Anne

Assist. Prof.

Community Translation and Interpretation Services in Settlement  Agencies: Perspectives from Translators and Interpreters in New  Brunswick, Canada

Aslı

Assist. Prof. Dr.

Türkiye’de Artan Toplum Çevirmenliği İhtiyaçları Bağlamında Çevirmenin Rolüne İlişkin Öğrenci Görüşleri

Yelda

The paradigm shift, which can generally be attributed to a "social turn" in translation studies, has led to the increased integration of methodological and theoretical approaches from various disciplines such as communication studies, psychology, sociology, and cultural studies. These approaches have signiﬁcantly enriched interpreting research by advancing the scholarly debate by introducing new perspectives. Consequently, these theoretical and methodological inquiries imply the need to re-examine the relevance of interpreter-mediated interactions in various social and cultural contexts and analyse them from a sociological interactional approach.This paper aims to descriptively demonstrate the extent to which the interactional sociological approach of the inter- action order, as proposed by American sociologist Erving Goﬀman, intersects with interpreter-mediated interactions in community interpreting. At the core of this study is the phenomenon of "face-to-face interaction," with a focus on social structures and individual actions within a social situation or setting.To provide an understanding of the application of Goﬀman’s interaction order, a summary of his approaches to the analysis of interactions in speciﬁc situations is presented. Goﬀman seeks to describe both the regularities and disruptions that emerge from the situation in which actors are in a reciprocal relationship. The actors involved in the interaction process can draw upon diﬀerent evaluations when assessing the given social situation, despite established norms and explicit expectations. Since much of Goﬀman’s work is based on theoretical statements about the interactional order, this paper does not highlight speciﬁc studies by Goﬀman. Instead, it incorporates the analysis of the interactional order according to Goﬀman to show how this analysis can be integrated into the dynamic interaction process of community interpretation. As such, the terms situation, institution, and interaction, which are embedded both in the concept of the interactional order and in interpreter-mediated interaction, are explained.It is important to emphasise the relevance of the actions of all actors involved in interpreter-mediated communication in public institutions, who operate within the tension between diﬀerent goals and expectations and are inﬂuenced by institutional contextual conditions. A perspective on interpreter-mediated interaction that focuses solely on the cognitive, linear, communicative, or linguistic dimension would fail to capture the fundamental importance of human communication.Goﬀman’s eﬀort to investigate face-to-face communication in a social situation by examining the mutual inﬂuence of actors on their actions is also a fundamental part of interpreting research. Interpreting is not only accepted as linguistic and cultural mediation, but the interpreter, as a social individual, comes to the fore of empirical studies due to their "allegedly" socially determined role, value and normative perceptions, and social competence in maintaining the ﬂow of conversation.In conclusion, the insights into face-to-face interaction from Goﬀman’s interactional sociological perspective reveal commonalities with the conceptualisation of interpreter-mediated interaction in community interpreting. These points of connection can help to better understand the complex socio-institutional framework surrounding the interpreting process and to analyse its eﬀects on the involved actors from a new perspective. Moreover, it is emphasised that in a speciﬁc situation, it is the participants themselves who (re)negotiate and continuously reshape the communicative structure. This establishes a relevant reference point for a more in-depth focus on the overall situation in the interpreting process, with an emphasis on the mutual involvement of the actors—thus, the co-construction of social reality—by incorporating both linguistic and nonverbal cues in a key interaction. This underscores the importance of ﬁeld studies, which provide detailed insights into the natural behaviour of participants in their respective social situations.

Goﬀman’ın Etkileşim Düzeni ile Toplum Çevirmenliğinde Sözlü Çeviri Etkileşimi Arasındaki Benzerlikler

Filiz

Rana

This study focuses on the stress management and self-care needs of interpreters in disaster and crisis settings and addresses the unique challenges they face during these times. In disasters and crises, interpreters must cope with heavy psychological and emotional burdens while struggling with linguistic and cultural barriers. Compared to other forms of community interpreting, disaster and crisis interpreting is a highly resilient process in a much more complex and uncertain ﬁeld. While other types of community interpreting (e.g. court, health, etc.) usually work in more institutionalised and structured settings, interpreters working in disaster and crisis settings must make decisions more quickly, take on multifaceted roles, and demonstrate physical and mental resilience.Disaster interpreting is not just about language. These interpreters serve as cultural bridges and connect local communities with international teams, facilitating coordination by swiftly and eﬀectively transferring information during crises. The work of the Emergency and Disaster Interpreters Organisation (ARÇ) is a testament. Established after the 1999 Marmara Earthquake, ARÇ’s mission is to break down language barriers in times of disaster and crisis by training volunteer interpreters. Following the February 6, 2023, earthquakes, ARÇ played a pivotal role in the initial days of the disaster and crisis, providing language support to international search and rescue teams and aiding in the rapid resolution of linguistic and cultural barriers.According to the survey results, disaster and crisis interpreters face language barriers, cultural diﬀerences, long working hours and the inability to take breaks. The inability to rest and the emotional burden of working in disaster settings strain interpreters’ resilience. The survey results revealed that many interpreters felt stress, helplessness and fatigue while on assignment. Disaster interpreters work under much more intense stress than community interpreters and are at a higher risk of burnout. According to the survey results, a signiﬁcant number of interpreters experienced psychological eﬀects such as guilt, extreme fatigue and emotional breakdown while returning to their social and professional lives after the disaster.With their challenges, disaster and crisis interpreters must prioritise self-care strategies. Practises like meditation, breathing exercises, regular breaks, healthy eating, and social support are instrumental in preserving the psychological well-being of the interpreters. The stressful and uncertain nature of disaster and crisis interpretation necessitates adopting such strategies. Increasing training and establishing psychological support systems for interpreters, particularly before disasters, can signiﬁcantly enhance their preparedness for these demanding roles. This study also underscores the importance of comprehensive training for interpreters before disasters and crises. The survey results reveal that most interpreters need adequate pre-disaster training, leading them to take responsibility for disaster areas unprepared. This lack of preparation can signiﬁcantly hinder their ability to cope with the challenges they face during a crisis. Developing and implementing training programmes for disaster interpreters can improve communication during crises and enhance interpreters’ psychological resilience.Coordination is also crucial for interpreters to fulﬁl their duties eﬀectively during disasters. While communicating between local people/teams and international aid organisations, interpreters actively participate in rapid decision- making processes. The survey results reveal that interpreters need help overcome cultural and linguistic diﬀerences between foreign teams and local communities, which makes coordination diﬃcult. In addition, factors such as lack of breaks, long task hours, and uncertainty during the task increase interpreters’ emotional burden and show that they need more support and guidance during these processes.In the aftermath of the disaster, access to psychological support is crucial for translators to return to their social and professional lives. According to the survey results, many interpreters found it challenging to return to their social and professional lives after the disaster and experienced symptoms such as extreme fatigue, anger, and depression.Therefore, providing psychological support to disaster interpreters after the crisis is critical in mitigating such adverse eﬀects. However, the survey results show that many interpreters do not have access to this support and try to cope only with the support of family and friends.In conclusion, disaster and crisis interpreting diﬀers from community interpreting in requiring multifaceted roles under uncertainty and intense stress. Beyond linguistic mediation, disaster and crisis interpreters must undertake crisis management and coordination tasks. This process severely strains the psychological and physical resilience of the interpreters. Adopting and disseminating self-care strategies in disaster and crisis interpreting will enable interpreters to fulﬁl their duties with less impact from these challenging processes. Among the main ﬁndings of this study are the importance of pre-disaster training, eﬀective coordination during the disaster process, and psychological support after the disaster.

Afet ve Kriz Çevirmenliğinde Stres Faktörleri ve Öz Bakım İhtiyacı

Gizem

Res. Assist.

Prof. Dr.

Türkiye’de Toplum Çevirmenliği Eğitimi: Akademisyen ve Çevirmen Görüşlerine Dayalı Bir Çalışma

Özge

Children of migrant families are often the quickest family members who learn the language and the social and cultural norms of the host country. Thus, they often perform interpreting tasks for their families in diﬀerent contexts shortly after migration. Children undertake the interpreting task for both interacting with local people and completing oﬃcial procedures as soon as they acquire the language of the host country. In this regard, child language brokers play a role in facilitating communication at the language level and in fostering interaction between minority and host cultures.Child language brokering, a phenomenon usually studied in the context of immigrant/refugee communities, can be deﬁned as a form of non-professional community interpreting. However, it has yet to be addressed as an independent research area within the ﬁeld of translation studies in Türkiye. Although it has been examined from the perspectives of educational science and developmental psychology for many years, child language brokering is fundamentally an interpreting activity that awaits the attention of translation studies. Besides, the current literature hosting a copious body of research represents only limited geography, ethnic groups, and languages. Considering that the social context is the most important factor in determining the ﬁndings related to child language brokering, further research is needed from more countries, migrant groups, and language pairs.To the best knowledge of the researcher, child language brokering has not been studied within the scope of Türkiye, despite the ever-increasing refugee population in the country recently. This study aims to explore the phenomenon of child language brokering, which has been addressed by various disciplines for years in countries with high levels of migration, within the context of migrant/refugee communities in Türkiye.This study seeks answers to the following research questions: 1) In which settings and why do migrant/refugee communities need child language brokering in Türkiye? 2) What are the impacts of language brokering on former child language brokers from migrant/refugee communities?As this research aims to analyse a current phenomenon in depth, a case study design was implemented among the qualitative research methods. Retrospective semi-structured interviews were conducted with six participants aged 18-21 who migrated to Türkiye from diﬀerent countries and engaged in language brokering activities for their families during their childhood. To ensure the competency of the participants in the Turkish language, which is set to be the interview language, and the cognitive ability of self-expression and of comprehending abstract concepts such as minority language, migrant rights, and identity, the study’s participation criteria included completion of high school education in Türkiye. Additionally, to ensure socioeconomic homogeneity among the participants, graduates of a selected state high school in the Mamak district of Ankara province were invited to participate in the study. The interview included 24 open-ended questions.The interviews were held online through the Zoom platform, and the average duration of the interviews was 35 min. The data were transcribed and subjected to thematic analysis using MaxQda 2024 software. Accordingly, a total of 480 codes were obtained and these codes are discussed and presented under ﬁve main themes, namely primary language brokering, brokering settings, interpreter role, ethics and responsibility, contributions of brokering, and feelings. The ﬁndings are expected to shed light on the brokering settings in Türkiye where child language brokering is most needed, the concept of primary language broker, and the feelings and contributions perceived by child language brokers regarding their brokering activities and the responsibilities they undertake.The main limitation of this study is its reliance on the self-reported data of the participants. Further studies are needed to follow the same participants for a certain period and/or observe child language brokers during their brokering activities.&nbsp;

Türkiye’de Göçmen/Mülteci Topluluklarında Çocuk Dil Aracılığı

Gülfer

Olcay

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) reports that 117,3 million people are forcibly displaced worldwide due to various factors, such as war and persecution, as of 2024. Among these, 73% come from countries like Afghanistan, Syria, Venezuela, Ukraine, and South Sudan. Türkiye is one of the leading countries hosting refugees, with approximately 4,4 million foreigners legally residing in the country as of August 2024. Despite Türkiye’s legal provisions enabling access to services, including free interpreting services, studies reveal that many refugees still face signiﬁcant barriers to accessing public services. Language barriers, for instance, prevent them from being aware of the services oﬀered in areas such as healthcare, education, and legal procedures (Şan &amp; Koçlu, 2018) and from making doctor appointments (AIDA, 2018). They also face diﬃculties in educational settings due to the fact that the classes are held in Turkish and the lack of catch-up classes for newly arrived students (AIDA, 2018). Furthermore, they experience discrimination, which forces them to abandon their education (Sever, 2020, s.2). Another signiﬁcant diﬃculty is encountered in accessing professional interpreters. Even though SGDD-ASAM employs approximately 60 interpreters, and since 2017, the UNHCR has been providing interpreter support, it has been revealed that there are challenges in accessing professional interpreters, especially in smaller provinces. As a result, individuals registered as asylum seekers (AIDA, 2018), those with a refugee background (Erdoğan, 2021, s. 142; Polat Ulaş, 2021, s. 150) or bilingual staﬀ working in Provincial Migration Administration Oﬃces act as an interpreter (Doğan, 2017, s.246), which leads to the violation of conﬁdentiality and negatively impacts the quality of the interpreting service provided (AIDA, 2018).Taking into consideration all these challenges, it is an undeniable fact that there is a need to raise awareness and develop an inclusive translation policy for individuals speaking diﬀerent languages to access quality services in Türkiye. Thus, this study aims to promote social innovation initiatives in Türkiye by discussing good practises that facilitate refugees’ access to quality services through translation and interpreting in Europe. With this aim in mind, the study seeks to identify the challenges faced by refugees living in various countries in Europe in accessing public services in education, healthcare, asylum and legal aid. It will then present a good practise initiative in Europe with the framework developed in accordance with the challenges detected and general good practise criteria.To support the study, a comprehensive literature review was conducted, analysing 182 academic articles, reports, and case documents published from the early 1990s to September 2024. From these, 128 data sources that aligned with the research objectives were selected for detailed analysis. The study used sources from various international organisations, including the UNHCR, IOM, EU, OSCE, and EUAA, as well as databases such as Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, PubMed, and Migration Hub.According to the ﬁndings, there are three main challenges that refugees face in Europe: 1) Access to information, 2) Availability of qualiﬁed interpreters, and 3) Collaboration problems. The data revealed that many refugees lack knowledge of their rights and the services available to them. They often rely on friends and informal networks for information, which may not always be accurate or accessible. This gap leads to increased vulnerability and miscommunication. Another challenge lies in the availability of qualiﬁed interpreters. A shortage of interpreters proﬁcient in rare languages creates barriers to accessing services. Financial constraints further limit the availability of professional interpreting services, forcing refugees to rely on untrained individuals. On the other hand, service providers and refugees often underestimate the role of professional interpreters, leading to ineﬀective communication and reliance on ad hoc interpreters, such as family members and friends, which can compromise the quality and conﬁdentiality of the information shared.Based on all these challenges, evaluation criteria of good practises consisting of 3 main criteria and 14 sub-criteria were developed, and the ‘Migrant-Friendly Hospitals’ project was selected as a case for this study. The ‘Migrant Friendly Hospitals’ project was analysed in terms of providing professional interpreters, including in rare spoken languages, organising training to enhance collaboration between parties, improving the quality of service, including interpreting service by raising cultural awareness and establishing quality control mechanisms for good practises.

Mültecilerin Temel Hizmetlere Erişiminde İletişim Engelleri ve Mülteci Çevirmenliğinde İyi Uygulama Pratikleri

Burak

Basın Toplantılarında Sözlü Çevirmenin (Ön-)Müzakere Edimlerinin Söylemsel Çözümlemesi: Spor Bağlamından İçgörüler

Nazan

Assoc. Prof. Dr.

Ensa

The establishment of the National Vocational Qualiﬁcations System is regulated by the Vocational Qualiﬁcations Authority in Turkey. The overriding concern of the National Vocational Qualiﬁcations System, which is linked to the European Qualiﬁcations Framework for Lifelong Learning (EQF-LLL), is to establish national occupational standards and occupational qualiﬁcations, which will enable the development of a stronger connection and cooperation based on shared learning outcomes between education and employment. The Council of Higher Education has initiated the strategy of internalization as of 2017. In line with this strategy and the Bologna Process, a stronger cooperation between the Vocational Qualiﬁcations Authority and Council of Higher Education is required for the eﬀective implementation of shared goals and action plans. The EQF-LLL plays a prominent role in the classiﬁcation of competences and learning outcomes in all types of learning environments, enabling the establishment of national and regional frameworks. In connection with the EQF-LLL, Turkey has developed the National Qualiﬁcations Framework and the National Qualiﬁcations Framework for Higher Education, speciﬁcally for the adoption of qualiﬁcations encompassing higher education, which paved the way for the establishment of national occupational standards and qualiﬁcations.As occupational standards explicate the required knowledge, skills, and attitudes practitioners of an occupation are expected to adopt, utilization of occupational standards in education programs is of paramount importance to reach the main (and shared) goals of the EQF-LLL and the National Vocational Qualiﬁcations System. Translation profession was incorporated into the National Vocational Qualiﬁcations System in 2011, and the National Occupational Standard for Translator and Interpreter [NOSTI (Level 6)] was ﬁrst published on the Oﬃcial Gazette in 2013. It was revised in 2020. This study aims to identify the inclusion of NOSTI in translation and interpreting undergraduate programs in Turkey with a focus on the content analysis of course structure diagrams and course details of these departments. As an instance of qualitative research methods, document analysis is used to explore to what extent NOSTI is integrated in the courses oﬀered in translation and interpreting departments.The document analysis has revealed that 98 undergraduate programs oﬀer translation and interpreting education in several language pairs (Turkish-English, Turkish-German, Turkish-French, Turkish-English&amp;French, Turkish-Arabic, Turkish-Russian, Turkish-Bulgarian, Turkish-Chinese, Turkish-Persian, and Turkish-Japan) in Turkey1. The results demonstrate that only 13 programs oﬀer courses covering NOSTI, and NOSTI is mostly included in translation and interpreting departments giving education in Turkish-English language pair, which corresponds to 8 out of 13 programs.The majority of the undergraduate programs present NOSTI to future translators and interpreters in compulsory courses. 10 out of 14 courses covering NOSTI are compulsory whereas 4 courses are enlisted as elective courses in course structure diagrams. These courses are predominantly oﬀered in the third year, in the sixth and/or ﬁfth semesters, followed by the seventh, eight, and second semesters, respectively. The analysis concerning the inclusion of NOSTI within course details shows that NOSTI is mainly involved in the “weekly course outline/syllabus” (10 out of 14 courses). In 5 of these 10 courses, “weekly course outline/syllabus” is the only part of the course details NOSTI is mentioned while the remaining 5 courses involve NOSTI in the “course content” in addition to the “weekly outline/syllabus”. Furthermore, in 2 of the 14 courses, NOSTI is merely included in the “course content”. The last category encompasses the combination of “course content” and “learning outcomes”; that is, NOSTI is declared to be taught both in the “course content” and “learning outcomes” in 2 out of 14 courses.To be well-equipped for today’s dynamic and multifaceted workplace, translator and interpreter candidates are expected to acquire a set of sub-competences and skills, including but not limited to language and culture, thematic and domain, translation, research and technology, translation service provision, and personal and interpersonal skills throughout their academic education2. These competence proﬁles, regarded as key reference standards for translation and interpreting (and language) industry, are meant to enhance the employability of translation and interpreting graduates. NOSTI delineates occupational duties and tasks accompanied by performance criteria, along with required professional knowledge and applied skills (to maintain these duties and tasks). As a result, integrating NOSTI into academic education and informing future translators and interpreters about expected occupational duties and tasks will help improve their conceptualization of essential aspects of translation and interpreting profession. Besides, NOSTI can serve an eﬀective reference tool for academic circles in the design of curriculum and course details to facilitate the establishment of a stronger cooperation between learning outcomes in translation and interpreting education and the needs and expectations of translation and interpreting industry.

Çevirmen (Seviye 6) Ulusal Meslek Standardı’nın Mütercim ve Tercümanlık Bölümlerinin Öğretim Programlarındaki Yeri: Çevirmen Adaylarını Standart ile Tanıştırıyor Muyuz?

Didem

The stranglehold of sexism and violence entangled in women’s lives as an extension of discrimination has overflowed from reality into fiction and leaked into literary works, and while taking over all times and spaces, it has been translated and spread time and again with its different cultural versions. The signs that construct representations of inequality in literary works are so integrated into the flow that in many cases they become almost unnoticeable due to excessive ordinarization. On the other hand, in many of the literary texts written earlier, when feminist criticism was not fully directed towards fact and fiction, there is a blatant overtness in terms of signs of violence that are now relatively implicit. American author O. Henry’s story "A Harlem Tragedy" remains an extreme case, where physical violence is clearly normalised by the female characters and even treated as a matter of envy and pride. Moreover, different forms of violence, such as silent treatment, deprivation, impoverishment, and servitude, are frequently interspersed in the story in normalised forms. In addition, the clichés such as women being pitted against each other are reproduced through the female character’s attempt to make another woman experience the trauma she herself has gone through. In this study, the ways in which the signs of discrimination and violence are translated into Turkish are analysed through published translations by Nuri Eren (1945), Mehmet Harmancı (1954), and Erol Esençay (1983) as well as through outputs obtained from DeepL, and the attitude of human translators towards these signs is compared with the attitude of the artificial translator. In these evaluations, the signs created by human and artificial translators are handled on the basis of overinterpretation of meaning, underinterpretation of meaning, darkening of the meaning, sliding of the meaning, alteration of the meaning, opposition of the meaning, perversion of the meaning, destruction of the meaning, and wiping out of the meaning as defined by Sündüz Öztürk Kasar within the context of Systematics of Designification in Translation (2021, 28). On the other hand, the extent to which these signs, as well as the Harlem dialect, slang, and invective discourses, are reflected in the target texts as complementary to the context, is discussed through different levels of meaning transformations and cause-effect relationality, and the extent to which the need for post-editing may vary based on the human or artificial translator factor is evaluated. As a result of the comparative analyses, the following conclusions are drawn from the study:• Meaning transformations are observed in both human and artificial translators’ texts. • In human translators’ texts, the transformations usually remain within the field of the meaning or peri-meaning. • In the case of the artificial translator, there are usually no over-interpretations due to the excess of signs or no wiping-out of the meaning due to the absence of signs. • As a result of word-for-word translation, slang and idioms are relatively less reflected in the artificial translator’s text. • In cases where human translators do not translate the idiom as an idiom, they still manage to convey the meaning despite under-interpretations caused by not following the style. • Situations in which human translators fail to convey the non-standard language can be attributed to their decisions, whereas instances in which they fail to account for idiom and slang usage might be related to inadequate analysis. • The intervention of the human translator seems to be essential to bring the translation output of the artificial translator into a coherent and consistent form in terms of expression, fluency, and style.• Even if the solutions it provides need post-editing, the artificial translator can help expedite the translation process by displaying a draft of the target text on the screen and providing ideas. • Since the artificial translator lacks the ability to analyse and understand the literary text, it does not yet seem possible for it to fully function efficiently on its own. • Using the artificial translator in literary translation seems to be possible only with the human translator’s critical approach and post-editing intervention. Finally, the analysis of the meaning transformations carried out through a feminist reading from the perspective of semiotics of translation within the scope of this study goes beyond words or signs; the transformations turn out to be factual in the case of gender discrimination and violence discourses, invading the literary text in particular and women’s lives in general.

Cinsiyet Ayrımcılığı ve Şiddet Göstergeleri Karşısında (Yapay) Çevirmenin Tutumu

Cihan

Sansür mü, yoksa Kuirleştirme mi? Türkiye’de South Park’ın TV Altyazı Çevirisi

Dilruba

Mehmet

Assoc. Prof.

Atalay

Türkiye’de Yerelleştirme Literatürünün Konumu (1998-2024)

Yerelleştirme Alanına İlişkin Geleceğin Kilidini Açmak: Son Teknoloji Bir Ders Programında İnsan Uzmanlığı ve Yapay Zekânın Birleşimi

Burcu

Sema

During recent years, the growing popularity and widespread use of artificial intelligence (AI) software have been the subject of research. The responses generated by AI systems like ChatGPT vary based on factors such as the time, location, phrasing of the prompt, and the politeness level of the language used. As a part of this research, graduate theses and scientific research articles on AI and news translations are analysed. Then, the AI system ChatGPT-4o, which generated news text about the recent events between Palestine and Israel, was instructed to frame the text from both a pro-Palestinian and a pro-Israeli perspective and to translate the text into Turkish and English. After obtaining the news texts and translations, the researchers conducted an interview with ChatGPT-4o about the news text generation and translation processes. The study aimed to perform a descriptive content analysis to examine the extent to which open-source AI software can produce biassed or unbiased text and translations. ChatGPT-4o’s ability to provide accurate information, generate impartial texts, and perform ideological translations, leading to broader inferences, was assessed. In the research, news texts produced by the AI tool ChatGPT4o were then translated into the target language in two different ways by the same AI tool. The translations were then subjected to content analysis. The research questions addressed were as follows: “Why do news consumers produce news texts with artificial intelligence?, To what extent is it possible for news consumers to produce news texts with artificial intelligence?, How feasible is the translation of AI-generated news texts into different types (neutral, biassed, and opposing)?, What is the process for producing and translating AI-generated news texts?”. This research focuses on the AI-supported production of news texts and their subsequent translation by the same AI software, examining the data obtained from ChatGPT-4o. In the literature review section, theses and the scientific research articles on AI and news translation in Turkey were reviewed using keywords such as AI and translation, AI and news translation, AI and journalism, robo-journalism, and robot journalism. The graduate theses were reviewed from 2004 to 2024. The scientific research articles reviewed between 2017 and 2024. Although derivatives and applications of artificial intelligence have been used for many years, it has only recently been referred to by these terms. Therefore, the limited number of comprehensive studies at the master’s or doctoral level is not surprising. Overall, producing news texts with artificial intelligence offers advantages in terms of convenience, speed, time, and efficiency. Additionally, automatic content generation, analysis of extensive data, personalised content production, language and translation services, writing and editing, post-editing, access to and coverage of research topics and sources, and consequently, cost savings are seen as beneficial. However, ensuring that all these benefits are obtained without violating any standards is essential. Ethical issues such as plagiarism or inappropriate content generation must be monitored. While gaining advantages in speed, time, and cost, it is crucial not to fall short on ethical considerations while using AI software. Therefore, future studies might explore the use of AI software for news text production and publication by news agencies and social media channels in terms of translation ethics and professional ethics. Finally, in potential further studies, the similarities and differences in texts produced by ChatGPT on different dates and times with the same input commands could be examined using content analysis. Another study may explore the place of AI in news text production and translation within academic translation education, and possible educational packages or course contents and models may be organised.

Yapay Zeka Destekli Haber Metni Üretimi Ve Çevirilerinin Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analizi: Chatgpt-4o Örneği

Arsun

Prof.

About The Manuscript Submission

The Community Interpreter’s Role: Students’ Perceptions in the Context of  Growing Needs in Türkiye

Parallels Between Goﬀman’s Interaction Order and Interpreting Interaction in Community Interpreting

Stress Factors and Self-Care Needs in Disaster and Crisis Interpreting

Community Interpreting Training in Türkiye: A Study Based on the Views of Academics and Interpreters

Child Language Brokering Among Migrant/Refugee Communities in Türkiye

Communication Barriers in Refugees’ Access to Public Services and Good Practices in Refugee Interpreting

Discursive Analysis of (pre-) Negotiation Behaviour in Mediated Press Conferences: Insights from the Sports Context

The Incorporation of the National Occupational Standard for Translator/Interpreter (Level 6) into the Course Structure Diagrams of Translation and Interpreting Departments: Are Future Translators and Interpreters Informed about the Standard?

Attitude of the (Artificial) Translator towards Signs of Gender Discrimination and Violence

Censoring or Queering? TV-Subtitling of South Park in Türkiye

The Position of Localization Literature (1998-2024) in Türkiye

Unlocking the Future of Localisation: A Fusion of Human Expertise and Artificial Intelligence in a Cutting-Edge Syllabus

Comparative Analysis of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted News Text Generation and Translations: The Case of Chatgpt4o

@JOURNAL_BOX_CURRENT

@JOURNAL_BOX_EARLYVIEW

Hossein

Armin

Amir

TRANSLATION CREATIVITY: ANALYZING THE DEGREE OF USING CREATIVE STRATEGIES IN TRANSLATING IRANIAN TOURISM WEBSITES AND BROCHURES

@JOURNAL_BOX_FEATURED

Yeşim

ON THE ACQUISITION OF CULTURAL COMPETENCE IN TRANSLATOR TRAINING

@JOURNAL_BOX_MOSTREAD

Istanbul University Journal of Translation Studies - İstanbul Üniversitesi Çeviribilim Dergisi, which is the official publication of Istanbul University, Faculty of Letters is an open access, peer-reviewed, multilingual, scholarly and international journal published two times a year in May and November. It was founded in 2001. The print version of the journal has been stopped as of 2022; the publication continues as an electronic only journal.

EBSCO

ERIH PLUS

TR Dizin

DOAJ

SOBIAD

Gale Cengage

@METRIC_VOLUMES

@METRIC_ISSUES

@METRIC_ARTICLES

@METRIC_OPENACCESS

Istanbul University Journal of Translation Studies

@INFO_TAB_ABOUT

Editor in Chief

Co Editor in Chief

Ethics Editor

Language Editor

Editorial Board Member

@INFO_TAB_BOARDS

Harking back to regional translation as a phenomenon which derives from the relations between not only the East and West but also the North and South, it intends to deal with the rich heritage in the light of the contemporary theories of translation studies and thereby enrich the international cultural mosaic of the world by adding to it her own authentic colours. Accordingly, it aims at functioning as a means of transferring knowledge from the rich translation experience of Turkey and her neighbourhood to the international arena instead of importing knowledge from international journals. Considering the current trend of the hegemony of English in international journals as well as the close relationship of “translation” with language and culture, it deliberately prefers to stay away from monolingualism and adopts the policy of multilingualism by making use of such languages as Turkish, English, German and French. Within the framework of its principles, it abides by the main terms of scientificity listed as follows: originality, clarity, systematicity, empricity as well as its potential to address the universal academic environment.The journal mainly covers the areas of Comparative Translation Studies, Translation Theory, Ethics of Translation, Translation Criticism, Translator Training, History of Translation, Professionalism, Information Technologies, Domain-specific Translation and Interdisciplinary Studies on translations.It is also open to translation-oriented studies which deal with comparative cultural and literary studies. The journal includes research articles, review articles, reviews of books and notices of translation activities.

Aim and Scope

TR IndexDOAJEBSCO Humanities SourceEBCSO Central &amp; Eastern European Academic SourceSOBİADERIH PLUS<a href="https://go.gale.com/ps/dispAdvSearch.do?userGroupName=anon~84c5a0c7&amp;prodId=AONE" target="_blank">Gale Cengage</a>

Indexing and Abstracting

The journal is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and pays regard to Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing published by the <a href="https://publicationethics.org/" target="_blank">Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)</a>, the <a href="https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/#principles-of-transparency-and-best-practice-in-scholarly-publishing" target="_blank">Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)</a>, the <a href="https://oaspa.org/" target="_blank">Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA)</a>, and the <a href="https://www.wame.org/" target="_blank">World Association of Medical Editors (WAME)</a> on <a href="https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing" target="_blank">https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing</a> The subjects covered in the manuscripts submitted to the Journal for publication must be in accordance with the aim and scope of the Journal. Only those manuscripts approved by every individual author and that were not published before in or sent to another journal, are accepted for evaluation.Changing the name of an author (omission, addition or order) in papers submitted to the Journal requires written permission of all declared authors.Plagiarism, duplication, fraud authorship/denied authorship, research/data fabrication, salami slicing/salami publication, breaching of copyrights, prevailing conflict of interest are unethical behaviors. All manuscripts not in accordance with the accepted ethical standards will be removed from the publication. This also contains any possible malpractice discovered after the publication. Plagiarism Submitted manuscripts that pass preliminary control are scanned for plagiarism using iThenticate software. If plagiarism/self-plagiarism will be found authors will be informed. Editors may resubmit manuscript for similarity check at any peer-review or production stage if required. High similarity scores may lead to rejection of a manuscript before and even after acceptance. Depending on the type of article and the percentage of similarity score taken from each article, the overall similarity score is generally expected to be less than 15 or 20%. Double Blind Peer-Review After plagiarism check, the eligible ones are evaluated by the editors-in-chief for their originality, methodology, the importance of the subject covered and compliance with the journal scope. The editor provides a fair double-blind peer review of the submitted articles and hands over the papers matching the formal rules to at least two national/international referees for evaluation and gives green light for publication upon modification by the authors in accordance with the referees’ claims.

Policies

The journal is an open access journal and all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Except for commercial purposes, users are allowed to read, download, copy, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the <a href="https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read" target="_blank">BOAI</a> definition of open access.The open access articles in the journal are licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en" target="_blank">CC BY-NC 4.0</a>) license.

All expenses of the journal are covered by the Istanbul University. Processing and publication are free of charge with the journal. There is no article processing charges or submission fees for any submitted or accepted articles.

Authors publishing with the journal retain the copyright to their work licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" target="_blank">CC BY-NC 4.0</a>) (<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" target="_blank">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</a> ) and grant the Publisher non-exclusive commercial right to publish the work. CC BY-NC 4.0 license permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Editor should consider publishing correction if minor errors that do not effect the results, interpretations and conclusions of the published paper are detected. Editor should consider retraction if major errors and/or misconduction that invalidate results and conclusions are detected.Editor should consider issuing an expression of concern if there is evidence of research or publication misconduct by the authors; there is evidence that the findings are not reliable and institutions of the authors do not investigate the case or the possible investigation seems to be unfair or nonconclusive. The guidelines of <a href="https://publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts/complete-set-english" target="_blank">COPE</a> and <a href="https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/" target="_blank">ICJME </a>are taken into consideration regarding correction, retractions or expression of concern.RetractionJournal follows <a href="https://publicationethics.org/sites/default/files/retraction-guidelines-cope.pdf" target="_blank">COPE’s Retraction Guidelines</a> in case of retraction. The editor has the right to retract an article if: <ul><li>There is clear evidence that the findings are unreliable; either as a result of a major error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error), or as a result of fabrication (e.g. of data) or falsification (e.g. image manipulation).</li><li>It contains plagiarised content. </li><li>It has been published elsewhere without proper attribution. </li><li>It contains material or data without authorisation for use.</li><li>There is copyright infringement or there is some other serious legal issue.</li><li>It reports unethical research. </li><li>There is evidence that the peer-review process is compromised or manipulated.</li><li>The author(s) failed to disclose a significant competing interest (also known as a conflict of interest) that, in the opinion of the editor, would have unduly influenced the interpretation of the work or the recommendations of the editors and peer reviewers.</li></ul>In case of retraction the following steps are followed:<ul><li>Retraction notice including article title is published in a subsequent issue of the journal. The retraction notice is paginated and listed in the table of contents. </li><li>A link is provided between the retraction notice and the original article in the electronic version. </li><li>The online article is preceded by a page containing the retraction notice; the reader can then proceed to the article itself.</li><li>The original article remains unchanged, except for a watermark on the .pdf on each page stating that it has been &#34;retracted”.</li></ul>Article Removal for Legal ReasonsIn the following circumstances, except the metadata (title and authors), the text of the article is removed and a page informing that the article has been removed for legal reasons replaces the article. <ul><li>The article is found to be defamatory or to infringe the legal rights of others, and retraction is not deemed to be an adequate solution.</li><li>The article has been, or is reasonably likely to be the subject of a court order.</li><li>There is a significant risk to public health. </li></ul>

To guarantee that all papers published in the journal are maintained and permanently accessible, articles are stored in Dergipark which serves as a  national archival web site and at the same time permits LOCKSS to  collect, preserve, and serve the content.Additionally, authors are encouraged to self-archive the final PDF version of their articles in open electronic archives with  that conform to standards of Open Archives Initiative (<a href="https://www.openarchives.org/" target="_blank">https://www.openarchives.org/</a>). Authors should provide a link from the deposited version to the URL of IUPress journal website.

The Artificial Intelligence Policy, prepared in light of developments in artificial intelligence (AI) and practices in scholarly publishing, sets out the editorial and ethical principles that authors, reviewers, and editors should follow when using such technologies. The following sources have been considered in the preparation of the AI policy:Committee on Publication Ethics <a href="https://publicationethics.org/guidance/cope-position/authorship-and-ai-tools" target="_blank">(COPE) - Authorship and AI tools</a>; International Committee of Medical Journal Editors <a href="https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html#four" target="_blank">(ICMJE) - Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology; World Association of Medical Editors  (WAME) Chatbots, Generative AI, and Scholarly Manuscripts</a><a href="https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html#four"></a>AI-assisted technologies (such as large language models [LLMs], chatbots, or image generators) can develop and produce a wide variety of content, including text, images, audio, and synthetic data. When used ethically and safely, these capabilities can increase productivity and foster innovation, but when used without human guidance, they pose risks such as inaccurate and biased results, omissions and errors in citations, deficiencies in protecting privacy and intellectual property rights, and potential violations of authors' and publishers' rights. IUPress adopts the following core principles to avoid these risks in the use of AI:  <ul><li>Details of any AI used in the production of content (including but not limited to text, figures, images, and code) must be declared and clearly explained in the appropriate section of the paper (as an acknowledgement and/or in the methods section). </li><li>No AI tool may be listed as an author in any scientific paper. </li><li>Authors are responsible for the accuracy, completeness, and originality of their work, even if AI is used in any way; they are responsible for the proper referencing and attribution of others' ideas, data, words, or other materials. </li><li>Reviewers and editors must not upload submitted work, in whole or in part, to any generative AI application.</li></ul>In the editorial processes of IUPress publications, tools are available to assist editors in identifying AI-generated content. On the other hand, it is common to use AI tools that provide suggestions for improving and enhancing readability, language, and grammar, and such AI tools can be used in IUPress publications under the supervision of editors and authors.

Artificial Intelligence Policy

<ul><li>Authors are required to declare if they have used AI-assisted technologies (such as large language models [LLMs], chatbots, or image generators) in the creation of their submitted work. </li><li>Authors should explain, both in the cover letter and in the appropriate section of the submitted paper (as a footnote and/or in the methods section), which AI tool and which version of it they have used and for what purpose. </li><li>Authors should also indicate how they used the AI tool and how they assessed the validity of the results obtained using this technology, and what aspects of the paper, manuscript content, data or supporting files were influenced by the use of the AI tool or were generated by AI.</li><li>It is the authors' responsibility to ensure the accuracy, validity and appropriateness of content and citations generated by AI-assisted technologies and to eliminate potential errors, inconsistencies and biased results. </li><li>Authors should always check the original sources to eliminate possible plagiarism, recognising that there is a potential for plagiarism in texts produced with AI-assisted technologies. They should confirm that they have checked and that the sources are original.  </li><li>AI-assisted tools (such as ChatGPT) cannot be listed as authors because they cannot be responsible for the accuracy, integrity, and originality of the work, and these responsibilities are essential to authorship. Therefore, authors are responsible for all material involving the use of AI-assisted technologies. Authors should ensure that all statements in the article that state the hypotheses, interpretations, conclusions, limitations, and implications of the study represent their own opinions.  </li><li>Studies created by authors using AI tools in the following ways, which substitute for the basic researcher's and author's responsibilities, violate the principles of scientific publishing and publication ethics, and such studies are not eligible for inclusion in publications: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Generation of text or code without rigorous review, </li><li>Generation of synthetic data to replace missing data without a robust methodology, </li><li>Creation of any inaccurate, synthetic content, including abstracts or supplementary materials, </li><li>Creation and manipulation of images and figures (pictures, graphs, data tables, medical images, image snippets, computer codes and formulae) or original research data (enhancing, hiding, moving, removing or adding a particular feature within an image or figure) using AI.</li></ul></ul>

It is essential to maintain confidentiality in the peer review process and not to share or use the reviewed work in this process. <a href="https://publicationethics.org/sites/default/files/ethical-guidelines-peer-reviewers-cope.pdf" target="_blank">(COPE – Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers</a>)<ul><li>Reviewers should not upload a manuscript or part of a manuscript submitted to them for review to generative AI tools or large language models to assist in the review, evaluation or decision-making process, as uploading content to such AI tools by reviewers violates the authors' privacy and property rights.  </li><li>Reviewing a scientific paper is a responsibility that can only be undertaken by human beings. The critical thinking and original evaluation required for peer review is beyond the scope of this technology, and there is a risk that the technology will produce inaccurate, incomplete or biased conclusions about the paper. The peer review report and decision letters should reflect the personal assessment of the reviewers and editors of the submitted content. The reviewer is responsible and accountable for the content of his/her report. </li><li>AI tools may be used in a limited way to improve the quality of the language of the peer review report (for translation or language editing) in the context of peer review. If such use is made, the reviewer must declare the use when submitting the report. </li><li>Reviewers who suspect inappropriate or undisclosed use of generative AI in a submission should report their concerns to the editor.</li></ul>

Editors are obliged to ensure that the confidentiality of the manuscripts submitted to the journal is maintained during the evaluation process, and it is essential that the peer-reviewed work is not shared or used outside the parties involved in that process. (COPE - Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors) <a href="https://publicationethics.org/files/Code_of_conduct_for_journal_editors_Mar11.pdf" target="_blank">(COPE – Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors)</a>.<ul><li>Editors should not upload a submitted article, or any part of it, to generative Artificial Intelligence tools or Big Language Models to assist in the review, evaluation or decision-making process, as this may violate authors' privacy and property rights. </li><li>Managing the editorial review of a scientific article implies responsibilities that can only be attributed to humans. Generative AI or AI-assisted technologies should not be used by editors to assist in the evaluation or decision-making process of an article, as the critical thinking and original evaluation required for this task is beyond the scope of this technology and there is a risk that the technology will produce inaccurate, incomplete or biased conclusions about the article. The editor is responsible and accountable for the editorial process, the final decision and its communication to the authors.</li><li>Editors should not use generative AI tools to compose decision letters or abstracts of unpublished research. </li><li>Editors may use generative AI tools to help find appropriate reviewers.</li><li>If editors suspect the use of generative AI in a submitted manuscript or a submitted referee report, they should conduct an editorial review of the matter and consider the policy.</li></ul>

I.U. Journal of Translation Studies is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and pays regard to Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing published by the <a href="https://publicationethics.org/" target="_blank">Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)</a>, the <a href="https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/#principles-of-transparency-and-best-practice-in-scholarly-publishing" target="_blank">Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)</a>, to access the <a href="https://oaspa.org/" target="_blank">Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA)</a>, and the <a href="https://www.wame.org/" target="_blank">World Association of Medical Editors (WAME)</a> on <a href="https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing" style="font-size: 10pt;" target="_blank">https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing</a> All parties involved in the publishing process (Editors, Reviewers, Authors and Publisher) are expected to agree on the following ethical principles.All submissions must be original, unpublished (including as full text in conference proceedings), and not under the review of any other publication synchronously. Each manuscript is reviewed by one of the editors and at least two referees under double-blind peer review process. Plagiarism, duplication, fraud authorship/denied authorship, research/data fabrication, salami slicing/salami publication, breaching of copyrights, prevailing conflict of interest are unnethical behaviors.All manuscripts not in accordance with the accepted ethical standards will be removed from the publication. This also contains any possible malpractice discovered after the publication. In accordance with the code of conduct we will report any cases of suspected plagiarism or duplicate publishing.

Ethics

I.U. Journal of Translation Studies adheres to the highest standards in research ethics and follows the principles of international research ethics as defined below. The authors are responsible for the compliance of the manuscripts with the ethical rules.<ul><li>Principles of integrity, quality and transparency should be sustained in designing the research, reviewing the design and conducting the research.</li><li>The research team and participants should be fully informed about the aim, methods, possible uses and requirements of the research and risks of participation in research.</li><li>The confidentiality of the information provided by the research participants and the confidentiality of the respondents should be ensured. The research should be designed to protect the autonomy and dignity of the participants.</li><li>Research participants should participate in the research voluntarily, not under any coercion.</li><li>Any possible harm to participants must be avoided. The research should be planned in such a way that the participants are not at risk.</li><li>The independence of research must be clear; and any conflict of interest must be disclosed.</li><li>In experimental studies with human subjects, written informed consent of the participants who decide to participate in the research must be obtained. In the case of children and those under wardship or with confirmed insanity, legal custodian’s assent must be obtained.</li><li>If the study is to be carried out in any institution or organization, approval must be obtained from this institution or organization.</li><li>In studies with human subject, it must be noted in the method’s section of the manuscript that the informed consent of the participants and ethics committee approval from the institution where the study has been conducted have been obtained.</li></ul>

It is authors’ responsibility to ensure that the article is in accordance with scientific and ethical standards and rules. And authors must ensure that submitted work is original. They must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere or is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere, in any language. Applicable copyright laws and conventions must be followed. Copyright material (e.g. tables, figures or extensive quotations) must be reproduced only with appropriate permission and acknowledgement. Any work or words of other authors, contributors, or sources must be appropriately credited and referenced.All the authors of a submitted manuscript must have direct scientific and academic contribution to the manuscript. The author(s) of the original research articles is defined as a person who is significantly involved in “conceptualization and design of the study”, “collecting the data”, “analyzing the data”, “writing the manuscript”, “reviewing the manuscript with a critical perspective” and “planning/conducting the study of the manuscript and/or revising it”. Fund raising, data collection or supervision of the research group are not sufficient roles to be accepted as an author. The author(s) must meet all these criteria described above. The order of names in the author list of an article must be a co-decision and it must be indicated in the <a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/3B8341B62E504DCFA05E4F535508091C" target="_blank">Copyright Agreement Form.</a> The individuals who do not meet the authorship criteria but contributed to the study must take place in the acknowledgement section. Individuals providing technical support, assisting writing, providing a general support, providing material or financial support are examples to be indicated in acknowledgement section.All authors must disclose all issues concerning financial relationship, conflict of interest, and competing interest that may potentially influence the results of the research or scientific judgment.When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published paper, it is the author’s obligation to promptly cooperate with the Editor to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.

Editor-in-Chief evaluates manuscripts for their scientific content without regard to ethnic origin, gender, citizenship, religious belief or political philosophy of the authors. He/She provides a fair double-blind peer review of the submitted articles for publication and ensures that all the information related to submitted manuscripts is kept as confidential before publishing.Editor-in-Chief is responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication, and must publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.Editor-in-Chief does not allow any conflicts of interest between the authors, editors and reviewers, and is responsible for final decision for publication of the manuscripts in the journal.Reviewers must have no conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors and/or the research funders. Their judgments must be objective.Reviewers must ensure that all the information related to submitted manuscripts is kept as confidential and must report to the editor if they are aware of copyright infringement and plagiarism on the author’s side.A reviewer who feels unqualified to review the topic of a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.The editor informs the reviewers that the manuscripts are confidential information and that this is a privileged interaction. The reviewers and editorial board cannot discuss the manuscripts with other persons. The anonymity of the referees must be ensured. In particular situations, the editor may share the review of one reviewer with other reviewers to clarify a particular point.

Only those manuscripts approved by its every individual author and that were not published before in or sent to another journal, are accepted for evaluation.Submitted manuscripts that pass preliminary control are scanned for plagiarism using iThenticate software. After plagiarism check, the eligible ones are evaluated by editor-in-chief for their originality, methodology, the importance of the subject covered and compliance with the journal scope.The editor hands over the papers matching the formal rules to at least two national/international referees for double-blind peer review evaluation and gives green light for publication upon modification by the authors in accordance with the referees’ claims.

Peer Review

Only those manuscripts approved by its every individual author and that were not published before in or sent to another journal, are accepted for evaluation.Submitted manuscripts that pass preliminary control are scanned for plagiarism using iThenticate software. After plagiarism check, the eligible ones are evaluated by the Editor-in-Chief for their originality, methodology, the importance of the subject covered and compliance with the journal scope.Editor evaluates manuscripts for their scientific content without regard to ethnic origin, gender, citizenship, religious belief or political philosophy of the authors and ensures a fair double-blind peer review of the selected manuscripts.The selected manuscripts are sent to at least two national/international external referees for evaluation and publication decision is given by Editor-in-Chief upon modification by the authors in accordance with the referees’ claims.Editor-in-Chief does not allow any conflicts of interest between the authors, editors and reviewers and is responsible for final decision for publication of the manuscripts in the journal.Referees are obliged to notify within a week if they want to arbitrate. Otherwise, another referee is appointed.The referee must deliver the evaluation report within one month. If the referee fails to submit the report within this period, the referee's duty will end. In this case, another referee is appointed for evaluation.Reviewers’ judgments must be objective. Reviewers’ comments on the following aspects are expected while conducting the review.- Does the manuscript contain new and significant information?- Does the abstract clearly and accurately describe the content of the manuscript?- Is the problem significant and concisely stated?- Are the methods described comprehensively?- Are the interpretations and consclusions justified by the results?- Is adequate references made to other Works in the field?- Is the language acceptable?Reviewers must ensure that all the information related to submitted manuscripts is kept as confidential and must report to the editor if they are aware of copyright infringement and plagiarism on the author’s side.A reviewer who feels unqualified to review the topic of a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.The editor informs the reviewers that the manuscripts are confidential information and that this is a privileged interaction. The reviewers and editorial board cannot discuss the manuscripts with other persons. The anonymity of the referees is important.

LanguageArticles in Turkish, English, German and French are published. Submitted manuscript must include an abstract both in the article language and in English, and an extended abstract in English as well. However extended abstract in English is not required for articles in English.Manuscript Organization and SubmissionAll correspondence will be sent to the first-named author unless otherwise specified. Manuscpript is to be submitted online via <a href="http://dergipark.gov.tr/login" target="_blank">http://dergipark.gov.tr/login</a> that can be accessed at <a href="https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iuceviri" target="_blank">https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iuceviri</a> and it must be accompanied by a <a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/8900E1F36E434F9C972A9F54E8E93688" target="_blank">Title Page</a> specifying the article category (i.e. research article, review etc.) and including information about the manuscript (see the Submission Checklist). Manuscripts should be prepared in Microsoft Word 2003 and upper versions. In addition, <a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/3B8341B62E504DCFA05E4F535508091C" target="_blank">Copyright Agreement Form</a> that has to be signed by all authors must be submitted.1. The manuscripts should be in A4 paper standards: having 2.5 cm margins from right, left, bottom and top, Times New Roman font style in 10 font size and line spacing of 1.5. Due to double blind peer review, the main manuscript document must not include any author information.2. A <a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/8900E1F36E434F9C972A9F54E8E93688" target="_blank">title page</a> including author information must be submitted together with the manuscript. The title page is to include fully descriptive title of the manuscript and, affiliation, title, e-mail address, postal address and phone number of the author(s) (see The Submission Checklist).3. Before the introduction part, there should be an abstract between 180 and 200 words in Turkish and English and an extended abstract only in English between 600-800 words, summarizing the scope, the purpose, the results of the study and the methodology used. Underneath the abstracts, five keywords that inform the reader about the content of the study should be specified in Turkish and in English. Extended abstract in English is required only for non-English manuscripts.4. The manuscripts should contain mainly these components: title, abstract and keywords; extended abstract in English, sections, end notes and references.5. Research article sections are ordered as follows: “INTRODUCTION”, “AIM AND METHODOLOGY”, “FINDINGS”, “DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION”, “ENDNOTES” and “REFERENCES” and “TABLES AND FIGURES”. For review and commentary articles, the article should start with the “INTRODUCTION” section where the purpose and the method is mentioned, go on with the other sections; and it should be finished with “DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION” section followed by “ENDNOTES”, “REFERENCES” and “TABLES AND FIGURES”.6. Tables, graphs and figures can be given with a number and a defining title.7. References should be in accordance with <a href="http://www.apastyle.org" target="_blank">American Psychological Association (APA) style 7th</a> Edition.8. Authors are responsible for all statements made in their work submitted to the Journal for publication.

Author Guidelines

I.U. Journal of Translation Studies complies with APA (American Psychological Association) style 7th Edition for referencing and quoting. For more information: - American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA.- <a href="http://www.apastyle.org" target="_blank">http://www.apastyle.org</a>Accuracy of citation is the author’s responsibility. All references should be cited in text. Reference list must be in alphabetical order. Type references in the style shown below.Citations in the TextCitations must be indicated with the author surname and publication year within the parenthesis.If more than one citation is made within the same paranthesis, separate them with (;).Samples:More than one citation;(Esin et al., 2002; Karasar, 1995)Citation with one author;(Akyolcu, 2007)Citation with two authors;(Sayıner &amp; Demirci, 2007)Citation with three, four, five authors;In references with three or more authors, valid for the first use; (Ailen et al., 2000)Citations in the ReferenceAll the citations done in the text should be listed in the References section in alphabetical order of author surname without numbering. Below given examples should be considered in citing the references.Basic Reference TypesBooka) Turkish BookKarasar, N. (1995). Araştırmalarda rapor hazırlama (8th ed.) [Preparing research reports]. 3A Eğitim Danışmanlık Ltd.b) Book Translated into TurkishMucchielli, A. (1991). Zihniyetler [Mindsets] (A. Kotil, Trans.). İletişim Yayınları. (Original work was published in 1990, 7th Edition.)c) Edited BookÖren, T., Üney, T., &amp; Çölkesen, R. (Eds.). (2006). Türkiye bilişim ansiklopedisi [Turkish Encyclopedia of Informatics]. Papatya Yayıncılık.d) Turkish Book with Multiple AuthorsTonta, Y., Bitirim, Y., &amp; Sever, H. (2002). Türkçe arama motorlarında performans değerlendirme [Performance evaluation in Turkish search engines]. Total Bilişim.e) Book in EnglishKamien R., &amp; Kamien A. (2014). Music: An appreciation.  McGraw-Hill Education.f) Chapter in an Edited BookBassett, C. (2006). Cultural studies and new media. In G. Hall &amp; C. Birchall (Eds.), New cultural studies: Adventures in theory (pp. 220–237). Edinburgh University Press.g) Chapter in an Edited Book in TurkishErkmen, T. (2012). Örgüt kültürü: Fonksiyonları, öğeleri, işletme yönetimi ve liderlikteki önemi [Organization culture: Its functions, elements and importance in leadership and business management]. In M. Zencirkıran (Ed.), Örgüt sosyolojisi [Organization sociology] (pp. 233–263). Dora Basım Yayın.h) Book with the same organization as author and publisherAmerican Psychological Association. (2009). Publication manual of the American psychological association (6th ed.). Author.Articlea) Turkish ArticleMutlu, B., &amp; Savaşer, S. (2007). Çocuğu ameliyat sonrası yoğun bakımda olan ebeveynlerde stres nedenleri ve azaltma girişimleri [Source and intervention reduction of stress for parents whose children are in intensive care unit after surgery]. Istanbul University Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing, 15(60), 179–182.b) English Articlede Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., &amp; Wodak, R. (1999). The discursive construction of national identity. Discourse and Society, 10(2), 149–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002002c) Journal Article with DOI and More Than Twenty AuthorsKalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Leetmaa, A., . . . Joseph, D. (1996). The NCEP/NCAR 40- year reanalysis project. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 77(3), 437–471. <a href="http://doi.org/fg6rf9" target="_blank">http://doi.org/fg6rf9</a>d) Journal Article from Web, without DOISidani, S. (2003). Enhancing the evaluation of nursing care effectiveness. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 35(3), 26-38. Retrieved from http://cjnr.mcgill.cae) Journal Article wih DOITurner, S. J. (2010). Website statistics 2.0: Using Google Analytics to measure library website effectiveness. Technical Services Quarterly, 27, 261–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07317131003765910f) Advance Online PublicationSmith, J. A. (2010). Citing advance online publication: A review. Journal of Psychology. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/a45d7867g) Article in a MagazineHenry, W. A., III. (1990, April 9). Making the grade in today’s schools. Time, 135, 28–31.Doctoral Dissertation, Master’s Thesis, Presentation, Proceedinga) Dissertation/Thesis from a Commercial DatabaseSarı, E. (2008). Cultural identity and politics: Interculturalism in Mardin. (Unpublished PhD Thesis). Ankara University.b) Dissertation/Thesis from an Institutional DatabaseVan Brunt, D. (1997). Networked consumer health information systems (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9943436)c) Dissertation/Thesis from WebYaylalı-Yıldız, B. (2014). University campuses as places of potential publicness: Exploring the politicals, social and cultural practices in Ege University (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Retrieved from: http://library.iyte.edu.tr/tr/hizli-erisim/iyte-tez-portalid) Dissertation/Thesis abstracted in Dissertations Abstracts InternationalTonta, Y. A. (1992). An analysis of search failures in online library catalogs (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley). http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~tonta/yayinlar /phd/ickapak.htmle) Master's/PhD Thesis in Dissertations Abstracts InternationalAppelbaum, L. G. (2005). Three studies of human information processing: Texture amplifica&#173;tion, motion representation, and figure-ground segregation. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B. Sciences and Engineering, 65(10), 5428.f) Symposium ContributionKrinsky-McHale, S. J., Zigman, W. B., &amp; Silverman, W. (2012, August). Are neuropsychiatric symptoms markers of prodromal Alzheimer’s disease in adults with Down syndrome? In W. B. Zigman (Chair), Predictors of mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and mortality in adults with Down syndrome. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Orlando, FL.g) Conference Paper Abstract Retrieved OnlineLiu, S. (2005, May). Defending against business crises with the help of intelligent agent based early warning solutions. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Miami, FL. Abstract retrieved from http://www.iceis.org/iceis2005/abstracts_2005.htmh) Conference Paper - In Regularly Published Proceedings and Retrieved OnlineHerculano-Houzel, S., Collins, C. E., Wong, P., Kaas, J. H., &amp; Lent, R. (2008). The basic nonuniformity of the cerebral cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 12593–12598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805417105i) Proceeding in Book FormSchneider, R. (2013). Research data literacy. S. Kurbanoğlu ve ark. (Ed.), Communications in Computer and Information Science: Vol. 397. Worldwide Communalities and Challenges in Information Literacy Research and Practice in (s. 134–140). Cham, İsviçre: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03919-0j) Paper PresentationNguyen, C. A. (2012, August). Humor and deception in advertising: When laughter may not be the best medicine. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Orlando, FL.Other Sourcesa) Newspaper ArticleBrowne, R. (2010, March 21). This brainless patient is no dummy. Sydney Morning Herald, 45.b) Newspaper Article with no AuthorNew drug appears to sharply cut risk of death from heart failure.(1993, July 15). The Washington Post, p. A12.c) Web Page/Blog PostBordwell, D. (2013, June 18). David Koepp: Making the world movie-sized [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.davidbordwell.net/blog/page/27/d) Online Encyclopedia/DictionaryIgnition. (1989). In Oxford English online dictionary (2nd ed.). Retrieved from http://dictionary.oed.comMarcoux, A. (2008). Business ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-business/e) PodcastDunning, B. (Producer). (2011, January 12). inFact: Conspiracy theories [Audio podcast].  http://itunes.apple.com/f) Single Episode in a Television SeriesEgan, D. (Writer), &amp; Alexander, J. (Director). (2005). Failure to communicate. [Television series episode]. In D. Shore (Executive producer), House; New York, NY: Fox Broadcasting.g) MusicFuchs, G. (2004). Light the menorah. On Eight nights of Hanukkah [CD]. Brick, NJ: Kid Kosher.

<a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/3B8341B62E504DCFA05E4F535508091C" target="_blank">Copyright Agreement Form</a><a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/AB91D5F1EA1242639EE030541163F63C" target="_blank">Title page</a><a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/11E84749F11B426897CF2F8887C133EF" target="_blank">Author Form</a>

Ensure that the following items are present: <ul><li>Confirm that the category of the manuscript is specifed.</li><li>Confirm that “the paper is not under consideration for publication in another journal”.</li><li>Confirm that disclosure of any commercial or financial involvement is provided.</li><li>Confirm that last control for fluent English was done.</li><li>Confirm that journal policies detailed in Information for Authors have been reviewed.</li><li>Confirm that the references cited in the text and listed in the references section are in with APA 7th. </li></ul>● <a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/3B8341B62E504DCFA05E4F535508091C" target="_blank">Copyright Agreement Form</a>● Permission of previous published material if used in the present manuscript● <a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/7360B6A1F80B45FBBEA252DA217420D8" target="_blank">Title page</a><ul><li>The category of the manuscript</li><li>The title of the manuscript both in the language of the article and in English</li><li>All authors’ names and affiliations (institution, faculty/department, city, country), e-mail addresses</li><li>Corresponding author’s email address, full postal address, and phone number</li><li>ORCIDs of all authors.</li><li>Grant support (if exists)</li><li>Conflict of interest (if exists) </li><li>Acknowledgement (if exists)</li></ul>● Main Manuscript Document<ul><li>Important: Please avoid mentioning the the author (s) names in the manuscript</li><li>The title of the manuscript both in the language of the article and in English</li><li>Abstract (180-200 words)</li><li>Key words: 5 words</li><li>Extended abstract in English: 600-800 words (for non-English articles) </li><li>Body text sections</li><li>References</li><li>All tables, illustrations (figures) (including title, explanation, captions)</li></ul>

Issue Type	Thematic
Editor(s)	Arsun Uras
Cover (PDF)
Full Text (PDF)
Front Pages (PDF)