Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences

GÖNDERBİLGİ
EnglishTürkçe

Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/CONNECTIST2019-0001   IUP :10.26650/CONNECTIST2019-0001    Tam Metin (PDF)

Türkiye’de Ekoloji Hareketlerinin Sınırlı Sosyal Medya Kullanımı: Ekoloji Birliği Twitter Ağı Analizi Örneği

Özlem Erkmen, Canan Arslan, Burcu Gümüş, İlknur Doğu Öztürk

Sanayi devriminin yarattığı toplum yapısı ve sınıfsal çatışmalar ilk toplumsal hareketlerin doğuşuna kaynaklık etmiştir. 20. yüzyılda çatışma konuları üçüncü kuşak insan hakları eksenine kayarken, kültürel ve sosyal konular etrafında şekillenen yeni toplumsal hareketler içinde en yoğun katılım bulanlardan biri de ekoloji hareketi olmuştur. Başlangıçta izole girişimlerden öteye geçemeyen pek çok ekoloji hareketi zamanla teknolojik gelişmelerin de kolaylaştırdığı ağlaşma fırsatlarını değerlendirerek, mücadele alanlarını genişletmiştir. Sosyal medyanın gelişmesiyle bu hareketler, bilgi ve gelişmeleri aktarabildikleri ve farklı kullanıcılarla etkileşimli bir ilişki kurabildikleri bir mecraya kavuşmuştur. Araştırmada, Türkiye’de ekolojik aktivist örgütlenmelerin sosyal medya kullanımlarına ilişkin bir analiz yapmak amacıyla; ekolojik örgütlerin Twitter’ı kullanım durumları, amaçları, kullanım sıklıkları, öne çıkan çevresel konular ve aktörler incelenmiştir. Twitter kullanım pratiklerindeki benzerlik ve farklılıklarla, paylaşımlarında öne çıkan konuların tespit edilmesi için nitel içerik analizi tekniğine başvurulurken; ekoloji ağında aktif olan aktörlerin ilişkileri de sosyal ağ analizi tekniğiyle incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın örneklemi Türkiye’de ekoloji alanında faaliyet gösteren 55 örgütün bir araya gelmesiyle kurulan Ekoloji Birliği çerçeve alınarak oluşturulmuştur. Sosyal ağ analizi Ekoloji Birliği ağında çatı örgütün etkinliğinin sınırlı kaldığını, Kuzey Ormanları Savunması’nın en baskın aktör olduğunu göstermektedir. İçerik analiziyse ekolojik örgütlerin ağı ağırlıkla ekolojik gündem ve platformun faaliyetleriyle ilgili gelişmeleri iletmek amacıyla kullandıklarını, özgün tweetlerinin sınırlı kaldığını ortaya koymaktadır. Araştırmanın bir diğer sonucu ise, Türkiye ekoloji ağında Twitter’ın kitleleri harekete geçirici bir araç olarak kullanımının sınırlı kaldığıdır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler: Ekoloji hareketi, sosyal ağ analizi, Twitter, sosyal medya, aktivizm
DOI :10.26650/CONNECTIST2019-0001   IUP :10.26650/CONNECTIST2019-0001    Tam Metin (PDF)

Ecological Movements’ Limited Use of Social Media in Turkey: A Social Network Analysis of Ecology Union within Twitter

Özlem Erkmen, Canan Arslan, Burcu Gümüş, İlknur Doğu Öztürk

The social structure and class conflicts caused by the Industrial Revolution were the main sources of first social movements. In the 20th Century, as the conflict issues moved towards the third generation human rights axis, among new social movements which came up around cultural and social issues, ecological movements were the ones with an intense number of participants. Ecological movements which started as isolated attempts, extended their struggle arena considering the networking opportunities enabled by technological developments. This research aims to analyze the social network usage of ecological organizations which operate in Turkey. An in depth analysis of Twitter use of ecological groups has been made including their purposes, frequencies of Twitter usage, prominent environmental issues and actors. Content analysis has been used in order to determine the differences and similarities in Twitter using practices and to find out the prominent issues. On the other hand, relationships among actors who are active on the ecological network has been determined by social network analysis. The sample of the study has been formed by taking Ecology Union, formed by the gathering of 55 local ecological organizations, as its framework. The social network analysis reveals that the Ecology Union has limited effect in the network and Northern Forests Defence (Kuzey Ormanları Savunması) is the most dominant actor. Through content analysis, it has been observed that ecological organizations use Twitter mostly to form ecological agenda and to inform their followers about the platform’s actions and related developments. However, genuine tweets posted are limited. Another outcome of the research is that in Turkey’s ecological network, Twitter is used only to a limited extend to activate masses. 

Anahtar Kelimeler: Ecological movements, social network analysis, Twitter, social media, activism

GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


In the information society, which has been in existence since the 60’s, the issues under discussion have evolved into cultural and social ones including women’s rights, gender equality, culture and identity conflicts based on ethnicity and environmental problems. This alteration of discussion issues has led to the rise of new social movements. Within the scope of new social movements, ecological movements are becoming the focus of attention with their effective organizations. Their primary goal is to attract public’s attention on environmental issues caused by the effects of modern life on the eco- system and to build public susceptibility towards these issues. 

In the 2000’s, several construction projects have been realized in different parts of Turkey and these projects have acted as a propellant force for ecological social movements. Focusing on the negative effects of these projects on natural life, ecological organizations have started to struggle against the dominant forces. With the advancements in social media, these platforms are able to reach wider audiences, thus improving the interactivity level of ecological social movements.

In the scope of this research, social media usage of these platforms have been examined. The sample of the study has been formed by taking Ecology Union, formed by the gathering of 55 local ecological organizations, as its framework. Along with Ecology Union’s, the accounts of 10 union member organizations which use Twitter most frequently and on a regular basis. Since the research aims to obtain data about social web usage practices of ecological organizations at a random time interval and a routine period, the study has been limited considering time and unit criteria. The study comprises the 92-day period between October 31- August 1, 2018 and the 3610 tweets which were tweeted during this time interval. Tweets which formed the source for content and social web analysis, and the information about the followers of these accounts have been obtained using Tweepy API. 

This study searched to find answers to the following questions: For what purposes do the ecological organizations use Twitter? What are the prominent ecological problems and issues on Twitter? How often do the organizations have a dialogue with their followers and other formations? What are the sources of the contents shared? What are the accounts which are retweeted frequently? How do the ecological organizations constitute relationship with each other? Do these groups have activist actions organized in virtual settings and carried on to physical settings? Who are the prominent actors on the ecological network constructed?

The methodological approach to this subject is two-fold: Firstly, a content analysis is used in order to identify the topics and issues in ecology movement’s Twitter agenda. Secondly the social network analysis technique is used in order to determine and define the most prominent actors in the ecology movement and their interrelations.

Results of the content analysis reveal that the number of genuine tweets posted by ecological organizations are limited. The general tendency observed on the web is retweeting, however the results show that retweets are also shared directly, without having any extra explanation or comments on the issue. It was found out that the main purpose of Twitter usage is to produce informative content about the scope of ecological organizations (%56). The social network analysis reveals that the Ecology Union has limited effect in the network and Northern Forests Defence (Kuzey Ormanları Savunması) is the most dominant actor. Through content analysis, it has been observed that ecological organizations use Twitter mostly to form ecological agenda and to inform their followers about the platform’s actions and related developments. However, genuine tweets posted are limited. Another outcome of the research is that in Turkey’s ecological network, Twitter is used only to a limited extend to activate masses.

Despite the fact that several studies have been realized on ecological movements, this study is the first on the subject with its content and sample. Thus, it will offer quantitatively and qualitatively informed insights and form a base for future researches with its findings about the social media usage of ecological movements in Turkey. 


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Adem, Ç. (2016). Non-state actors and environmentalism. In F. Adaman & M. Arsel (Eds.), Environmentalism in Turkey: Between democracy and development? (pp. 71–86). New York, USA: Routledge. google scholar
  • Akkor Gül, A. (2005). A Media Agenda Setting Research: The Mardin Kızıltepe Event. In 3rd International Symposium Communication in the Millennium, May 11-13, 2005 (No. 1663, p. 29). Andolu Üniversitesi. google scholar
  • Algül, F. (2014). Yeni Toplumsal Hareketler ve Sosyal Medya: Kuzey Ormanları Savunması Hareketine Yönelik Bir Örnek Olay İncelemesi. Marmara İletişim Dergisi, 22, 139-152. google scholar
  • Alver, F. (2011). Basında Siyasal Liderlerin ve Köşe Yazarlarının Sosyal Haklara İlişkin İletilerinin Analizi. In Sosyal Haklar Uluslararası Sempozyumu III (pp. 289-339). Kocaeli, Turkey: Petrol-İş Yayını. google scholar
  • Ansari, A. (2012). The role of social media in Iran’s Green Movement (2009-2012). Global Media Journal-Australian Edition, 6, 1–6. google scholar
  • Atauz, A. (1994, January/February). Çevreci hareketlerin Türkiye’yi sarsmayan on yılı. Birikim. Retrieved from http://www.birikimdergisi.com/birikim-yazi/4939/cevreci-hareketlerin-turkiye-yi-sarsmayan-on-yili#. XDHPclwzZPY google scholar
  • Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661 google scholar
  • Bookchin, M. (2013). Ekolojik Bir Topluma Doğru. İstanbul, Turkey: Sümer Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (2000). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks, 21, 375-395. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00019-2 google scholar
  • Bozkurt, Y., & Bayansar, R. (2016). Yeni toplumsal hareketler çerçevesinde çevreci hareket ve gezi parkı olayları. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(2), 276-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.11611/JMER178655 google scholar
  • Bruns, A., Highfield, T., & Burgess, J. (2013). The Arab spring and social media audiences English and Arabic twitter users and their networks. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 871–898. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0002764213479374 google scholar
  • Brym, R., Godbout, M., Hoffbauer, A., Menard, G., & Zhang, T. H. (2014). Social media in the 2011 Egyptian uprising. The British Journal of Sociology, 65, 266–292. google scholar
  • Çakır, S. Y. (2017). Sosyal medyada dijital aktivist hareketler üzerine kuramsal bir inceleme. E-GİFDER, 5(2), 753783. http://dx.doi.org/10.19145/e-gifder.303261 google scholar
  • Calvet-Mir, L., Maestre-Andrés, S., Molina J. L., & van den Bergh. J. (2015). Participation in protected areas: A social network case study in Catalonia, Spain. Ecology and Society, 20(4), 45. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES07989-200445 google scholar
  • Carty, V. (2014). Arab spring in Tunisia and Egypt: The impact of new media on contemporary social movements and challenges for social movement Theory. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 51, 51-80. google scholar
  • Castells, M. (2008). Ağ Toplumunun Yükselisi: Enformasyon Çağı: Ekonomi, Toplum ve Kültür. (E. Kılıç, Trans.). İstanbul, Turkey: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Castells, M. (2015). Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age. Malden, USA: Polity Press. google scholar
  • Ceritli, İ. (2001). Çevreci hareketin siyasallaşma süreci. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25(2), 213-226. google scholar
  • Çımrın, F. K. (2015). Bergama köylü hareketinin dünü ve bugünü. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(53). Retrieved from: http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/70638 google scholar
  • Çoban, B. (2014). Sosyal medya d/ evrimi. In B. Çoban (Ed.) Sosyal medya d/ evrimi (pp. 9- 21). İstanbul, Turkey: Su Yayınları. google scholar
  • Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D. (2015). The rise of Twitter in the political campaign: Searching for intermedia agenda-setting effects in the presidential primary. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 20, 363380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12124 google scholar
  • Diani, M. (1992). The concept of social movements. The Sociological Review, 40(1). http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1992.tb02943.x google scholar
  • Diani, M. (1997). Social movements and social capital: A network perspective on movement outcomes. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 2(2), 129-147. google scholar
  • Doğu, B. (2019). Environment as Politics: Framing the Cerattepe Protest in Twitter. Environmental Communication, 13(5), 617-632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1406384 google scholar
  • Edman, H. (2007). Twittering to the top: A content analysis of corporate tweets to measure organization-public relations. (Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA) Retrieved from: https:// digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/1726 google scholar
  • Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2007). The qualitative content analysis process. JAN Research Methodology, 107-115. google scholar
  • Fuchs, C. (2006). The self-organization of social movements. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 19(1), 101137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11213-005-9006-0 google scholar
  • Furuncu, D. (2014). Yeni Toplumsal Hareketler, Küreselleşme ve Dijital Aktivizm: Gezi Parkı Örneği. (Master’s thesis, Maltepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Radyo, Sinema ve Televizyon Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Turkey) Available from YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi (No. 370345) google scholar
  • Geçkin Onat, S. (2017). Yakınsama kültürü ve online çevreci katılım: Greenpeace, TEMA Vakfı, Karadeniz İsyandadır Platformu Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. Global Media Journal: Turkish Edition, 8(15), 276-304. Retrieved from: http://globalmediajournaltr.yeditepe.edu.tr/sites/default/files/14_semra_geckin_onat.pdf google scholar
  • Gençer, Y. (2016). Sosyal medya ağlarında örgütlenme: Dijital aktivizmin toplumsal dönüşüme yansımaları. Intermedia International e-Journal, 2(3), 505-522. Retrieved from: http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/ intermedia/article/view/5000171193/5000154510 google scholar
  • Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism, London, UK: Pluto Press. google scholar
  • Göktolga, O. (2013). Yeni siyaset ve ekolojik hareketler. Birey ve Toplum Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(1), 127-136. google scholar
  • Graneheim U.H., & Lundman B. (2004) Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105-112. google scholar
  • Gül, S. S., Sezer, M., & Nizam, Ö. K. (2015). Eylemcilerin gözünden bir sosyal hareket ve kent hakkı talebi olarak Taksim Gezi Parkı eylemleri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22, 1-28. google scholar
  • Habermas, J. (1981). New Social Movements. Telos, 49, 33-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.3817/0981049033 google scholar
  • Heaney, M.T., & Rojas, F. (2009). Hybrid Politics: Social Movement Mobilization in a Multi-Movement Environment. Journal of Sociology, 119(4), 1047-1103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/674897 google scholar
  • Hermida, A., Lewis, S. C. & Zamith, R. (2014). Sourcing the Arab Spring: A case study of andy carvin’s sources on Twitter during the Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 479–499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12074 google scholar
  • Herring, S. C., Scheidt, L.A., Kouper, I. & Wright, E. (2007). Longitudinal content analysis of blogs: In M. Tremayne (Ed.), Blogging 2003-2004. Blogging, Citizenship, And The Future Of Media, 3-20. google scholar
  • Hodges, H. E., & Stocking, G. (2016). A pipeline of tweets: Environmental movements’ use of Twitter in response to the Keystone XL pipeline. Environmental Politics, 25, 223-247. google scholar
  • Horuş, M. (2009, April). Türkiye Çevre Hareketi Halklaşırken, Metalürji Mühendisleri Odası Metalürji Dergisi. Retrieved from: http://politeknik.org.tr/site/index.php/polsecmenu/4-cevre/937-tuerkiye-cevre-hareketihalklarken-mehmet-horu.html google scholar
  • Hougaard, S.A. (2017). Tweeting for a Cause: A Content Analysis of Successful Charitable Nonprofits’ Publishing Strategies on Twitter. (Master’s thesis, Brigham Young University College of Fine Arts and Communications, Utah, USA) Retrieved from: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/6274/ google scholar
  • Isa, D., & Himelboim I. (2018). A social networks approach to online social movement: social mediators and mediated content in #freeajstaff Twitter network. Social Media + Society, January-March, 1-14. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/2056305118760807 google scholar
  • Işık, G. (2013). Yeni toplumsal hareketler ve sanal gerçeklik boyutunda gezi parkı eylemleri. Selçuk Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Akademik Dergisi, 8(1), 19-33. google scholar
  • Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 59-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 google scholar
  • Kasap, D. G. (2014). Türkiye Kamu Yönetiminde sosyal Medya Uygulamaları: Demokrasi ve Yurttaş Katılımı Üzerine Bir İnceleme. In B. Çoban (Ed.), Sosyal Medya D/evrimi (pp. 139-153). İstanbul, Turkey: Su Yayınları. google scholar
  • Kavada, A. (2005). Exploring the role of the internet in the “movement for alternative globalization”: The case of the paris 2003 European social forum. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 2(1), 72-95. http:// dx.doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.9 google scholar
  • Kaya, R. (2011). Bir Ekoloji Hareketi Olarak Yeşiller ve Türkiye’de Yeşiller Partisi. Retrieved from: https:// modernwish.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/yesil_dusunce_brosur_dizisi_2ramazan_kaya11.pdf google scholar
  • Kiousis, S. (2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication & Society, 4(4), 381-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0404_4 google scholar
  • Korkmaz, A., Ustakara, F., & Aydın, U. (2018). Dijital aktivizm bağlamında artvin cerattepe olayları üzerine bir içerik analizi. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29, 57-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.31123/akil.459321 google scholar
  • Kuyucu, M. (2014). Çevresel Haber Ortamı Olarak Twitter ve Twitter Gazeteciliği. UHIVE, 2(3), 159-189. google scholar
  • Lamert, K. (2014). Environmental law ngos and social media use: An Analysis of Strategies and Organizational Impacts (Doctoral dissertation, Michigan University, USA) Retrieved from: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/ bitstream/handle/2027.42/107752/katelamb.pdf?sequence=1 google scholar
  • Lipsky, M. (1968). Protest as a political resource. American Political Science Review, 62, 1144-1158. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/1953909 google scholar
  • Littau, J., & Jahng, M. R. (2016). Interactivity, social presence, and journalistic use of Twitter. Faculty Publications. Paper 9. Retrieved from: http://preserve.lehigh.edu/cas-journalism-faculty-publications/9 google scholar
  • Lu, H., & Hsiao, K. (2010). The influence of extro/introversion on the intention to pay for social networking sites. Information & Management, 47, 150-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.01.003 google scholar
  • Melucci, A. (1985) The Symbolic Challenge of Contemporary Movements. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 52(4), 789-816. google scholar
  • Mermer, A. (2016). Yeni Sosyal Hareketler Bağlamında Bergama Mücadelesi (Master’s thesis, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sosyoloji Anablim Dalı, Aydın, Turkey) Retrieved from: http:// adudspace.adu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11607/2813 google scholar
  • Morozov, E. (2007). Activism and New Media. Presentation delivered at “New Media Essentials” summer school of Transitions Online. Retrieved from: https://www.slideshare.net/evgeny.morozov/activism-and-new-mediaintroduction google scholar
  • Morozov, E. (2011). The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York, USA: PublicAffairs. google scholar
  • Ogan, C., & Varol, O. (2017). What is gained and what is left to be done when content analysis is added to network analysis in the study of a social movement: Twitter use during Gezi Park. Information, Communication & Society, 20, 1220–1238. http://dx.doi.org/1369118X.2016.1229006 google scholar
  • OHAL ekolojik mücadeleyi olumsuz etkiledi. (2017, December 30). Dokuz8 Haber. Retrieved from: https:// dokuz8haber.net/ekoloji-cevre/ohal-ekolojik-mucadeleyi-olumsuz-etkiledi/ google scholar
  • Parmelee, J. H. (2013). Political journalists and Twitter: Influences on norms and practices. Journal of Media Practice, 14, 291-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/jmpr.14.4.291_1 google scholar
  • Rootes, C. (1995). The Green Challenge: The Development of Green Parties in Europe. London, UK: Routledge. google scholar
  • Segerberg, A., & Bennett, W. L. (2011). Social media and the organization of collective action: Using twitter to explore the ecologies of two climate change protests. The Communication Review, 14, 197-215. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2011.597250 google scholar
  • Sun, Y., DeLuca, K.M. & Seegert, N. (2017). Exploring environmentalism amidst the clamor of networks: A social network analysis of utah environmental organizations. Environmental Communication A Journal of Nature and Culture, 11(3), 332-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1094101 google scholar
  • Şahin, Ü. (2007). Bir Sivil Toplum Teması Olarak Çevrecilik: Ekoloji Hareketlerinin Siyaset Dışına İtilmesi. Sivil Toplum: Düşünce & Araştırma Dergisi, 5(20), 77-89. google scholar
  • Şahin, Ü. (2010, April 28). Çevre direnişlerinin buluşması. Radikal Gazetesi. Retrieved from: http://www.radikal. com.tr/radikal2/cevre-direnislerinin-bulusmasi-1006210/ google scholar
  • Şen, A. F., & Şen, Y. F. (2016). Online environmental activism in Turkey: The case study of “the right to water”, Global Bioethics, 27(1), 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2015.1137184 google scholar
  • Şengül, M. (2013). Türkiye’nin su politikası ve köylülerin öfkesi. Su kaynaklarının yönetimi: Politikalar ve sorunlar - küreselden yerele panel bildirileri, Nevşehir Üniversitesi İİBF, 29-41, Retrieved from: https://dosyalar.nevsehir. edu.tr/14238761182a7ce8e6e338332dc26e85/su_paneli_bildiri_kitabi.pdf google scholar
  • Şengül, M., Kocatürk, G.A., & Bilgili, F. (2017). Sanal mekanda yerel çevre hareketleri: Türkiye’de HES karşıtı mücadelerler üzerine bir inceleme. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 2183-2207. google scholar
  • Thoreau, D. H. (2016) Sivil İtaatsizlik. (C. Turan, Trans.) Ankara, Turkey: Say Yayınları. google scholar
  • Touraine, A. (1985). An ıntroduction to the study of social movements. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 52(4), 749-787. google scholar
  • Tremayne, M. (2014). Anatomy of protest in the digital era: A network analysis of Twitter and occupy wall street. Social Movement Studies, 13, 110–126. google scholar
  • Turhan, D. G. (2017). Dijital aktivizm. Journal of Suleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, 26(1), 26-44. google scholar
  • Wang, R., Liu, W., & Gao, S. (2016). Hashtags and information virality in networked social movement: Examining hashtag cooccurrence patterns. Online Information Review, 40(7), 850-866. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OIR12-2015-0378 google scholar
  • Yates, L. (2015). Everyday politics, social practices and movement networks: Daily life in Barcelona’s social centres. The British Journal of Sociology, 66, 236–258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12101 google scholar
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013) Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara, Turkey: Seçkin Yayıncılık. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Erkmen, Ö., Arslan, C., Gümüş, B., & Öztürk, İ. (2019). Türkiye’de Ekoloji Hareketlerinin Sınırlı Sosyal Medya Kullanımı: Ekoloji Birliği Twitter Ağı Analizi Örneği. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 0(56), 31-66. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2019-0001


AMA

Erkmen Ö, Arslan C, Gümüş B, Öztürk İ. Türkiye’de Ekoloji Hareketlerinin Sınırlı Sosyal Medya Kullanımı: Ekoloji Birliği Twitter Ağı Analizi Örneği. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences. 2019;0(56):31-66. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2019-0001


ABNT

Erkmen, Ö.; Arslan, C.; Gümüş, B.; Öztürk, İ. Türkiye’de Ekoloji Hareketlerinin Sınırlı Sosyal Medya Kullanımı: Ekoloji Birliği Twitter Ağı Analizi Örneği. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 56, p. 31-66, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Erkmen, Özlem, and Canan Arslan and Burcu Gümüş and İlknur Doğu Öztürk. 2019. “Türkiye’de Ekoloji Hareketlerinin Sınırlı Sosyal Medya Kullanımı: Ekoloji Birliği Twitter Ağı Analizi Örneği.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0, no. 56: 31-66. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2019-0001


Chicago: Humanities Style

Erkmen, Özlem, and Canan Arslan and Burcu Gümüş and İlknur Doğu Öztürk. “Türkiye’de Ekoloji Hareketlerinin Sınırlı Sosyal Medya Kullanımı: Ekoloji Birliği Twitter Ağı Analizi Örneği.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0, no. 56 (Apr. 2024): 31-66. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2019-0001


Harvard: Australian Style

Erkmen, Ö & Arslan, C & Gümüş, B & Öztürk, İ 2019, 'Türkiye’de Ekoloji Hareketlerinin Sınırlı Sosyal Medya Kullanımı: Ekoloji Birliği Twitter Ağı Analizi Örneği', Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, vol. 0, no. 56, pp. 31-66, viewed 28 Apr. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2019-0001


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Erkmen, Ö. and Arslan, C. and Gümüş, B. and Öztürk, İ. (2019) ‘Türkiye’de Ekoloji Hareketlerinin Sınırlı Sosyal Medya Kullanımı: Ekoloji Birliği Twitter Ağı Analizi Örneği’, Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 0(56), pp. 31-66. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2019-0001 (28 Apr. 2024).


MLA

Erkmen, Özlem, and Canan Arslan and Burcu Gümüş and İlknur Doğu Öztürk. “Türkiye’de Ekoloji Hareketlerinin Sınırlı Sosyal Medya Kullanımı: Ekoloji Birliği Twitter Ağı Analizi Örneği.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, vol. 0, no. 56, 2019, pp. 31-66. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2019-0001


Vancouver

Erkmen Ö, Arslan C, Gümüş B, Öztürk İ. Türkiye’de Ekoloji Hareketlerinin Sınırlı Sosyal Medya Kullanımı: Ekoloji Birliği Twitter Ağı Analizi Örneği. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences [Internet]. 28 Apr. 2024 [cited 28 Apr. 2024];0(56):31-66. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2019-0001 doi: 10.26650/CONNECTIST2019-0001


ISNAD

Erkmen, Özlem - Arslan, Canan - Gümüş, Burcu - Öztürk, İlknur Doğu. “Türkiye’de Ekoloji Hareketlerinin Sınırlı Sosyal Medya Kullanımı: Ekoloji Birliği Twitter Ağı Analizi Örneği”. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0/56 (Apr. 2024): 31-66. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2019-0001



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim07.01.2019
Kabul17.05.2019

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.