’s statements within the contestability period. Incontestability clauses have historically emerged in the context of life insurance. Similarly, these are the provisions that are mostly regulated and discussed in the context of life insurance today. However, it is seen that such provisions are also regulated in the context of insurance contracts such as sickness, health, and accident insurance. As a matter of fact, in Turkish law, the issue is essentially regulated under Article 1498 regarding life insurance. However, via references in Articles 1510/2 and 1591/1, Article 1498 will also apply accident, disease, and health insurance contracts. It is seen that two opposing views are defended regarding whether incontestability provisions should also be applied to property insurance. In this respect, it should be remembered that the main reason why incontestability provisions are regulated by law as mandatory rules is the superior interest related to protecting the policyholder and beneficiaries, and the existence of this superior interest is also valid for the policyholder and the insured in property insurance. Article 1484/1 which is related to compulsory liability insurance regulated as a type of property insurance in the TCC is an incontestability provision because it is stated that even if the insurer is fully or partially relieved of his indemnity obligation towards the insured, his obligation will continue up to the amount of compulsory insurance for the injured party in the article. In American law, two basic conditions are required for an insurance contract to become incontestable. The first of these is that the insurance premium has been paid, which is a condition directly mentioned in the relevant legal regulations. Article 1498 doesn’t include such a condition. However, in Turkish law, the insurer can always use its rights of rescission and termination of the contract in case of non-payment of premium, whether within or after the contestability period. The second condition of the incontestability provisions is that the contestability period has passed. In Turkish law, this period is determined as five years, which is longer than the period that is usually two years in the USA. However, similar to American law, the Turkish legislator has also regulated that renewals will be taken into account in the calculation of five years. On the other hand, Article 1498 does not include the condition, which is sought in American and even German law that the contestability period must be ended while the insured is alive, in other words, the risk must be occurred after the contestability period. The main application area of incontestability provisions is the misrepresentations at the time the contract is made. Nevertheless, with Article 1499 of TCC, a separate incontestability regulation has been made regarding the misrepresentation during the continuation of the contract. In the foreign literature, the two main exceptions that are considered to be outside the scope of application of incontestability provisions are intentional misrepresentations and misstatement of age. Similarly, the Turkish legislator has excluded intentional misrepresentations from the scope of application of Article 1498 and has made an age adjustment regulation in Article 1497 for cases where age is incorrectly declared. The provision of Article 1498, which states that the insurer can’t exercise its right of rescission against misrepresentations at the time the contract was made after the five-year contestability period has passed, is an incontestability regulation. Despite that, in the same regulation, the Turkish legislator gave the insurer the right to request the additional premium. If this request is not accepted, the insurer also has the right to pay a discounted insurance amount according to the ratio between the premium paid and the premium should must paid. Moreover, the insurer has the absolute right of rescission in cases where the increase in risk falls outside the insurance limits of the insurer. Thus, the assurance regarding the payment of the insurance amount provided by incontestability provisions to the policyholder and the beneficiaries has been circumvented by the legislator.&nbsp;

Türk Ticaret Kanunu’nun 1498. Maddesi Bağlamında Hayat  Sigortalarında İtiraz Edilemezlik Hükümleri

Mehmet

&nbsp;In cases where a person suffers partial or total permanent incapacity for work due to a tort or contractual breach, he/she may bring an action for compensation against the insurance company whose liability arises because of the damage due to this incapacity. For this purpose, the injured person can apply to the state court or the Insurance Arbitration Commission (for voluntary insurances, provided that the relevant insurer is a member of the insurance arbitration system; for compulsory insurances, membership is not required). The person who has exercised his/her right of choice in favour of filing a lawsuit in the state court may experience a progression in the effect of the damaging incident and a consequent increase in the degree of incapacity after the conclusion of the lawsuit. At this point, the question arises as to whether the injured party, who had previously obtained a judgment from the state court concerning the same incident, still has the option to choose between state jurisdiction and the Insurance Arbitration Commission in respect of a new case based on the increase in incapacity. Because in Article 30/14 of the Insurance Law, it is accepted that no application can be made to the Commission regarding disputes submitted to the court. This study mainly aims to address this issue. In this context, firstly, the issue of whether the negative effect of res judicata [Article 114/1 (i) of the CPC] arising as a result of the first lawsuit will constitute an obstacle to the examination of the second lawsuit to be filed with the claim that the degree of incapacity has increased is examined. It has been determined that the Court of Cassation has adopted the view that if there is an increase in the degree of disability of the injured person due to an evolving situation, a new lawsuit can be filed for compensation of the damage linked to this reason. In other words, the Court of Cassation accepts that there is a difference in terms of cause and subject matter of the case between the compensation case filed based on the evolving situation and the compensation case previously filed and concluded regarding the same damaging incident. &nbsp;This study then examines the scope of the rule in Article 30/14 of the Insurance Law. It is possible to associate the aforementioned rule with pendency and res judicata, among the negative litigation conditions regulated in the CPC. However, in Article 30/14, instead of the concept of pendency or res judicata, a phrase unusual for our civil procedure law terminology and whose scope is uncertain (the dispute has been submitted to the court) has been used. This phrase raises doubts about the cases in which this rule will be applied. Until the end of 2022, the Court of Cassation had interpreted the aforementioned rule in parallel with the pendency and res judicata. However, it has been determined that the Court of Cassation’s approach to the scope of application of the Insurance Law Article 30/14 has tended to change since late 2022 and has begun to interpret the field of application of the provision more broadly. This tendency of the Court of Cassation was also determined in our subject of examination. Because until late 2022, the Court of Cassation considered it permissible to apply to the Commission for compensation of damages linked to an increased degree of incapacity due to an evolving situation. However, some more recent decisions have concluded that such applications should be rejected under Article 30/14 of the Insurance Law. In our opinion, Article 30/14 of the Insurance Law, as a rule, can be applied in cases where a previously filed lawsuit with the same parties, cause and subject matter is still pending in the state court or where the negative effect of the res judicata exists. Accordingly, if it is accepted that the lawsuit filed for compensation for damages linked to the increased incapacity due to an evolving situation is different in terms of cause and subject matter from the first compensation lawsuit filed and decided by the state court, it should be possible to file a second lawsuit by applying to the Commission. In fact, in this situation, the dispute previously examined in the court differs from the dispute to be examined by the insurance arbitrators, and no prior dispute regarding compensation for damages linked to increased incapacity for work has been referred to the court. In addition, after it is deemed possible to file a new lawsuit for compensation for the damage linked to an increased degree of incapacity, there is no interest to be protected in not accepting that this case can be filed by applying to the Insurance Arbitration Commission.

İş Göremezlik Oranının Arttığı İddiasıyla Sigorta Tahkim  Komisyonuna Yapılan Başvuruların ‘‘Mahkemeye İntikal Etmiş  Uyuşmazlıklarla İlgili Olarak Komisyona Başvuru Yapılamaz’’ Kuralı  (SK m 30/14) Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi

M. Emir

&nbsp;In cases where the will of the transferor is impaired by error, fraud, or threat, it has long been a matter of controversy whether the transferee becomes an entrusted possessor or not. This controversy directly concerns the scope of application of Articles 988 and 989 of Turkish Civil Code No. 4721. If, in these cases, the transferee is not deemed as an entrusted possessor, it is not possible for the bona fide third party to acquire a right in rem from him/her at the time of the transaction, and it becomes necessary to examine whether the conditions of acquisitive prescription are met. However, if the opposite view is taken, a bona fide third party is to acquire the right in rem at the time of the transaction. The solution to this debate, which has important practical implications, depends on both conceptual considerations regarding the will to transfer possession and striking an appropriate balance of interests between the owner and the bona fide third party. The conceptual problem mainly concerns whether there is a difference between the will required to transfer the possession of movables and the will required to conclude legal transactions. If these wills are actually one and the same, then the problem must be solved according to articles 30 et seq. of Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098. However, if these wills are not the same, then it is necessary to explain what is meant by the will to transfer possession and how it differs from the will required to conclude a legal transaction. In arriving at a conclusion thereof, it must also be considered that the transfer of possession can occur with or without delivery. If, as a result, there is a difference between said wills, then the regulations relating to legal transactions are not applicable to the will to transfer possession. Thus, once this conceptual issue has been overcome, it should be examined how cases of error, fraud, and threat affect the will to transfer possession. It should be emphasised that the solution of this problem does not necessarily have to be “lump sum” and that a distinction can be made between defects of will. The solution to this problem is also decisive for the balance to be established between the interests of the movable’s owner and the bona fide third party. A mere conceptual approach does not guarantee an appropriate balance of interests. Therefore, conceptual results must be reviewed from this perspective. Whereas accepting the transferee as an entrusted person protects the security of transactions, denying such a title protects the security of rights. The former is advantageous for the bona fide third &nbsp;party, while the latter serves the interests of the owner. In cases where possession is transferred by delivery, it is difficult to justify leaving the bona fide third party unprotected in cases of error and fraud, as these defects only affect the motive of the transferor. The transferor delivers the movable under an erroneous conception that does not correspond to reality, without realising that he has made an error or has been deceived. It hardly seems appropriate to place the risk of the owner, who delivered the movable under an erroneous conception of reality, on the bona fide third party. Unlike these cases, in threats, the owner delivers the possession of the movable with complete awareness that he/she is being coerced to do so. In terms of the balance of interests, it does not seem appropriate to equate a threat with an error or a fraud. But here, as well, cases of transfer of possession without delivery must be treated differently. Since it is almost unanimously accepted that types of transfers without delivery consist legal transactions, the interest-based approach regarding these is required to be in line with articles 30 et seq. of Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098.&nbsp;

Taşınırın Zilyetliğini Devredenin İradesinin Sakatlandığı Durumlarda  İyiniyetli Üçüncü Kişinin Zilyetliği Devralandan Ayni Hak Kazanımı

Musa

&nbsp;The sell-on clause is agreed in the football player transfer agreement between the old club and the new club and entitles the old club to claim a portion of the transfer fee from the new club when the player transfers to a third club. This provision may be freely agreed between the old club and the new club within the framework of the principle of freedom of contract. However, the sell-on clause must not contravene Article 18bis of the Fédération I nternationale de Football Association Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (FIFA RSTP) and the rule of good faith and equity. The sell-on clause is a conditional obligation. Therefore, for this provision to be effective, the player must transfer from the new club to the third club, and the new club must receive a transfer fee for this transfer. In the period before the sell-on clause becomes effective, the new club must not prevent the transfer of the player to the third club by acting contrary to the rule of good faith. Otherwise, the condition is deemed fulfilled and the new club is obliged to pay the old club based on the fee determined in accordance with equity. The old club and the new club may agree on the details regarding the sell-on clause in the football player transfer agreement. However, in practice, some agreements do not include the details of the sell-on clause. In such cases, a legal dispute may arise between the parties. In disputes regarding the sell-on clause, the sell-on clause must be interpreted. During the interpretation, the words used by the parties in the sell-on clause should be the basis. Other provisions in the contract, non-contractual events, customs, and traditions should also be considered. In practice, disputes regarding the sell-on clause may arise in the following cases: (1) the new club makes a loan of professionals with the third club, (2) the footballer renews his contract with the new club, (3) the footballer unilaterally terminates his contract with the new club, (4) the new club exchanges the footballer with the third club, (5) the new club transfers a portion of the economic rights of the footballer to the third club, (6) the new club acts against the rule of good faith and (7) simulation in the footballer transfer agreement between the new club and the third club. Most disputes are resolved by examining the words in the sell-on clause. In these disputes, a decision can be reached by interpreting the words used in the sell-on clause, especially by determining whether the word “sale” or the word “transfer” is used in this provision. Since both the old club and the new club are experienced in contracts related to football, it may be assumed&nbsp;that they could consciously choose the words used in the contract and foresee the consequences. On the other hand, in some disputes, a decision can be reached by determining the true and common intention of the parties instead of using unclear expressions in the contract. The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) also uses these methods in its decisions. When the sell-on clause becomes effective, the amount to which the old club is entitled must be calculated. In the football player transfer agreement between the old club and the new club, it may be agreed that the sell-on clause will be calculated by considering the gross or net transfer fee. If there is no agreement regarding this, the sell-on clause should be calculated on the basis of the transfer fee in the football player transfer agreement between the new club and the third club. If the mandatory costs of the transfer are to be paid by the third club, the sell-on clause is calculated on the amount obtained after deduction of these costs. On the other hand, if the mandatory costs are to be paid by the new club, they cannot be deducted from the transfer fee. However, if the third club has paid an amount different from the transfer fee in the football player transfer agreement between the new club and the third club, the calculation should be made taking into account the actual payment. The payment schedule of the sell-on clause is set according to the payment schedule of the transfer fee in the football player transfer agreement between the new club and the third club.

Futbolcu Transfer Sözleşmesinde Sonraki Satıştan Pay

Vural

Prof. Dr.

&nbsp;In this study, the conditions under which the debtor can raise personal defences against the holder of a negotiable instrument under the Turkish Commercial Code (TCC) are examined. Articles 659 and 825 of the TCC stipulate that in commercial bills other than those written to the order of a specific person, personal defences can only be raised if the holder knowingly acts to the detriment of the debtor. Similarly, Article 687 of the TCC specifies that a debtor can only raise a personal defence in a letter of exchange if the holder knowingly acts to the detriment of the debtor. The Regulation also applies to promissory notes and checks. In this context, there is a difference between the concepts of “knowingly acting to the detriment of the debtor” and “deliberately acting to the detriment of the debtor.” The TCC consciously uses these two distinct concepts for different types of negotiable instruments. The aim of this study is to clarify the difference between these two concepts and examine the conditions necessary for a debtor to raise personal defence against the holder using negotiable instruments. According to Articles 659 and 825 of the TCC, a holder who acquires a commercial bill free from personal defences, they must not knowingly act to the detriment of the debtor. In this case, the holder’s good faith is irrelevant. It is sufficient for the debtor to claim that the holder knew or could have known about the harm to the debtor when acquiring the bill. In the case of negotiable instruments, Article 687 of the TCC requires the holder to deliberately act at the detriment of the debtor to be able to raise personal defences. This requires the holder not only to be aware of the existence of the personal defence but also to acquire the instrument with the intent to harm the debtor. Although there is no consensus in the doctrine on this issue, the predominant view is that the holder must have known about the personal defence and acquired the instrument with the intent to prevent it.&nbsp; How a debtor can prove that the holder deliberately acted to his/her own benefit in a negotiable instrument is also problematic. For a debtor to raise a personal defence against the holder, he/she must prove that the holder acquired the instrument deliberately acting to his/her detriment. This presents a significant challenge in terms of the burden of proof. Some authors in the doctrine argue that it is sufficient for the debtor to prove that the holder was aware of the personal defence. However, this approach eliminates the important difference between commercial bills and negotiable instruments in terms of the conditions for raising personal defence against the holder. Despite the difficulties in proving this, the law-established distinction must be maintained. Negotiable instruments are written to order and change hands through endorsement and delivery of possession. In negotiable instruments written to order, personal defences generally cannot be raised by the new holder during the transfer. However, if the holder acquires the instrument deliberately acting to the detriment of the debtor, these defences can be raised (TCC Art. 867/1). This provision allows the debtor to defend himself against a holder who has acquired the instrument through a valid transaction. There are some similarities between the purpose of this provision and the purpose of an action for annulment of a transaction under Article 277 of the Turkish Execution and Bankruptcy Law. The fundamental principle underlying an annulment action is to prevent individuals who are parties to a transaction from causing harm to a creditor. In an action for annulment, the creditor must prove that the debtor’s transactions with third parties have harmed them. To overcome this difficulty, the court established certain presumptions in Article 280 of the Execution and Bankruptcy Law. For instance, it is presumed that third parties with close family relationships with the debtor are aware of the debtor’s insolvency and intent to harm the creditor by making a transaction with the debtor that results in a decrease in their assets. In the practice of the Court of Cassation, it is accepted that if there is a specific close relationship between the holder and the endorser, the holder is considered to be acting in “bad faith”. For example, in situations involving a spouse, friendship, or parent-child relationship, it can be presumed that the holder deliberately acted to the detriment of the debtor. Additionally, in terms of endorsements made between companies, it is accepted that if an organic connection between the endorser and the holder, the holder deliberately acted to the detriment of the debtor. The Court of Cassation’s case law of such presumptions provides ease of proof for debtors, but the lack of concrete criteria in the decisions is open to criticism. The analogous application of the presumptions stipulated in Article 280 of the Execution and Bankruptcy Law can alleviate the heavy burden of proof on the debtor and enhance legal predictability. Thus, a debtor can raise a personal defence against a holder who has acted with the intent to harm them.

Kambiyo Senetlerinde Şahsî Def’ilerin İleri Sürülmesi Bakımından  “Bilerek” ve “Bile Bile” Borçlunun Zararına Hareket Etme Kavramları  ile Hamilin Bile Bile Borçlu Zararına Hareket Ettiğinin İspatına İlişkin  Düşünceler

Abdülsamet

&nbsp;It can be seen that the police service, which is provided by the state and carries the authority to use force, can be divided into different types in terms of their nature. Regardless of its type, it is clear that police activities are in a serious relationship with the fundamental rights of individuals. In this regard, how the police service is organised in a country will have extremely important consequences on individual rights. Because it is undeniable that police officers who have the authority to use force on individuals carry a potential risk to their fundamental rights. The relationship between the police and the fundamental rights of individuals is not just about having the authority to use force over them. As a matter of fact, the difference in quality between the administrative police, which emerged before the crime and works for the protection of public order and security, thus called preventive law enforcement, and the judicial police, which started to work after the crime and assisted the investigation carried out by the prosecutor, is an extremely important aspect. In this context, although it is understandable for the administrative police to work under the hierarchy of administrative authorities, it is a serious problem how and where the judicial police, which takes part in independent and impartial criminal investigations, should be located. This is important both in terms of the expectation of a fair trial of those who are investigated as suspects and in terms of satisfying the wishes of the victims of the crime to clarify the act of crime and punish the responsible. Because administrative police officers who served before the crime and worked under the command of the administration, re-entering the field after the crime may cause serious problems, especially in terms of independence. The biggest problem that may occur in this context is investigations in which the perpetrators of the crime are the administrative police officers themselves. There is a high probability of serious violations against individuals, especially in the context of the right to life and the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatments, due to the force used while performing administrative police activities. Therefore, while investigating these acts, it is of great importance for judicial police to be separated from these administrative police officers. Administrative and judicial law enforcement in Turkiye are organised under the same organisation. Indeed, when the criminal procedure law is examined, it is understood that both law enforcement agencies are separated not in terms of organisation, but in terms of duty. Accordingly, some police officers working in the same organisation are engaged in administrative affairs, while others take on judicial duties. Although the job definitions of the personnel in question are made in this way, both types of law enforcement work within the same organisation and are subject to the same status in terms of appointment, disciplinary regulations, and other aspects. In addition, as the law provided that the judicial police would work under the command of the &nbsp;prosecutor when carrying out judicial proceedings, it stated that at other times, they would be subordinate to the hierarchy of their administrative superiors. In addition, the law states that administrative police officers will assist in judicial affairs when necessary. In this case, we come across a view where law enforcement in Turkiye is completely intertwined and entangled in terms of judicial and administrative polices. This issue has been discussed in the criminal and administrative law literature for a long time, and various remarks have been made. Some have defended this system, but on the contrary, opinions suggest that both police agencies should be completely separated from each other. However, it is rare to find that the issue is examined in constitutional law. In this study, after summarising the opinions in the criminal and administrative law literature, it has mainly been tried to examine the issue with the data of constitutional law. In this context, during the practice of individual application, which has become the dominant tool of the constitutional judiciary, serious violations have emerged because of the current structure of law enforcement. Indeed, the Constitutional Court has issued many violations in the context of investigating crimes such as murder, injury, or degrading treatment in which administrative police officials are potential perpetrators. The reason that led the Court to this conclusion in these cases is often the fact that the incident was not investigated independently and effectively. There is no doubt that Turkiye is in direct contact with the above-mentioned organisational form of law enforcement. In this article, some of the decisions of the Constitutional Court are examined in detail, and it is tried to be revealed in all clarity how the judicial police, which is under the same organisation with the administrative police, cannot effectively investigate such events. Thus, it has been concluded that a judicial police agency separate from the administrative police is necessary to protect fundamental rights more effectively and fulfil the state’s positive obligations in this context.

Türkiye’de Kolluk Tartışmalarına Farklı Bir Bakış: Anayasa  Mahkemesinin Bireysel Başvuru Kararları Işığında Adli ve İdari  Kolluğun Ayrı Teşkilatlanmasının Değerlendirilmesi

Dilara

İbrahim

Arbitration, an alternative dispute resolution method, is increasingly being used to resolve sports disputes and is also gaining popularity in Turkish law. According to Article 59 of the Constitution of the Republic of Turkey (the Constitution), the decisions of sports federations related to the administration and discipline of sporting activities can be challenged only through compulsory arbitration. The arbitral board’s awards are final and shall not be appealed to any judicial authority. This means that disputes related to the decisions of sports federations concerning the management and discipline of sporting activities must be resolved through arbitration. The arbitral board possesses supreme authority in these cases, and its judgments are conclusive. As per the provision of the Constitution and other related regulations, such as article 6 of the law, Nr. 5894 on Establishment and Duties of the Turkish Football Federation, the Turkish Football Federation Arbitration Board (TFF Arbitration Board) is the sole entity empowered to receive objections regarding decisions about the management and discipline of sporting activities by the Turkish Football Federation (TFF). Therefore, arbitration is compulsory for decisions about the management and discipline of the TFF’s sporting activities. This means that the parties are forced to initiate proceedings before the TFF Arbitration Board instead of the national court, and the decisions made by the Board are conclusive and cannot be contested. In disputes where the TFF Arbitration Board is the sole authorised body, any objections regarding the constitutionality of the laws applied must also be directed to the Board. Nonetheless, it is unclear whether concrete norm control measures can be implemented when any party or the Board finds a constitutional violation during arbitrations conducted by the TFF Arbitration Board. It is crucial to review the Board’s jurisdiction to assess claims of unconstitutional laws because it is the only authorised body, and its decisions cannot be appealed.&nbsp;The parties’ only recourse is to seek protection of their fundamental rights through concrete norm control through the TFF Arbitration Board. This is because the Board’s decisions regarding the management and discipline of sports activities are final, and individuals cannot start a case at the Turkish Constitutional Court through an individual application. Maintaining concrete norm control is crucial to safeguarding fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution for sports stakeholders. Concrete norm control also helps eliminate any unconstitutional regulations in sports law. Therefore, during arbitrations managed by the TFF Arbitration Boards, the parties should have the right to raise objections. The Board should also have the authority to bring such objections before the Constitutional Court. This study examines the decision of Ali Rıza and Others v. Turkey (Case of European Court of Human Rights app no. 30226/10 dated 28 January 2020) and its effects as a hypothetical case study. In its decision, the Court ruled that Mr. Riza’s fair trial rights, as stated in Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights, were violated due to structural deficiencies in the TFF Arbitration Board. Since the same structural defects are still in Turkish law, any decisions of the TFF Arbitration Board would be tainted by the possibility of violating the parties’ fair trial rights. Therefore, parties should have the right to challenge the constitutionality of laws and apply for concrete norm control during arbitration, which is managed by the TFF Arbitration Board. When initiating concrete norm control in cases that the TFF Arbitration Board manages, it is vital to evaluate the criteria for concrete norm control stated in the Constitution. Considering this objective, this study first examines compulsory arbitration in Turkish sport law. This highlights a potential issue of unconstitutionality, as stated in the Ali Rıza and Others v. Turkey, which could be brought before the TFF Arbitration Board. Then, each condition for resorting to concrete norm control, as stated in Article 152 of the Constitution, is evaluated within the scope of the mandatory arbitration proceedings of the TFF Arbitration Board. This study examines European Court of Human Rights rulings, decisions made by Constitutional Courts, and constitutional laws from multiple countries for comparative law analysis. This section concludes by discussing the required modifications to be made in the positive law.

Somut Norm Denetimine Türkiye Futbol Federasyonu Tahkim  Kurulu’nun Başvuru İmkanı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme

The period, which went down in European history as “The Age of the Witch Hunts”, has been the subject of many historical studies with several aspects, such as its causes, consequences, and varying characteristics in different geographic contexts. However, the analysis of the legal aspects of the hunt, which was essentially a judicial process, has remained relatively obscure. Although the role and details of the inquisitorial system that became valid in the 13th century in regions where the hunt was intense have been examined in some studies, the operation of various tacit assumptions and prejudices in the cases of witchcraft needs to be analysed. In particular, the marginal characteristics of the general profile of victims raise doubts about the existence of a metaphor of anomalousness that justified the verdict of conviction. The objective of this article is to investigate whether it is possible to confirm this suspicion. Employing the feminist method that reveals the role of metaphors in judicial decisions, this article aims to discover whether the metaphor in question had impacts in the cases of witchcraft, if so, how it operated, and what kind of components it consisted of. To verify the possible operation of the metaphor, the feminist method aimed at revealing gender-based assumptions that constitute the rationale for judicial decisions was employed. As a result of the application of the aforementioned method to cases of witchcraft, it has been argued that unmarried, old, and mostly poor women, who were found dangerous by the ruling classes, were targeted as Satan’s followers within the framework of the modern witchcraft notion formulated by the same groups. Although the main victims were also often considered eccentric by their neighbours, the transformation of their harmless anomalousness into a rationale for witchcraft accusations occurred in the late Medieval and Early Modern periods as a result of the efforts made by the ruling elites, especially by the clergy. Therefore, it has been pointed out that as a result of the operation of the metaphor of anomalousness, which was established by the classes that organised the hunt, women displaying the components of the metaphor, namely, unmarried, old, and poor women, were made the main target of the hunt. Principally, the data obtained from the writings and the statements of demonologists and witch hunters has been used as a basis for determining the role of the ruling classes in the association of unmarried, old, and poor women with the crime of witchcraft. In this article, the single status of the accused women is presented as the principal element of the metaphor. As outcasts free of masculine control, unmarried women were often found threatening and targeted as prominent suspects by the ruling elite of medieval and early modern Christian Europe, where the family was a fundamental social structure. It has been revealed that these women, who were also seen as a social problem by the ruling classes due to their poverty, became the bearer of another component of the metaphor, as a result of the presumption that they made a pact with Satan in exchange for pecuniary gain. Finally, the vulnerability of old women to witchcraft accusations was examined as a result of gendered prejudices such as their so-called envy against the “fertility” of young mothers and wives. In response to the questions put forward in the first paragraph, it has been concluded that unmarried, old, and poor women who were found dangerous by ruling classes were targeted as Satan’s servants within the framework of the modern concept of witchcraft. The anomalousness attributed to the civil status, age, and class of these women often served as a rationale for the witchcraft accusations. Thus, it has been noted that as a result of the operation of the metaphor of anomalousness, unmarried, old, and poor women who displayed the characteristics of the metaphor were the main targets of the accusations. It has been highlighted that with the introduction of the new criminal procedure, which allowed the use of torture in the cases of witchcraft and imposed both the burden of proof and the determination of the verdict on the court, the operation of this metaphor not only resulted in the accusation but also in the conviction, and therefore in the execution of thousands of anomalous women at the stage of the criminal charge.

Geç Orta Çağ ve Erken Modern Dönem Avrupa Cadılık Davalarında  Norm Dışılık Metaforu

Hayrettin

&nbsp;The Zoning Law No. 3194 dated 03.05.1985, is the main source of the Turkish Zoning Law. The law regulates which administrations are authorised in terms of zoning and the extent and content of the authorities of such administrations. The main feature of administrative law is the lack of authority; however, the state of being authorised is the exception. Therefore, if it is claimed that an administration is authorised on a certain issue, the relevant legislative provision should be proposed. In this respect, the law gives various administrations the authority to perform regulatory transactions on matters concerning zoning law and the authority to perform individual transactions. At the beginning of these administrations are the Ministry of Environment, Urbanisation and Climate Change, provincial special administrations, and municipalities. When Law No. 3194 is examined, it can be stated that local administrations are the general authorities, and the Ministry of Environment, Urbanisation and Climate Change is the exceptional authority. From this standpoint, it may be brought forward that the authority to make master and implementation development plans that concretely determine the structure of the city rests with local administrations. However, article 9 of the Law mentions that, the powers of the Ministry are regulated so broadly that it can be asserted that the powers of local administrations are secondary to the authorities of the Ministry. According to this regulation, the Ministry is authorised to change the zoning plans made by local administrations when deemed necessary, as well as to make, have these plans made and approve them ex officio. In addition to this, the Ministry can give instructions to the municipality through the governorship in case of a need to include official buildings and facilities in the zoning plan for the purpose of performing public services, or in case of changes, or making and approving the plan on this issue, and resolving disputes related to zoning plans that concern more than one municipality. While some of the authorities of the Ministry in this regulation are the primary powers given to it, some of them are tutelage powers. In general, the tutelage authority is the control and intervention authority carried out by another administration over the transactions and personnel of an administration with a public legal personality.&nbsp; However, the powers in Article 9 are so wide that it may be stated that the Ministry has the opportunity to override the authorities of local administrations on zoning planning. However, giving so much power to the Ministry indicates a departure from the rule of autonomy of local administrations and the principle of subsidiarity. However, it would not be right to think that the authority of the Ministry on Zoning Planning is unlimited. The arrangement itself has some limitations. The Ministry may use its powers in paragraph 1 “when necessary”, “by cooperating when necessary” and “informing the relevant administrations in this way”. Therefore, when applying for this authority, the applicant must meet the conditions set out in the article. There are also other limitations in the article. In addition, in accordance with the rule of the gradual unity of the plans, the Ministry must act in conformity with the upper tier plans when making changes to the plan. Despite this, it is doubtful that these restrictions are insufficient and that the Ministry may see an obstacle in exercising the powers contained in this regulation. On the other hand, in conformity with the principle of parallelism of power and procedure, it may not be possible for the local administration to alter a plan previously made by the Ministry. This means that local administrations cannot use this power. taking away the possibility of the local administration to use this power. In this respect, revealing the content and legal characteristics of the Ministry’s powers in the aforementioned article deems useful.&nbsp;

İmar Kanunun 9. Maddesi Bağlamında Çevre, Şehircilik Ve İklim  Değişikliği Bakanlığının İmar Planlamasına İlişkin Yetkileri

&nbsp;In the name of legal certainty, the language of law has been approached from a mathematical and logical perspective. Most of us accept that law includes logic to some extent. However, the view that mathematical language resembles law has led to controversy. Some of these discussions attempted to reduce the law to a mathematical language by focusing on mathematical certainty. In this sense, reducing the legal language to a mathematical formula may achieve certainty. In other words, it aims to create definitions similar to those in mathematics for the general validity of legal concepts. At the same time, for this purpose, the present study attempts to identify the moral background of law with the apriori field of mathematics. Discussions on the other side focused on the conclusion that law derives from complex human relations, arguing that mathematical language is invalid in law. They argued that such reductions were invalid, claiming that the two domains were independent of each other. In fact, both discussions focused on the direct representation of law as a mathematical language. Law has neither purely mathematical precision nor a view that there is no mathematical objectivity. The focus should be on the similarity between law and mathematical language. In fact, the fields of law and mathematics cross borders without syntheses and identification. Mathematics tries to analyse the infinite by reducing it to symbols. The ∞ symbol denotes infinite equals. This symbol simply helps us understand the concept of infinity, which we cannot fully comprehend. Law also symbolizes justice, equality, and the scales. The scale symbolizes these two concepts, which we can never reach completely. Of course, the holders of these scales may vary, and the realisation of these concepts may vary. Both approaches attempt to identify areas of uncertainty. Our primary purpose here is to reveal the relationship between law, logic, and mathematics. Although mathematical methods are not used in law, law uses logical techniques. Although law does not use mathematical methods, law and mathematics can be observed within the same limits. Our aim here will be to dwell on the similarities between mathematical reasoning and legal reasoning rather than reducing law to a purely mathematical level. After the similarities between law and mathematical propositions, how important is the effect of mathematical reasoning on law? Does mathematical reasoning provide fairness to the law? Does it also provide objectivity? We will discuss the effect of logic on legal reasoning with questions like these. In fact, our aim in this study was not to create a purely mathematical law. In fact, it would be utopian to accept the foundations of law and mathematics as identical to undertake such a business. At the same time, efforts to construct a law using a purely mathematical language are one of the most dangerous ways. The effort to mathematize the law is only due to efforts to create a legal field and to realise&nbsp;&nbsp;justice. In such a situation, ignoring the exceptions in law causes the language of the law to be unfairly constructed. However, logic is effective in making correct inferences in law. Although mathematics does not explicitly source law, the function of logic in law is obvious. As a matter of fact, few lawyers would seriously defend the thesis that legal decision-making consists solely of applying the facts of a case to a rule to draw legal consequences. Considering the content of the rule and the decisions regarding the classification of events, the legal consequences of the case are handled logically.

Hukukun Matematikle İlişkisinin Felsefi Temelleri: Hukuk  Matematiksel Kesinliğe Sahip Midir?

Peri

&nbsp;This paper first examines discrimination as a concept in general, defining its components and classifications as direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, positive discrimination, multiple (intersectional) discrimination, compound discrimination, structural discrimination. After emphasising that human rights cannot be understood only as adult rights and that every individual has human rights regardless of age, discrimination against children and international instruments that guarantee their rights against discrimination are evaluated in detail. In this context, the major international human rights conventions in which children are protected by anti-discrimination provisions are highlighted. In particular, the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) is analysed as the most widely accepted and rapidly ratified international human rights treaty in history. The significance of the CRC as a unique international instrument that ensures children’s rights, protects them from all forms of discrimination, imposes obligations on States to respect and fulfil the rights set out in the CRC is emphasised. In the rest of this paper, discrimination against children on multiple grounds is discussed in a comparative perspective, in light of the various landmark decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the US Supreme Court, to understand the approaches of these two judicial authorities in protecting children against discrimination. In the United States, where children’s rights are not directly regulated in the US Constitution and the Convention on the Rights of the Child has not been ratified by the US Government, the US jurisprudence of the Supreme Court has significantly contributed to the recognition of children’s rights. On the other hand, the European Court of Human Rights has been instrumental in promoting access to remedies for children in relation to their right to be free from discrimination. Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides for the prohibition of discrimination and ensures that the full exercise of the rights set out in the Convention without discrimination based on any factor. The Convention does not define the child; however, Article 1 of the Convention requires State Parties to guarantee the rights mentioned in the Convention to “everyone” under their authority. The European Court of Human Rights has adopted this approach in its judgement and has accepted the definition of the “child” of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). The European Court of Human Rights has recognised the significance of the CRC and has often referred to it in its rulings. Both the European Court of Human Rights and the US Supreme Court have an extensive body of case law on discrimination against children, particularly based on ethnic background, disability, age, birth, other grounds as religion and language. In the light of these monumental decisions it is analysed how these Courts interpret and address the discrimination issues, whether they take into account the “best interests&nbsp;of the child” when deciding cases related to discrimination against children, whether these Courts are receptive to achieve a beneficial outcome for a disadvantaged group, and finally, whether these Courts have adapted the interpretation of rights provisions to constantly evolving circumstances and situations when interpreting these provisions, in other words, whether these Courts have interpreted the instruments such as the US Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights as living documents or not. Finally, in conclusion, evaluations are provided in line with the formulation and jurisprudence of both Courts on landmark cases of discrimination against children.

Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi ve ABD Yüksek Mahkemesi’nin Önemli Kararları Işığında ‘Çocuklara Yönelik Ayrımcılık’

Esin

Karşılaştırmanın Sınırları ve Zorlukları

@JOURNAL_BOX_CURRENT

@JOURNAL_BOX_EARLYVIEW

Ayşe

One of the principles that Civil Procedure Law based on is the “dispositional control of the parties principle”. Under this principle, parties’ have the right solve private law disputes according to their dispositions. Under the principle, dispute parties are free to decide choose or not to choose litigation as way of resolution. Principle also covers to end the dispute by an settlement (in principle). One of the dispute ending options under the principle is the parties settlement agreement. Settlement agreement, generally, is an agreement in which parties agree to ending the dispute with mutual compromise. In other words, it can be also defined as an agreement in which parties completely or partially ending the dispute mutually. Settlement agreement, regulated as an stand alone regulation for the first time in the Article 313/1 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) numbered 6100. Under the Article, settlement agreement means that the parties agreement on to ending the dispute completely or partially in an outstanding case. This definition only covers the in-judicial settlement. Because the definition requires a settlement in front of the court. Out of judicial/court settlement is not regulated under the CCP. Because, this kind of settlement fall in the area of the Turkish Code of Obligations. Out of judicial settlement is an agreement out of the court in which the parties agreed to end the dispute completely or partially at mutual interest point they considered. There is no necessity of an outstanding ongoing case process at this point. Additionally, an ongoing trial process would not affect the out of judicial settlement. It is needed a transformation of the out of judicial settlement to an in-judicial settlement to affect an ongoing trial at the same dispute. Out of judicial settlement is an substantive law agreement. This agreement is fall in the provisions (General Provisions) of the Turkish Code of Obligations. Out of judicial settlement agreement is not be need to be made in written because of the “freedom as to form” principle of the Turkish Code of Obligations. If the out of judicial settlement transformed to an in-judicial settlement it could affect an ongoing trial at the same dispute. Parties convey the out of judicial settlement to the court and then court get in record the agreement. After that moment, out of judicial settlement is evaluated as an in-judicial settlement. It is not needed that the whole provisions of the out of judicial settlement to get in recorded in the trial documents. Article 315/1 of the CCP regulates the provisions on effects and solutions of settlement agreements. Under this provisions when the out of judicial settlement transformed to an in-judicial settlement it would has the same legal power and&nbsp;solutions of it. The first solution of this transformation is the ending of existing dispute, in other words ending of the existing court trial. The second important outcome of the in-judicial settlement agreement is that it would have the same legal effect of final court decision. In-judicial settlement has an important another legal effect that it would has the power of the final court decisions under the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code Article 38. If the out of judicial settlement transformed to an in-judicial settlement it would has the same affect as well.

Mahkeme Dışında Yapılan Sulh ve Yargılamaya Etkisi

Involvement of persons with disabilities in business life is extremely important – just as much as in their access to education and health services - and in their enjoyment of social protection because unemployment makes individuals becoming unemployed feel like they are useless. Involvement of persons with disabilities in business life, and pursuing the same eliminates the social effects caused by the risk of unemployment. In addition, working persons with disabilities benefit from social insurance protection based on their work, and thus a decrease occurs in the expenses made for persons with disabilities from the social security budget. While the policies relevant to persons with disabilities started with passive policies such as protecting persons with disabilities, today they have transformed into active policies such as ensuring the complete participation of persons with disabilities in employment. In Turkey, the number of persons with disabilities recorded on the National Database on Persons with Disabilities is 2.461.828 for the first half of the year 2019. And the rate of participation of persons with disabilities in employment is 22.1 percent. When compared with the data for the EU and OECD, this number is very low. Thus, increasing the participation in employment of persons with disabilities is also among the objectives relevant to business life. When the legal regulations in Turkey are examined, it can be observed that rules relevant to the protection of persons with disabilities have taken place in Constitutional Law for the first time. According to Article 17 of Constitutional Law, everyone has the right to live, and to preserve and improve their material and moral presence. And, according to Article 49 of Constitutional Law, working is everyone’s right and obligation. The government takes the required measures to increase the standard of living of employees, protect the unemployed, and support working. The government’s actualization of this obligation is especially important in terms of persons with disabilities who are experiencing many difficulties in involvement in business life. For this reason, it is required that the government should take special measures for persons with disabilities, and to provide the work environment for them. Hence, in Article 50 of Constitutional Law, it has been emphasized that no one could be employed in works not conforming to their strength, and the rule of “the ones having physical and psychological insufficiency are distinctively protected in terms of working conditions” has been established. And the most basic law regarding persons with disabilities is the Law on Persons with Disabilities no 5378. This law intends that persons with disabilities should benefit from fundamental rights and freedoms, and to ensure their participation in social life under equal conditions with other individuals. Article 30 of Labour Law no 4857 regulates the details relevant to the liability of employers to employ persons&nbsp;with disabilities. Article 30 was regulated again in 2008, and new principles were established regarding the employment of persons with disabilities. In accordance with this, employers employing fifty or more employees in the workplace have to employ a specific number of persons with disabilities. When Article 30 of Labour Law is examined, it is observed that the straightforward quota method has been adopted regarding the employment of persons with disabilities. The quota determined within this scope is three percent for workplaces in the private sector, and four percent for workplaces in the public sector. It is required that the following conditions are present for liability of the employer to employ persons with disabilities to arise : i) The workplace’s inclusion in the scope of Labour Law, or Maritime Labour Law, ii) Employment of fifty or more employees in the workplace. In case of the presence of these conditions, the employers are required to employ persons with disabilities whose rate of disability is at least 40 percent. Persons with disabilities should be employed through the Turkish Employment Agency. But the employer may also employ a person with disabilities through his own means. In this case, it is required to inform the Turkish Employment Agency, and to have the person with disabilities recorded at the Agency. An administrative fine is imposed on the employer acting against the liability of employing persons with disabilities. Another method regarding the employment of persons with disabilities is the concept of sheltered employment. Briefly, this method is ensuring the employment of persons with disabilities – for whom it is difficult to bring them in business life - within the frame of special conditions. In this system, there are sheltered workplaces where the working environment is specifically arranged in order to ensure the employment of persons with disabilities. In Turkish Law, the principles of this subject have been regulated in the Law on Persons with Disabilities, and in a certain regulation issued on this subject. That Regulation first came into force in 2006, and it was renewed in 2013. Persons with disabilities who will be employed at sheltered workplaces, are not only persons with physical disabilities but persons with mental and psychological disabilities. In terms of acquiring the status of a sheltered workplace, some conditions have been sought by the Regulation. Above all, it is required that the workplace is one which holds the qualifications determined by the Regulation, and where at least eight persons with disabilities are employed. In addition, the ratio of the number of persons with disabilities who will be employed at a sheltered workplace to the number of total employees shouldn’t be less than seventy five percent. In the Regulation, the physical conditions and equipment that the sheltered workplace has to have (safety, traffic safety, fire protection etc.) were also specified. A specific part of the remunerations&nbsp;of the persons with disabilities being employed at sheltered workplaces is paid by the government. In Turkish law, amendments made in time in Article 30 of Labour Law being the basis of the liability of employing persons with disabilities, and especially the increase in incentives for the employers in private sector are deemed as proper regulations. Again, allowing the employers to find workers who will be employed by their own means is also among those steps which would facilitate employment. Certainly, considering the measures ensuring employment as incentives rather than a quota and fine method would be a more constructive approach.

İşverenin Engelli İşçi Çalıştırma Yükümlülüğü

@JOURNAL_BOX_FEATURED

Night work has been the subject of many discussions due to its contradictory nature to the biological structure of the human body. This attribute of night work requires that night work and day work should not be handled in the same way in the legal order. The developments in the field of Occupational Health and Safety Law, and the researches regarding the effects of night work on the human health, constantly demand the review and improvement of the regulations regarding night work. In this regard, the most important protective provision regarding the workers working at night could be the limit on the night working time. In accordance with the Article 69 (I) of the Labour Law No. 4857, “night” is defined as the period starting at the latest at 20.00 in the evening, and lasting at the earliest until 06.00 in the morning, which in any case lasts maximum eleven hours. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 69 (III), night work shall not exceed seven and a half hours. However, significant exceptions have been recently adopted to this rule. The amendment, enacted in 2015, allows employers in some sectors (private security, tourism and jobs related to healthcare) to demand night work in excess of seven and a half hours by obtaining written approval from the worker. It should be noted that the regulations concerning night work are particularly important regarding the work carried out by shift work. Taking into consideration the need for governing special procedures and principles on this subject, a regulation specifically on shift work has been issued, and exceptions to the rule on the limit of the night working time are also included in this regulation. In my opinion, the propriety of this change amendment is highly debatable. It can be argued that the service should continue uninterruptedly in the sectors mentioned in the Article (private security, tourism and jobs related to healthcare). However, the employment of the workers for longer periods is not the only way to ensure the continuity of the service. Although written approval of the worker enabling the night work in excess of seven and a half hours is stipulated, the worker-protective approach of the Labour Law which protects the workers even from themselves, especially on the issues regarding occupational health and safety should not be disregarded. It should also be noted that the Regulation on shift work also includes a statement which is not included in the text of the Labour Law. In the Regulation; it is prescribed that the workers employed by the subcontractor in the workplaces, where private security, tourism and health services are carried out, also fall under this scope. If the letter of the statement is followed; it could be concluded that all workers employed by the subcontractor in the health, tourism and private security sectors may be employed at night for more than seven and a half hours. However, it is clear that such an interpretation would be incompatible with the exception regulated in the Labour&nbsp;Law. The provision of the regulation should be interpreted in a manner to cover subcontractor workers who are employed in the sectors referred to in the Labour Law, specifically in cases where subcontracted work is carried out with respect to these sectors. It has been concluded that the recent changes in the field of night work constitute a reversal in terms of workers’ rights. It is clear that the continuity of the services without disruption can be also maintained by increasing the number of shifts. Furthermore, I would like to draw attention to the fact that the regulations regarding night work are quite disorganized. In this regard, it may be suggested that all the rules regarding night work should fall into a single regulation. As a result, it may be stated that there is a need for the review of the regulations on night work in our legislation.

Gece Çalışması ve Gece Çalışma Süresinin Sınırı ile İlgili Değişikliklerin Değerlendirilmesi

Cemile

This article deals with multi-tier dispute resolution clauses incorporating both mediation and arbitration together under Turkish Law. I use the terminology of “med-arb” not only for the situation where the mediator acts as an arbitrator, but rather in a general meaning covering all instances where the arbitration is commenced following an unsuccessful mediation. The purpose of this article is to discuss the validity of the med-arb agreements, the consequences of starting arbitration before the mediation fails, the effects of the mediation proceedings and of the mediator acting as an arbitrator on the arbitration that follows the mediation as well as the admissibility of the documents and factual evidence exchanged at the mediation. For the purpose of this article, the comparative laws, international ethics rules, international guidelines on the conflict of interest and admissibility of evidence are reviewed along with Turkish law. Turkish Code on Mediation in Civil Law Disputes stipulates some provisions related to the med-arb. These provisions shall apply equally to both domestic and international arbitrations where the place of arbitration is Turkey. Following the jurisprudence of the Turkish Supreme Court, a med-arb agreement is valid only if it reflects, without doubt, both parties’ consents to the arbitration following the failure of the mediation proceedings. Therefore, a multi-tier dispute resolution clause subject to Turkish law needs to be drawn carefully. In this respect IBA Guidelines for Drafting International Arbitration Clauses are of assistance. In cases where one of the parties commences arbitration without a recourse to mediation first, the arbitral tribunal should make a decision on the admissibility of the claim. There is no direct provision related to the question of admissibility under Turkish law. Under Turkish law, in parallel with the practice of international arbitration, the tribunal has to interpret the med-arb agreement to make a decision on the question of whether the recourse to mediation is a pre-condition of the arbitration. If the mediation is a pre-condition, then the tribunal should suspend the arbitral&nbsp;proceedings and direct the parties to the mediation. However, in the case that the mediation fails, the tribunal may resume the arbitral proceedings. There is nothing under Turkish law suggesting that a precondition of arbitration is a jurisdictional issue rather than an admissibility issue. The advantages of the med-arb are subject to heated debates among people holding different perspectives. Such advantages are controversial since when a dispute arises and the arbitration starts without a recourse to mediation, the respondent may object to the jurisdiction of the tribunal or to the admissibility of the claim relying on the fact that the pre-condition to try mediation first is not met. Such an objection may cause arbitration to be delayed and/or the costs of arbitration to increase. Therefore, before opting for a med-arb agreement the parties should evaluate the possibility of settling their dispute at the Med-arb. The parties who are able to consider their commercial interests do not need a med-arb agreement as they are able to settle the disputes without the assistance of a mediator. They first try to settle the dispute, in some cases for years, and to avoid adjudication by an arbitral tribunal. They only start arbitration when there is no possibility of settlement of their dispute and of saving their commercial alliance. In such cases, med-arb agreements become a tool to delay the proceedings and increase the costs for the claimant to force him or her to give up his or her claim. Having said that, for the parties who are unable to consider their commercial interest and unable to avoid adjudication, med-arb agreement may be the right dispute resolution clause. In a med-arb agreement, the parties may wish the mediator to act as their arbitrator if the mediation fails. Neither the Turkish Code of Mediation in Civil Disputes nor the Turkish International Arbitration Code prevents a mediator to act as an arbitrator. Turkish Ethics Rules for Mediators stipulate that a mediator may act as an arbitrator only if the parties have agreement in writing. Therefore, any mediator to act as arbitrator needs to have the parties’ written consent. In international mediation and arbitration practices, the scholars and practitioners widely accept that having an arbitrator who previously acted as a mediator generates a number of serious risks and concerns. First of all, the mediator-arbitrator may not protect his or her impartiality in the arbitration because of the facts that she or he became aware of during the mediation. Secondly, the mediator-arbitrator may rely on the confidential information exchanged in caucus while making the award. Thirdly, the mediator may be too willing to act as an arbitrator and as a result the mediation may prematurely fail. Finally, the mediator may abuse his or her powers and force the parties to settle their disputes as the mediator suggests. The parties may feel that if they are not able to settle their dispute and proceed to the arbitration, the mediator-arbitrator would make an arbitral award in parallel of the recommendations at the mediation phase. Considering the severity of the consequences, if the parties agree to have an arbitrator&nbsp;who previously acted as their mediator, they need to be aware of such consequences and they need to make an informed decision accordingly . The Turkish Code of Mediation in Civil Law Disputes restrains the ability of the mediator-arbitrator to rely on the documents produced during the mediation for the purpose of settlement and defines which documents are in this category. In the case where the mediator-arbitrator relies on these documents while making the award, depending on the extent the document or information has a bearing on the award, the arbitral award may be cancelled, or its enforcement may be refused. In November 2019, Istanbul Arbitration Center (ISTAC) introduced its Medarb Rules. ISTAC Med-arb Rules are the first published institutional Med-arb rules. ISTAC Med-arb Rules reflect the best practices in international mediation – arbitration. I believe that ISTAC Med-arb Rules will be welcomed in the field of international dispute resolution.

Arabuluculuk ve Tahkimi Bir Arada İçeren Uyuşmazlık Çözüm Yolu

@JOURNAL_BOX_MOSTREAD

İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası, İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi tarafından yayımlanmaktadır.
İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası’nda, hukuk ve/veya hukuk ile ilişki kuran bilimsel disiplinler alanlarında, özgün akademik çalışmalara yaslanan, teorik veyahut uygulamalı; toplum içindeki davranış ve ilişkilerin değerlendirilmesi, hukuk sistemleri, makale, karar incelemeleri, mevzuat tahlili-tahkiki, hukukî matbuatın değerlendirilmesini konu edinen (müspet-menfi) eleştirel metinler, tercümeler dolayısıyla ulusal ve uluslararası ölçeğe teşmil olabilecek çalışmalar yayımlanmaktadır.
Bu çerçevede Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası’nda; (i) Hukuk kuramını genişleten ve hukukî uygulamaların teorik zeminini besleyen; (ii) gerek akademik gerekse de bir erk olarak yargının usûllerini (metodoloji) tahlil ve gerektiğinde teşrih edici; (iii) özel ya da kamusal bağlamda topluma geniş çaplı etki eden hukuksal tefekkürün, fiillerin, süreçlerin, simgelerin vb. mevcudiyetini irdeleyen; (iv) başta hukukî olmak üzere ele alınan konuyu sosyolojik, siyasal, psikolojik, felsefî, ahlâkî, coğrafî, tarihsel yanlarıyla da tahlil edebilecek metinlere yer verilmektedir.

Derginin tüm giderleri İstanbul Üniversitesi tarafından karşılanmaktadır. Dergide makale yayını ve makale süreçlerinin yürütülmesi ücrete tabi değildir. Dergiye gönderilen ya da yayın için kabul edilen makaleler için işlemleme ücreti ya da gönderim ücreti alınmaz.

Fethi

Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)

EBSCO

ERIH PLUS

TR Dizin

DOAJ

SOBIAD

Gale Cengage

@METRIC_VOLUMES

@METRIC_ISSUES

@METRIC_ARTICLES

@METRIC_OPENACCESS

İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası

@INFO_TAB_ABOUT

Editor in Chief

Co Editor in Chief

Editorial Assistant

Language Editor

Editor

@INFO_TAB_BOARDS

İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası, yayın dili Türkçe, İngilizce olan; yılda dört defa yayınlanan, akademik ve hakemli bir dergidir.İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası‘nda, hukuk ve/veya hukuk ile ilişki kuran bilimsel disiplinler alanlarında, özgün akademik çalışmalara yaslanan, teorik veyahut uygulamalı; makale, karar incelemeleri, mevzuat tahlili-tahkiki, hukukî matbuatın değerlendirilmesini konu edinen (müspet-menfi) eleştirel metinler, tercümeler dolayısıyla ulusal ve uluslararası ölçeğe teşmil olabilecek çalışmalar yayımlanmaktadır.İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası’nda; (i) Hukuk kuramını genişleten ve hukukî uygulamaların teorik zeminini besleyen; (ii) gerek akademik gerekse bir erk olarak yargının usûllerini (metodoloji) tahlil ve gerektiğinde teşrih edici; (iii) özel ya da kamusal bağlamda topluma geniş çaplı etki eden hukuksal tefekkürün, fiillerin, süreçlerin, simgelerin vb. mevcudiyetini irdeleyen; (iv) başta hukukî olmak üzere ele alınan konuyu sosyolojik, siyasal, psikolojik, felsefî, ahlâkî, coğrafî, tarihsel yanlarıyla da tahlil edebilecek metinlere yer verilmektedir.Bu kapsamda özellikle şu konulara öncelik tanınmaktadır:• İnsan hakları hukuku,• Ceza hukuku,• Finans ve mali hukuk,• Medeni hukuk,• Ticaret hukuku,• Borçlar hukuku,• İcra ve iflâs hukuku

Amaç ve Kapsam

Web of Science - Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)TÜBİTAK-ULAKBİM TR Dizin)EBSCO Central &amp; Eastern European Academic SourceEBSCO Legal SourceDOAJERIH PLUSSOBİADGale Cengage

Dizinler

Dergi yayın etiğinde en yüksek standartlara bağlıdır ve <a href="https://publicationethics.org/" target="_blank">Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)</a>, <a href="https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/#principles-of-transparency-and-best-practice-in-scholarly-publishing" target="_blank">Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)</a>, <a href="https://oaspa.org/" target="_blank">Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA)</a> ve <a href="https://www.wame.org/" target="_blank">World Association of Medical Editors (WAME)</a> tarafından yayınlanan etik yayıncılık ilkelerini benimser; Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing başlığı altında ifade edilen ilkeler için: <a href="https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing" target="_blank">https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing</a> Gönderilen makaleler derginin amaç ve kapsamına uygun olmalıdır. Orijinal, yayınlanmamış ve başka bir dergide değerlendirme sürecinde olmayan, her bir yazar tarafından içeriği ve gönderimi onaylanmış yazılar değerlendirmeye kabul edilir. Makale yayınlanmak üzere Dergiye gönderildikten sonra yazarlardan hiçbirinin ismi, tüm yazarların yazılı izni olmadan yazar listesinden silinemez ve yeni bir isim yazar olarak eklenemez ve yazar sırası değiştirilemez.İntihal, duplikasyon, sahte yazarlık/inkar edilen yazarlık, araştrma/veri fabrikasyonu, makale dilimleme, dilimleyerek yayın, telif hakları ihlali ve çıkar çatışmasının gizlenmesi, etik dışı davranışlar olarak kabul edilir. Kabul edilen etik standartlara uygun olmayan tüm makaleler yayından çıkarılır. Buna yayından sonra tespit edilen olası kuraldışı, uygunsuzluklar içeren makaleler de dahildir.İntihal Ön kontrolden geçirilen makaleler, iThenticate yazılımı kullanılarak intihal için taranır. İntihal/kendi kendine intihal tespit edilirse yazarlar bilgilendirilir. Editörler, gerekli olması halinde makaleyi değerlendirme ya da üretim sürecinin çeşitli aşamalarında intihal kontrolüne tabi tutabilirler. Yüksek benzerlik oranları, bir makalenin kabul edilmeden önce ve hatta kabul edildikten sonra reddedilmesine neden olabilir. Makalenin türüne bağlı olarak, bunun oranın %15 veya %20'den az olması beklenir.Çift Kör Hakemlikİntihal kontrolünden sonra, uygun olan makaleler baş editör tarafından orijinallik, metodoloji, işlenen konunun önemi ve dergi kapsamı ile uyumluluğu açısından değerlendirilir. Editör, makalelerin adil bir şekilde çift taraflı kör hakemlikten geçmesini sağlar ve makale biçimsel esaslara uygun ise, gelen yazıyı yurtiçinden ve /veya yurtdışından en az iki hakemin değerlendirmesine sunar, hakemler gerek gördüğü takdirde yazıda istenen değişiklikler yazarlar tarafından yapıldıktan sonra yayınlanmasına onay verir.

Politikalar

Dergi açık erişimlidir ve derginin tüm içeriği okura ya da okurun dahil olduğu kuruma ücretsiz olarak sunulur. Okurlar, ticari amaç haricinde, yayıncı ya da yazardan izin almadan dergi makalelerinin tam metnini okuyabilir, indirebilir, kopyalayabilir, arayabilir ve link sağlayabilir. Bu <a href="https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/translations/turkish-translation" target="_blank">BOAI</a> açık erişim tanımıyla uyumludur. Derginin açık erişimli makaleleri Creative Commons Atıf-GayrıTicari 4.0 Uluslararası (<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.tr" target="_blank">CC BY-NC 4.0</a>) olarak lisanslıdır.

Derginin tüm giderleri İstanbul Üniversitesi tarafından karşılanmaktadır. Dergide makale yayını ve makale süreçlerinin yürütülmesi ücrete tabi değildir. Dergiye gönderilen ya da yayın için kabul edilen makaleler için işlemleme ücreti ya da gönderim ücreti alınmaz.

Yazarlar dergide yayınlanan çalışmalarının telif hakkına sahiptirler ve çalışmaları  Creative Commons Atıf-GayrıTicari 4.0 Uluslararası (<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.tr" target="_blank">CC BY-NC 4.0</a>) olarak lisanslıdır. CC BY-NC 4.0 lisansı, eserin ticari kullanım dışında her boyut ve formatta paylaşılmasına, kopyalanmasına, çoğaltılmasına ve orijinal esere uygun şekilde atıfta bulunmak kaydıyla yeniden düzenleme, dönüştürme ve eserin üzerine inşa etme dâhil adapte edilmesine izin verir.

Editörler, yayınlanan makalede, bulguları, yorumları ve sonuçları etkilemeyen küçük hatalar tespit edilirse düzeltme yayınlamayı düşünebilirler. Editörler, bulguları ve sonuçları geçersiz kılan büyük hatalar / ihlaller söz konusu olduğunda, makaleyi geri çekmeyi düşünmelidir. Yazarlar tarafından araştırma veya yayını kötüye kullanmaya yönelik olasılık söz konusu ise; bulguların güvenilir olmadığına ve yazarların kurumlarının olayı soruşturmadığına dair kanıtlar var veya olası soruşturma haksız veya sonuçsuz görünüyor ise, editörler endişe ifadesi yayınlamayı düşünmelidir. Düzeltme, geri çekme veya endişe ifadesi ile ilgili olarak <a href="https://publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts/complete-set-english" target="_blank">COPE</a> ve <a href="https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/" target="_blank">ICJME</a> yönergeleri dikkate alınır.Geri ÇekmeDergi geri çekme durumunda <a href="https://publicationethics.org/sites/default/files/retraction-guidelines-cope.pdf" target="_blank">COPE Retraction Guidelines</a>’ı izler. Editör, aşağıdaki durumlarda bir makaleyi geri çekme hakkına sahiptir: <ul><li>Büyük bir hata (örn. yanlış hesaplama veya deneysel hata), uydurma öğeler  (örn. veri) veya tahrifat (örn. görüntü manipülasyonu) gibi bulguların güvenilmez olduğu sonucunu çıkarmaya dair açık kanıtlar varsa; </li><li>İçerikte intihal varsa; </li><li>Uygun atıf yapılmadan başka bir yerde yayınlanmışsa;</li><li>Kullanım izni olmayan materyal veya veri içeriyorsa;</li><li>Telif hakkı ihlali veya başka bir ciddi yasal sorun varsa;</li><li>Etik olmayan araştırma içeriyorsa; </li><li>Hakem değerlendirme sürecinin bozulduğuna veya manipüle edildiğine dair kanıt varsa;</li><li>Yazar(lar), editörün görüşüne göre, çalışmanın yorumlanmasını veya editörlerin ve hakemlerin tavsiyelerini önemli derecede etkileyebilecek, kritik bir çıkar çatışmasını açıklamamış ise.</li></ul>Geri çekme durumunda aşağıdaki adımlar izlenir:<ul><li>Makale başlığını da içeren geri çekme bildirimi derginin bir sonraki sayısında yayınlanır. Geri çekme bildirimi  içindekiler tablosunda sayfa nosu verilerek listelenir. </li><li>Elektronik versiyonda geri çekme bildirimi ile orijinal makale arasında link sağlanır. </li><li>Online makaleden önce geri çekme bildirimini içeren sayfa gelir; okuyucu daha sonra makalenin kendisine geçebilir.</li><li>Orijinal makale, her sayfadaki .pdf üzerinde “geri çekildiğini” belirten bir filigran dışında değişmeden kalır.</li></ul>Yasal Nedenlerle Makalenin KaldırılmasıAşağıdaki durumlarda, üst veriler (başlık ve yazarlar) hariç olmak üzere, makale metni kaldırılır ve makalenin yasal nedenlerle kaldırıldığını bildiren bir sayfa makalenin yerini alır. <ul><li>Makalenin karalayıcı içerik ihtiva ettiği veya başkalarının yasal haklarını ihlal ettiği tespit edilir ve geri çekmenin yeterli bir çözüm olmadığı düşünülürse;</li><li>Makale bir mahkeme kararına konu olmuşsa veya olacağına dair makul bir neden varsa;</li><li>Kamu sağlığı açısından önemli bir risk söz konusu ise;  </li></ul>

Dergide yayınlanan tüm yazıların korunmasını ve kalıcı olarak erişilebilir olmasını sağlamak için makaleler, ulusal bir arşiv sitesi olarak hizmet veren ve aynı zamanda LOCKSS'in içeriği toplamasına, korumasına ve sunmasına izin veren Dergipark'ta saklanmaktadır.Ek olarak, yazarların kendilerinin makalelerinin son PDF sürümünü Open Archives Initiative (<a href="https://www.openarchives.org/" target="_blank">https://www.openarchives.org/</a>) standartlarına uygun açık elektronik arşivlerde arşivlemeleri önerilir. Yazarlar, yayınladıkları arşiv versiyonundan, İ.Ü. Yayınevinin dergi web sitesinin URL'sine bağlantı sağlamalıdır.

Yapay Zeka konusundaki gelişmeler ve akademik yayıncılıkta görülen uygulamalar dikkate alınarak oluşturulan Yapay Zeka Politikası, yazarların, hakemlerin ve editörlerin bu türden teknolojilerin kullanımında uymaları gereken editöryal ve etik ilkeleri içerir. Yapay Zeka politikasının oluşturulmasında, aşağıdaki kaynaklar dikkate alınmıştır:Committee on Publication Ethics <a href="https://publicationethics.org/guidance/cope-position/authorship-and-ai-tools" target="_blank">(COPE) - Authorship and AI tools</a>; International Committee of Medical Journal Editors <a href="https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html#four" target="_blank">(ICMJE) - Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology; World Association of Medical Editors  (WAME) Chatbots, Generative AI, and Scholarly Manuscripts</a><a href="https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html#four"></a>Yapay Zeka destekli teknolojiler (Büyük Dil Modelleri [LLM'ler], sohbet robotları veya görüntü oluşturucular gibi), metin, görüntü, ses ve sentetik veriler dahil olmak üzere çeşitli içerikler geliştirebilmekte ve üretebilmektedir. Bu yetenekleri etik ve güvenli bir şekilde kullanıldığında üretkenliği artırabilir ve yeniliği teşvik edebilir; ancak insan yönlendirmesi olmadan kullanımında doğru olmayan ve taraflı sonuçlar; atıf verme konusunda eksikler ve hatalar; gizlilik ve fikri mülkiyet haklarının korunmasında eksiklikler; yazar ve yayıncıların haklarının potansiyel ihlali gibi riskler taşımaktadır. IUPress, Yapay Zeka kullanımı konusunda söz konusu riskleri bertaraf etmeyi amaçlayan aşağıdaki temel ilkeleri benimser:  <ul><li>İçerik üretiminde kullanılan (metin, şekiller, resimler ve kod dahil ancak bunlarla sınırlı olmamak üzere) her türlü Yapay Zeka ile ilgili ayrıntılar çalışmanın uygun bölümünde (bilgi notu olarak ve/veya metod kısmında) beyan edilmeli ve net biçimde açıklanmalıdır. </li><li>Hiçbir Yapay Zeka aracı hiçbir bilimsel çalışmada yazar olarak listelenemez. </li><li>Yazarlar, herhangi bir şekilde Yapay Zeka kullanımı durumunda da çalışmalarının doğruluğu, bütünlüğü ve özgünlüğünden sorumludur; başkalarının fikirleri, verileri, kelimeleri veya diğer materyallerini doğru referanslama ve atıf ile sunmakla yükümlüdürler. </li><li>Hakemler ve editörler gönderilen çalışmayı tamamen ya da kısmen hiçbir üretken Yapay Zeka uygulamasına yükleyemez. </li></ul>IUPress yayınlarının editöryal süreçlerinde, Yapay Zeka ile üretilmiş içerikleri tespit eden yardımcı araçlar editörlerin kullanımındadır. Öte yandan okunurluğu, dil ve grammeri iyileştirme ve geliştirme konusunda önerilerde bulunan Yapay Zeka araçlarının kullanılması yaygındır ve IUPress  yayınlarında bu türden Yapay Zeka araçları editörlerin ve yazarların gözetiminde kullanılabilir.

Yapay Zeka Politikası

<ul><li>Yazarlar, gönderdikleri çalışmayı oluştururken <a target="_blank">Yapay Zeka destekli teknolojiler (Büyük Dil Modelleri [LLM'ler], sohbet robotları veya görüntü oluşturucular gibi) </a>kullandılarsa, bunu  beyan etmekle yükümlüdür. </li><li>Yazarlar hem ön yazıda hem de sunulan çalışmanın uygun bölümünde (bilgi notu olarak ve/veya metod kısmında), hangi Yapay Zeka aracını ve hangi versiyonunu ne amaçla kullandıklarını açıklamalıdır. </li><li>Yapay Zeka destekli teknolojilerden yararlanılarak oluşturulan içeriğin ve alıntıların doğruluğu, geçerliliği ve uygunluğunun sağlanması, olası hata, tutarsızlık ve taraflı sonuçların giderilmesi yazarların sorumluluğundadır. </li><li>Yazarlar, Yapay Zeka destekli teknolojiler ile üretilmiş metinlerde intihal potansiyeli olduğunu dikkate alarak, olası intihali bertaraf etmek için orijinal kaynakları mutlaka kontrol etmelidir. Kontrol ettiğini ve kaynakların orijnal kaynaklar olduğunu teyid etmelidir.  </li><li>Yapay Zeka destekli araçlar (ChatGPT gibi) yazar olarak listelenemez çünkü çalışmanın doğruluğundan, bütünlüğünden ve orijinalliğinden sorumlu olamazlar ve bu sorumluluklar yazarlık için şarttır. Bu nedenle, Yapay Zeka destekli teknolojilerin kullanımını içeren tüm materyallerden yazarlar sorumludur. Yazarlar, makalede yer alan ve çalışmanın hipotezlerini, yorumlarını, sonuçlarını, sınırlamalarını ve çıkarımlarını bildiren tüm ifadelerin kendi fikirlerini temsil ettiğinden emin olmalıdırlar.  </li><li>Yazarların, Yapay Zeka araçlarını temel araştırmacı ve yazar sorumluluklarının yerini alacak, aşağıdaki şekillerde kullanarak oluşturdukları çalışmalar bilimsel yayıncılık ve yayın etiği ilkelerine aykırıdır ve bu türden çalışmaların yayınlarda yer almasına izin verilmez: <ul><li>Titiz revizyon olmadan metin veya kod oluşturma, </li><li>Sağlam bir metodoloji olmadan eksik verileri ikame etmek için sentetik veri üretimi,  </li><li>Özetler veya ek materyaller de dahil olmak üzere her türlü hatalı, sentetik içerik oluşturulması </li><li>Yapay Zeka kullanımı ile görüntü ve şekillerin (resimler, çizelgeler, veri tabloları, tıbbi görüntüler, görüntü parçacıkları, bilgisayar kodları ve formüller) veya orijinal araştırma verilerinin oluşturulması ve manipüle edilmesi (bir görüntü veya şekil içinde belirli bir özelliğin artırılması, gizlenmesi, taşınması, kaldırılması veya eklenmesi).</li></ul></li></ul>

Hakem sürecinde gizliliğin korunması, değerlendirilen çalışmanın bu süreçte paylaşılmaması veya kullanılmaması esastır.  <a></a><a href="https://publicationethics.org/sites/default/files/ethical-guidelines-peer-reviewers-cope.pdf" target="_blank">(COPE – Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers</a>) <ul><li>Hakemler, kendilerine değerlendirme için gönderilen bir makaleyi veya herhangi bir bölümünü gözden geçirme, değerlendirme veya karar verme sürecine yardımcı olması için üretken Yapay Zeka araçlarına veya Büyük Dil Modellerine yüklememelidirler; zira hakemlerin bu türden Yapay Zeka araçlarına içerik yüklemesi yazarların gizlilik ve mülkiyet haklarını ihlal eder.  </li><li>Bilimsel bir makalenin incelenmesi, yalnızca insanlara atfedilebilecek sorumluluktur. Hakem değerlendirmesi için gereken eleştirel düşünme ve orijinal değerlendirme bu teknolojinin kapsamı dışındadır ve teknolojinin makale hakkında yanlış, eksik veya önyargılı sonuçlar üretme riski vardır. Hakem raporu ve karar mektupları, hakemlerin ve editörlerin gönderilen içeriğe ilişkin kişisel değerlendirmelerini yansıtmalıdır. Hakem, raporunun içeriğinden sorumludur ve hesap vermekle sorumludur. </li><li>Yapay Zeka araçları, hakem değerlendirmesi ile bağlantılı olarak hakem değerlendirme raporu dilinin kalitesini artırmak için (çeviri veya dil düzenlemesi için) sınırlı bir şekilde kullanılabilir. Böyle bir kullanım olduğunda, hakem raporu iletirken, kullanımı beyan etmelidir. </li><li>Bir başvuruda üretken Yapay Zekanın uygunsuz veya açıklanmamış kullanımından şüphelenen hakemler, endişelerini dergi editörüne bildirmelidir. </li></ul>

Editörler dergiye gönderilen makalelerin değerlendirme sürecinde gizliliğinin korunmasını sağlamakla yükümlüdürler, değerlendirilen çalışmanın bu sürece dahil olan taraflar dışında paylaşılmaması veya kullanılmaması esastır <a href="https://publicationethics.org/files/Code_of_conduct_for_journal_editors_Mar11.pdf" target="_blank">(COPE – Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors)</a>.<ul><li>Editörler, yazarların gizlilik ve mülkiyet haklarını ihlal edebileceğinden, gönderilen bir makaleyi veya herhangi bir bölümünü gözden geçirme, değerlendirilme veya karar verme sürecine yardımcı olması için üretken Yapay Zeka  araçlarına veya Büyük Dil Modelleri'ne yüklememelidir. </li><li>Bilimsel bir makalenin editoryal değerlendirmesini yönetmek, yalnızca insanlara atfedilebilecek sorumluluklar anlamına gelir. Üretken Yapay Zeka veya Yapay Zeka destekli teknolojiler, editörler tarafından bir makalenin değerlendirme veya karar verme sürecine yardımcı olmak için kullanılmamalıdır, çünkü bu iş için gereken eleştirel düşünme ve orijinal değerlendirme bu teknolojinin kapsamı dışındadır ve teknolojinin makale hakkında yanlış, eksik veya önyargılı sonuçlar üretme riski vardır. Editör, editoryal süreçten, nihai karardan ve bunların yazarlara iletilmesinden sorumlu ve mesuldür.</li><li>Editörler, karar mektupları veya yayınlanmamış araştırmaların özetlerini oluşturmak için üretken Yapay Zeka aracı kullanmamalıdır. </li><li>Editörler, uygun hakemleri bulma konusunda yardımcı olması için üretken Yapay Zeka araçlarını kullanabilir.</li><li>Editörler, gönderilen bir makalede veya gönderilen bir hakem raporunda üretken Yapay Zeka kullanıldığından şüphelenirse konuyla ilgili editoryal bir değerlendirme yapmalı ve politikayı göz önünde bulundurmalıdır. </li></ul>

İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası, yayın etiğinde en yüksek standartlara bağlıdır ve <a href="https://publicationethics.org/" target="_blank">Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)</a>, <a href="https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/#principles-of-transparency-and-best-practice-in-scholarly-publishing" target="_blank">Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)</a>, <a href="https://oaspa.org/" target="_blank">Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA)</a> ve <a href="https://www.wame.org/" target="_blank">World Association of Medical Editors (WAME)</a> tarafından yayınlanan etik yayıncılık ilkelerini benimser; Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing başlığı altında ifade edilen ilkeler için adres: <a href="https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing" target="_blank">https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing</a>Gönderilen tüm makaleler orijinal, yayınlanmamış ve başka bir dergide değerlendirme sürecinde olmamalıdır. Her bir makale editörlerden biri ve en az iki hakem tarafından çift kör değerlendirmeden geçirilir. İntihal, duplikasyon, sahte yazarlık/inkar edilen yazarlık, araştrma/veri fabrikasyonu, makale dilimleme, dilimleyerek yayın, telif hakları ihlali ve çıkar çatışmasının gizlenmesi, etik dışı davranışlar olarak kabul edilir.Kabul edilen etik standartlara uygun olmayan tüm makaleler yayından çıkarılır. Buna yayından sonra tespit edilen olası kuraldışı, uygunsuzluklar içeren makaleler de dahildir.

Etik

Dergi araştırma etiğinde en yüksek standartları gözetir ve aşağıda tanımlanan uluslararası araştırma etiği ilkelerini benimser. Makalelerin etik kurallara uygunluğu yazarların sorumluluğundadır.-    Araştırmanın tasarlanması, tasarımın gözden geçirilmesi ve araştırmanın yürütülmesinde, bütünlük, kalite ve şeffaflık ilkeleri sağlanmalıdır.-    Araştırma ekibi ve katılımcılar, araştırmanın amacı, yöntemleri ve öngörülen olası kullanımları; araştırmaya katılımın gerektirdikleri ve varsa riskleri hakkında tam olarak bilgilendirilmelidir.-    Araştırma katılımcılarının sağladığı bilgilerin gizliliği ve yanıt verenlerin gizliliği sağlanmalıdır. Araştırma katılımcıların özerkliğini ve saygınlığını koruyacak şekilde tasarlanmalıdır.-    Araştırma katılımcıları gönüllü olarak araştırmada yer almalı, herhangi bir zorlama altında olmamalıdırlar.-    Katılımcıların zarar görmesinden kaçınılmalıdır. Araştırma, katılımcıları riske sokmayacak şekilde planlanmalıdır.-    Araştırma bağımsızlığıyla ilgili açık ve net olunmalı; çıkar çatışması varsa belirtilmelidir.-    Deneysel çalışmalarda, araştırmaya katılmaya karar veren katılımcıların yazılı bilgilendirilmiş onayı alınmalıdır. Çocukların ve vesayet altındakilerin veya tasdiklenmiş akıl hastalığı bulunanların yasal vasisinin onayı alınmalıdır.-    Çalışma herhangi bir kurum ya da kuruluşta gerçekleştirilecekse bu kurum ya da kuruluştan çalışma yapılacağına dair onay alınmalıdır.-    İnsan öğesi bulunan çalışmalarda, “yöntem” bölümünde katılımcılardan “bilgilendirilmiş onam” alındığının ve çalışmanın yapıldığı kurumdan etik kurul onayı alındığı belirtilmesi gerekir.

Makalelerin bilimsel ve etik kurallara uygunluğu yazarların sorumluluğundadır. Yazar makalenin orijinal olduğu, daha önce başka bir yerde yayınlanmadığı ve başka bir yerde, başka bir dilde yayınlanmak üzere değerlendirmede olmadığı konusunda teminat sağlamalıdır. Uygulamadaki telif kanunları ve anlaşmaları gözetilmelidir. Telife bağlı materyaller (örneğin tablolar, şekiller veya büyük alıntılar) gerekli izin ve teşekkürle kullanılmalıdır. Başka yazarların, katkıda bulunanların çalışmaları ya da yararlanılan kaynaklar uygun biçimde kullanılmalı ve referanslarda belirtilmelidir.Gönderilen makalede tüm yazarların akademik ve bilimsel olarak doğrudan katkısı olmalıdır, bu bağlamda “yazar” yayınlanan bir araştırmanın kavramsallaştırılmasına ve dizaynına, verilerin elde edilmesine, analizine ya da yorumlanmasına belirgin katkı yapan, yazının yazılması ya da bunun içerik açısından eleştirel biçimde gözden geçirilmesinde görev yapan birisi olarak görülür. Yazar olabilmenin diğer koşulları ise, makaledeki çalışmayı planlamak veya icra etmek ve / veya revize etmektir. Fon sağlanması, veri toplanması ya da araştırma grubunun genel süpervizyonu tek başına yazarlık hakkı kazandırmaz. Yazar olarak gösterilen tüm bireyler sayılan tüm ölçütleri karşılamalıdır ve yukarıdaki ölçütleri karşılayan her birey yazar olarak gösterilebilir. Yazarların isim sıralaması ortak verilen bir karar olmalıdır. Tüm yazarlar yazar sıralamasını <a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/E53FB0CE54514A729F14BBA673C58319" target="_blank">Telif Hakkı Anlaşması Formu'nda</a> imzalı olarak belirtmek zorundadırlar.Yazarlık için yeterli ölçütleri karşılamayan ancak çalışmaya katkısı olan tüm bireyler “teşekkür / bilgiler” kısmında sıralanmalıdır. Bunlara örnek olarak ise sadece teknik destek sağlayan, yazıma yardımcı olan ya da sadece genel bir destek sağlayan, finansal ve materyal desteği sunan kişiler verilebilir.Bütün yazarlar, araştırmanın sonuçlarını ya da bilimsel değerlendirmeyi etkileyebilme potansiyeli olan finansal ilişkiler, çıkar çatışması ve çıkar rekabetini beyan etmelidirler. Bir yazar kendi yayınlanmış yazısında belirgin bir hata ya da yanlışlık tespit ederse, bu yanlışlıklara ilişkin düzeltme ya da geri çekme için editör ile hemen temasa geçme ve işbirliği yapma sorumluluğunu taşır.

Baş editör, makaleleri, yazarların etnik kökeninden, cinsiyetinden, cinsel yöneliminden, uyruğundan, dini inancından ve siyasi felsefesinden bağımsız olarak değerlendirir. Yayına gönderilen makalelerin adil bir şekilde çift taraflı kör hakem değerlendirmesinden geçmelerini sağlar. Gönderilen makalelere ilişkin tüm bilginin, makale yayınlanana kadar gizli kalacağını garanti eder. Baş editör içerik ve yayının toplam kalitesinden sorumludur. Gereğinde hata sayfası yayınlamalı ya da düzeltme yapmalıdır.Baş editör; yazarlar, editörler ve hakemler arasında çıkar çatışmasına izin vermez. Hakem atama konusunda tam yetkiye sahiptir ve Dergide yayınlanacak makalelerle ilgili nihai kararı vermekle yükümlüdür.Hakemlerin araştırmayla ilgili, yazarlarla ve/veya araştırmanın finansal destekçileriyle çıkar çatışmaları olmamalıdır. Değerlendirmelerinin sonucunda tarafsız bir yargıya varmalıdırlar. Gönderilmiş yazılara ilişkin tüm bilginin gizli tutulmasını sağlamalı ve yazar tarafında herhangi bir telif hakkı ihlali ve intihal fark ederlerse editöre raporlamalıdırlar. Hakem, makale konusu hakkında kendini vasıflı hissetmiyor ya da zamanında geri dönüş sağlaması mümkün görünmüyorsa, editöre bu durumu bildirmeli ve hakem sürecine kendisini dahil etmemesini istemelidir.Değerlendirme sürecinde editör hakemlere gözden geçirme için gönderilen makalelerin, yazarların özel mülkü olduğunu ve bunun imtiyazlı bir iletişim olduğunu açıkça belirtir. Hakemler ve yayın kurulu üyeleri başka kişilerle makaleleri tartışamazlar. Hakemlerin kimliğinin gizli kalmasına özen gösterilmelidir. Bazı durumlarda editörün kararıyla, ilgili hakemlerin makaleye ait yorumları aynı makaleyi yorumlayan diğer hakemlere gönderilerek hakemlerin bu süreçte aydınlatılması sağlanabilir.

Daha önce yayınlanmamış ya da yayınlanmak üzere başka bir dergide halen değerlendirmede olmayan ve her bir yazar tarafından onaylanan makaleler değerlendirilmek üzere kabul edilir. Gönderilen ve ön kontrolü geçen makaleler iThenticate yazılımı kullanılarak intihal için taranır. İntihal kontrolünden sonra, uygun olan makaleler baş editör tarafından orijinallik, metodoloji, işlenen konunun önemi ve dergi kapsamı ile uyumluluğu açısından değerlendirilir.Seçilen makaleler en az iki ulusal/uluslararası hakeme çift taraflı kör hakemlik ile değerlendirmeye gönderilir; yayın kararı, hakemlerin talepleri doğrultusunda yazarların gerçekleştirdiği düzenlemelerin ve hakem sürecinin sonrasında baş editör tarafından verilir.

Hakemlik Hakkında

Baş editör, makaleleri, yazarların etnik kökeninden, cinsiyetinden, cinsel yöneliminden, uyruğundan, dini inancından ve siyasi felsefesinden bağımsız olarak değerlendirir. Yayına gönderilen makalelerin adil bir şekilde çift taraflı kör hakem değerlendirmesinden geçmelerini sağlar. Gönderilen makalelere ilişkin tüm bilginin, makale yayınlanana kadar gizli kalacağını garanti eder. Baş editör içerik ve yayının toplam kalitesinden sorumludur. Gereğinde hata sayfası yayınlamalı ya da düzeltme yapmalıdır.Baş editör; yazarlar, editörler ve hakemler arasında çıkar çatışmasına izin vermez. Hakem atama konusunda tam yetkiye sahiptir ve Dergide yayınlanacak makalelerle ilgili nihai kararı vermekle yükümlüdür.Hakemlerin araştırmayla ilgili, yazarlarla ve/veya araştırmanın finansal destekçileriyle çıkar çatışmaları olmamalıdır. Değerlendirmelerinin sonucunda tarafsız bir yargıya varmalıdırlar. Gönderilmiş yazılara ilişkin tüm bilginin gizli tutulmasını sağlamalı ve yazar tarafında herhangi bir telif hakkı ihlali ve intihal fark ederlerse editöre raporlamalıdırlar. Hakem, makale konusu hakkında kendini vasıflı hissetmiyor ya da zamanında geri dönüş sağlaması mümkün görünmüyorsa, editöre bu durumu bildirmeli ve hakem sürecine kendisini dahil etmemesini istemelidir.Değerlendirme sürecinde editör hakemlere gözden geçirme için gönderilen makalelerin, yazarların özel mülkü olduğunu ve bunun imtiyazlı bir iletişim olduğunu açıkça belirtir. Hakemler ve yayın kurulu üyeleri başka kişilerle makaleleri tartışamazlar. Hakemlerin kimliğinin gizli kalmasına özen gösterilmelidir. Bazı durumlarda editörün kararıyla, ilgili hakemlerin makaleye ait yorumları aynı makaleyi yorumlayan diğer hakemlere gönderilerek hakemlerin bu süreçte aydınlatılması sağlanabilir.

Daha önce yayınlanmamış ya da yayınlanmak üzere başka bir dergide halen değerlendirmede olmayan ve her bir yazar tarafından onaylanan makaleler değerlendirilmek üzere kabul edilir. Gönderilen ve ön kontrolü geçen makaleler iThenticate yazılımı kullanılarak intihal için taranır. İntihal kontrolünden sonra, uygun olan makaleler baş editör tarafından orijinallik, metodoloji, işlenen konunun önemi ve dergi kapsamı ile uyumluluğu açısından değerlendirilir.Baş Editör, makaleleri, yazarların etnik kökeninden, cinsiyetinden, uyruğundan, dini inancından ve siyasi felsefesinden bağımsız olarak değerlendirir. Yayına gönderilen makalelerin adil bir şekilde çift taraflı kör hakem değerlendirmesinden geçmelerini sağlar.Seçilen makaleler en az iki ulusal/uluslararası hakeme değerlendirmeye gönderilir; yayın kararı, hakemlerin talepleri doğrultusunda yazarların gerçekleştirdiği düzenlemelerin ve hakem sürecinin sonrasında baş editör tarafından verilir.Hakemlerin değerlendirmeleri objektif olmalıdır. Hakem süreci sırasında hakemlerin aşağıdaki hususları dikkate alarak değerlendirmelerini yapmaları beklenir.-Makale yeni ve önemli bir bilgi içeriyor mu?-Öz, makalenin içeriğini net ve düzgün bir şekilde tanımlıyor mu?-Yöntem bütünlüklü ve anlaşılır şekilde tanımlanmış mı?-Yapılan yorum ve varılan sonuçlar bulgularla kanıtlanıyor mu?-Alandaki diğer çalışmalara yeterli referans verilmiş mi?-Dil kalitesi yeterli mi?Hakemler, gönderilen makalelere ilişkin tüm bilginin, makale yayınlanana kadar gizli kalmasını sağlamalı ve yazar tarafında herhangi bir telif hakkı ihlali ve intihal fark ederlerse editöre raporlamalıdırlar. Hakem, makale konusu hakkında kendini vasıflı hissetmiyor ya da zamanında geri dönüş sağlaması mümkün görünmüyorsa, editöre bu durumu bildirmeli ve hakem sürecine kendisini dahil etmemesini istemelidir.Değerlendirme sürecinde editör hakemlere gözden geçirme için gönderilen makalelerin, yazarların özel mülkü olduğunu ve bunun imtiyazlı bir iletişim olduğunu açıkça belirtir. Hakemler ve yayın kurulu üyeleri başka kişilerle makaleleri tartışamazlar. Hakemlerin kimliğinin gizli kalmasına özen gösterilmelidir.

<ol><li>İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası, ESCI ve ULAKBİM tarafından taranan “Hakemli Dergi” statüsünde yılda dört sayı (Mart, Haziran, Eylül, Aralık) olarak yayımlanır.</li><li>Mecmua’ya gönderilen yazılar, başka bir yerde yayımlanmamış ve yayımlanmak üzere gönderilmemiş olmalıdır. Bu hususta yazarlardan ayrıca taahhütname talep edilecektir.</li><li>Editörler Kurulu tarafından ilk değerlendirilmesi yapılan ve işbu yayın ilkelerine uygun olmadığı saptanan yazılar, hakeme gönderilmeden önce, buradaki kurallar doğrultusunda düzeltilmesi için yazara iade edilir. Yazım yanlışlarının olağanın dışında bulunması, incelenen konu bakımından gerekli olan yerli ve yabancı kaynakların tüketilmemiş olması, bilimsel ölçütlere ve akademik etik prensiplere uyulmaması, makale konusunun teori ve/veya uygulama açısından güncel bir değerinin/öneminin bulunmaması, yazının Editörler Kurulu tarafından reddi için yeterlidir.</li><li>Yazı, hakemlere gönderilmeden önce özel bilgisayar programları yardımı ile intihal incelemesine tabi tutulur. İlgili yazılım raporunun editöryel incelemesi kapsamında, dijital benzerlik oranının % 20’nin üzerinde çıkması, yazının reddi için yeterlidir.</li><li>Mecmua’da yayımlanacak makalenin, en üstün akademik standartlara uygun şekilde kaleme alınmış olması esastır. Bu çerçevede yazarlardan/yazılardan doktora/doçentlik tezi seviyesinde bir entelektüel çaba ve katkı beklenir.</li><li>İlk değerlendirmede uygun bulunan yazılar, yazar adları metinden çıkarılarak hakemlere gönderilir. Yazarlara yazının hangi hakemlere gönderildiği ile ilgili bilgi verilmez. Hakemlerden gelen raporlar doğrultusunda yazının yayımlanmasına, düzeltilmesine ya da geri çevrilmesine karar verilir. Hakem aşamasının asgari ve/veya azami bir süresi yoktur. Bu konunun takibi, münhasıran Editörler Kurulu’na ait bir görev ve yetki olup, yazı sahiplerinin doğrudan veya dolaylı şekilde bu aşamaya müdahale etmeleri etik ihlal sayılır.</li><li>Hakem raporlarının sonucunda yazının/eserin nihai olarak yayımlanıp yayımlanmayacağı ve yayımlanacaksa yazının Mecmua’nın hangi sayısında yer alacağı hususunda nihai takdir yetkisi ve sorumluluğu, Editörler Kurulu’na aittir. Tek bir olumsuz hakem raporunun varlığı, makalenin yayımlanmaması için yeterlidir.</li><li>Hakem aşamasının tamamlanmış olması, yazarlara makalenin yayımlanacağını gösterir özel/resmi bir belge talep etme yetkisi vermez. Yazarlar, bu konunun bilincinde ve sorumluluğunda olarak makalelerinin Mecmua’da yayımlanması ve hakem incelemesine tâbi tutulması başvurusunda bulunmaktadırlar. </li><li>Yazarlar; unvanlarını, görev yaptıkları kurumları, iletişim adresleri ile telefonlarını ve e-posta adreslerini bildirmelidirler.</li><li>Mecmua’nın yazı dili Türkçe ve İngilizcedir. Makalelerde 250 kelimeden oluşan Türkçe öz ve İngilizce abstract bölümlerine yer verilmeli ve en az 5 en çok 15 anahtar kelimenin de Türkçe ve İngilizce olarak yazıya eklenmesi gerekmektedir. Özetleri takiben Türkçe ve İngilizce dilindeki tüm makaleler için ayrıca 600-800 kelimelik İngilizce genişletilmiş özet yer almalıdır. Yayım başvurusuna konu edilen makalenin -dipnotlar dâhil olmak üzere- en fazla 20.000 kelimeden oluşması gerekir. Asgari bir kelime sınırı yoktur.</li><li>Makale metni, Times New Roman yazı tipinde, 1,5 satır aralığı ve 12 punto, dipnotları ise, tek satır aralığı ve 10 punto olarak hazırlanmalıdır. Dipnotları sayfa altında gösterilir. Atıflar OSCOLA atıf sistemi esas alınarak yapılmalıdır. Aksi takdirde makale hakem ataması yapılmaksızın yazara düzeltmeleri yapması için geri gönderilir. Türkçe makalelerdeki kısaltmalar ve diğer hususların ilan edilen yazım kuralları uyarınca yapılması gerekmektedir. Söz konusu atıf kurallarına https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ihm adresi üzerinden ulaşılabilir.</li><li>Yazar isimleri Türkçe ve İngilizce konu başlığının altında ve sağ tarafında yer almalı ve soyadının bitiminde yıldız konulmalıdır. Yıldızlı dipnotta yazarın unvanı, çalıştığı kurum, alanı ve e-posta adresi bildirilmelidir.</li><li>Makalenin sonunda, makalede kullanılan kaynakların, yazarların soyadlarına göre sıralandığı bir kaynakça bulunmalıdır.</li><li>Fakülte tarafından yayımlanan nüshalarla sınırlı kalmak üzere; yayına kabul edilen makalenin Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunu ve ilgili mevzuat çerçevesinde çoğaltma, yayma, umuma iletim, işleme ve çeviri konusundaki mali hakları, basılı, görsel, işitsel, sayısal/dijital vb. ortamlarda yurt içinde ve yurt dışında kullanılmak üzere Fakülte’ye devredilmiştir. Telif ücreti ödenmeyeceği yazarlar tarafından kabul edilmiştir.</li><li>Mecmua’da, makalelerin yanı sıra çeviri de yayımlanabilir. Bu nitelikteki yazılar Editörler Kurulu tarafından kabul edilebilir veya geri çevrilebilir. Çeviri metni ile birlikte asıl metin ve hak sahiplerinin (asıl eser sahibi ve yayınevinin) muvafakati de iletilmelidir. Çeviriler de hakem değerlendirilmesine tâbi tutulur.</li><li>İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası’nda yayımlanması istenen yazıların iuhfdergiler@istanbul.edu.tr e-posta adresine Microsoft Word yazılımı formatında (*.doc, *.docx) ve işbu yayın kurallarına uygun şekilde gönderilmesi gerekmektedir.</li><li>Bir başvurucunun aynı yayın yılı içerisinde (4 sayılık süreçte) sadece bir makalesi hakem incelemesine konu edilebilir.</li><li>Editörler Kurulu, derginin bir sayısında yer alacak makaleleri, Özel Hukuk – Kamu Hukuku dengesini koruma amacı, makalenin Mecmua’ya gönderilme ve hakem aşamasının tamamlanma tarihleri, makale konusun güncelliği, yazarların İstanbul Üniversitesi mensubu olup olmaması noktasındaki oransal denge gibi kriterleri gözeterek belirler.</li><li>Editörler Kurulu, tüm sayıların mümkün olduğunca eşit sayıda makale ile çıkması noktasında azami gayreti gösterir. Bir sayının çıkma tarihi itibarıyla, mizanpaj aşaması da dahil olmak üzere, yayım için gerekli tüm aşamaları tamamlamış olan bir makale, makale sayısı itibarıyla ilgili sayıda yayımlanamaz ise, ancak bu şartla, ilgili sayıdan belli bir süre sonra Online-First adı verilen sistem çerçevesinde bir sonraki sayı çıkmadan önce dijital olarak yayımlanır.</li></ol>

Yazım Kuralları

Makale başvuruları doğrudan <a href="mailto:iuhfdergiler@istanbul.edu.tr" target="_blank">iuhfdergiler@istanbul.edu.tr</a> adresine yapılmaktadır.

Derleme yazıları, okuyucular için bir konudaki kaynaklara ulaşmayı kolaylaştıran bir araç olsa da, her zaman orijinal çalışmayı doğru olarak yansıtmaz. Bu yüzden mümkün olduğunca yazarlar orijinal çalışmaları kaynak göstermelidir. Öte yandan, bir konuda çok fazla sayıda orijinal çalışmanın kaynak gösterilmesi yer israfına neden olabilir. Birkaç anahtar orijinal çalışmanın kaynak gösterilmesi genelde uzun listelerle aynı işi görür. Ayrıca günümüzde kaynaklar elektronik versiyonlara eklenebilmekte ve okuyucular elektronik literatür taramalarıyla yayınlara kolaylıkla ulaşabilmektedir.Kabul edilmiş ancak henüz sayıya dahil edilmemiş makaleler Early View olarak yayınlanır ve bu makalelere atıflar “forthcoming” şeklinde verilmelidir. Genel bir kaynaktan elde edilemeyecek temel bir konu olmadıkça “kişisel iletişimlere” atıfta bulunulmamalıdır. Eğer atıfta bulunulursa parantez içinde iletişim kurulan kişinin adı ve iletişimin tarihi belirtilmelidir. Bilimsel makaleler için yazarlar bu kaynaktan yazılı izin ve iletişimin doğruluğunu gösterir belge almalıdır. Kaynakların doğruluğundan yazar(lar) sorumludur. Tüm kaynaklar metinde belirtilmelidir. Kaynaklar alfabetik olarak sıralanmalıdır.Referans Stilli ve Formatıİstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası, makalelerinde referans sistemi olarak OSCOLA kullanımını benimser. OSCOLA (Oxford Standard for the Citation of Legal Authorities), Oxford Üniversitesi tarafından yayınlanmış bir sistemdir. Ayrıntılı bilgi ve örnekler için:<a href="https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/publications/oscola" target="_blank">https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/publications/oscola</a>OSCOLA Referans Stili ÖrnekleriGenel HususlarKısaltmalarda nokta kullanmayınız. Bir dipnotta birden fazla esere atıf yapılıyorsa her bir eseri noktalı virgül ile ayırınız.Atıflarda supra, infra, ante, id, loc cit, op cit, contra kısaltmaları kullanılmayacaktır.İçindekiler kısmına yer verilmeyecektir.Kısaltmalar cetveline yer verilmeyecektir.Öz / AbstractMakalelerde 250 kelimeden oluşan Türkçe öz ve İngilizce abstract bölümlerine yer verilmelidir.Anahtar Kelimeler / KeywordsÖz bölümünün altında Türkçe en az 5 en çok 15 anahtar kelime kullanılmalıdır.Abstract bölümünün altında İngilizce en az 5 en çok 15 keywords kullanılmalıdır.Extended SummaryMakalelerde, makaleye yabancı yazarlar tarafından atıf yapılmasını sağlayacak ölçüde, makalede yer verilen bilgi ve görüşlerin derlendiği en az 600 en fazla 1000 kelimeden oluşacak İngilizce bir extended summary yer almalıdır.Mevzuata Yapılacak AtıfTürk mevzuatına atıf, aşağıda gösterildiği şekilde yapılmalıdır:•    Nüfus Hizmetleri Kanunu, Kanun Numarası: 5490, Kabul Tarihi: 25.4.2006, RG 29.4.2006/26153Yabancı devlet mevzuatına ve AB mevzuatına yapılacak atıflarda OSCOLA’nın 2.4, 2.6.1 ve 2.8.2 numaralı bölümlerinde gösterildiği şekilde atıf yapılmalıdır.KitaplarDipnotlarda öncelikle yazarın adı/soyadı atıfta bulunulan eserde yer aldığı şekilde yazılmalıdır. Dipnotlarda önce yazarın adı verilmeli, bunu bir virgül takip etmeli ardından kitap ismi italik olarak verilmelidir.Birbirini takip eden birden fazla sayfaya yapılan atıflarda ff kısaltması kullanılır.Ad Soyad, Kitap Adı (Kaçıncı Bası Olduğu, Yayınevi Yılı) Atıf Yapılan Sayfa.Makalenin yazım dili Türkçe iseTek yazarlı kitaplarda:•    3B Bahadır Erdem, Türk Vatandaşlık Hukuku (6. Bası, Beta 2017) 165.Çok yazarlı kitaplarda:•    Aysel Çelikel ve Günseli Öztekin Gelgel, Yabancılar Hukuku (24. Bası, Beta 2019) 86 vd.•    Cemal Şanlı, Emre Esen ve İnci Ataman-Figanmeşe, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk (6. Bası, Beta 2018) 322.Editörlü Kitaplarda:Ad Soyad, ‘Eser (Bölüm) Adı’ iç Editör(ler) Adı (ed / birden çok editör olması halinde edr), Kitap Adı (Yayınevi Yıl) Atıf Yapılan Sayfa.•    Rumeysa Partalcı, ‘Türkiye’nin Çocuk Haklarına Dair Sözleşme’ye Koyduğu Çekincelerin İncelenmesi’ iç Günseli Öztekin Gelgel ve Faruk Kerem Giray (edr), Milletlerarası Aile ve Çocuk Hukukuna İlişkin Seçilmiş Makaleler (Beta 2017) 5.Makalenin yazım dili İngilizce iseTek Yazarlı kitaplarda:•    3B Bahadır Erdem, Türk Vatandaşlık Hukuku (6th, Beta 2017) 165.Çok yazarlı kitaplarda:•    Aysel Çelikel and Günseli Öztekin Gelgel, Yabancılar Hukuku (24th edn, Beta 2019) 86 ff.•    Cemal Şanlı, Emre Esen and İnci Ataman-Figanmeşe, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk (6th edn, Beta 2018) 322.Editörlü KitaplarAd Soyad, ‘Eser (Bölüm) Adı’ in Editör(ler) Adı (ed / birden çok editör olması halinde eds), Kitap Adı (Yayınevi Yıl) Atıf Yapılan Sayfa.•    Rumeysa Partalcı, ‘Türkiye’nin Çocuk Haklarına Dair Sözleşme’ye Koyduğu Çekincelerin İncelenmesi’ in Günseli Öztekin Gelgel ve Faruk Kerem Giray (eds), Milletlerarası Aile ve Çocuk Hukukuna İlişkin Seçilmiş Makaleler (Beta 2017) 5.MakalelerAd Soyad, ‘Makale Adı’ (Yıl) Cilt (Sayı) Dergi Adı İlk Sayfa Numarası, Atıf Yapılan Sayfa•    Sevin Toluner, ‘Kıbrıs’ın Avrupa Birliği’ne Üyelik Başvurusunun Hukuki Geçerliliği ve Sonuçları’ (2002) 22(2) MHB (Prof. Dr. Ergin Nomer’e Armağan) 857, 860.•    Ayşe Nur Tütüncü, ‘Montreux Convention and Canal Istanbul’ (2017) 37(1) MHB 113, 116.Elektronik KaynaklarMakalenin yazım dili Türkçe iseYazar Adı Soyadı, ‘Eser Adı’ (Yıl) Cilt(Sayı) Dergi Adı Erişim Tarihi.•    Graham Greenleaf, ‘The Global Development of Free Access to Legal Information’ (2010) 1(1) EJLT &lt; http://ejlt.org//article/view/17 &gt; Erişim Tarihi 27 July 2010.Makalenin yazım dili İngilizce ise•    Graham Greenleaf, ‘The Global Development of Free Access to Legal Information’ (2010) 1(1) EJLT &lt; http://ejlt.org//article/view/17 &gt; Date of Access 27 July 2010.Web Siteleri ve BloglarMakalenin yazım dili Türkçe iseSarah Cole, ‘Virtual Friend Fires Employee’ (Naked Law, 1 May 2009) Erişim Tarihi 19 November 2009Makalenin yazım dili İngilizce iseSarah Cole, ‘Virtual Friend Fires Employee’ (Naked Law, 1 May 2009) Date of Access 19 November 2009Aynı Yazarın Birden Fazla Eserine AtıfAynı yazarın birden fazla eserine yapılacak atıflarda eser adları uygun şekilde kısaltılmalıdır:•  15 Erdem, Vatandaşlık Hukuku (n 3) 142.    23Erdem, ‘Cinsiyet Farkı’ (n 9) 297.Aynı Esere Birden Fazla Atıf YapılmasıAynı esere birden fazla atıf yapılması halinde:Makalenin yazım dili Türkçe ise1 Aysel Çelikel ve Günseli Öztekin Gelgel, Yabancılar Hukuku (24. Bası, Beta 2019) 86.…26 Çelikel ve Öztekin Gelgel (n 1) 112.27 ibid 114-115.Makalenin yazım dili İngilizce ise1 Aysel Çelikel and Günseli Öztekin Gelgel, Yabancılar Hukuku (24th edn, Beta 2019) 86.…26 Çelikel and Öztekin Gelgel (n 1) 112.27 ibid 114-115.Yargı Kararları - DavalarTürk mahkeme kararlarına aşağıda yer alan örneklerde gösterildiği şekilde atıf yapılmalıdır:Ankara 3 Sulh Mahkemesi, 4558/3543, 11.03.2017.Ankara 1 İdare Mahkemesi, 4558/3543, 11.03.2017.Ankara 3 BAM, 4558/3543, 11.03.2017.Ankara 3 BİM, 4558/3543, 11.03.2017.Danıştay 10 D, 2247/5111, 25.11.2011.Yargıtay 2 HD, 4558/3543, 11.03.2017.Anayasa Mahkemesi, 2014/13044, 11.11.2015.Yabancı mahkeme kararlarına OSCOLA’nın 2.1 ilâ 2.3 numaralı bölümlerinde gösterildiği şekilde atıf yapılmalıdır.Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi kararlarına aşağıda yer alan örneklerde gösterildiği şekilde atıf yapılmalıdır:•    Omojudi v UK (2009) 51 EHRR 10.•    Osman v UK ECHR 1998–VIII 3124.•    Balogh v Hungary App no 47940/99 (ECHR, 20 July 2004).•    Simpson v UK (1989) 64 DR 188.KaynakçaKaynakçada öncelikle yazarın soyadına daha sonra adının ilk harfine yer verilir. Makalelerin sayfa aralığı gösterilir:Makalenin yazım dili Türkçe ise•    Erdem BB, Türk Vatandaşlık Hukuku (6. Bası, Beta 2017) 165.•    Çelikel A ve Öztekin Gelgel G, Yabancılar Hukuku (24. Bası, Beta 2019).•    Şanlı C, Esen E ve Ataman-Figanmeşe İ, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk (6. Bası, Beta 2018).•    Tütüncü AN, ‘Montreux Convention ve Canal Istanbul’ (2017) 37(1) MHB 113-123.Makalenin yazım dili İngilizce ise•    Erdem BB, Türk Vatandaşlık Hukuku (6th, Beta 2017) 165.•    Çelikel A and Öztekin Gelgel G, Yabancılar Hukuku (24th edn, Beta 2019).•    Şanlı C, Esen E and Ataman-Figanmeşe İ, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk (6th edn, Beta 2018).•    Tütüncü AN, ‘Montreux Convention and Canal Istanbul’ (2017) 37(1) MHB 113-123.Atıf kuralları hakkında ayrıntılı bilgi için bkz. OSCOLA 4th Edition.

<div><a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/2991A311942E454E8B4DBF4B271350E3" target="_blank">Telif Hakkı Anlaşması Formu</a><a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/5750CB1484324495A8C74D69447BFD44" target="_blank">Kapak Sayfası</a></div>

Aşağıdaki listede eksik olmadığından emin olun:●    Editöre mektup<ul><li>Makalenin türü</li><li>Başka bir dergiye gönderilmemiş olduğu bilgisi</li><li>Sponsor veya ticari bir firma ile ilişkisi (varsa belirtiniz)</li><li>İstatistik kontrolünün yapıldığı (araştırma makaleleri için)</li><li>İngilizce yönünden kontrolünün yapıldığı</li><li>Yazarlara Bilgide detaylı olarak anlatılan dergi politikalarının gözden geçirildiği</li><li>Kaynakların OSCOLA 4’e göre belirtildiği</li></ul>●    <a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/E53FB0CE54514A729F14BBA673C58319" target="_blank">Telif Hakkı Anlaşması Formu</a>●    Daha önce basılmış ve telife bağlı materyal (yazı-resim-tablo) kullanılmış ise izin belgesi●    <a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/31F96BBD2789401F92877085635FE53C" target="_blank">Kapak sayfası</a><ul><li>Makalenin türü</li><li>Makalenin Türkçe ve İngilizce başlığı</li><li>Yazarların ismi soyadı, unvanları ve bağlı oldukları kurumlar (üniversite ve fakülte bilgisinden sonra şehir ve ülke bilgisi de yer almalıdır), e-posta adresleri</li><li>Sorumlu yazarın e-posta adresi, açık yazışma adresi, iş telefonu, GSM, faks nosu</li><li>Tüm yazarların ORCID’leri</li></ul>●    Makale ana metni<ul><li>Makalenin Türkçe ve İngilizce başlığı</li><li>Özetler: 250 kelime Türkçe ve İngilizce</li><li>Anahtar Kelimeler: 5-15 adet Türkçe ve 5-15 adet İngilizce</li><li>Makale Türkçe ise, 600-800 kelime İngilizce genişletilmiş özet (Extended Summary)</li><li>Finansal destek (varsa belirtiniz)</li><li>Çıkar çatışması (varsa belirtiniz)</li><li>Teşekkür (varsa belirtiniz)</li><li>Kaynaklar</li><li>Tablolar-Resimler, Şekiller (başlık, tanım ve alt yazılarıyla)</li></ul>

Sayı Türü	Regular
Editör(ler)
Tam Metin (PDF)